babe wake up may 9 Moscow parade schedule just dropped

babe wake up may 9 Moscow parade schedule just dropped

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No Armata?

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Armata bros..!?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >tfw you salute so hard you herniate a disc

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No Armata?

      That means it's in the field. Killing dills. Not seen because it's the best stealth tank ever produced. No, actually, what the frick, where is it?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >No, actually, what the frick, where is it?
        Don't. Turn. Around.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It just flew over my house.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      WHERE ARE THEY?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      there no worry, armata cant break down if never run*~~

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >S-400 is so shit they decided to just put it in the parade instead of deploying
    lol

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/WctGDyU.jpeg

      babe wake up may 9 Moscow parade schedule just dropped

      I'm expecting the S-400 will be active during the parade

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >cessna spotted
        >makes way to moscow
        >s400 operator, unraped for parade morale, thinks its his time to shine
        >gets lock
        >for monke!
        >yeets missile straight into crowd
        >cessna flies over head to strike another refinery eastward

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >They are doing the lone T-34-85 from Laos again

    Holy shit how humuliating. If they bring the Leopard and Abrahms on truck beds for the parade, there will be more NATO tanks during the parade than Russian ones lmao.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      like you said it's the t34 bought from Laos, so in any case there will be more foreign tanks than russian

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      like you said it's the t34 bought from Laos, so in any case there will be more foreign tanks than russian

      It's a Laotian T-34 from Czech post-war production iirc.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ONE TANK

      The T-34-85 is widely regarded as the best tank of WW2. In one incident, an entire company of Tiger 2's attempted to destroy a lone advancing T-34-85 only to have all their rounds bounced by the T-34's superior angled armor. Said T-34 dispatched all the Tiger 2's with a single shot to their frontal armor that was constructed of pig iron. Wartime records indicate that the T-34-85 had a K/D ratio of 50,000,000:1. The single lost vehicle due to the crew drinking too much in celebrating their 1000th Tiger kill, and then driving their tank into a 20-feet deep river of Aryan blood. Fear of the T-34 was so great, that Germans would immediately surrender upon sight of them. The prisoners were then forced to lie down, and promptly run over by T-34's to avenge the 6 million israelites. Many historians contend that the Allies only won WW2 because of the T-34-85, and by extension, the T-34 series as a whole.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So…you get that the USSR won the war…right?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          sometimes when i'm feeling down i think about how many russians were forced into prostitution between 1993 and 1999

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          USA*

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    uhh where's the Armata????

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Never existed. Clearly you are delusional.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Probably sold to chinks

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is even worse then last year. What MIC doing?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What MIC?
      A good question.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Researching Siege Engineers for their siege ram rush.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >this device requires skilled engineers, my lord

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      getting dropped

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      good moment to remember the difference between then and than

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No turtle tanks?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      tbh not sending some of their hardest fighting units with actual battle wear and tear shows how superficial Russia is and that it doesn't appreciate the hard work, dedication and patriotism that actually goes into holding that shit-hole together.

      Disneyland of force for the delusional, spoiled oligarchs, while true hard working patriots must be hidden from public sight.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wouldn't they want those units on the frontlines? Unless you mean as like a reward from service they get some leave for the parade

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dubs control one aussie paperc**t uav
    Trips and you have a section of unmanned Cessna's at your disposal
    Quads summons Boris Johnson to the parade

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      rollan for the T-34 breaking down and blocking the whole parade from passing

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Less likely to break than Armata.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Ukies need to hit a TEL during the parade because it would literally be the funniest thing ever to happen if they did

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, let's try.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I wish for a Boris Johnson-controlled Cessna with undercarriage drone launchers.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        at the rate Boris Johnson are used in this conflict, I must voice my suspicion of the effectiveness of BoJo weaponry. There is no way the UK can produce that many BoJo at their current state.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Boris with suicide vest but it's bangers and beans

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Quints and Putin fricking explodes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      paperc**t to fokin' ICBM

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Rolls for Boris Johnson

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Where BoJo?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Roll for BoJo to be NoMore

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did they run out of spare parts for the 3 or so moving Armatas they had before the ZMO?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    whats the thing after the s-400

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Topol-M 2: MIRV boogaloo

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-24_Yars

        thanks

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-24_Yars

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no tanks
    >Boomerang
    I didn't even know they produced Boomerangs.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >boomerang
      Got it? Coz they touch the front and immediately go back

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        every time I see a new video of a Russian vehicle blowing up it just makes me laugh now

        how the FRICK are they able to put up with this?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ONE TANK

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I DON'T KNOW WHY

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >1 tank, 2 APCs, 8 trucks

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Idk why people are asking where the Armata is when the MoD said outright that the T-90M is their tank of the future and Armata won’t ever be put into production

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Remember when ziggers proudly posted that by 2024 Russia would have thousands of T-14s that all would be immune against the western anti-tank systems?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Of course.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not sure you can be immune against the western anti-tank systems when your systems were engineered by the same people.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > Why do you care about the t90, t55 is tank of the future.

      T90 is a literal Honda body kit for t72

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would Russia continue building a tank that has proven itself incapable of surviving on a modern battlefield?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No tank can.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The Merkava begs to differ.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Die israelite

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Hamas knocked out a few

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They aren't.
        It is a private company.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So they are doing a three-pronged parade symbolism:

    1.) A single T-34 as synonym of their victory back then. A single tank not as a practical force, but to put an emphasis of it being a symbol of that time they defeated the Nazis and that they are doing it again today. Also "ein vatnik, ein mir, ein putin" etc.
    2.) Likely to include captured HATO equipment, to humiliate their adversary and show they are big and bad and stronk.
    3.) NOOOOOKS! Don't dare provoke the bear to lift its eyebrows.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      great analysis

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That was my take as well

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      funny but all t-34-85s at latest parades are post-war czechoslovakian variants they bought from laos in like 2019

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    BTW the T-34 was an AWFUL piece of shit. Luckily for the USSR tanks weren’t terribly important later in the war.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >TEL only has 16 wheels

      Whats with these rookie numbers?

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >2nd year in a row that T-34s will be the only tank on show
    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw wectern exposition is bigger than ur main "parade"
    lol lmaososo even

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >average boomer vatnig still thinks that the things are going as planned even as the big yearly parade turns into nothing but infantry and nuke trucks

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Has Bumerang seen combat in Ukraine?

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I thought it was common knowledge that the removal of tanks from the parade was due to b***hing over "why are tanks in a parade when they’re needed at the front"? Why are you people pretending that they literally can’t run their usual T-14 parade vehicles nor any of their many thousands of remaining vehicles which are being refurbed from stockpiles full-time? They literally can’t pull a few of the nicer ones for the sake of a parade they do once a year? WTF is wrong with you guys’ heads?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They literally can’t pull a few of the nicer ones for the sake of a parade they do once a year?
      Apparently not

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They don’t because boomer optics "why are tanks being wasted in a parade while our guys are dying". That’s literally the reason why they stopped after the 2022 parade. It’s simpleton’s logic but it’s pretty obvious that’s what a Russian boomer mindset would be like.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's just a 3 day special military operation, surely they could show off their military might to the people and boost their patriotism.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nice cope Ivan.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >we can, we just don't want to do it
      yeah, okay bud

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's not why. The 1st Guards unit that typically did the parade was sent into Ukraine at the start of the war and got so badly mauled it needed to be reconstituted

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They literally can’t pull a few of the nicer ones for the sake of a parade they do once a year?
      They had parade vehicles pulled into active duty with their silly stickers still on them in 2022.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cope Ivanovich... question to you - why even bother with parade at that point? May 9 is all about the cope victory in Otechestvenaya war and they doing it while there is active war lol lmao

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The T14 is not used at the front you stupid vatnik monkey

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I thought it was common knowledge
      No, we are not Russian. We do not follow your local 'discourse' (lel)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      stop larping, it's not clever

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >their many thousands of remaining vehicles
      May we see them?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Where's the Armata then? They don't use it on the front.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon,the Armata is still in testing.Sending it on parade makes sense,everybody already knows it exists and it helps prepare logistics for when(if) it is deployed.

      The only reasons to not do that are it being so unreliable it can't be expected to work even in the best conditions,or being so far ahead of everything they can send it demoralizes the troops.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bitching doesn't fricking matter in Russia because its a fricking consolidated, mafia-state dictatorship you stupid frick. The RU federal government doesn't have to do nothing for nobody inside Russia. If they want to have a donkey show in as their parade, they can. So if they're not putting tanks and having these pathetic showings with T-34s and National Guard vehicles, its not because of someone complaining.

      This fricking website. Since 2013 you have to explain, make a drawing and then explain the fricking drawing multiple times.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It’s the IMAGE they’re worried about you moron. The Armata showed up every year until 2023 and we KNOW they weren’t used in combat, just reportedly some testing. They literally can’t put one in a parade since last year?

        The worst case is that as others have mentioned the regiment which has traditionally did these parades has been rebuilt from combat losses and aren’t ready to do parades so that part got cut.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But I thought Russia can just pull out several thousand tanks from their stockpiles easily?
      Why not get 10 or 20 for the parade?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Those tanks are busy chasing fleeing hohols

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >chasing
          I don't think armata can move without truck

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I really hoped they would roll the captured wrecks around.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They really ought to. /k/ will be really disappointed if they don’t. Also they should have some guy whipping them with chains or something that would be hot.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Jesus Christ, why do I have such powerful imagination.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      maybe they will, we don't know

      https://i.imgur.com/n2N6nwr.gif

      >boomerang
      Got it? Coz they touch the front and immediately go back

      have there even been any confirmed sightings of Boomerangs at the front. I don't think I have seen it mentioned once in two years, which seems amazing

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because it's varpoware, just like the Armata.
        What's older than the BTR-50 that they could send in next?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >even India managed to produce a semi functional new 8x8 vehicle
          grim

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Send in the KV-1s

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          We kinda peaked already.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            not the same tank

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yes it is. Soviets never used the same tactical numbers for new vehicles, only added more.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Outright false. Wanna prove me wrong? Show me tanks with 6-digit tactical numbers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But these are per district/unit, they do not simply add one each time.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So in other words there'd be multiple tanks with the same number.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Technically, but finding T-55A with the number 320 would be a challenge.
                So maybe instead explain why do you think it's not the same tank?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not really. These are per unit. Unit being regiment. There's a 320 in every tank regiment. And guess what, the Soviets had a hell of a lot of tank regiments back then.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >There's a 320 in every tank regiment.
                >A regimental headquarters oversaw command of three Tank Battalions of thirty-one tanks each

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See:

                https://i.imgur.com/2UFhnIq.jpeg

                Because "320" on on the turret just means 3rd battalion, 2nd company and 0 iirc is commanders tank.
                And this same system of numbering was used in every soviet/russian tank regiment.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                Also, you know, there's this radical thing that can happen. That being that vehicles get transferred between units and get their numbers changed in the process. It is in fact extremely unlikely that this is the same tank, and it is extremely unlikely that that old 320 from Budapest (if it is still around) still bears that number at all.

                Basically meaning it could easily be the very same tank. Your points doesn't discard that completely, only point to the idea that it may be another one

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. Basically meaning that it is astronomically unlikely to be the same tank. In fact, the chance of it being the same tank is just about 1:[total number of T-55A ever fielded by the Red Army]

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >1:[total number of T-55A ever fielded by the Red Army]
                Wrong, it's 1/[total of T-55A that got 320] and also it's not "astronomical" lol lmao
                Also, even if chance a low it doesn't discard the statement that it's same tank
                vatniks science everyone lol lmao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Also, even if chance a low it doesn't discard the statement that it's same tank
                You're straight up coping. Over a cheap meme. Touch grass.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I mean whole probability theory now called "coping"
                right

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your arguement boils down too
                >i know it could be the same tank but because there's a 1/100000 chance it must be
                Fricking moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's not 100000 tho so moronic r u

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's not 100000 tho so moronic r u

                If this one is correct

                Not really. These are per unit. Unit being regiment. There's a 320 in every tank regiment. And guess what, the Soviets had a hell of a lot of tank regiments back then.

                it's fricking 1/31 WOW so ASTRONOMICAL

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not really. These are per unit. Unit being regiment. There's a 320 in every tank regiment. And guess what, the Soviets had a hell of a lot of tank regiments back then.

                Also, you know, there's this radical thing that can happen. That being that vehicles get transferred between units and get their numbers changed in the process. It is in fact extremely unlikely that this is the same tank, and it is extremely unlikely that that old 320 from Budapest (if it is still around) still bears that number at all.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because "320" on on the turret just means 3rd battalion, 2nd company and 0 iirc is commanders tank.
                And this same system of numbering was used in every soviet/russian tank regiment.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >56
            Older. OLDER!

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Older. OLDER!

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                unironically car is car

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A model T then can handle rasputisa just like a hardened military vehicle designed for mud.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Every car is gonna sink in the mud equally yeah

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Patently false, not every car has the same surface pressures.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And no car can handle the raspubreastsa
                Anyway, my point was that any car is just gonna get blown up by a drone anyway so it hardly matters

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The top one is a T-55, the bottom one is a T-54

            T-55s never had the fan intake seen infront of the HMG on the second tank, as that wouldnt work with its NBC system. The sights are also different, and the cupola.

            That said, that T-55 on the top is probably produced just a year or two after the bottom tank was.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              We've been over this, it could have been upgraded. We dont have hard proof of it being the same tank, but there's also nothing that disproves it.
              It's also more way funnier.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It would be funny, but the USSR tended to not upgrade T-54s to T-55 standard. While it was possible, it was rare, and they usually just pushed T-54s to WARPACT nations or third worlders (or sent them to storage) when they had newer tanks.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What's older than the BTR-50 that they could send in next
          PT-76 and T-10M come to mind.

          >that single t-34 again
          IIRC they bought a few dozen in working condition from Laos, where are the others?
          Don't tell me we might actually see a T-34 obr 2024 repurposed into a turtle tank at the front some time

          Good question since I remember they used to have multiple T-34 and Su-100 taking part in parades previously. Maybe the other T-34s are sent to smaller parades across the country?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >T-10M come to mind
            Hold my vodka.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I really wanna see what a T-10M Obr. 2024 would look like.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Like a baseline T-10M except rustier.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What's older than the BTR-50 that they could send in next?
          They would be sending this if they didn't melt it down

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that thing being on the frontlines/at a parade would be certified /k/ino

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What's older than the BTR-50 that they could send in next
          PT-76 and T-10M come to mind.
          [...]
          Good question since I remember they used to have multiple T-34 and Su-100 taking part in parades previously. Maybe the other T-34s are sent to smaller parades across the country?

          BTR-152, BTR-40, BRDM-2, BRDM-1 and T-44 where the hell is it?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            everything except brdm-2 is not existant anymore

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              How do you know that and how can you tell?

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The division (4th Tanks guards I think) that did the parades got annihilated (twice) in Ukraine.
    Is the Airshow cancelled or canceled due to weather?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Is the Airshow cancelled or canceled due to weather?
      I think they will say something like - there was no airshow ever on May 9, what u talking about?

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >there's more working NATO equipment in the parade than russian vehicles

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They won't parade the "captured" NATO stuff? Don't they have at least one AMX-10?

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No Abrams? I was convinced they would show off the wrecks of any Western armor they got their hands on while Monke gives a grand speech about how the decadent Anglo-Saxon culture is declining and Nazi tanks are burning on the Ukrainian steppe once again

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So why exactly is the T 34 dead russians per second the only tonk they have at these parades?
    Why not show the Armata? It's not like they get used on the front.
    Don't really see the Logik

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They probably ran out of parts needed to keep Armatas running

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >that single t-34 again
    IIRC they bought a few dozen in working condition from Laos, where are the others?
    Don't tell me we might actually see a T-34 obr 2024 repurposed into a turtle tank at the front some time

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've seen some screenshots on twitter from the parade last year - there were apparently two extra t34 parked nearby. probably in case the main one breaks down.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Don't tell me we might actually see a T-34 obr 2024 repurposed into a turtle tank at the front some time
      Oh, we will
      Sure, we will

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Where are they Putin?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Getting upgraded with ERA, and cope barn, to Obr. 2024

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Kind of amazed how good the condition of these things are given they've been across different wartorn shitholes. Czechnology I guess

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wait, no actual service tanks in general? Only soft-skin vehicles and prototypes?

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is not pathetic, but in fact stronk and impressive

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PLEASE let them put the NATO stuff on flatbeds, drive them down the parade ground and let the crowd boo & hiss and throw trash. Dirtying their own streets to stick it to the West.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what the frick is this? more Western tank than russian ones? how the frick is vatniks going to cope with this?

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've heard from a few people that that Soviets used to loop tanks back around during large parades and quickly renumber them for another pass. Seems like BS though. The Soviet Army had thousands of tanks it could show off if it wished.
    Modern Russia can't even try this type of farce because they can't spare anything to display.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I've heard from a few people that that Soviets used to loop tanks back around during large parades and quickly renumber them for another pass. Seems like BS though. The Soviet Army had thousands of tanks it could show off if it wished.
      Its a case of chinese whispers, with the story being garbled by each reteling.
      It was not tanks, it was bombers, and it happened in the 50s.
      Russians faked parade flybys of their newest Myasishchev M4 heavy bombers during the 1955 .
      Due to delays and problems with production they had just 10 of them avaiable . During parade flyby they circled around moscow and then flew over red square again. Needless to say there was no repainting of numbers involved

      Western observers duly counted each of them , and from the cooked numbers displayed on parade they extrapolated that in next years russians will have a about 800 of them in operational service . And as americans like to do, they massively overreacted, building the gorillions of B-52s, many of them still flying, armada of air tankers to keep them in the air, and massive infrastructure boost to ward off the imaginary soviet menace.

      An a way its kind of similar to MiG-25 and F-15 story.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The intel thing was one of the bigger issues of the cold war until the end and something I think normies just really don't appreciate. The iron curtain really was pretty impenetrable for a long time, obviously never completely but stuff was real garbled and this was long before the kind of spy sats available now. U-2 and SR-71 programs were a big fricking deal, far more then I can remember ever reported outside of specific military histories and retrospectives.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Creep looking mf

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >An a way its kind of similar to MiG-25 and F-15 story.
        and that thing about soviet tanks having nightvision equipment which had everyone in the west pooping their pants

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >no Nork T-34s on the parade
    lame

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      tfw North Korea sells tanks to Rossiya
      >supposedly the Iglas on top can be remote controlled from the inside on the later variants

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bets on the parade next year?
    A guy with a rifle, some bread, a Ukranian soldier (occupying Russia)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      two dudes moving Lenin out of his fricking ziggurat

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        will they puppeteer him like kermit?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          they should!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Shoigu going down Red Square on a rickshaw pulled by a mobik

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Golf carts, and a lot of them

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So what's the difference between the tigr, ural, and tajfun?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Who offered most bribes during the contract phase.

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like the army of some small despotic oil nation with no border enemies.

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Th-this was s-supposed to be a joke picture.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      100% unironic question: Would old ass ladas be better or worse at delivering troops to the front than the golf carts?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's probably easier to find parts for the golf carts than the ladas.

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Only take is T-34 again
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >T-34, BTR 82 (only kino thing on this list), some MRAPs and a NOOOOOK
    This parade is getting more and more pathetic every year, this is really sad. I loved watching these shows.

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    does russia still have these things?
    honestly this is the only vehicle im looking forward.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They should, I've never seen them in footage from Ukraine, that being said I don't pour over all of the footage so it may have slipped. AFAIK they're slated to be (? or are? Not sure of their adoption status) VDV vehicles.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      these things are only good for killing civilians so perfect for russia

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Money laundry/embezzlement project so obviously they still have it in that perpetual stasis of vague "developtment" that's perfect for corruption.

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >can't scrounge up a few tanks for zigger christmas but can't forget le nook truck because remember WE GOT NOOKS XAXAXAXA *~~*~~*~~

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >tfw when u need to brake stabilizers on all wectern machines, coz yours hanging sooo low that even NORKS have a better parade than u

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ziggers never stop taking Ls do they?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      well they took Luhansk and Lysychansk so yeah

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        moron

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Image stolen for prodigious use on May 9th.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No golf karts?

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >noooooks, T-I-G-R and t-34

    Why are they like this? Is it on purpose?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >XAXAXAXA mighty PUCCIA has Su-57, and APMATA, and T-I-G-E-R-ACK
      always has been

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will they ever realize that holding yearly Russia stronk parades for an event that happened 80 years ago is kinda cringy? Modern Russia is the equivalent of that annoying boomer that keeps telling you stories about his glory days in high school.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Will they ever realize that holding yearly Russia stronk parades for an event that happened 80 years ago is kinda cringy?
      like celebrating the independence day, right?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They do that too, and it's entirely separate

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You Poles love to pretend like this is a big deal but it really isn't. Most people have no idea the date even coincides with Polish defeat, it's only really there beacuse they needed a replacement for November 7th.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >it's only really there beacuse they needed a replacement for November 7th
            And they actually managed to pick a day on which nothing happened lmao. That entire holiday is such a rushed hack job.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Almost installed a puppet tsar around that time. Sure not a big deal, and while ruskies boast about stopping Hitler and Napoleon, they were nearly taken over by fricking poland. Fricking comedy.

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would be behind based if someone put an RPG round or whatever into the ICBM. Even better if it has warheads installed and irritated red square.

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >There are more Western tanks in Moscow right now than Russian

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      "Is there something else you'd like to discuss?"

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    вce кoнчeнo

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just for comparison

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Funnily enough this was also the only October Revolution parade held until the end of the war.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Funnily enough this was also the only October Revolution parade held until the end of the war.

      Because Stalin at least understood optics and knew that no parade was better than a strong parade (why aren't those tanks at the front, what about muh Great Patriotic War?) or a weak parade (jajajajaja die schweinen are out of panzers t. goebbels).

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >T-14?
    >That was of course the predecessor of T-18.
    >110 years and westoids still so mad when Russia took FT-17 and improved it*~~*~~

  53. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    cope

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *