When/If China invades Russia to take back Siberia and outer Manchuria, who will win?
Who will the west support militaristically?
Chinese/Russian war
When/If China invades Russia to take back Siberia and outer Manchuria, who will win?
Who will the west support militaristically?
>Who will the west support militaristically?
>he doesn't know about extracontinental Alaska
China would never do that but if they did easy PRC win.
>China would never do that
They literally almost did a few decades ago and Russia threatened to NUUK
Border skirmishes happen all the time in history.
>China would never try to take back outer Manchuria
>China tried taking back outer Manchuria
>China would never do X
>China does X
What are the implications of this almost always being true?
Anyone dumb enough to fall for commie lies get what they deserve.
>America saves Russia from being exterminated by the germans
>Russia instantly tries to backstab America
>America saves China from being exterminated by the Japanese
>Instantly get back stabbed by the Chinese
They didn't, it was an accidental border skirmish that escalated diplomatically.
>It was an accidental border skirmish
Lol. Russia threatened to nuke China and China wanted outer Manchuria back. Right after this China betrayed the Russians and the soviet/Sino split happened. Your cope is next level.
Nothing came out of it, unless you think America wants to annex China because MacArthur suggested using nukes in the Korean war.
It lead to the sino Soviet split which is one of the major causes of the collapse of the USSR
Sino Soviet split happened in 1961, the border skirmish you're talking about in 1969.
Sino Soviet split mainly happened because Chinese didn't like Soviet destalinization and with big daddy Stalin gone no longer saw the need to be under Russian Marxist authority, Mao wanted to go his own way.
Problem is China never owned Siberia so there's nothing to take back.
As far as outer Manchuria it doesn't make much sense. There's no resources there and it's blockaded in as a port by SK and Japan unless you take Sakhalin and Kuril islands too, but the passage freezes in the winter.
China is actually geographically in a pretty good place, the South China Sea makes sense to secure its shipping lane and soft underbelly to its coast. Taiwan obviously makes much more sense but it would be a huge waste to nuke it at this point which is what an invasion would do, they're leaning towards KMT winning elections and starting soft reintegration.
That was Russia threatening to invade China and nuke it before Nixon intervened since US wanted China as a counterweight against Russia.
You say they’ve never owned it but there’s nothing to take back but as you know everything is rightful Han clay. Pretty sure there’s a city in northern India no where near the disputed area that China is muttering about being an ancient Han settlement. So sorry anon anything and everything is rightful han clay
Who cares there are always schizos muttering about their own hyperboreas in every country.
China will win, no question.
The west will sit on the sidelines and just call for peace
>Call for peace
I doubt this. Their enemies fighting would only be good for them. I think they would support whichever side is losing to cause the most damage possible in the long run.
We can always call for peace (while funnelling weapons to whichever side requires them)
Well the West wont DO anything, but we'll still pretend to be worried and whisper "peace?".
Gotta pretend to care you know?
>The west will sit on the sidelines and just call for peace
As someone from America who has been studying the Russia-Ukraine war closely since it began, this. The West can't stomach war, they're too fractured and incapable of uniting against a common enemy. They would never send troops let alone arm their allies with military equipment.
Ukraine war jokes are all well and good but neither China nor Russia is a Western ally
For any Western nation to get involved in a Russia-China conflict it'd have to be because they're getting something out of it, but what would that be is the question
Causing as much damage as possible to a geopolitical rival is probably worth a crate or two of surplus weapons
>wumao chinkshit spews his dream bullshit again
remember that we would stomp both of you commie scumbags
China should invade Russia, and Russia should beg America/NATO for aid.
And the us and nato are moronic enough to help them.
They will buy out the oligarchs and putinmonkee will be just a barking stray dog.
Depends. During Ukraine war, who cares, let Russia get dabbed on. After Ukraine war, we better go in and help our new puppet state, Russia. We need to protect their gas, I mean people.
>who will win?
India. Russia and China fighting amongst themselves will unironically propel India into being a true superpower.
Did number 2s so hard they became number 2 by default.
> China invades Russia
> who will win?
Everybody else.
Actually, china is already sort of invading Siberia
> china needs wood
> Russia has lots of it
> Siberia!
> Chinese have bought logging rights to large tracts of Siberian forests
> Chinese are using Chinese workers
> it's the triple play: raping the landscape, not using domestic labor, displacing russian businesses
Why would they want to?
An idiot sees a weak Third World nation and thinks, “What if I made these impoverished, uneducated people mine?” A smart person just pays them pennies to work to hand over their resources.
China doesn’t need more people. They have 1.4 billion already under the benevolent leadership of the CCP. So long as Russia is anchored on becoming a global anti-Western empire China can make them a slave-state just by being their “friend.
While Russia is distracted looking at the west with militaristic eyes, China is picking their pockets from the east.
Russians don’t know what wealth is. They are completely captivated with the right-wing notion of supremacy: “If I knock myself 10 steps down the ladder, as long as I knocked you down at least 11, I win!”
The Chinese know what wealth is: “Anything which doesn’t move me up the ladder is movement in the wrong direction.”
War is destruction of your own resources to destroy your enemy’s. If the aftermath of the war doesn’t result in increased resource extraction on the captured territory beyond what you sunk into the war, you lost. That the other side lost more is irrelevant - neither of you won anything.
China is aware of this to the point they’ve armed their soldiers on the border with India with sticks lest clashes result in even $500 rifles being lost over worthless mountainous terrain.
They don't need to invade, they can just play the waiting game and buy Russia's debt riddled corpse for cheap.
Chinese annexation of Russia will probably be conducted as a "soft" invasion where Chinese people increasingly occupy Russia as "migrant workers" while street signs gradually change from Cyrillic to Hanzi. If they just straight up invaded, we'd likely support Russia just to deny it to the Chinese.