lol, for now I've saved at least 2GB of russian frick ups. And that's probably rooky numbers. We litteraly have enough content to banter the vatniks for a lifetime.
homie, Muttoids losing to goat herders in flip flops is and will forever be the biggest blunder of the 21st century.
Imagine telling your grandson that people with rail guns and nuclear ICBM submarines lost to illiterate peasants with no helmets nor bullet proof vests. If that story was in the bible not even the most devoyhkssyut creationist would believe that.
Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away
Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield
its not a production model though, all the T-14s that exist are prototypes
2 years ago
Anonymous
Shouldn't qualified experts be building the prototypes? It does not take long to learn how to weld to the minimum acceptable level.
2 years ago
Anonymous
If anything that makes it worse. Figuring out affordable mass production of each component is harder than making a handful of proof-of-concepts using whatever tools and machinery you want.
>The British weren't beaten by the Americans, French, Dutch and Spanish in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Americans only came out of their forests when the British went away
That's what you sound like.
we literally didn't experience military defeat in the field or anything close to it, how is this a difficult concept to wrap your head around? the 'war' was practically over for the US and we were sitting back funneling billions into a black hole trying to prop up afgani democracy. it's more equivalent to if the brits had, instead of colonizing, gone full moron and given the indians gibs to set up their own govt on british principles. a mind-blowingly stupid decision, but not because of some military defeat
inb4 these were accidents, you think Muttoids would admit losing an aircraft to Talibans ?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Talibans had a higher k:d ratio than you + ANA + ANP + contractors
proofs?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>you + ANA + ANP + contractors
the us part of that is like .01%. no one said the ANA didn't lose
2 years ago
Anonymous
that's like saying Germany and Japan didn't lose WWII because their generals make up 0% of combat losses
2 years ago
Anonymous
so your argument is that america lost a military conflict second hand through the ANA, and what you have to back that up is... that generals are part of their respective militaries. mm, yes. quite coherent.
2 years ago
Anonymous
the ANA were following your orders, that's like saying France didn't lose, the French Foreign legion lost
the whole world is laughing at you when you say you didn't lose
Talibans control more land now than they did in 2001
2 years ago
Anonymous
the FFL is a french army corp. which part of the american armed forces did the ANA serve under?
2 years ago
Anonymous
The difference is that Afghanistan was a conventional for like .0002 seconds until becoming a slogging insurgency. Russia is being pushed back with tanks and planes likes its the 1940s. ON ITS DOORSTEP. The United States can destroy any nations conventional military forces in weeks, it is inept at the management of what to do after that peace, but this is not anywhere near relatable as columns of Abraham's being destroyed and losing 50k men to the equivalent of Mexico of Canada.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>. ON ITS DOORSTEP. The United States can destroy any nations conventional military forces in weeks,
Muttistan lost to fricking Canada, which is on its doorsteps.
2 years ago
Anonymous
ah, the 200 year old checkmate
2 years ago
Anonymous
And Russia lost to a barely industrialized Japan. JAPAN beat your armies. On land and sea.
2 years ago
Anonymous
that's MRAP, not a tank
2 years ago
Anonymous
>tank
HAHAHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAHA
2 years ago
Anonymous
>all this coping and sneeding about muh taliban
ISAF couldn't beat the Taliban because they were totally indistinguishable from the civilian population. Because of the nature of the mission 99% of ISAF actions were reactive. To actually combat an insurgency like the Taliban you need to actively weed them out like in Malaya or Kenya, but that would have required crimes against humanity and an appetite for extremely violent action that the west did not possess. Even then it's not guaranteed to work, just look at what happened to the Soviets.
The ISAF mission succeeded in making the Taliban go to ground for the last few years of the occupation, and it took several years after the end of the intervention for the Taliban to be able to actively combat the ANA again.
By comparison the Soviet backed government lasted about a year after their withdrawal
>took me 0.001s to find an example
That's not a tank
>Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away
>The British weren't beaten by the Americans, French, Dutch and Spanish in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Americans only came out of their forests when the British went away
That's what you sound like.
The Taliban strategically defeated the US in Afghanistan. Despite twenty years of occupation the US could never defeat the Taliban, they could never destroy their ability to conduct operations or build up an official government army that could stand up to them. It's nowhere near as bad of a defeat as having your shit pushed in by a bunch of far-right football hooligans like Russia's experiencing but it's still a defeat.
>get in a fight >beaten to a pulp >wheezing through your broken face >assailant gets bored and leaves >"I survived. This is a total strategic victory"
The Taliban strategically defeated the US in Afghanistan. Despite twenty years of occupation the US could never defeat the Taliban, they could never destroy their ability to conduct operations or build up an official government army that could stand up to them. It's nowhere near as bad of a defeat as having your shit pushed in by a bunch of far-right football hooligans like Russia's experiencing but it's still a defeat.
Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away
Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield
Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away
Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield
I like to dab on muskals, but this isn't really indicative of much, except that famous Russian attention to detail.
The turret itself is tiny, since there's nobody in it. It's just a gun, a coax, and a loading assembly. Everything else is just a bunch of cladding/applique over the actual armor.
Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away
Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield
homie, Muttoids losing to goat herders in flip flops is and will forever be the biggest blunder of the 21st century.
Imagine telling your grandson that people with rail guns and nuclear ICBM submarines lost to illiterate peasants with no helmets nor bullet proof vests. If that story was in the bible not even the most devoyhkssyut creationist would believe that.
what repercussions for the US will come of it? Seems like the everything has more or less carried on as normal, while Russia is facing an existential crisis
Name the battles the U.S. lost to goat herders in flip-flops. The U.S. literally left their bases and then the Taliban came out if their caves to defeat a bunch of Afghan zoomers. The only point of being there was to get rid of Al Qaeda it wasn't even to keep the Taliban out of government as them becoming a political party had always been discussed. Anyways they are begging us for food now so...
>of the 21st century
its good that you added the qualifier because otherwise we would be talking about when the soviets lost to the same goat herders in halft the time with twice the losses and while killin 10 times as many civilians and collapsing immediatly afterwards.
if only I had your optimism. I think even if they pulled out tomorrow they'd had a headcanon made up by next week, something along the lines of "The entire NATO elite force was in Ukraine that's why we lost!!". And then try again somewhere else in a few years after reswarming.
You seen the recent Vostok-2022? They advertised using 50 ships but only used 5, of which 4 were corvettes and one was a surveillance ship. Kek. The Chinks chipped in another 3 ships.
I think we continually huffed the huffs of our doomposting and fearmongering until we couldn't see what was right in front of us... Even people shitting on Russia with some idea of the corruption and mismanagement must have had some inkling of "oh man though I sure don't hope we have to face them" in their minds.
it was just a zimulacrum all along..
I’ve stopped responding to each and every 3rd-worlder claim of American defeat. They literally don’t care, they’re just here to seethe and work out their envy. So let them, it won’t change anything in the real world.
But what about fighting for the hearts and minds of the new /k/ members so they don't get led astray? Gotta debunk every bs claim until you're worn out brah.
lol, for now I've saved at least 2GB of russian frick ups. And that's probably rooky numbers. We litteraly have enough content to banter the vatniks for a lifetime.
Has anyone made a MEGA folder or something of War footage/pictures? I'm trying to catch up.
>have enough ammunition to banter with vatniks forever
>vatBlack folk cease to exist (dead, russia gone)
monkey paw
/k/ thought Russia could take on NATO and the whole world at once
>/k/ though this. /k/ thought that
homosexual. Shill. homosexualy shill. have a nice day. Or at least get off the board.
Continue shitting yourself.
I need to dive into the archives sometime soon to dig up some delicious posturing from around 2017, I think that was the height of it
I gotchu senpai
Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away
Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield
Jesus christ there are apprentice machinists/fitters/makers here that could do better.
its not a production model though, all the T-14s that exist are prototypes
Shouldn't qualified experts be building the prototypes? It does not take long to learn how to weld to the minimum acceptable level.
If anything that makes it worse. Figuring out affordable mass production of each component is harder than making a handful of proof-of-concepts using whatever tools and machinery you want.
I'd like to see you try to make a better barrel than this*~~
That thing must flex like a banana when it heats up
That would be one helluva case of Peyronie's.
Thats the idea comrade
are they literally making these in a garage with makeshift tools?
imagine the absolute shitfest domestic politics would be if the US was losing irreplaceable equipment like Russia is doing rn
>The British weren't beaten by the Americans, French, Dutch and Spanish in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Americans only came out of their forests when the British went away
That's what you sound like.
So, how many tanks did the Taliban destroy, or how many planes did they shoot down when the US left the country?
As many as russia lost?
T14 Armata presented in Moscow, showing tinfoil armor
Can't be helped if logic is not your strong point.
we literally didn't experience military defeat in the field or anything close to it, how is this a difficult concept to wrap your head around? the 'war' was practically over for the US and we were sitting back funneling billions into a black hole trying to prop up afgani democracy. it's more equivalent to if the brits had, instead of colonizing, gone full moron and given the indians gibs to set up their own govt on british principles. a mind-blowingly stupid decision, but not because of some military defeat
>we literally didn't experience military defeat in the field
you did stupid Muttoid
Talibans had a higher k:d ratio than you + ANA + ANP + contractors
>So, how many tanks did the Taliban destroy,
took me 0.001s to find an example
https://mobile.twitter.com/tghazniwal/status/1172399177642340358
>or how many planes did they shoot down when the US left the country?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aviation_accidents_and_incidents_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan
inb4 these were accidents, you think Muttoids would admit losing an aircraft to Talibans ?
>Talibans had a higher k:d ratio than you + ANA + ANP + contractors
proofs?
>you + ANA + ANP + contractors
the us part of that is like .01%. no one said the ANA didn't lose
that's like saying Germany and Japan didn't lose WWII because their generals make up 0% of combat losses
so your argument is that america lost a military conflict second hand through the ANA, and what you have to back that up is... that generals are part of their respective militaries. mm, yes. quite coherent.
the ANA were following your orders, that's like saying France didn't lose, the French Foreign legion lost
the whole world is laughing at you when you say you didn't lose
Talibans control more land now than they did in 2001
the FFL is a french army corp. which part of the american armed forces did the ANA serve under?
The difference is that Afghanistan was a conventional for like .0002 seconds until becoming a slogging insurgency. Russia is being pushed back with tanks and planes likes its the 1940s. ON ITS DOORSTEP. The United States can destroy any nations conventional military forces in weeks, it is inept at the management of what to do after that peace, but this is not anywhere near relatable as columns of Abraham's being destroyed and losing 50k men to the equivalent of Mexico of Canada.
>. ON ITS DOORSTEP. The United States can destroy any nations conventional military forces in weeks,
Muttistan lost to fricking Canada, which is on its doorsteps.
ah, the 200 year old checkmate
And Russia lost to a barely industrialized Japan. JAPAN beat your armies. On land and sea.
that's MRAP, not a tank
>tank
HAHAHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAHA
>all this coping and sneeding about muh taliban
ISAF couldn't beat the Taliban because they were totally indistinguishable from the civilian population. Because of the nature of the mission 99% of ISAF actions were reactive. To actually combat an insurgency like the Taliban you need to actively weed them out like in Malaya or Kenya, but that would have required crimes against humanity and an appetite for extremely violent action that the west did not possess. Even then it's not guaranteed to work, just look at what happened to the Soviets.
The ISAF mission succeeded in making the Taliban go to ground for the last few years of the occupation, and it took several years after the end of the intervention for the Taliban to be able to actively combat the ANA again.
By comparison the Soviet backed government lasted about a year after their withdrawal
>took me 0.001s to find an example
That's not a tank
But the British did lose militarily. Big time. Saratoga ring a bell?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Yorktown
you are a literal absolute moron.
Yes, but they still chose to leave instead of keep fighting. That's the point.
they had to surrender to leave lol
he doesn't understand the difference, he is too smoothbrained to comprehend.
What are we looking at here? Gaps showing fake armor?
>Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away
common cope. many such cases.
>get in a fight
>beaten to a pulp
>wheezing through your broken face
>assailant gets bored and leaves
>"I survived. This is a total strategic victory"
The Taliban strategically defeated the US in Afghanistan. Despite twenty years of occupation the US could never defeat the Taliban, they could never destroy their ability to conduct operations or build up an official government army that could stand up to them. It's nowhere near as bad of a defeat as having your shit pushed in by a bunch of far-right football hooligans like Russia's experiencing but it's still a defeat.
>those pics
I dont get it
Hey guys, do you want to see a fat Putin?
Armor as thin as Putin's dick
sheet metal is not great armor
Hell ya design tanks like my fancy gpu fan housing, if it covered in hype angles it must be good
I like to dab on muskals, but this isn't really indicative of much, except that famous Russian attention to detail.
The turret itself is tiny, since there's nobody in it. It's just a gun, a coax, and a loading assembly. Everything else is just a bunch of cladding/applique over the actual armor.
"But, sir, it's a prototype. It's not ready."
Armatard was probably conscripted
How little we knew.
homie, Muttoids losing to goat herders in flip flops is and will forever be the biggest blunder of the 21st century.
Imagine telling your grandson that people with rail guns and nuclear ICBM submarines lost to illiterate peasants with no helmets nor bullet proof vests. If that story was in the bible not even the most devoyhkssyut creationist would believe that.
serbia is not a country
>t.
what repercussions for the US will come of it? Seems like the everything has more or less carried on as normal, while Russia is facing an existential crisis
Name the battles the U.S. lost to goat herders in flip-flops. The U.S. literally left their bases and then the Taliban came out if their caves to defeat a bunch of Afghan zoomers. The only point of being there was to get rid of Al Qaeda it wasn't even to keep the Taliban out of government as them becoming a political party had always been discussed. Anyways they are begging us for food now so...
>50,000 dead for this
two more feints and Putin will feint out of Moscow to his ural bunker
I'm more concerned about number of civillians killed. It will take decades to recover. I wonder how long will it take for life to be normal again.
>homie, Muttoids losing to goat herders in flip flops is and will forever be the biggest blunder of the 21st century.
>of the 21st century
its good that you added the qualifier because otherwise we would be talking about when the soviets lost to the same goat herders in halft the time with twice the losses and while killin 10 times as many civilians and collapsing immediatly afterwards.
Talibans ars still using 60 years old Soviets equipments, your blackhawks are already crashing after one year of use
your weapons and vehicles are so unreliable and trash even terrorists prefer to use Toyotas over your humvees
And yet somehow Russia managed to do worse during their time in Afghanistan.
We did have the battle of Khasham, but that was just a little merc trolling.
i forgor
the best thing out this war is that no unironical russcuck will show their face here for 20+ years
>baltic fleet again deployed in foreign theatre
Second black sea squadron confirmed?
if only I had your optimism. I think even if they pulled out tomorrow they'd had a headcanon made up by next week, something along the lines of "The entire NATO elite force was in Ukraine that's why we lost!!". And then try again somewhere else in a few years after reswarming.
Imagine if that guy was a redeployed from the moskva
US GDP vs russian GDP
>country with a bigger population has a bigger GDP
woooooooooooooow
It also looks bad per capita.
They're Russian. That's reason enough to mock them.
Remember this? Insanely huge russian troop exercises (against OSCE rules), while NATO only did exercises with a few thousand or ten thousand soldiers.
Guess NATO knew back then that they can beat russia in a 10:1 scenario
damn. you can actually measure the depletion of russian army funds by the shrinking of their excercises over time
You seen the recent Vostok-2022? They advertised using 50 ships but only used 5, of which 4 were corvettes and one was a surveillance ship. Kek. The Chinks chipped in another 3 ships.
Oh shit, totally forgot. Wikileaks cope about PanamaPapers
lizardmen vs. lizardmen, happy to watch them expose one another
It's always a fun watch.
Qrd? This wasn't something I paid much attention to at the time.
I think we continually huffed the huffs of our doomposting and fearmongering until we couldn't see what was right in front of us... Even people shitting on Russia with some idea of the corruption and mismanagement must have had some inkling of "oh man though I sure don't hope we have to face them" in their minds.
it was just a zimulacrum all along..
I’ve stopped responding to each and every 3rd-worlder claim of American defeat. They literally don’t care, they’re just here to seethe and work out their envy. So let them, it won’t change anything in the real world.
But what about fighting for the hearts and minds of the new /k/ members so they don't get led astray? Gotta debunk every bs claim until you're worn out brah.
The people posting those don't believe it, it's just a way of begging for attention because they're too fat to go outside.
There was this as well, but I yeah there wasn't much to make fun of relative to now. We are really spoiled these days.
I remember when /k/ liked tanks and didn't give a frick who made them.