According to classified Pentagon documents leaked online, China conducted a flight test of a developmental DF-27 IRBM-class hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) on Feb. 25. The HGV flew for ~12 minutes and traveled ~2,100km.
https://twitter.com/ryankakiuchan/status/1645657427315142656?t=HQlbsn4ArIe6y5mKxJ_Wvw&s=19
>US mogged again
How will mutts cope this time
The only reason China invests so much into this stuff is because they still can’t into jet engines and know they’ll never be able to gain air superiority. There’s not much point to having hypersonic weapons in US doctrine. They’d be nice to have for sure but it’s not really a necessity and we can take our time getting there.
What’s China’s cope for having ships with backwards hatches and tanks that give the crew carbon monoxide poisoning?
Lmao
>be Chinese
>can’t into basic tech
>develop super advanced tomorrow land technology instead
You muttmen are so pathetic, it’s laughable.
ME CHINESE ME MAKE JOKE
ME PUT PEEPEE IN YOUR ASS
homosexual
Manufacturing jet engines is more complicated than you’d think and hypersonic flight has been a thing since the 60’s. You are moronic.
It’s such a thing that the US has already mastered it. Except it didn’t lmao.
Designing and building modern turbofans requires several orders of magnitude greater engineering effort/experience than a HGV. I’d argue designing and building the machines that build modern turbofans require greater expertise
>US mogged
>leaked documents only showcases the extent of US intelligence and how much they were well aware of "secret" operations
China knows the same shit about you, they just don't leak like you amateurs
t14 armata moment
by investing another 2 gorilion dollars into a new better missle even if these news are fake
are you fricking morons never gonna learn ?
>How will mutts cope this time
The will create an alternative reality where hypersonic weapons doesn´t exist (aka:Cope) and they will make troll post out of anger (aka: seethe) on /k/ and reddit
Can anyone here explain the difference between centripetal motion and centrifugal motion? I'm super confused.
No
centripetal force make things move in a circle, like the string tied to a rock held by you, that string's tension points inwards to the centrum of the circle traced by the rock, keeping the rock in a curved trajectory
centrifugal force is a pseudo-force (meaning that it is not a true force but an illusion), it is the sensation an object feels as its inertial movement tries to continue in a straight path while it is on a curved path of motion
this is a rough and moronic simplification
You know how every force has an equal and opposite reaction?
If you're in free fall, you feel no force.
If you're standing still in a grav field, you're exerting force and something else is exerting the opposite of said force on you.
I.e. hold an apple in your hand, the weight of the apple pushes down, your hand pushes up.
If you're moving in a circle, there's an acceleration towards the center since you're constantly changing direction (if the acceleration stops you'll be moving in a straight line). If there's an acceleration, there must be a force. That's the centripetal force, towards the center of the circle. However, this also means you'll be exerting an opposite force against whatever it is that's keeping you moving in a circle. That's called the centrifugal force, as in centrifuges.
Some people will say it's a ficticious force. However such a thing doesn't exist. In physics all frames of reference are equal, meaning the perspective of the spinning object being at rest and of the non spinning frame being at rest are equally valid, and neither force more "real". We should strap said people to centrifuges. Best of luck!
Centripetal force is a reaction to the constant inward acceleration needed to move continuously in a circle
Centrifugal force doesn't exist
Pretty sure this is the first time this page was ever posted publicly after the discordserversource was deleted.
>The twittergay who posted it works in USAF
lol
apparently some chinese site has most of them or a lot of them. BBC says 100 odd were leaked. Also I saw a meme here
these are my holy grail pls link em if you find them anons. I have almost all the ukraine ones that've been posted elsewhere though
It's been some time since this dropped, what are the chances that people are now making credible fakes that were never even part of the original batch of leaks?
All that info there is just a compilation of mostly publicly available shit. Out of 110 docs i have only got my eyes on 40 and none of it is critical information.
The remaining 70 about Iran, South Kore, Israel and China are the big fish not the slavic Black person war reports.
The issue is these millenial and zoomer generayions are absokutly pussified and all the homosexuals that alegedly have them wont post because muh "FBI" will knock on their door.
God i hate these homosexual generations, in the old days these would be on wikileaks the next day.
Tldr zoomies are too moronic and lazy to make credible forgeries so i wouldnt worry about it.
>in the old days these would be on wikileaks the next day
I'm honestly impressed that since then nothing has really even come close to replacing them, all this info yet it feels like we're in the dark ages because it's all literalwhos on Twitter trying to throw together something or clueless 'professionals' and open organizations coasting by on the credibility of their positions.
The bad guys won.
It really is funny,the more regulated the internet gets the less usefull it is,like most things in life really.If only they would hold the big corpos,banks etc to the same standards...kek.
Frick the state.
0 chance
They tried this shit months ago too, same garbage printed on paper, folded up with the same disgusting yellow tint. It was fake then, its still fake now. Ziggers still frick up basic acronyms, make stupid mistakes and don't proof read their shit
>They tried this shit months ago too, same garbage printed on paper, folded up with the same disgusting yellow tint. It was fake then, its still fake now. Ziggers still frick up basic acronyms, make stupid mistakes and don't proof read their shit
Its fake and gay but I'm not sure its ziggers. I think its originates in the east coast USA or UK
That makes sense, the discord chodes who saw the original leaks are already jumping to defend the leaker and threatening to release (or re-release) all the pics if he's arrested, because muh freedom and sheeit. These guys give off the same vibe as the dudes who still defend Snowden even after he got a free apartment and Russian citizenship, useful idiots at the very least.
All I can say for sure is that this isn’t a real daily intelligence brief. Everything from the formatting to the language used is wrong. Picrel is still what higher level briefings generally look like unless the target audience is a bunch of nobody E-3 intel analysts in the army, in which case they aren’t telling them anything that important anyway.
Forgot pic
You don't have to be from russia to be a zigger
Is there any centralised place to download these all or do you have to get it sent through dms of discord or something?
t.Not a glowie
>China is already developing second generation HGVs as the US just cancelled their only HGV the AGM-183 due to all the failures
IT'S OVER!
damn the yanks really have glowies everywhere. The extent of information in the previous leaks hints at the entire kremlin being compromised lol
Is this like the intelligence brief they give the president every morning?
No, more like the intel briefs they give lieutenant colonels once a month. it's a generic military style and format
Pretty much the briefs they give any of the heads of the executive branch yeah. Most of it won’t be in detail.
Of course Everyone spies on the USA too. Most countries goverments have issues with the leaks themselves rather than the info. They already we know that they know someone knows ect.
So fake and gay then?
That looks like a super dumbed down report for some over paid moron boomer in a $3000 suit. It doesn't even use complete sentences in most places. What fricking morons. Unironically /misc/tards make more sophisticated posts...no wonder DoD can't figure anons out, they use big words and complete sentences. KEK
What does "hypersonic" actually mean?
Is the American Phoenix hypersonic since it goes at like Mach 5?
Technically, yes.
Every IRBM and ICBM is also hypersonic.
Then why ar wthe chinks and the Russian so smug? Isn't the phoenix like 40+ year old tech by now?
an ICBM is hypersonic because of the gravity effect when it's descending. a hypersonic missile's speed - like the one that Russia has - isn't like that. picrel is the stage where a MIRV/ICBM becomes hypersonic in.
>the one that Russia has - isn't like that.
except it is lol
>read about it more
>it's actually a simple ballistic missile
>Kinzhal actually does have a re-entry phase because that's the only way it can reach hypersonic speed without hypersonic gliding technology
wew
it's quite literally an air launched Iskander. Strapping the second stage of a Minuteman to an F-15 was proposed and started going through wind tunnel tests back in the early 2000s before realizing even as an interim solution it wasn't worth it and instead just went back to slow cooking real hypersonic weapons programs.
That's hilarious
Is the missile on top because if it was below, the wheels couldn't reach the ground?
Also, was it intended for a nuclear warhead or just conventional?
Zircon is supposed to be scramjet. But Kinzhal, according to Ukrainians, still works and seems like (interview on BBC) you really can't see it on radars.
isn't basically anything going hypersonic going to be invisible because its covered in the plasma sheath? Did they figure out how to effectively guide the missile yet? Because the sheath also makes it opaque to basically all other kinds of electromagnetic radiation so you have to go with shit like inertial guidance which is why nobody reasonable pursued hypersonics to this day
A lot of missiles are hypersonic. Anything that goes Mach +.
There are two types of hypersonic. The first is simply something that can go Mach 5+, the second is something that can do Mach 5+ and maneuver in atmosphere without tearing itself to pieces. The first is pretty easy to do, the second is complete fricking bullshit made up by Russia and China and the DoD for gibs.
So you're basically describing the Phoenix then right?
>second is complete fricking bullshit made up by Russia and China and the DoD for gibs.
moron doesn't know about Sanger and Qian Xue Shen hypersonic glider trajectories which were first conceived at the end of WW2 for intercontinental bombing and transport.
It's more to do with Its unpredictable "gliding" trajectory + speed that makes It much harder to intercept than your usual ballistic missiles (which are hypersonic on their terminal phase but their trajectory is easy to predict)
This is just US proxy war. It's not possible to deny after "leaks".
All intelligence data come to Ukraine. US knows everything: where to strike, when to strike, all Russian plans, everything. It's basically map hack for Ukraine. And Russia can't do anything about it. Any attempt to destroy all those giga-advanced spy satellites will cause WW3. The best you can it to dab on drone out of anger. Ultimate cuckolding. US wanted this for decades. One big bait, The Black Swan.
sometimes i wish the average person could know just how deep intel goes, this website would crash legitimately
>t. intel in the usaf
If this shit were a newspaper I would read it every day.