What they shot down. Earlier in the war, they were filled with missile and Shashed silhouettes.
My guess is that Ukraine finally had enough and decided to risk one a Patriot battery by deploying it near Avdiivka
Seems to be paying off. Feels like they're destroying an Sukhoi every day on average. With how many they have left, we may see the entire fleet destroyed by the end of the year - or the cessation of FAB-lobbing.
The glide bombs were a huge issue and Russia was using them almost exclusively at Avdiivka, save for an occasional raid in Kherson Oblast. Now that Avdiivka is lost the next couple dozen settlements in Russian way of advance are all small villages and tiny towns. FABs would obliterate anything there
The KABs were deployed in Avdiivka IMO because the Ukrainians had a permanent fortifications network there built up after 2014. The usual disposable troop assault + artillery wasn’t enough so I guess Putin pushed the VKS to step up and start flinging KABs to crack the forts. Or maybe they didn’t have enough KABs to be meaningful until now, or maybe they were waiting for Ukie AD to be attrited down to a level that they felt they could risk significant air support ops at the frontline. Maybe it was a one-off thing because Putin wanted a win for whatever political reason. Whatever the reason it was reportedly very effective.
>Seems to be paying off.
Yes it pays off. And hopefully they continue operating them near the frontline AND change its positioning constantly. Can't imagine the shitposting if a ShaSNEED destroys one
If we go by ukie numbers than for 2 years of conflict there has been 1 plane downed every 2 days, about the same for helicopters so by ukie claims about 1 airframe loss per day
They kind of have to, getting big ass dumb bombs dropped on you on a daily basis must suck ass.
On the flip side, Russia has to risk it's fighter bombers to have any hope at all of taking ground and they are the ones loosing their expensive ass, borderline unreplaceable systems.
>safely eject >after being hit by a PAC-2 with a closing velocity of mach 2-4
3 months ago
Anonymous
>PAC-2
makes no sense.
those need active illumination.
too risky for any ambushes. you will lose that radar.
3 months ago
Anonymous
they survive barely 50% of the time, because even those who eject often die on the ground or drown if shot down above water, true story
3 months ago
Anonymous
I can't wait until anon finds out what happens when you eject above mach 1 and below like 5,000 feet. That interview still haunts me.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>above mach 1 and below like 5,000 feet
in which phase of the sortie would you be at that?
3 months ago
Anonymous
After Stonehenge starts firing.
3 months ago
Anonymous
3 months ago
Anonymous
>he doesn't get the reference
Fricking pathetic. Also the F-111, Tornado, etc all trained for low supersonic ingress in wartime conditions.
>In June 1960, the USAF issued specification SOR 183 for a long-range interdiction/strike aircraft able to penetrate Soviet air defenses at very low altitudes and high speeds.[9] Specifically, it was to be capable of at least 800 miles of low-level flight, 400 of which was to be at a speed of no less than Mach 1.2.
The incident being referenced was an F-15 or F-15E, I believe an F-15E.
3 months ago
Anonymous
What happens? Do you die instantly?
3 months ago
Anonymous
I don't know the story but you don't have to read many military mishap stories to know that dying instantly is something of a best case scenario for any story where people get cryptic so I assume that the pilots who do eject above mach 1 but below 5000 feet will die in a messy fashion but it will not be quick or painless.
3 months ago
Anonymous
hiding dead pilots isn't that easy.
that dead pilot the other day was quickly identified.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Bruh, singular people from the sinking of Moskva still prop up as dead periodically. Some relatives had no signs from their men in the army for 1+ year.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>seamen are pilots
/k/ - misunderstood genuises
3 months ago
Anonymous
Why are you being brown?
The logic is that they hide KIA.
I think it's the Russians that changed, they must have gone from conserving aircraft to more forward deployments, we have heard them talk about near continuous use of glide bombs to strike ardvarkia
Russia has been relying more heavily on glide bombs because even with a fresh infusion of North Korean shells, their actual artillery platforms are still suffering heavy attrition from Ukrainian counterbattery. They still have planes thanks to being heavily conservative with their use for most of the war, but now that they're being pressed into frontline service again, we're seeing spikes in losses because Russian pilots don't know how to deal with air defenses.
Anon, you're a midwit and you need to realize that fact. You don't know as much as you think you do. The problems the US faced in Vietnam are very different to those the Russians are facing in Ukraine. Accept your place.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>no argument
Concession accepted.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Not anon but you’re sperging out on the wrong point.
He’s saying that the attrition rates for such little tactical benefit is reminiscent of US losses in Vietnam. Russia is obviously doing worse, meaning the calculus is way more dire than the situation US pilots faced.
A few months back Ukraine received at least one additional patriot battery in addition to the at least two system they were previously using. Since then, they've been bolder with forward deploying at least one patriot in a more offensive role.
>tfw Zaluzhnyy was a fricking AA sniper but couldn't do much with it because he was stuck in Kyiv
My God...the Ukrainians must have figured out how to inject Boris Johnson genes into other people...
The russians are more and more aggressively using glidebomb (they've finally "invented" JDAM like kits for their FAB bombs). It's their recent super weapon, because the they can demolish pretty much anything with them. Usually they can drop them just about from far away as to not get targeted by AA, but there are limits to this.
Because only the stupidest of shills think a town of 30k is a major victory, Russians are pushing hard after Avdiivka trying to make a breakthrough. But They Can’t SEAD
Russian recent successes in the field seem to be heavily correlated with their ability to deploy aircraft closer to the front line. Ukraine has ideas about Russia doing that.
Clearly Russia has realized that these "irreplaceable" fighters are useless anyway, so they might as well exhaust them for some gains.
Russia is attempting to gain more ground so they are throwing more shit, it will be interesting to see how much of their hard to replace air force they are willing to throw into the meat grinder
they're finally using their air force when they were just using bombers to launch long range missiles before way outside of the range of AD. Now they're actually using their fighter bombers to bomb shit and they're taking losses.
Yeah but why now?Did they actually believe that Ukraine would collapse after Avdiivka?Or did they just decide that they no longer care if they take losses?
F-16 being deployed, and it's increasingly obvious given how far these are away from even the line of contact. The entire surge since December is probably mostly this.
The problem with that webm is that it has been mirrored. You can see the sign on the store near the end is backwards. Sukhoi should come from the right.
My guess is that it is the mix of the following:
1) They are trying to capitalize Ukies pulling out of Avdiivka, trying to push them further.
2) Ukies taking advantage of this and pushing some more advanced AA gear close to front lines.
3) Russian aviation is running on fumes. They have been using their planes way too much compared to maintenance hours. They have skipped on maintenance cycles and have difficulties getting spare parts. At worst they have to completely overhaul the engines after 100-200 flight hours, depending on plane type. And they just can't keep up. So they know that their planes are reaching the end of their lifespan. They are getting to the point where they are not sure if the plane can return back to the field. So they have decided to use them while they still have them.
All this leads to Russian aviation taking much bigger risks than before. Frick it, just load them full of bombs and send them to chase the retreating ukies. And then they fly straight to some pushed-forwards SAM-battery.
> Russian aviation is running on fumes
most people don't understand just how expensive the whole aviation business is, just the maintenance costs more than the whole tanks/arty budget combined, not to mention the pilot's training
It could be loads of different AA systems. The fact people think it's Patriot is just cope because it is the most advanced AA system in theatre. So you can't be lost to a Gepard or whatever, it has to be Patriot.
>Maybe is Russia is pushing hard right now because major aid packages are being held up and they want to maximize their advantage while they have it
Yeah I'm pretty sure this factors in
If you make the assumption that the aid will come eventually, then no matter how bad the ratios are for attacking now, they're better than they will be in the future. Also helps them push the "ukraine is losing so no point in helping them :^)" narrative even if the territorial gains are objectively very minor and come at absurd costs.
I do not believe current russian military leadership could have arrived at this plan.
It's too logical and relies on soft subversive propaganda effect rather than bruteforce bullshit.
>As it’s turning out, Avdiivka was a catastrophic failure, not a planned withdrawal. The withdrawal was officially ordered, reportedly, AFTER those positions had already begun collapsing.
I am very demoralized
Let me guess, New York Times which employs three Russians who are probably FSB and has the editorial position of "Ukraine should just give in and get assfricked"?
and Reuters, CNN, the Telegraph, BBC, WashPo. You can just google "Ukraine" and check the news section.
I think the SU-34 is a shitty fighter jet. Also why haven't they deployed the SU-57's yet to blow up the Patriots? I thought it was a fifth gen fighter that could easily evade enemy radar??
3 months ago
Anonymous
because the su57 like any Russian claims are a meme
3 months ago
Anonymous
Su57's biggest problem is that its a russian project, so its built on lies from the get go
3 months ago
Anonymous
Maybe it was there but it couldn't be seen because it's so stealthy
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Reuters
Literally has a contract with TASS to repost their shit
3 months ago
Anonymous
Unlimited press freedom is a mistake, during WW1&2 even the UK and US dealt with 5th columnists very quickly. You now have western media outlets spamming vatnik demoralization 24/7 because it gets more attention and revenue. Imagine if Ukraine did that, while their soldiers are dying to defend their country sheltered journo rats would post about inevitable defeat and a collapsing economy.
>As it’s turning out, Avdiivka was a catastrophic failure, not a planned withdrawal.
kek, not even ziggers say that. Even they admit Ukrainians left in decent order and Russians failed to encircle any significant amount of men.
I'll believe it when i see photographic of video proof. I saw one SU-35 fall from the sky but is there footage of the rest? These successes showing up after they just suffered a defeat is suss. Could be Ukraine propaganda, could be Russia moronation trying to push, could go either way.
Do you really think that you are going to see photografic evidence of crashed airplanes that went down in rural, occupied Ukraine?
Expect the russians to be completely silent on this. One shot down aircraft demonstrates capability, which is crucial to inflict such losses.
>Do you really think that you are going to see photografic evidence of crashed airplanes that went down in rural, occupied Ukraine?
I didn't say they are obligated to provide proof for every jet they shoot down, especially since it's probably behind enemy lines now. I said i can't just blindly believe what one side of this war says. Visual confirmation has been the standard for equipment losses since the start of the war and it's the only standard that can be trusted. So I'll take the news with a grain of salt until they can be confirmed. Also this is the most filmed and photographed war in history so it's not out of the realm of reality that footage can surface (just like that one Flanker).
[...]
Shut the frick up snowBlack person, you don't know who i am or what i think.
I think of the 7 at least 4-5 have been confirmed by zigger sources. There was also a video of one falling out of the sky and another video of them recovering a dead pilot in the water by Mariupol
All these Boris Johnsons are getting out of control . Thre are marauding bands of them operating behind russian lines, launching starstreaks at everything that flies out there,
this is the true reason why our navy cant get a ship out of harbour and trident tests are failing. we've moved the entire navy and nuclear forces budget to the next best thing - the SuperBorisJohnson detachment
I remember when a Russian couldn't make a post without being harassed by poorly drawn roosters
https://i.imgur.com/U5zRK4q.jpg
Too bad no-one has seen any
Russians don't even dare to say they are Russians on /k/ anymore. The scuttle around like the spiteful little cucks they are trying to stir up flame wars.
/k/ has been derussified.
Russians don't even dare to say they are Russians on /k/ anymore. The scuttle around like the spiteful little cucks they are trying to stir up flame wars.
/k/ has been derussified.
DJ PATRIOT
WE DA BEST
They ain't believe in us
GOD DID
Heh.
*Sniff, sniff* here the come, the wave brown is around the corner. Do da needful saaars
funny if true
What do these graphics released by the Ukrainian government represent? Why are they being posted constantly?
What they shot down. Earlier in the war, they were filled with missile and Shashed silhouettes.
Seems to be paying off. Feels like they're destroying an Sukhoi every day on average. With how many they have left, we may see the entire fleet destroyed by the end of the year - or the cessation of FAB-lobbing.
The glide bombs were a huge issue and Russia was using them almost exclusively at Avdiivka, save for an occasional raid in Kherson Oblast. Now that Avdiivka is lost the next couple dozen settlements in Russian way of advance are all small villages and tiny towns. FABs would obliterate anything there
The KABs were deployed in Avdiivka IMO because the Ukrainians had a permanent fortifications network there built up after 2014. The usual disposable troop assault + artillery wasn’t enough so I guess Putin pushed the VKS to step up and start flinging KABs to crack the forts. Or maybe they didn’t have enough KABs to be meaningful until now, or maybe they were waiting for Ukie AD to be attrited down to a level that they felt they could risk significant air support ops at the frontline. Maybe it was a one-off thing because Putin wanted a win for whatever political reason. Whatever the reason it was reportedly very effective.
>Seems to be paying off.
Yes it pays off. And hopefully they continue operating them near the frontline AND change its positioning constantly. Can't imagine the shitposting if a ShaSNEED destroys one
If we go by ukie numbers than for 2 years of conflict there has been 1 plane downed every 2 days, about the same for helicopters so by ukie claims about 1 airframe loss per day
Ace Combat stats, probably
Did you know the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine has links to the Ukrainian government? Just one of many things the western media is trying to bury.
read intel celeron Z on mammogram for more stories.
So what changed?
Why so many of these shootdowns all of a sudden?
I wouldn't worry about it.
My guess is that Ukraine finally had enough and decided to risk one a Patriot battery by deploying it near Avdiivka
They kind of have to, getting big ass dumb bombs dropped on you on a daily basis must suck ass.
On the flip side, Russia has to risk it's fighter bombers to have any hope at all of taking ground and they are the ones loosing their expensive ass, borderline unreplaceable systems.
Russia has around 1,000 fighter-bombers.
they are easily replaceable.
lulw
>They have 1000 guys posting under the same Telegram handle
>The meat is easily replaceable
Are trained pilots?
You can speed up training drastically by skipping the landing lessons.
Subscribe for more life hacks.
no, but most pilots safely eject
>safely eject
>after being hit by a PAC-2 with a closing velocity of mach 2-4
>PAC-2
makes no sense.
those need active illumination.
too risky for any ambushes. you will lose that radar.
they survive barely 50% of the time, because even those who eject often die on the ground or drown if shot down above water, true story
I can't wait until anon finds out what happens when you eject above mach 1 and below like 5,000 feet. That interview still haunts me.
>above mach 1 and below like 5,000 feet
in which phase of the sortie would you be at that?
After Stonehenge starts firing.
>he doesn't get the reference
Fricking pathetic. Also the F-111, Tornado, etc all trained for low supersonic ingress in wartime conditions.
>In June 1960, the USAF issued specification SOR 183 for a long-range interdiction/strike aircraft able to penetrate Soviet air defenses at very low altitudes and high speeds.[9] Specifically, it was to be capable of at least 800 miles of low-level flight, 400 of which was to be at a speed of no less than Mach 1.2.
The incident being referenced was an F-15 or F-15E, I believe an F-15E.
What happens? Do you die instantly?
I don't know the story but you don't have to read many military mishap stories to know that dying instantly is something of a best case scenario for any story where people get cryptic so I assume that the pilots who do eject above mach 1 but below 5000 feet will die in a messy fashion but it will not be quick or painless.
hiding dead pilots isn't that easy.
that dead pilot the other day was quickly identified.
Bruh, singular people from the sinking of Moskva still prop up as dead periodically. Some relatives had no signs from their men in the army for 1+ year.
>seamen are pilots
/k/ - misunderstood genuises
Why are you being brown?
The logic is that they hide KIA.
Russia has only built 150 Su-34s and 150 Su-35s. We don't know how many of those are flight worthy.
I think it's the Russians that changed, they must have gone from conserving aircraft to more forward deployments, we have heard them talk about near continuous use of glide bombs to strike ardvarkia
They've been using them heavily for months. I think it's the Ukies finally shifting from city defense to frontline deployments.
They tried the meatwaves, now they're using metalwaves.
Russia has been relying more heavily on glide bombs because even with a fresh infusion of North Korean shells, their actual artillery platforms are still suffering heavy attrition from Ukrainian counterbattery. They still have planes thanks to being heavily conservative with their use for most of the war, but now that they're being pressed into frontline service again, we're seeing spikes in losses because Russian pilots don't know how to deal with air defenses.
It seems Russia is now facing a similar problem that the USAF did in Vietnam.
Are you seriously comparing Vietnam era SEAD/DEAD against Soviet systems to the same against modern US systems? Are you fricking moronic?
>begging the question
>ad-hominem
Done.
Do you have any idea what TVM means?
>moving the goalpost
See?
Anon, you're a midwit and you need to realize that fact. You don't know as much as you think you do. The problems the US faced in Vietnam are very different to those the Russians are facing in Ukraine. Accept your place.
>no argument
Concession accepted.
Not anon but you’re sperging out on the wrong point.
He’s saying that the attrition rates for such little tactical benefit is reminiscent of US losses in Vietnam. Russia is obviously doing worse, meaning the calculus is way more dire than the situation US pilots faced.
A few months back Ukraine received at least one additional patriot battery in addition to the at least two system they were previously using. Since then, they've been bolder with forward deploying at least one patriot in a more offensive role.
Russians got uppity with their glide bombs, Ukraine probably snuck a patriot next to the front lines to surprise them
Zaluzhnyy got replaced by Syrskyy
>tfw Zaluzhnyy was a fricking AA sniper but couldn't do much with it because he was stuck in Kyiv
My God...the Ukrainians must have figured out how to inject Boris Johnson genes into other people...
The russians are more and more aggressively using glidebomb (they've finally "invented" JDAM like kits for their FAB bombs). It's their recent super weapon, because the they can demolish pretty much anything with them. Usually they can drop them just about from far away as to not get targeted by AA, but there are limits to this.
Because only the stupidest of shills think a town of 30k is a major victory, Russians are pushing hard after Avdiivka trying to make a breakthrough. But They Can’t SEAD
It’s the La Li Lu Le Lo
Russian recent successes in the field seem to be heavily correlated with their ability to deploy aircraft closer to the front line. Ukraine has ideas about Russia doing that.
Clearly Russia has realized that these "irreplaceable" fighters are useless anyway, so they might as well exhaust them for some gains.
Russia is attempting to gain more ground so they are throwing more shit, it will be interesting to see how much of their hard to replace air force they are willing to throw into the meat grinder
they're finally using their air force when they were just using bombers to launch long range missiles before way outside of the range of AD. Now they're actually using their fighter bombers to bomb shit and they're taking losses.
Yeah but why now?Did they actually believe that Ukraine would collapse after Avdiivka?Or did they just decide that they no longer care if they take losses?
Probably the latter, there's likely been major pressure on them to actually get shit done.
F-16 being deployed, and it's increasingly obvious given how far these are away from even the line of contact. The entire surge since December is probably mostly this.
Nice!
Xaxaxaxa! Stupid hohols are helping to clear out hangar space for our new Su-57s*~~))
>(07.30.)
Is this supposed to be the time of day?
So that's 7 in a week? How many planes does Russia have left?
They've got more planes than pilots IIRC.
>more planes than pilots
So how long until we start seeing kamikazes?
>start
classic
>the parachute at the end
gets me every fricking time
Holy shit, I've never seen this angle.
The problem with that webm is that it has been mirrored. You can see the sign on the store near the end is backwards. Sukhoi should come from the right.
world of tanks footage and HATO warcrime
Any proofs?
add it to the list
>ETERNAL FLIGHT
sexy af, they will be stopping air operations soon at this rate
My guess is that it is the mix of the following:
1) They are trying to capitalize Ukies pulling out of Avdiivka, trying to push them further.
2) Ukies taking advantage of this and pushing some more advanced AA gear close to front lines.
3) Russian aviation is running on fumes. They have been using their planes way too much compared to maintenance hours. They have skipped on maintenance cycles and have difficulties getting spare parts. At worst they have to completely overhaul the engines after 100-200 flight hours, depending on plane type. And they just can't keep up. So they know that their planes are reaching the end of their lifespan. They are getting to the point where they are not sure if the plane can return back to the field. So they have decided to use them while they still have them.
All this leads to Russian aviation taking much bigger risks than before. Frick it, just load them full of bombs and send them to chase the retreating ukies. And then they fly straight to some pushed-forwards SAM-battery.
> Russian aviation is running on fumes
most people don't understand just how expensive the whole aviation business is, just the maintenance costs more than the whole tanks/arty budget combined, not to mention the pilot's training
This there is a very large difference in flying a few propaganda trips around England and full on 100 sorties a day.
And we know what the operational attrition of the truck and tanks looks like...
There is a reason the video that get posted on the evening news have so much shit censored, so you can't tell the Date or the plane numbers.
could be this?
It could be loads of different AA systems. The fact people think it's Patriot is just cope because it is the most advanced AA system in theatre. So you can't be lost to a Gepard or whatever, it has to be Patriot.
The important factor is range. Going by where the planes are shoot down and distance to the front, Patriot is the most plausible.
That makes what (supposedly) 7 this week? There's only been photographic evidence of one correct? Or has there been any more?
One of the Su-35s was confirmed and at least 2 of the Su-34s after Russian sources mentioned search and rescue operations for multiple pilots
>proofs?
Proofs are that even Russians aren't denying but Reee'ing about eternal Flight sukhois.
>Maybe is Russia is pushing hard right now because major aid packages are being held up and they want to maximize their advantage while they have it
Yeah I'm pretty sure this factors in
If you make the assumption that the aid will come eventually, then no matter how bad the ratios are for attacking now, they're better than they will be in the future. Also helps them push the "ukraine is losing so no point in helping them :^)" narrative even if the territorial gains are objectively very minor and come at absurd costs.
I do not believe current russian military leadership could have arrived at this plan.
It's too logical and relies on soft subversive propaganda effect rather than bruteforce bullshit.
>MiG-23 obr. 2024
They just don't stop eh?
>bunch of bros going around in a patriot shooting down enemy planes all day erry day
what a life
any reason why su-34 keep getting L after L?
It's a fighter-bomber, so it operates close to the frontline.
>As it’s turning out, Avdiivka was a catastrophic failure, not a planned withdrawal. The withdrawal was officially ordered, reportedly, AFTER those positions had already begun collapsing.
I am very demoralized
To play double's advocate.
That can be true and Russia could have still won a pyrrhic victory. The two are not mutually exclusive.
blyat
Let me guess, New York Times which employs three Russians who are probably FSB and has the editorial position of "Ukraine should just give in and get assfricked"?
Look, not every bearer of bad Ukrainian news is brown or lives in a woodrot hut in the middle of a shit hole 3rd world country
It was the New York Times, wasn't it?
Actually I'm pretty sure I read it on BBC, I'm not certain though.
inb4 bbc just as bad
It was the New York Times then.
and Reuters, CNN, the Telegraph, BBC, WashPo. You can just google "Ukraine" and check the news section.
I think the SU-34 is a shitty fighter jet. Also why haven't they deployed the SU-57's yet to blow up the Patriots? I thought it was a fifth gen fighter that could easily evade enemy radar??
because the su57 like any Russian claims are a meme
Su57's biggest problem is that its a russian project, so its built on lies from the get go
Maybe it was there but it couldn't be seen because it's so stealthy
>Reuters
Literally has a contract with TASS to repost their shit
Unlimited press freedom is a mistake, during WW1&2 even the UK and US dealt with 5th columnists very quickly. You now have western media outlets spamming vatnik demoralization 24/7 because it gets more attention and revenue. Imagine if Ukraine did that, while their soldiers are dying to defend their country sheltered journo rats would post about inevitable defeat and a collapsing economy.
These aren't news, though, they're glavset fantasies.
what happens to pilots
yes it was a catastrophe, they had to leave 3 wounded men and russian subhumans tied them up and murdered them
Even by the worst accounts, don't people only use "Hundreds" instead of even a singular "Thousand"? I've seen it mentioned a few times before.
>As it’s turning out, Avdiivka was a catastrophic failure, not a planned withdrawal.
kek, not even ziggers say that. Even they admit Ukrainians left in decent order and Russians failed to encircle any significant amount of men.
I'll believe it when i see photographic of video proof. I saw one SU-35 fall from the sky but is there footage of the rest? These successes showing up after they just suffered a defeat is suss. Could be Ukraine propaganda, could be Russia moronation trying to push, could go either way.
Do you really think that you are going to see photografic evidence of crashed airplanes that went down in rural, occupied Ukraine?
Expect the russians to be completely silent on this. One shot down aircraft demonstrates capability, which is crucial to inflict such losses.
>Do you really think that you are going to see photografic evidence of crashed airplanes that went down in rural, occupied Ukraine?
I didn't say they are obligated to provide proof for every jet they shoot down, especially since it's probably behind enemy lines now. I said i can't just blindly believe what one side of this war says. Visual confirmation has been the standard for equipment losses since the start of the war and it's the only standard that can be trusted. So I'll take the news with a grain of salt until they can be confirmed. Also this is the most filmed and photographed war in history so it's not out of the realm of reality that footage can surface (just like that one Flanker).
Shut the frick up snowBlack person, you don't know who i am or what i think.
It took 2 days to confirm the Su-35s pilot death
I think of the 7 at least 4-5 have been confirmed by zigger sources. There was also a video of one falling out of the sky and another video of them recovering a dead pilot in the water by Mariupol
All these Boris Johnsons are getting out of control . Thre are marauding bands of them operating behind russian lines, launching starstreaks at everything that flies out there,
I wonder if the name Boris Johnson will be adopted by special forces the way the Jolly Roger was adopted by submarine crews.
I doubt many SAS operators are memeing on /k/. They probably don't even know about it
>I doubt many SAS operators are memeing on /k/
Oh you poor naïve man.
this is the true reason why our navy cant get a ship out of harbour and trident tests are failing. we've moved the entire navy and nuclear forces budget to the next best thing - the SuperBorisJohnson detachment
Can we see it?
>cant see it not real cope
Are you a toddler?
But how can you tel it is in fact real? What's the standard?
So no standard, you just don't question what your team says. Great approach bro. You learned that from the ziggers?
Yo pituhi go see this one
I remember when a Russian couldn't make a post without being harassed by poorly drawn roosters
I'm Ukrainian and I question those claims.
maybe some proofs are in order
Exactly, some proofs wouldn't hurt
Too bad no-one has seen any
Not true, there are proofs for two planes. Zero for the rest of them
Your proofs are not proofs.
looked a little like goatse in thumbnail
Russians don't even dare to say they are Russians on /k/ anymore. The scuttle around like the spiteful little cucks they are trying to stir up flame wars.
/k/ has been derussified.
All fricking katsaps must fricking hang.
THANK YOU PATRIOT
A-50 got shot down today too lmao at this rate the Russian air force will cease to exist in a few years