If you have matchsticks for shoulders and ricecakes for vertebrae, then no, it's not for you if you wanna carry any substantial weight.
If, however, you're used to carry weight without significant any significant body support, then go ahead, it's a tough piece of gear that will not fail you.
Source: I have a Rush 24, and I've taken that thing through hell and back. It's not the most comfortable at any rate, but it gets the job done without falling apart at the first mishap.
>everyone else is weak >but I won’t show anyone my body
Fat frick detected. It’s up to you to prove you’re not, since you’re the one accusing others of being weak.
Never said everyone else is weak. Just said that the backpack isn't good for those who aren't suited for it.
Did- did I strike a nerve, perhaps? Sorry anon, I didn't mean to hurt your feels. Now kindly piss off if you can't contribute, you weapons grade poodle penetrating thunderc**t.
nta
I'm a fat frick and i carry a Maxpedition Vulture II which i imagine is similar build/ weight and i do just fine.
granted i carry heavy shit at work and i do back exercises on the regular
>anyone who can carry four pounds has never carried a pack
okay
10 months ago
Anonymous
You don’t even understand the basic concepts of hiking, Anon. The wild part is the vast majority of PrepHole are in the same boat. Just totally moronic newbies who are clueless as to what they don’t know.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>basic concepts of hiking
You mean walking from A to B and then autistically shitting on anyone who didn't do it exactly the way you did? kek
10 months ago
Anonymous
This is exactly what I’m talking about. “It’s just walking.” You don’t even know what you do t know.
I've had the same rush 72 as my go anywhere bag for almost 15 years now. It survived 2 tours in Afghanistan and a lot of 3 day mountain use. It wouldn't be my first choice for any extended hike, and I wouldnt want to hike a long manicured trail with it a lighter hiking pack would be better. But the rush 72 has excelled at being a 3 day gear pack for me.
my rush24 2.0 has been alright. I use it for luxurious daytrips where i bring a lot of gear, but its not good for carrying heavy or walking far since it lacks a waist strap
nope
Nope, too heavy.
A friend of mine had one, he ended buying a Kelty redwing, once he saw mine.
If you have matchsticks for shoulders and ricecakes for vertebrae, then no, it's not for you if you wanna carry any substantial weight.
If, however, you're used to carry weight without significant any significant body support, then go ahead, it's a tough piece of gear that will not fail you.
Source: I have a Rush 24, and I've taken that thing through hell and back. It's not the most comfortable at any rate, but it gets the job done without falling apart at the first mishap.
-1 significant*
Post physique, fat boy.
I shall not appease your perverted wishes, stick friend.
>everyone else is weak
>but I won’t show anyone my body
Fat frick detected. It’s up to you to prove you’re not, since you’re the one accusing others of being weak.
Never said everyone else is weak. Just said that the backpack isn't good for those who aren't suited for it.
Did- did I strike a nerve, perhaps? Sorry anon, I didn't mean to hurt your feels. Now kindly piss off if you can't contribute, you weapons grade poodle penetrating thunderc**t.
>weapons grade poodle penetrating thunderc**t.
nta
I'm a fat frick and i carry a Maxpedition Vulture II which i imagine is similar build/ weight and i do just fine.
granted i carry heavy shit at work and i do back exercises on the regular
Rush 24 is too heavy, the Rush 12 I like, been using one for EDC and day hikes for over five years. Used it for a a few over nighters.
>too heavy
Grow stronger
4 pounds for a no frame backpack, no thanks.
>I won't improve myself because I consider four pounds heavy
What a sad life you must lead
He says, posting on PrepHole
Will PrepHole ever progress to a level were there aren’t so many morons who’ve never carried a pack yet still shit their opinion onto every thread?
>anyone who can carry four pounds has never carried a pack
okay
You don’t even understand the basic concepts of hiking, Anon. The wild part is the vast majority of PrepHole are in the same boat. Just totally moronic newbies who are clueless as to what they don’t know.
>basic concepts of hiking
You mean walking from A to B and then autistically shitting on anyone who didn't do it exactly the way you did? kek
This is exactly what I’m talking about. “It’s just walking.” You don’t even know what you do t know.
Wristlet cope
I live a great life, still not going to carry a 4 pound pack.
Tactical bags like this are gay. Molle isn't that useful on a small surface area
I've had the same rush 72 as my go anywhere bag for almost 15 years now. It survived 2 tours in Afghanistan and a lot of 3 day mountain use. It wouldn't be my first choice for any extended hike, and I wouldnt want to hike a long manicured trail with it a lighter hiking pack would be better. But the rush 72 has excelled at being a 3 day gear pack for me.
No, not even for "tactical" use
My Rush 12 busted a zipper but other than that it has held up to abuse.
my rush24 2.0 has been alright. I use it for luxurious daytrips where i bring a lot of gear, but its not good for carrying heavy or walking far since it lacks a waist strap
I have a Rush 48, very nice bag. It is heavy but I used it for work / travel by plain, not hiking.
This bag will last you a long time.