Another glaring flaw was the lack of ATGM mounted to the warrior. Small numbers of vehicles had bolt on Milans added but they required the gunner to lean out of the turret and expose himself. This was in stark contrast to the Bradley whose gunner could fire the tow missiles using his own excellent sights without ever having to leave the vehicle. The Milan also couldn’t be reloaded from inside the vehicle like the Bradley could and it only had one ATGM at the ready compared to the Bradley’s 2
You just... wake up, sit bolt upright and start muttering shit like this, don't you?
I’m sorry but how does this deflect from the topic at hand. The warrior is rife with flaws
So why not lobby the govt and get a petition going instead of boring us all with your drivel/concerns here?
Why would I lobby a foreign government to fix their poor choices when I can just point out its flaws
>Poor choices
At no point ever did the 30mm Rarden cause any kind of scandal, nor did anyone die as a result of the cannon not being stabilised or belt fed.
The government would likely turn around and say it was money well saved as the more expensive autocannons would have had zero effect on its service.
If the Warrior had terrible armour and kept getting soldiers killed to the point it had to be withdrawn from theatre and replaced entirely by a different vehicle. That would be a good reason to constantly post and obsess about it, but it didn't it was as safe as houses and everyone loved it. Sorry it hurts your feelings so much.
>The government would likely turn around and say it was money well saved as the more expensive autocannons would have had zero effect on its service.
That’s called cope
What do you call your constant posting in the subject? Autistic Obsession?
A gentle reminder
No, its a sign that you are in poor mental health.
They did.
Ocelot is a terrible vehicle. Not a true mrap at all. That explains its poor service record
>Ocelot is a terrible vehicle. Not a true mrap at all.
>monocoque V-shape hull
>not a true MRAP
And btw, there was also Husky (came before Foxhound) and Mastiff, Wolfhound, Ridgeback and Panther. You have no idea what you're talking about. I can only presume a Briton fricked your mother (or father or dog)
>certainly not your Gf though, as such a thing has never existed.
>have 10 bad vehicles instead of 1 really good one
>bad
HUGE IF TRUE! Link?
It was smarter of the Americans to replace the Bradley in a coin environment with purpose built MRAPs. The British should have done the same
>Smarter
Yeah to avoid more of those nasty pictures of Bradley's terrible armour exposed for what it truly is.
Bradley had fine armor. Huge IEDs kill all flat bottomed vehicles. If the warrior deployed more than a few times you would understand that
Warrior was deployed for the duration of the war in Iraq and most of the war in Afghanistan. Generally, when you want to argue with people about something, you do some research on the topic before flapping your wienerholster.
The British had nothing assignments and rarely saw combat. A start contrast from the heavy combat seen by the Americans
>tell me you know nothing without telling me you know nothing.
I'll take 'What is Helmand' for 500, Alex
Nah it got fricked over constantly by RPGs the Warrior just laughed at them and remained intact. Meanwhile the Bradley did picrel.
He's just a resident aspie shill stop giving him ~~*you*~~'s
I wouldn't worry about why he does it.
ayo dis homie posted in another thread by mistake
>Warriortard makes yet another thread filled with nonsense
>coper deflects from discussing actual capabilities of military vehicles because his favorite country built the worst in class
>The Milan also couldn’t be reloaded from inside the vehicle like the Bradley
I wouldn't class this as reloading from inside the vehicle when you have to open up hatches
I love the warrior it looks so good. Why does it live rent free in your mind
It looks good but it was outdated when it was first adopted compared to other vehicles in its class.
Nah, I know your usual speil.
It was no worse than the others. The Bradley had the best armament of the time that's about it. German Marder didn't have a stabiliser neither did the French.
It's sad you have spiralled out of control threads weren't too bad before you outed yourself as a poorgay with a shit job.
The Bradley was the best, then marder
Post your craftsman bag mate let's have a laugh again
Is that gun stabilized
Cmon mate, post the stonemountain wallet too. Amazon special only $1.99.
One Bradley could delete that entire platoon. That’s why the warrior is widely seen as so bad
At least post the stool dude
>uttering absolute nonsense when confronted with uncomfortable facts
Warriorposting has broken this noble Brit
>warriotard thread 1016
>Who is warriortard? Stable proofs?
>Some time later
>HA it was me all along
Just post the bag, card, stool or wallet with a happy smile to let us know your OK.
>more absolute nonsense instead of trying to defend the warrior (you really can’t)
get help anon
You no fun anymore, get new material.
>it looks straight out of my heckin anime!
Genuine question; did a bong frick your wife?
Why do you have 3 threads in the catalog already warriortard?
>Stryker Dragoon
>Stinger
>Warrior
Is this what mental illness looks like? I’m educating on the warrior I don’t have time to be making other threads
Anti-warrior poster absolutely getting mogged in the stinger thread. Multiple pro stinger posters have joined in and he’s been quiet ever since
no one loves you anon, go outside
Are you moronic? I have a wife and children that love me
Lmao no you don't, your an autistic incel with a shit job and even worse tools
>worst IFV
>worst service rifle
What’s going on in Britain
A lot of people suspect Chinese influence in modern British procurement. A weakened Britain benefits the Chinese above all else
Absolutely BTFO
Warriortard sucks donkey dicks.
Echo Tango Mike Bravo Bravo Three Five Five Nine Zero Zero