It's because someone like Scar is the combination of the masculine and feminine, some people like to think that makes you 'perfect' but you're closer to evil than anything.
Takes a special sort of person to combine all aspects of yourself without becoming evil.
People identify it as homosexual but it's much deeper than that.
You have to balance your total personality along ego and self, shadow and being, before you attempt any masculine/feminine btw, or you'll go insane and degrade yourself. (homosexual or troony or serial killer or investment banker)
In media and most people you'll see irl that attempt it go with the latter.
Anyway I'm going to suppress my power level now, ciao
Not enough women to spread around, some men will adapt with the proper conditioning. Note how Wez here has chosen a very feminine looking man, because of his latent natural heterosexuality, he prefers the feminine but with options being as they are this is what he's reduced to. All homosexuality is deviant.
They'd be perfectly "allowed" if they were psychotic killer warlords that just snuffed out anyone saying otherwise. As illustrated in books like The Steel Remains, it turns out if you have a deviant lifestyle but are also a superlative killer in a might makes right society, then your lifestyle is viable as long as you can defend it with a blade.
They are savage raiders so they would be degenerate. It's the civilized groups that would be strongly anti homosexual in order to repopulate the earth. Abrahamic religion has such strictures because israelites were a small tribe in a hostile environment who needed to boost their numbers, exactly like a post apocalyptic scenario.
Resources are scarce in post apocalyptic settings, it's only reasonable to not reproduce. Hence, it's more beneficial to be gay than to be straight. You dig me, homie?
This! Dykes couldn't exist! In fact women would find a group of s.o.y Simps and use them as a co habitat provider meet rewards! There'll be ten women to thirty thirsty desperate men who'll become the providers for a few minutes a day of sexual release and cooks and cleaners!
Because society has an irrational hatred towards homosexuality that isn't warrented. A single digit percent of the population wanting to get their ass railed isn't going to harm society.
What makes it irrational? Peoples' aversion to homosexuality comes naturally, first and foremost, because it doesn't reproduce. It's instinct for what helps and what doesn't help. Currently it's associated with pedophilia because leftoids are telling pppl they're homophobic if they want to protect innocent children. Leftism is further cementing the connection between pedophilia and homosexuality. They really think they can normalize pedophilia through fear, through bullying. it's moronic
>Hell, punk just means a dude that lets his holes be used in prison.
I thought you were trolling but this is actually true. And the whole time I thought it was a term that meant "block of wood" only to be re-appropriated.
You do know 1/3rd of all HIV cases were in heterosexuals, right? Do you really think millions of women aren't promiscuous bawds that never use condoms?
Anon, AIDS what gay cancer and then Black person cancer from junkies. And it only become so widespread because homosexuals couldn't stop having anonymous sex with dudes they met in parks and the like. Hell they couldn't stop going to fricking orgies during monkey pox but "thankfully" someone came up with a vaccine for that one... Always weird how it stopped getting reported in the news once it was coming out that dogs and kids of gay couples started getting monkeypox.
>Male-to-male sex has been the most common mode of exposure among persons reported with AIDS (46%), followed by injection drug use (25%) and heterosexual contact (11%). The incidence of AIDS increased rapidly in all three of these risk categories through the mid-1990s; however, since 1996, declines in new AIDS cases have been higher among MSM and injection drug users than among persons exposed through heterosexual contact
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5021a2.htm#fig2
I'm not even a gay, but if we lived in mad max end times I'd probably resort to raping men too. Women are dead in that scenario without men to take care of them, so there'd be a huge male to female ratio disparity.
You won't be singing that tune, when the apocalypse kills off 90% of women and the remaining 10% are kept in the harems of the most powerful warlords.
Your natural instinct will overpower any sense of reason.
It's the same as eating flesh in times of starvation. Everything you know and feel as a well-adhusted man is thrown out the window when you're on the brink of death. And the imperative to spread your seed is arguably a stronger instinct than even hunger.
I don't frick men. I'm saying I would if society collapsed to that level. Call me a homosexual, I'm not really insecure enough to take that insult as badly as you want me to
>Anon goes years shitposting without sexual contact or even a kiss >"Yeah you'd go gay in a second due to lack of available women in post apocalyptic scenario"
Anon has 20 fleshlights, 40tb of porn, every kind of sex act ever recorded at his fingertips, and cam distract himself with shitposting and vidya when he's not jerking off.
In mad max world, there is no porn. There are no distractions. If you're a high-test male that needs to get off, you may be forced to resort to manrape. But the real neetgays and low-test gays would be the ones getting raped.
We've seen the violent downfall of civilians many times before. It's actually the women who survive more often because men sacrifice their lives to protect them and even pillagers understand the value of breeding
Warring men in civilizational breakdown scenarios aren't interested in killing women, just hoarding them as wives and concubines. So yeah if you're a woman you have a higher chance of survival but you'll probably have to put out for some barbarian. Of course that comes pretty naturally for them...
On the scale of Mad Max 2? When?
This was a highly advanced, post-industrial age society that crumbled into nuclear-wasteland level dystopia in one generation. This isn't equivalent to past collapses. It would be devastation on a level never experienced in history and (if the world outside of Australia is as fricked) billions would die.
Gays maybe but not gays. Also being a bottom would immediately make you a b***h just like prison. While gays were disrespected in pagan societies they weren't exactly persecuted like they were under religions that made it a point to do so.
If a man can force another man to spread his cheeks then he is clearly the one deciding what is allowed and what is not. Even in apocalyptical setting.
I imagine that gays would be encouraged as homosexuality would alleviate conflict over the dwindling number of available females while also giving the masses a hedonistic distraction to keep them from rebelling against the ruling class.
It's lesbians who would be discouraged given the waste of reproductive assets in a society where replacement births have become vital. However given that true lesbianism is so rare I don't see it being much of an issue and furthermore I'm sure thr carpet munchers would be willing to make use of their wombs for the good of their community.
Technically two plauges; COVID and MonkeyPox, which the media conveniently stopped discussing once it started showing up in gay people, then kids and dogs.
>he doesn't have his twink sex slave already lined up
It's about status. If you're hanging out with a bunch of raping, pillaging bandits, NOT having a frickboy on a leash may as well be an invitation to get railed.
You demonstrate your masculinity, virility, and skill in battle to your fellow marauders by openly and brazenly touting your conquests as you would your arms and armor. And what greater conquest is there than to reduce your fellow man to the status of an object?
homos = bringers of the end times
are there any laws saying it isn't
Frick off back to your containment scrotum of a board.
I thought rebbit folded?
>stop talking about movies on the movie board
You go back to your containment board, tourist Black person
Gays portrayed as psychotic degenerates who make animal noises?
Gaycoding villains = a kino villain. Every time. Even gays like it. Not our fault gays are flamboyant and sassy.
Not that they are gay, just that their behavior sure isn't stereotypically straight.
It's because someone like Scar is the combination of the masculine and feminine, some people like to think that makes you 'perfect' but you're closer to evil than anything.
Takes a special sort of person to combine all aspects of yourself without becoming evil.
People identify it as homosexual but it's much deeper than that.
You have to balance your total personality along ego and self, shadow and being, before you attempt any masculine/feminine btw, or you'll go insane and degrade yourself. (homosexual or troony or serial killer or investment banker)
In media and most people you'll see irl that attempt it go with the latter.
Anyway I'm going to suppress my power level now, ciao
Gay shit would totally exist in a crackhead leather biker gang in the wasteland.
>society falls apart
>here's a biker gang full of sexual deviants
>gays think this is a positive portrayal
Not enough women to spread around, some men will adapt with the proper conditioning. Note how Wez here has chosen a very feminine looking man, because of his latent natural heterosexuality, he prefers the feminine but with options being as they are this is what he's reduced to. All homosexuality is deviant.
I like how Wez turns up in Weird Science.
They'd be perfectly "allowed" if they were psychotic killer warlords that just snuffed out anyone saying otherwise. As illustrated in books like The Steel Remains, it turns out if you have a deviant lifestyle but are also a superlative killer in a might makes right society, then your lifestyle is viable as long as you can defend it with a blade.
>the only people left are psychos, homos, animals, men that are basically animals, and a gas station
lol
>the only people left are psychos, homos, animals, men that are basically animals, and a gas station
It IS Australia, anon.
They are savage raiders so they would be degenerate. It's the civilized groups that would be strongly anti homosexual in order to repopulate the earth. Abrahamic religion has such strictures because israelites were a small tribe in a hostile environment who needed to boost their numbers, exactly like a post apocalyptic scenario.
Resources are scarce in post apocalyptic settings, it's only reasonable to not reproduce. Hence, it's more beneficial to be gay than to be straight. You dig me, homie?
All the women got raped to death early on
This! Dykes couldn't exist! In fact women would find a group of s.o.y Simps and use them as a co habitat provider meet rewards! There'll be ten women to thirty thirsty desperate men who'll become the providers for a few minutes a day of sexual release and cooks and cleaners!
Who is really going to stop them if they have guns and gas?
So you're saying societal collapse (gradual or otherwise) corresponds to increased rates of homosexuality. shocker
Because society has an irrational hatred towards homosexuality that isn't warrented. A single digit percent of the population wanting to get their ass railed isn't going to harm society.
>A single digit percent of the population wanting to get their ass railed isn't going to harm society.
The results say otherwise.
What makes it irrational? Peoples' aversion to homosexuality comes naturally, first and foremost, because it doesn't reproduce. It's instinct for what helps and what doesn't help. Currently it's associated with pedophilia because leftoids are telling pppl they're homophobic if they want to protect innocent children. Leftism is further cementing the connection between pedophilia and homosexuality. They really think they can normalize pedophilia through fear, through bullying. it's moronic
>A single digit percent of the population
not anymore. zoomers are mostly gay
in war torn regions of the world many men in occupied areas have anal injuries that imply they were raped
homosexual warlords are a kino threat because they will both rape you and kill/enslave you
gays in general make great villains because they threaten too emasculate you by fricking your ass
Why does nobody ever talk about the superior post apoc film
people tend to not sympathize with rapist protagonists
its an interesting film, I liked it
they don't have marvelous judgment (or particularly good taste)
He looks a bit like Chalamet in that pic.
*young Marc Almond
Yeah I see that
Rock and roll punks were always against the established order of things. GG Allin cross dressed before it was cool.
Yes, punks are homosexuals, we know. Hell, punk just means a dude that lets his holes be used in prison.
>Hell, punk just means a dude that lets his holes be used in prison.
I thought you were trolling but this is actually true. And the whole time I thought it was a term that meant "block of wood" only to be re-appropriated.
Yeah, which is why punks are all homosexuals.
I think the idea was they are just crazy degenerates and the dude riding b***h looked feminine enough so "a hole is a hole" mentally kicked in
The gay population was on the brink of being wiped out by AIDS before prophylactic medications came along in the 2000's.
You do know 1/3rd of all HIV cases were in heterosexuals, right? Do you really think millions of women aren't promiscuous bawds that never use condoms?
Anon, AIDS what gay cancer and then Black person cancer from junkies. And it only become so widespread because homosexuals couldn't stop having anonymous sex with dudes they met in parks and the like. Hell they couldn't stop going to fricking orgies during monkey pox but "thankfully" someone came up with a vaccine for that one... Always weird how it stopped getting reported in the news once it was coming out that dogs and kids of gay couples started getting monkeypox.
>homosexuals couldn't stop having anonymous sex
Compared to all the women that have sex with dozens of 6'2 psychopaths at the bar?
>Male-to-male sex has been the most common mode of exposure among persons reported with AIDS (46%), followed by injection drug use (25%) and heterosexual contact (11%). The incidence of AIDS increased rapidly in all three of these risk categories through the mid-1990s; however, since 1996, declines in new AIDS cases have been higher among MSM and injection drug users than among persons exposed through heterosexual contact
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5021a2.htm#fig2
>1/3rd of all HIV cases were in heterosexuals,
You mean 33% of cases were in 95% of the popuation? Wow those heterosexuals sure are as bad as gays.
I'm not even a gay, but if we lived in mad max end times I'd probably resort to raping men too. Women are dead in that scenario without men to take care of them, so there'd be a huge male to female ratio disparity.
>I'm not even a gay
>but if we lived in mad max end times I'd probably resort to raping men too.
You only get to pick one of these.
You won't be singing that tune, when the apocalypse kills off 90% of women and the remaining 10% are kept in the harems of the most powerful warlords.
Your natural instinct will overpower any sense of reason.
It's the same as eating flesh in times of starvation. Everything you know and feel as a well-adhusted man is thrown out the window when you're on the brink of death. And the imperative to spread your seed is arguably a stronger instinct than even hunger.
Anon, fricking other dudes is gay. Rationalize it however you want, but it's gay. You are a homosexual.
I don't frick men. I'm saying I would if society collapsed to that level. Call me a homosexual, I'm not really insecure enough to take that insult as badly as you want me to
>I don't frick men but I fantasize about it.
>I'm really not gay and it doesn't bother me that you call me that.
>But I'm not gay.
Anon you are a homosexual and it does bother you. Otherwise you wouldn't have said anything and you keep trying to rationalize it.
>and you keep trying to rationalize it
No, I already rationalized it. And your argument was
>dude you're gay
I'm gonna admit I was wrong, though. You wouldn't turn to raping men come the apocalypse. You'll be one of meatslaves, taking raider wiener
>Anon goes years shitposting without sexual contact or even a kiss
>"Yeah you'd go gay in a second due to lack of available women in post apocalyptic scenario"
Anon has 20 fleshlights, 40tb of porn, every kind of sex act ever recorded at his fingertips, and cam distract himself with shitposting and vidya when he's not jerking off.
In mad max world, there is no porn. There are no distractions. If you're a high-test male that needs to get off, you may be forced to resort to manrape. But the real neetgays and low-test gays would be the ones getting raped.
We've seen the violent downfall of civilians many times before. It's actually the women who survive more often because men sacrifice their lives to protect them and even pillagers understand the value of breeding
Warring men in civilizational breakdown scenarios aren't interested in killing women, just hoarding them as wives and concubines. So yeah if you're a woman you have a higher chance of survival but you'll probably have to put out for some barbarian. Of course that comes pretty naturally for them...
On the scale of Mad Max 2? When?
This was a highly advanced, post-industrial age society that crumbled into nuclear-wasteland level dystopia in one generation. This isn't equivalent to past collapses. It would be devastation on a level never experienced in history and (if the world outside of Australia is as fricked) billions would die.
>implying anybody on this board would be the raper
I'd be the raper. You'd be the rapee.
What Swans song is that?
Gays maybe but not gays. Also being a bottom would immediately make you a b***h just like prison. While gays were disrespected in pagan societies they weren't exactly persecuted like they were under religions that made it a point to do so.
Yes, I think gays fit well into apocalyptic settings.
All bikers are gays. Always have been.
If a man can force another man to spread his cheeks then he is clearly the one deciding what is allowed and what is not. Even in apocalyptical setting.
At the rate things are going the post apocalypse is going to be incredibly gay. I'm going out by grilling. Last monster can? I'll be gone.
I imagine that gays would be encouraged as homosexuality would alleviate conflict over the dwindling number of available females while also giving the masses a hedonistic distraction to keep them from rebelling against the ruling class.
It's lesbians who would be discouraged given the waste of reproductive assets in a society where replacement births have become vital. However given that true lesbianism is so rare I don't see it being much of an issue and furthermore I'm sure thr carpet munchers would be willing to make use of their wombs for the good of their community.
It's all come true.
Technically two plauges; COVID and MonkeyPox, which the media conveniently stopped discussing once it started showing up in gay people, then kids and dogs.
>he doesn't have his twink sex slave already lined up
It's about status. If you're hanging out with a bunch of raping, pillaging bandits, NOT having a frickboy on a leash may as well be an invitation to get railed.
You demonstrate your masculinity, virility, and skill in battle to your fellow marauders by openly and brazenly touting your conquests as you would your arms and armor. And what greater conquest is there than to reduce your fellow man to the status of an object?