>The Canadian Armed Forces are so short on manpower that they're letting non-citizens enlist,
Yeah because the USA never ever gets non-citizens to fight their Israel interest wars.
So woke my dude, lmao.
The CAF is an absolute shitshow, cope
https://www.cmfmag.ca/policy/permanent-residents-welcome-to-join-canadian-armed-forces/
https://i.imgur.com/NKbjy4C.jpg
>I didn’t know Canada was in possession of such based vehicles.
We made guns illegal but you know, who the frick is handing in THIER guns? No one, that's who.
Secondly, you should check out Canadian military history because that tends to kill the "Canadians are nice" meme.
>We made guns illegal
Literally anything besides that is irrelevant you moron, you're not even allowed to *inherit* a pistol anymore never mind buy one
https://i.imgur.com/RTzunZm.jpg
>Another worthless contribution from anon never served on /k/.
Lmao, the people who seethe about Canadians have to be the fattest pussies every.
It's only overweight, dumb frick USA mutts that hate Canadians.
Mother fricker I talk to people all over the world, YOUR country get's the scorn the most.
Sorry we gave Ukraine some shitty vehicles, tell you what? Why dont you send them your Humvees and APCs?
Nobody hates Canadians more than their own homosexual government does
>The Canadian Armed Forces are so short on manpower that they're letting non-citizens enlist,
Yeah because the USA never ever gets non-citizens to fight their Israel interest wars.
So woke my dude, lmao.
>I didn’t know Canada was in possession of such based vehicles.
We made guns illegal but you know, who the frick is handing in THIER guns? No one, that's who.
Secondly, you should check out Canadian military history because that tends to kill the "Canadians are nice" meme.
>IED protection.
You are fricking stupid. MRAPs have mine protection, mine protection doesn't make an MRAP an APC you fricking gigantic fricking moron. The senator isn't even an MRAP, there's no indication it has mine protection at all hence it's an armoured SUV.
Calling this an APC is pure monkey mind shit, calling it an MRAP also strains credulity.
This is the kind of shit you send to Ukraine when you absolutely have no shit to send to Ukraine,it's not surprising but it's a sad reminder of how fricking shit the Canadian armed forces presently are.
Damn you're a persistant frickwit aren't you? >Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP; /ˈɛmræp/ EM-rap) is a term for United States military light tactical vehicles produced as part of the MRAP program that are designed specifically to withstand improvised explosive device (IED) attacks and ambushes.[1] The United States Department of Defense MRAP program began in 2007 as a response to the increased threat of IEDs during the Iraq War.
1 year ago
Anonymous
You have reading comprehension issues anon.
1 year ago
Anonymous
You do since the question asked is implied to be what the vehicle in question lacks to not be considered an MRAP.
Your butthole is so loose from being btfo repeatedly I'm going to dip out like your dad and rid myself of your stupidity.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>You do since the question asked is implied to be what the vehicle in question lacks to not be considered an MRAP
You can't read properly and that's my fault? Looking at how you construct sentences though it's not surprising.
The Toyota War (Arabic: حرب تويوتا, romanized: Ḥarb Tūyūtā, French: Guerre des Toyota) or Great Toyota War[9] was the last phase of the Chadian–Libyan conflict, which took place in 1987 in Northern Chad and on the Chad–Libya border. It takes its name from the Toyota pickup trucks used, primarily the Toyota Hilux and the Toyota Land Cruiser, to provide mobility for the Chadian troops as they fought against the Libyans, and as technicals.[10] The 1987 war resulted in a heavy defeat for Libya, which, according to American sources, lost one tenth of its army, with 7,500 men killed and US$1.5 billion worth of military equipment destroyed or captured.[11] Chadian forces only suffered 1,000 deaths.[8]
Because I know you're too fat and dumb to use Wiki and will NOT click whatever link I put down.
Fricking dumb frick.
>Another worthless contribution from anon never served on /k/.
Lmao, the people who seethe about Canadians have to be the fattest pussies every.
It's only overweight, dumb frick USA mutts that hate Canadians.
Mother fricker I talk to people all over the world, YOUR country get's the scorn the most.
Sorry we gave Ukraine some shitty vehicles, tell you what? Why dont you send them your Humvees and APCs?
Can someone explain how the leafs are calling this an APC? It's an armoured truck and it's very clearly an armoured truck. The chassis is a fricking Ford Super Duty.
These things are amazing for police departments because they can be serviced at the local ford dealer. I don't think they ever had a military user before.
>Leafs gonna leaf
No one supported the bans, you fricking mutt. >Wah guys, wah Canada did a thing! Wah!
Holy frick, you boys cry all day like the prissy little b***hes you are.
>No one supported the bans >"hey our government acts completely contrary to what we want and cucks us constantly and we don't do anything about it, which actually means we're totally based"
Also everyone who lives within 250 miles of the St Lawrence is a moron who does support banning guns
Super duty + body armor is like 90% of the 4x4 apc market. It fricking works. Plasan Sandcat being a famous one.
IEDs aren't a threat and if you're going for small arms only protection there's absolutely nothing wrong with these. Nothing will stop ATGMs from killing anything up to an Abrams anyway.
>Super duty + body armor is like 90% of the 4x4 apc market.
I'm choking back tears anon I m about to piss myself. You can't be this stupid, can you leaf?
Can you? Basically every bank truck, 4x4 military acp, Leo/seat armored car, etc is based off the super duty. More Plasan Sandcats have been sold than any other 4x4 apc in history.
It'll keep shrapnel and small arms fire out. If you're this upset about it go build your own MRAP. All you need is a Ford Super Duty and some 5mm steel, apparently.
an MRAP is by definition an APC, it's armored and carries troops. It's probably just as well armored as a base model M113 with better mine protection. What it lacks is off road flotation.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>an MRAP is by definition an APC,
No. An MRAP is an MRAP. No one refers to the bushmaster as a fricking APC. No one refers to the Oshkosh M-ATV/JLTV as an APC or the Caiman or the M1224 or the cougar , Golan, Buffalo etc etc etc etc
You can get a Sandcat and other super duty based APCs with mine/ied protection. It raises the cost significantly and imo probably warrants a non cots chassis but it is an option.
https://i.imgur.com/ojxWDW0.png
>4x4 apc
Stop anon I can't
>Tigre >APC >Engulfs your sof troops in flames and burns them to death when some local yokel chucklefricks lob an RPG (made in USSR) at it
I'm laughing. Lol. Lmao!
>Can someone explain how the leafs are calling this an APC? It's an armoured truck
Never serves are the fricking worst.
Are you moronic and fat? Yes, yes you are.
What the frick do you think APC means?
https://i.imgur.com/y3KQHuF.jpg
>It's an actual fricking ford with armor on it.
Jesus kek
I thought you fat hicks loved trucks?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War
You fat fricking "conservatives" are the worst, never served, never fought, know zero about military history or strategy and cry every time the fricking Canadians breath the wrong way.
How much sand did you get in your pussy? gay.
>Ukrainians like those uparmoured cars, but it's by no means an APC.
An armoured personnel carrier (APC) is a broad type of armoured military vehicle designed to transport personnel and equipment in combat zones. Since World War I, APCs have become a very common piece of military equipment around the world.
According to the definition in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, an APC is "an armoured combat vehicle which is designed and equipped to transport a combat infantry squad and which, as a rule, is armed with an integral or organic weapon of less than 20 millimetres calibre."[1] Compared to infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), which are also used to carry infantry into battle, APCs have less armament and are not designed to provide direct fire support in battle. Infantry units which travel in APCs are known as mechanized infantry. Some militaries also make a distinction between infantry units which use APCs and infantry units which use IFVs, with the latter being known as armoured infantry in such militaries.
That's cool but whatever man, opinion.
Looks gay. Senators are gay and Canadians are gay so I suppose it fits.
The duality of man.
>Canadians are gay
Americans have a higher rate of Homosexuality and all the homosexual shit is from the USA hollywood.
Shut the frick up, fattie.
Thanks senpai, you're a good poster, you keep the shitposts down.
Could you be more cringe?
>"USA is gayer than Canada!"
lmao
The CAF is an absolute shitshow, cope
https://www.cmfmag.ca/policy/permanent-residents-welcome-to-join-canadian-armed-forces/
>We made guns illegal
Literally anything besides that is irrelevant you moron, you're not even allowed to *inherit* a pistol anymore never mind buy one
Nobody hates Canadians more than their own homosexual government does
Looks based. Senators are based and Canadians are based so I suppose it fits.
Looks like a scaled up 40k toy.
I like it.
this nothing against z. z has kornet, tanks, rpgs, lancets.
Don't forget the T I G E R S
Don't forget incels
Slava Z
The Canadian Armed Forces are so short on manpower that they're letting non-citizens enlist, so it's not like they'd use any new APCs anyway
>The Canadian Armed Forces are so short on manpower that they're letting non-citizens enlist,
Yeah because the USA never ever gets non-citizens to fight their Israel interest wars.
So woke my dude, lmao.
Isn't that like the entirety Canadian Army's equipment?
I didn’t know Canada was in possession of such based vehicles.
Do the French know about this? What about the Chinese?
>I didn’t know Canada was in possession of such based vehicles.
We made guns illegal but you know, who the frick is handing in THIER guns? No one, that's who.
Secondly, you should check out Canadian military history because that tends to kill the "Canadians are nice" meme.
Apperantly anything is an APC nowadays.
Well if it carries personnel and is armoured, chances are it's an APC.
What's the difference between OPs vehicle and an MRAP?
IED protection. This night have a mild v shape armor on the bottom for grenade protection.
Perfect tbh. You can buy 3-4 of these for every mrap. Neither of which will protect you from HE anyway.
>IED protection.
You are fricking stupid. MRAPs have mine protection, mine protection doesn't make an MRAP an APC you fricking gigantic fricking moron. The senator isn't even an MRAP, there's no indication it has mine protection at all hence it's an armoured SUV.
Calling this an APC is pure monkey mind shit, calling it an MRAP also strains credulity.
This is the kind of shit you send to Ukraine when you absolutely have no shit to send to Ukraine,it's not surprising but it's a sad reminder of how fricking shit the Canadian armed forces presently are.
Damn you're a persistant frickwit aren't you?
>Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP; /ˈɛmræp/ EM-rap) is a term for United States military light tactical vehicles produced as part of the MRAP program that are designed specifically to withstand improvised explosive device (IED) attacks and ambushes.[1] The United States Department of Defense MRAP program began in 2007 as a response to the increased threat of IEDs during the Iraq War.
You have reading comprehension issues anon.
You do since the question asked is implied to be what the vehicle in question lacks to not be considered an MRAP.
Your butthole is so loose from being btfo repeatedly I'm going to dip out like your dad and rid myself of your stupidity.
>You do since the question asked is implied to be what the vehicle in question lacks to not be considered an MRAP
You can't read properly and that's my fault? Looking at how you construct sentences though it's not surprising.
The Toyota War (Arabic: حرب تويوتا, romanized: Ḥarb Tūyūtā, French: Guerre des Toyota) or Great Toyota War[9] was the last phase of the Chadian–Libyan conflict, which took place in 1987 in Northern Chad and on the Chad–Libya border. It takes its name from the Toyota pickup trucks used, primarily the Toyota Hilux and the Toyota Land Cruiser, to provide mobility for the Chadian troops as they fought against the Libyans, and as technicals.[10] The 1987 war resulted in a heavy defeat for Libya, which, according to American sources, lost one tenth of its army, with 7,500 men killed and US$1.5 billion worth of military equipment destroyed or captured.[11] Chadian forces only suffered 1,000 deaths.[8]
Because I know you're too fat and dumb to use Wiki and will NOT click whatever link I put down.
Fricking dumb frick.
Mine resistance and ambush protection
>send law enforcement SUV to Ukraine
Another worthless contribution from Canada.
It's not a real APC but it's better than a Buhanka for casevac or border patrol
Bruh, ukies are riding random civilian SUVs to the front. This is at least 10x better.
Transportation is transportation and the infantry need something to keep up with the tanks for the summer counteroffensives
>Another worthless contribution from anon never served on /k/.
Lmao, the people who seethe about Canadians have to be the fattest pussies every.
It's only overweight, dumb frick USA mutts that hate Canadians.
Mother fricker I talk to people all over the world, YOUR country get's the scorn the most.
Sorry we gave Ukraine some shitty vehicles, tell you what? Why dont you send them your Humvees and APCs?
>t.scorched burger
also 200 LAV ACSV Super Bison
Can someone explain how the leafs are calling this an APC? It's an armoured truck and it's very clearly an armoured truck. The chassis is a fricking Ford Super Duty.
It's an actual fricking ford with armor on it.
>It's an actual fricking ford with armor on it.
Jesus kek
I hate Canada so much it's unreal
These things are amazing for police departments because they can be serviced at the local ford dealer. I don't think they ever had a military user before.
Why are they dumping them on Ukraine?
It looks as if anything higher than 7.62 will go through all sides, anyone inside and keep on traveling.
So they're already better protected than BMPs
I dunno, why are they calling a Ruger No.1 an "assault-style weapon" in the ban bill they're trying to pass? Leafs gonna leaf
>Leafs gonna leaf
No one supported the bans, you fricking mutt.
>Wah guys, wah Canada did a thing! Wah!
Holy frick, you boys cry all day like the prissy little b***hes you are.
>No one supported the bans
>"hey our government acts completely contrary to what we want and cucks us constantly and we don't do anything about it, which actually means we're totally based"
Also everyone who lives within 250 miles of the St Lawrence is a moron who does support banning guns
Super duty + body armor is like 90% of the 4x4 apc market. It fricking works. Plasan Sandcat being a famous one.
IEDs aren't a threat and if you're going for small arms only protection there's absolutely nothing wrong with these. Nothing will stop ATGMs from killing anything up to an Abrams anyway.
>Super duty + body armor is like 90% of the 4x4 apc market.
I'm choking back tears anon I m about to piss myself. You can't be this stupid, can you leaf?
Can you? Basically every bank truck, 4x4 military acp, Leo/seat armored car, etc is based off the super duty. More Plasan Sandcats have been sold than any other 4x4 apc in history.
Learn some shit.
>4x4 apc
Stop anon I can't
well we sent a few and Ukraine apparently asked for more
do you think you have more experience with APCs than the UAF?
Quite a few are based on the unimog but its the same concept. (Except the unimog mogs a trugg in almost all aspects)
It'll keep shrapnel and small arms fire out. If you're this upset about it go build your own MRAP. All you need is a Ford Super Duty and some 5mm steel, apparently.
>go build your own MRAP. All you need is a Ford Super Duty
I'm sure it's a functioning MRAP but an APC it is not
an MRAP is by definition an APC, it's armored and carries troops. It's probably just as well armored as a base model M113 with better mine protection. What it lacks is off road flotation.
>an MRAP is by definition an APC,
No. An MRAP is an MRAP. No one refers to the bushmaster as a fricking APC. No one refers to the Oshkosh M-ATV/JLTV as an APC or the Caiman or the M1224 or the cougar , Golan, Buffalo etc etc etc etc
You are a frickwit.
You can get a Sandcat and other super duty based APCs with mine/ied protection. It raises the cost significantly and imo probably warrants a non cots chassis but it is an option.
>Tigre
>APC
>Engulfs your sof troops in flames and burns them to death when some local yokel chucklefricks lob an RPG (made in USSR) at it
I'm laughing. Lol. Lmao!
>You can't be this stupid, can you leaf?
The fricking irony on this fat frick.
LOSE WEIGHT YOU FAT FRICK.
>Can someone explain how the leafs are calling this an APC? It's an armoured truck
Never serves are the fricking worst.
Are you moronic and fat? Yes, yes you are.
What the frick do you think APC means?
I thought you fat hicks loved trucks?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War
You fat fricking "conservatives" are the worst, never served, never fought, know zero about military history or strategy and cry every time the fricking Canadians breath the wrong way.
How much sand did you get in your pussy? gay.
Ukrainians like those uparmoured cars, but it's by no means an APC.
>Ukrainians like those uparmoured cars, but it's by no means an APC.
An armoured personnel carrier (APC) is a broad type of armoured military vehicle designed to transport personnel and equipment in combat zones. Since World War I, APCs have become a very common piece of military equipment around the world.
According to the definition in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, an APC is "an armoured combat vehicle which is designed and equipped to transport a combat infantry squad and which, as a rule, is armed with an integral or organic weapon of less than 20 millimetres calibre."[1] Compared to infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), which are also used to carry infantry into battle, APCs have less armament and are not designed to provide direct fire support in battle. Infantry units which travel in APCs are known as mechanized infantry. Some militaries also make a distinction between infantry units which use APCs and infantry units which use IFVs, with the latter being known as armoured infantry in such militaries.
That's cool but whatever man, opinion.
So it's an IFV then? According to what you posted, the distinguishing factor is the role of direct fire support.
the Senator is an APC but if you slap a BTR-82A turret on it becomes an IFV
germany will send ratte
how many rattes do we need for victory