An Apache pilot thinks this attack took place at night because of the contrast and the gunner not switching to a visible spectrum camera during the at...

An Apache pilot thinks this attack took place at night because of the contrast and the gunner not switching to a visible spectrum camera during the attack

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does the Ka-52 even have a (color) visual camera?
    I've only seen them using (apparently) MWIR thermals and monochromatic NIR (or SWIR).

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It would have to because thermals are useless in rain and dense kinds of smoke and fog.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >and dense kinds of smoke and fog.
        Are you moronic?
        Thermals (LWIR and MWIR) can see through fog and smoke as long as they're aren't hot. They can see though oil and water smoke/fog. Vis/NIR spectrum are easier to obstruct.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          You have never seen real fog in your life.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous
            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Retailer showing ideal conditions

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >moving the Black personpost

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You've never seen real smoke in your life.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                homie fog is not smoke
                fog is dense water patricles
                smoke is DUST

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, in fact both are colloids, the difference is particle size (some fogs are larger) but the IR is always less affected because its wavelength +10 times longer (Tyndall scattering).
                That aside the advantage of thermal is that it's easier to see object through 'smoke' if the object itself is an emitter, unlike NIR or vis you can't avoid emit IR. Even if some smoke makes the visibility in the IR far worse you still can see some hot objects behind it. Of course a really thick fog or a wall are opaque enough even for the IR.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                homie water absorbs IR

                stop being an idiot

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >niggi witir ibisirbi IRI
                Yes moron, but the matter is HOW MUCH compared to visual.

                Read homie read.
                https://www.flir.com/discover/rd-science/can-thermal-imaging-see-through-fog-and-rain/

                if you can't see with LWIR then you can't see with vis, asat

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >company that sells a thing has a study saying it can do that thing.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >keeps moving the Black personpost

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes moron, but the matter is HOW MUCH compared to visual.

                you cant see shit period if flir was able to see through fog it sure as hell it can see through clouds which....is fog
                and guess what

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Particle size moron.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                oh god its not the particle that matters its the DENSITY you idiot

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Particles length then wavelength can't stop radiation.
                Water vapors in atmosphere indeed absorbs IR (like others gases in the atmosphere). But they do it as spectral lines. Radiation passes through gaps.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Do tanks deploy smoke or fog for concealment?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Do tanks deploy smoke or fog for concealment?

                They deploy IR obscurant smokes for IR and visual concealment or conventional smokes for visual concealment. They are not the same, for example one can see through visual obscurants using sensors to kill the enemy.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >smokes
                It stands to reason that its a fog.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          You'll be surprised

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      at the start of the war there was a russian milblogger that said nearly all of them are different from each other depending on parts available during construction, some have french thermals some "russian made" ones, some have british laser warning systems some have empty ones (which is proably how the stugna clips came to be).......whatever was at hand.
      so i'm sure some have them and some only have monos.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      some yes, some Ka52s have the camera above the wienerpit, other below, it's very messy because Russians being both poor and corrupt mixed the lots so each one is unique in a way

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >unique, hand-built, irreplaceable relics
        something something Russia is 40k

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          With the Ka-52, they are specifically the faction that thinks it's a good idead to:
          >reduce armor
          >reduce sensors and electronics
          >degrade flight characteristics and endurance
          >add more weapon hardpoints

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Which Ork faction steals the most? Probably the Freebootas huh cos the anal sex is implied in the pirate theme. Blood Axes at least into tactics

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Deffskullz are the loota faction.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s a shame because I love how they look.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Does the Ka-52 even have a (color) visual camera?
      It has daylight white and black camera.
      Also it has direct view periscope above wienerpit (like tank gun sight) but you can't conviniently record view from there.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Does the Ka-52 even have a (color) visual camera?
      >I've only seen them using (apparently) MWIR thermals and monochromatic NIR (or SWIR).
      it uses an SNES superscope, adapted for vatnik rocket launchers

      this is the power of sanckshoooooooooons

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    SIRS

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What could the Ukies have done to counter the Ka52 given nobody can fly safely beyond their lines? Even if they had a radar to tell them it was there do they have anything capable of hitting it? If this is the new meta and Ukraine doesn't have the attack helis to counter then they're pretty boned.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No point of using VIS if NIR gives enemies glowing

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >An Apache pilot thinks this attack took place at night because of the contras
    Well it's obvious. in sunlight you ain't gonna get tracks hotter than hull and turret lit by sunlight.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Literally destroy a nato column.
    This ka-52 chopper is based.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Unrelated. Also, ghost of kiev. Shhh

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >context is king and queen
    what did he mean by this?

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous
  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    an apache for comparison

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *