Boeing's entry for NGAD literally has canards lmao!

Boeing's entry for NGAD literally has canards lmao!

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    J20 bros we’re eating good

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Canards look cool, go frick yourself.

      Except on the J20, that thing is just out of proportion.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Where were you when China revolutionized America’s NGAD design?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >canards didn't exist before J-20

          Wew

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >”canard” is a French word for a type of water fowl.
          > the French used the word to describe the winglet attached to the front of the airframe.
          >the French used it in multiple aircraft
          >China steals it and uses it
          >”CHUYNA REVOLTIONIZE AVIATION!”

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Canards are for improving take-off lift and/or maneuverability in a dogfight. Neither of which should be a factor in NGAD. If Boeing tack welded on a set, it was done as a hack, because the design wasn't working.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Maneuverability in a dogfight will become more important during the time NGAD becomes operational, because by then the first mover advantage of the US in stealth will be gone. Stealth aircraft will be the norm, which means that a) aircraft won't be able to see anything on their radars most of the time and b) if they do see something they won't be able to IFF because the turbine blades aren't visible to the radar (the West's preferred and only somewhat reliable IFF method).
          As a consequence merging into dogfights will become more probable again. Staying invisible yourself and lobbing missiles from far away at easily observable and identifiable targets will be seen as an unrealistic priviledge which was enjoyed only during the transition from the pre-stealth to the stealth era by the first mover. Designing an aircraft under these old assumptions is akin to preparing for the last war.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            NGAD is optimized for stealth and range. If it gets in a dogfight it's toast.

            NB4 "We'll just put railguns on it!"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Stealth aircraft will be the norm
            Russia and China can barely get a handful operational at a time while the US has hundreds
            And their stealth has yet to be actually demonstrated for international observers.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Russia and China can barely get a handful operational at a time while the US has hundreds
              in an absolute state of dilapidated crisis, so much so they are available for combat less than 16% of the time

              unironically the US should have made a couple dozen like Russia/China,
              at least then they could have maybe kept them in the air

              how many F35c's are deployed?
              like 2 WHOLE squadrons out of "le 1000 F35's made"?
              2?
              thats it
              2 F35 squadrons in the entire USN?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >how many F35c's are deployed? like 2 WHOLE squadrons out of "le 1000 F35's made" LOL! Potatoes!?

                > The F-35 aircraft, with its advanced capabilities, represents a growing portion of DOD's tactical aviation fleet, with about 450 of the aircraft fielded. [GAO 'F-35 Aircraft: DOD and the Military Services Need to Reassess the Future Sustainment Strategy' Sept 2023]

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia and China can barely get a handful operational at a time while the US has hundreds
                in an absolute state of dilapidated crisis, so much so they are available for combat less than 16% of the time

                unironically the US should have made a couple dozen like Russia/China,
                at least then they could have maybe kept them in the air

                how many F35c's are deployed?
                like 2 WHOLE squadrons out of "le 1000 F35's made"?
                2?
                thats it
                2 F35 squadrons in the entire USN?

                F-35C only has like 2 or 3 squadrons because most of the carriers don't have the upgrades to operate F-35Cs yet.

                Those upgrades are ongoing and more F-35C squadrons will enter service over the next decade.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >t. drooling moron with the reading comprehension of a 5 year old.
                Do you turd worlders somehow get off on being blatantly wrong about easily verifiable information, what gives?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Russia is a paper tiger. The war in Ukraine has made that clear. They only stay relevant because of nukes. Nothing more, nothing less.

              China is a different animal. It would be foolish to base design characteristics of NGAD on the hopes that the primary adversary may not be able to pull things off. Hope for the best but plan for the worst. Math and physics are the same for everyone. So it comes down to political will, industrial capacity and organizational ability. Xi is determined to unfrick his country's MIC from the old corruption.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >So it comes down to political will, industrial capacity and organizational ability
                so the NGAD is doomed,
                and is basically a .jpg vaporware project that will cost $trillions.

                got it

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You understand that NGAD is being developed in the United States, whose MIC has recently been validated as one of the most vital organizational structures of the free world and whose supply chain is comparable in scale to the collective circulatory systems of an entire pantheon of gods, right?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Let me present a counterargument:

                Boeing

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                So why did he have missiles filled with water for most of his time in power? Why did he need the CIA to tell him this? The same CIA he supposedly expunged from his country.

                >So it comes down to political will, industrial capacity and organizational ability
                so the NGAD is doomed,
                and is basically a .jpg vaporware project that will cost $trillions.

                got it

                >most recent aircraft from the US MIC is the B-21
                >delivered under budget and on time
                Kek.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                wat?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                lmfao .jpgs and photo-opps arent "serial coded deliveries"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >missiles filled with water
                Most PLAAF missiles are solid booster, how do you fill it with water you ignorant moron?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Warheads are solid booster too?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >t hydrocephalus

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Canards are useful for stability, but also they can be locked into angles where they are non-intrusive stealth wise. There is virtually no downsides to a well designed canard over none, as it means the plane can break off from an attack quicker.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thirdie mindset

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Canards look cool, go frick yourself.

      Except on the J20, that thing is just out of proportion.

      Based

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >boeing

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >bigger
      >and a dorito

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > F-22 Combat radius : 470 nanometers
      Uh ?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        nautical miles

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        We in quantumania now

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Defeating the Chinese quantum menace at the source.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      From the rumors the airforce is more interested in boeing's design, but are more confident in lockheed's ability to actually follow through.

      I'm not sure who they're going to go with though.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Boeing’s was probably going to get thrown a bone after Lockhead and Northrup getting the F-35/B-21.
        But they’re probably not going to do that with the recent, very public, Boeing quality issues. Even if Boeing’s military division is separate from civilian division, public sentiment and congressional pressure might put a stop to them getting any special treatment.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >MQ-25
          >KC-46
          Enough bones for them

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Boeing is now sequestered to fuel tanker (water boy) duty
            Absolute kek

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              they are unironically better suited to making that kind of plane

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > Boeing is great at making tankers!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                who are you quoting

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >t-take this six year old article!
                homosexual. They have 80 of them already delivered.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Supposedly the boom issues are mostly ironed out now

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                When they first tested raising and lowering the boom, the motor used was far inadequate and resulted in the boom falling to the floor. Ngl it was funny

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                None of which actually work to spec. Hence the billions in write downs Boeing is taking on the program.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                If we tell you those 15 are part of the original buy, analogous to a line item release on a blanket PO and not a new buy, you will be so sad.

                And if we tell you those are all fixed price and Boeing loses $10s of millions on each, you may just break down and cry.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >consistently loses competitions to the A330 MRTT
                >$7 billion over budget on a $.9 billion program
                >years behind schedule
                >boom problems only partially fixed
                >camera problems not going to be fixed until 2025
                >still having basic delivery problems of random parts and debris being loose inside the aircraft
                The KC-46 is a fricking turd and the Air Force should have just stayed with the KC-45, which just fricking works. Boeing can't build planes anymore since they fired all the stateside engineers and outsourced design work to their Inidan and Russian design centers. It's been years and the piece of shit still isn't combat certified. The only brigh spot of the program is that it's a firm-fixed-price contract and that al the budget overruns are being eaten by the business suits at Boeing instead of being dumped on taxpayers. Pic rel is a plane that actually works and what we could have had instead of this piece of shit 767.

                McDonald Douglas and it's consequences have been a disaster for American aviation.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > Stealth (radar, IR, visual)
      > visual

      How would they achieve that?
      Do they mean low visibility or plain magic invisible?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >hey i thought i saw a weird half invisible flying dorito piloted by a gorrilla smoking a cigar

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >He doesn't know

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I wouldn't worry about it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        We received another tech package from Pleiades. Don't worry about it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >retvrn to atari

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > a fricking panini press rafale

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The upper row looks more like warp nacelles

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >boeing

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >America copying China
    Many such cases

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You can stop samegayging now chink

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It may shock you but there is a billion samegays living in China right now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      50 yuan have been added to your account

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        xie xie

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Uhh, are Chinks now setting the trends that others follow?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >chinks
      >not frenchies

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's so pretty. I love the Rafale.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >It's so pretty. I love the Rafale.
          4u anon

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Euro canards are a different thing, they are on different axis as the wings while the J20 canards are on the same axis.
        They have very different aerodynamics.
        Also, Euro canards increase RCS by a lot, but tge lifting canards of the J20 doesn't.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Euro canards increase RCS by a lot, but the lifting canards of the J20 doesn't.
          Lol
          Lmao even.
          Your source is your butthole on both claims.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Other countries create canard aircraft
    >*silence*
    >One US prototype happens to uses canards
    >LITERALLY COPYING CHYNA
    What did /k/ mean by this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why are you seething so much? Is your local McDonalds closed today or something? It’s just a joke. Yet China continues to live as you say ‘rent free’ in your mind.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They can die rent free too. Just step outside onto a city street. Lmao

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I don’t live in Chicago

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Pointing out flawed logic = bruh why u mad xd
        Thanks for telling me your mental state btw

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You are very fragile like porcelain eagle.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            go eat gutter oil and die instead of shitting up the board, chang

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yes the Chinese have ruined the board and not the america superiority cum slurpers that cannot recognize irony and humor.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >america superiority cum slurpers
                vatBlack folk always project

                project the cum chugger moniker onto others, project American dominance onto themselves, project their shilling onto actual posters, etc

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I’m a registered democrat but I won’t be voting for either side in the upcoming election.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                no one cares homosexual

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I only brought it up because anon was going to go through the whole gambit of calling me everything except an American born citizen. I expect to get called a Rajesh or Juan next.
                Point is canards don’t make a plane shit.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >t. Chengdu design bureau
                Your canards kinda suck

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                What’s your problem? Are you having a melty?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Blacke-out number
                >Automagically the "J-**" is translated as J-20
                Vatnik tier of brain damage.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                are you saying chinese flankers are this bad instead?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Prajeet tier BS

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                > canards don’t make a plane shit.
                Correct Ramesh. Because that’s backwards.
                Canards don’t make a plane shit. Planes have canards BECAUSE they’re shit. Canards are an indicator of shittiness, not a cause

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Okay show me your degree in aeronautical engineering. What grounds do you have to support your claim?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You first. Show me how they’re good.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >registered Democrat

                Leave my country, then apologize to me for being born in it. You do not belong here, you never will. And before you accuse me of being a chudlican or whatever tired insult your party stole from an 80s movie, they all need to die too. Except Rand Paul, he's the only one that gets it, but he's on thin ice, as all career politicians should be at all times.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I only registered dem because I like John Kerry. It’s not like party sides mean anything anymore to the deep state. Wars will always happen at the interest of those who profit most.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Ha, gottem! I was only pretending to be moronic!
        Also, McDonald's is the bottom of the bottom tier these days while they charge like they're fricking Hard Rock Cafe.
        It's take Culver's over Micky Ds these days.
        If they're going to charge nearly $20+ for a double burger, drink and fries I'll just go to The Habbit.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's just butthurt chink shills

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What about the gaping America/Israel shills crying right now?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      My concern is the RCS. Didn't the j-20 get a lot of shit over how the canards frick with RCS of the plane making it shit at stealth? Wouldn't make sense for a 6th gen that's built for stealth to have elements that frick with it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's Boeing. They're probably gonna lose then claim their entry actually wasn't the final version and the real entry was gonna be much less laughably bad. Just like with the X-32.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >submit design
          >IT'S NOT EVEN THE FINAL FORM
          Sounds like they just make something real quick the night before then submit it

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Boeing got screwed in the JSF

          USAF gave boeing and Lockheed $750 mil budget

          Boeing stuck with the budget

          Lockheed intentionally didn't and went over

          Then USAF rewards Lockheed

          They were prototypes

          So yeah it wasn't the final version

          Neither was the Lockheed x-35

          Anyways x-35 was always gonna win because the X-32 was just ugly

          USAF is all into looks

          Also why they preferred the F-22, the YF-23 was considered weird looking

          Even though YF-23 was stealthier and had longer ranged and better suited for the upcoming pacific war

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Didn't the j-20 get a lot of shit over how the canards frick with RCS of the plane making it shit at stealth?
        Yes, because online morons think they can calculate RCS by eyes

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >there are people that think that human eyes and radars work the same way

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Nuh uh, I stuffed this 3d model I got off cgtrader.com into some radar simulator shit and made some crazy lookin charts

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Pretty sure part of stealth is angles to redirect radar waves

          You can see angles

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >t DK moron

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ops, it seems that we just hurted the feeling of american people.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    if it's Boeing, I ain't going

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    politicsgays get the rope

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Don't worry, they snap off after takeoff.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Everybody crying about canards and muh j20. Smooth brain chinks don't realize design has no other fins, ventral or dorsal. Reduction of extraneous control surfaces is absolutely where stealth is heading next.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      implessive

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Canards are gay

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick would the military trust Boeing of all companies to not deliver absolute garbage these days?

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wyvern-bros we're so back

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Cool in the fictional verse. Probably be plagued with the same problems as the f-14 (expensive maintenance nightmare) in the real world

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Boeing can't engineer shit
    doomed to fail company
    mismanaged and outsourced right into the ground

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    J-20chads we just keep winning

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      implessive!

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good, means Boeing’s entry gonna lose again. As they should, can’t let them get away with shitty QC problems by awarding them big contract.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AHHAHAHAHHA
    a
    AHAHHAHAAHHAH
    AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
    >"IMPLESSIVE"
    HAHHAHHAHAH
    AHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAH

    USA numba WAN!

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Do you escalator chow morons seriously think Boeing revealed either of their NGAD designs in a throwaway video about digital engineering?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Do you escalator chow morons seriously think Boeing revealed either of their NGAD designs in a throwaway video about digital engineering?
      unironically "Yes"
      this is the us-MIC 2024

      thats like exactly, precisely something they would do

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why does this look like you took a picture of a display on the Enterprise-D with your cell phone?

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >canards are stoopid, they ruin your RCS
    >but if you push them few meters back and call them a stabilizer they're completely fine

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *