You now remember when this was the best?

You now remember when this was the best PrepHole had to mock Russia with

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lol, for now I've saved at least 2GB of russian fuck ups. And that's probably rooky numbers. We litteraly have enough content to banter the vatniks for a lifetime.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Has anyone made a MEGA folder or something of War footage/pictures? I'm trying to catch up.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >have enough ammunition to banter with vatniks forever
      >vatmorons cease to exist (dead, russia gone)
      monkey paw

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PrepHole thought Russia could take on NATO and the whole world at once

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >PrepHole though this. PrepHole thought that
      gay. Shill. gayy shill. have a nice day. Or at least get off the board.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Continue shitting yourself.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I need to dive into the archives sometime soon to dig up some delicious posturing from around 2017, I think that was the height of it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I gotchu senpai

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        bro, Muttoids losing to goat herders in flip flops is and will forever be the biggest blunder of the 21st century.

        Imagine telling your grandson that people with rail guns and nuclear ICBM submarines lost to illiterate peasants with no helmets nor bullet proof vests. If that story was in the bible not even the most devoyhkssyut creationist would believe that.

        Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away

        Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Jesus christ there are apprentice machinists/fitters/makers here that could do better.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              its not a production model though, all the T-14s that exist are prototypes

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Shouldn't qualified experts be building the prototypes? It does not take long to learn how to weld to the minimum acceptable level.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If anything that makes it worse. Figuring out affordable mass production of each component is harder than making a handful of proof-of-concepts using whatever tools and machinery you want.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'd like to see you try to make a better barrel than this*~~

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That thing must flex like a banana when it heats up

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That would be one helluva case of Peyronie's.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thats the idea comrade

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                are they literally making these in a garage with makeshift tools?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous
        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          imagine the absolute shitfest domestic politics would be if the US was losing irreplaceable equipment like Russia is doing rn

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The British weren't beaten by the Americans, French, Dutch and Spanish in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Americans only came out of their forests when the British went away
          That's what you sound like.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So, how many tanks did the Taliban destroy, or how many planes did they shoot down when the US left the country?

            As many as russia lost?

            [...]

            What are we looking at here? Gaps showing fake armor?

            T14 Armata presented in Moscow, showing tinfoil armor

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Can't be helped if logic is not your strong point.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            we literally didn't experience military defeat in the field or anything close to it, how is this a difficult concept to wrap your head around? the 'war' was practically over for the US and we were sitting back funneling billions into a black hole trying to prop up afgani democracy. it's more equivalent to if the brits had, instead of colonizing, gone full retard and given the indians gibs to set up their own govt on british principles. a mind-blowingly stupid decision, but not because of some military defeat

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >we literally didn't experience military defeat in the field

              you did stupid Muttoid

              Talibans had a higher k:d ratio than you + ANA + ANP + contractors

              So, how many tanks did the Taliban destroy, or how many planes did they shoot down when the US left the country?

              As many as russia lost?

              [...]
              T14 Armata presented in Moscow, showing tinfoil armor

              >So, how many tanks did the Taliban destroy,

              took me 0.001s to find an example

              https://mobile.twitter.com/tghazniwal/status/1172399177642340358

              >or how many planes did they shoot down when the US left the country?

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aviation_accidents_and_incidents_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan

              inb4 these were accidents, you think Muttoids would admit losing an aircraft to Talibans ?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Talibans had a higher k:d ratio than you + ANA + ANP + contractors
                proofs?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you + ANA + ANP + contractors
                the us part of that is like .01%. no one said the ANA didn't lose

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's like saying Germany and Japan didn't lose WWII because their generals make up 0% of combat losses

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so your argument is that america lost a military conflict second hand through the ANA, and what you have to back that up is... that generals are part of their respective militaries. mm, yes. quite coherent.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the ANA were following your orders, that's like saying France didn't lose, the French Foreign legion lost

                the whole world is laughing at you when you say you didn't lose

                Talibans control more land now than they did in 2001

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the FFL is a french army corp. which part of the american armed forces did the ANA serve under?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The difference is that Afghanistan was a conventional for like .0002 seconds until becoming a slogging insurgency. Russia is being pushed back with tanks and planes likes its the 1940s. ON ITS DOORSTEP. The United States can destroy any nations conventional military forces in weeks, it is inept at the management of what to do after that peace, but this is not anywhere near relatable as columns of Abraham's being destroyed and losing 50k men to the equivalent of Mexico of Canada.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >. ON ITS DOORSTEP. The United States can destroy any nations conventional military forces in weeks,

                Muttistan lost to fucking Canada, which is on its doorsteps.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ah, the 200 year old checkmate

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And Russia lost to a barely industrialized Japan. JAPAN beat your armies. On land and sea.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's MRAP, not a tank

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >tank
                HAHAHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAHA

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >all this coping and sneeding about muh taliban
                ISAF couldn't beat the Taliban because they were totally indistinguishable from the civilian population. Because of the nature of the mission 99% of ISAF actions were reactive. To actually combat an insurgency like the Taliban you need to actively weed them out like in Malaya or Kenya, but that would have required crimes against humanity and an appetite for extremely violent action that the west did not possess. Even then it's not guaranteed to work, just look at what happened to the Soviets.
                The ISAF mission succeeded in making the Taliban go to ground for the last few years of the occupation, and it took several years after the end of the intervention for the Taliban to be able to actively combat the ANA again.
                By comparison the Soviet backed government lasted about a year after their withdrawal

                >took me 0.001s to find an example
                That's not a tank

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But the British did lose militarily. Big time. Saratoga ring a bell?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Yorktown
            you are a literal absolute retard.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, but they still chose to leave instead of keep fighting. That's the point.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they had to surrender to leave lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                he doesn't understand the difference, he is too smoothbrained to comprehend.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/Ug6qlHj.jpg

          I gotchu senpai

          What are we looking at here? Gaps showing fake armor?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away

          common cope. many such cases.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The British weren't beaten by the Americans, French, Dutch and Spanish in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Americans only came out of their forests when the British went away
            That's what you sound like.

            The Taliban strategically defeated the US in Afghanistan. Despite twenty years of occupation the US could never defeat the Taliban, they could never destroy their ability to conduct operations or build up an official government army that could stand up to them. It's nowhere near as bad of a defeat as having your shit pushed in by a bunch of far-right football hooligans like Russia's experiencing but it's still a defeat.

            >get in a fight
            >beaten to a pulp
            >wheezing through your broken face
            >assailant gets bored and leaves
            >"I survived. This is a total strategic victory"

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The Taliban strategically defeated the US in Afghanistan. Despite twenty years of occupation the US could never defeat the Taliban, they could never destroy their ability to conduct operations or build up an official government army that could stand up to them. It's nowhere near as bad of a defeat as having your shit pushed in by a bunch of far-right football hooligans like Russia's experiencing but it's still a defeat.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/UxbDjtT.jpg

        [...]

        Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away

        Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield

        >those pics
        I dont get it

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Hey guys, do you want to see a fat Putin?

          Armor as thin as Putin's dick

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          sheet metal is not great armor

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hell ya design tanks like my fancy gpu fan housing, if it covered in hype angles it must be good

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/UxbDjtT.jpg

        [...]

        Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away

        Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield

        I like to dab on muskals, but this isn't really indicative of much, except that famous Russian attention to detail.
        The turret itself is tiny, since there's nobody in it. It's just a gun, a coax, and a loading assembly. Everything else is just a bunch of cladding/applique over the actual armor.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/UxbDjtT.jpg

        [...]

        Lol dude, the US wasn't beaten by the Taliban, not even in the slightest. They chose to leave, and the Taliban only came out of their caves when the US went away

        Unlike russia, which was beaten and then fled the battlefield

        https://i.imgur.com/37s11zC.jpg

        "But, sir, it's a prototype. It's not ready."

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Armatard was probably conscripted

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How little we knew.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bro, Muttoids losing to goat herders in flip flops is and will forever be the biggest blunder of the 21st century.

    Imagine telling your grandson that people with rail guns and nuclear ICBM submarines lost to illiterate peasants with no helmets nor bullet proof vests. If that story was in the bible not even the most devoyhkssyut creationist would believe that.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      serbia is not a country

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >t.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what repercussions for the US will come of it? Seems like the everything has more or less carried on as normal, while Russia is facing an existential crisis

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Name the battles the U.S. lost to goat herders in flip-flops. The U.S. literally left their bases and then the Taliban came out if their caves to defeat a bunch of Afghan zoomers. The only point of being there was to get rid of Al Qaeda it wasn't even to keep the Taliban out of government as them becoming a political party had always been discussed. Anyways they are begging us for food now so...

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >50,000 dead for this

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        two more feints and Putin will feint out of Moscow to his ural bunker

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm more concerned about number of civillians killed. It will take decades to recover. I wonder how long will it take for life to be normal again.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >bro, Muttoids losing to goat herders in flip flops is and will forever be the biggest blunder of the 21st century.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >of the 21st century
      its good that you added the qualifier because otherwise we would be talking about when the soviets lost to the same goat herders in halft the time with twice the losses and while killin 10 times as many civilians and collapsing immediatly afterwards.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Talibans ars still using 60 years old Soviets equipments, your blackhawks are already crashing after one year of use

        your weapons and vehicles are so unreliable and trash even terrorists prefer to use Toyotas over your humvees

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And yet somehow Russia managed to do worse during their time in Afghanistan.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We did have the battle of Khasham, but that was just a little merc trolling.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i forgor

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the best thing out this war is that no unironical russcuck will show their face here for 20+ years

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >baltic fleet again deployed in foreign theatre
      Second black sea squadron confirmed?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      if only I had your optimism. I think even if they pulled out tomorrow they'd had a headcanon made up by next week, something along the lines of "The entire NATO elite force was in Ukraine that's why we lost!!". And then try again somewhere else in a few years after reswarming.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine if that guy was a redeployed from the moskva

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    US GDP vs russian GDP

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >country with a bigger population has a bigger GDP

      woooooooooooooow

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It also looks bad per capita.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're Russian. That's reason enough to mock them.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Remember this? Insanely huge russian troop exercises (against OSCE rules), while NATO only did exercises with a few thousand or ten thousand soldiers.

    Guess NATO knew back then that they can beat russia in a 10:1 scenario

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      damn. you can actually measure the depletion of russian army funds by the shrinking of their excercises over time

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You seen the recent Vostok-2022? They advertised using 50 ships but only used 5, of which 4 were corvettes and one was a surveillance ship. Kek. The Chinks chipped in another 3 ships.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit, totally forgot. Wikileaks cope about PanamaPapers

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lizardmen vs. lizardmen, happy to watch them expose one another

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's always a fun watch.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lizardmen vs. lizardmen, happy to watch them expose one another

      Qrd? This wasn't something I paid much attention to at the time.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think we continually huffed the huffs of our doomposting and fearmongering until we couldn't see what was right in front of us... Even people shitting on Russia with some idea of the corruption and mismanagement must have had some inkling of "oh man though I sure don't hope we have to face them" in their minds.
    it was just a zimulacrum all along..

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I’ve stopped responding to each and every 3rd-worlder claim of American defeat. They literally don’t care, they’re just here to seethe and work out their envy. So let them, it won’t change anything in the real world.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But what about fighting for the hearts and minds of the new PrepHole members so they don't get led astray? Gotta debunk every bs claim until you're worn out brah.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The people posting those don't believe it, it's just a way of begging for attention because they're too fat to go outside.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There was this as well, but I yeah there wasn't much to make fun of relative to now. We are really spoiled these days.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I remember when PrepHole liked tanks and didn't give a fuck who made them.

Your email address will not be published.