You guys dont actually do this, right?

You guys don’t actually do this, right?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's my right.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      First post autistic post

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >black man with scary black gun
        >told the news he won't protest during pick up and drop off times
        >nothing burger to drum up fear
        get fricked maryland

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      He’s not doing anything illegal.

      >but it makes people uncomfortable
      Not my problem.

      It's inevitably the kind of incident that gets used as an argument to change the law
      You should know by now that no law is sacred and unchangeable

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        the correct thing to do is to do it MORE and all the time to normalize it and show lawmakers that you're not giving up your rights
        the wrong and moronic thing to do is go "eek that's such bad optics let's ban it!!!!"

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nothing will turn normalgays against you more than threatening their kids, and you lose your rights by turning normalgays against you
          >but I'm not threatening their kids
          your intention doesn't matter here, their perception does

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >your intention doesn't matter here, their perception does
            How about not keeping your weapon in low ready then?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's not just lawmakers this provokes, it's >99% of the population. Odds are some cop or parent is going to pop this guy thinking he's about to kill a bunch of kids. You need the people on your side to take on the government, and you don't get them inside by making them think you're going to massacre the neighborhood school bus

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            MUH OPTIIIIIIICS
            JUST DRESS UP IN DRAG GOY, 99% OF THE POPULATION WILL BE AGAINST YOU IF YOU DON'T
            JUST SUCK THE DICK, BIGOT

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >MUH OPTIIIIIIICS
              It's a protest, optics are the entire point you dumb Black person

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, I'm in support of the Black person with the rifle here. Please suckstart a shotgun, you stupid homosexual. Preferable after you learn reading comprehension and context.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I know you are, that's why I'm calling you a dumb Black person, you dumb Black person.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        They were always going to ban it amyways

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      a desperate cry for attention

      we all have a right to be stupid

      He’s not doing anything illegal.

      >but it makes people uncomfortable
      Not my problem.

      perfectly legal to be an idiot

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      He’s not doing anything illegal.

      >but it makes people uncomfortable
      Not my problem.

      Look, kids learn before adolescence that their subjective experiences of the world are not universal. Not everybody knows what you know.
      Now think about it, hypothetically, if you're able, that's some weirdo just stands there every day, with a rifle in their hands. He's a bit oddly dressed, at a slightly hunched over, days upon end. I mean, by the looks of it, I'd judge him a risk and keep an eye on him. He doesn't exactly seem trustworthy, does he?

      Legal or not, he could do precisely the same in a far better way, without looking like a ticking time bomb, like some weirdo waiting for an excuse. Hell, he could have a simple fricking sign or something, making his protest clear. I mean, doesn't he want to send a message? What kind of fricking protest is it at all, if nobody can tell you apart from some loon? Really, I think "Mr. Waist-fat" there is just some shut-in who imagines himself some vigilante or community protector, and the whole "protest" deal is just an excuse. But to protect someone, you've first gotta gain their trust. And he clearly hasn't. "lmao"

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        dont care
        if you dont want guns around your kids, vote smarter

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      open carrying in public places should be considered a form of brandishing
      no one needs a fricking ar-15 at the grocery
      no pussy needs four pistols strapped to go blow his wad on lottery tickets
      if you want to carry a pistol, get a fricking concealed holster
      sick of NRA supporting autistic fricktards that just like the power play, like these clownshoes

      He’s not doing anything illegal.

      >but it makes people uncomfortable
      Not my problem.

      You sound like one of those redditors who believe you should be able to kill someone for open carrying a pistol in a hip holster.

      >"what if I'm going hunting or sport shooting?"
      then your rifles will be on your fricking rack when you stop in for slim jims and a big gulp
      >"what if I need to protect myself?"
      get a fricking concealed handgun
      >"what if there is a riot?"
      if its actually a riot, grab your weapons and get the frick out
      if its just some protest and your only goal is to put on as many pairs of sunglasses as possible and leer menacingly from the sidelines because you like the implicit threat half your arsenal sticking out of your ass provides, go frick yourself. your autistic bullshit is the problem.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        [...]

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          real clever, pussy

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous
            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              See your own post

              [...]

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous
        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not an argument

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >get a fricking concealed handgun
        And what if their area doesn’t have permitless carry and they’re waiting on their CCW to clear? Should they just not carry a handgun because it makes you uncomfortable?

        >just move
        Not a real answer

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >waiting on CCW to clear
          my state barely has gun laws in place aside from stores doing warrant checks, you don't need a CCW or anything. so I wasn't thinking of one of the shitholes that does.

          I posted that pic the other day from reddit. It's a pro shooter who kept his valuables on him during a competition to get lunch. I'm surprised you didn't know that since it was on reddit.

          it would take 2 minutes to secure them in your truck.
          image is at least a year or two old
          glad you're enjoying reposting shit to reddit, though, guy

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, I reposted from reddit. FROM reddit.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >That image is a year or two old
              >I got that image from Reddit the other day
              Read, Black person, READ

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            there's still quite a few states that have CCW permits

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I posted that pic the other day from reddit. It's a pro shooter who kept his valuables on him during a competition to get lunch. I'm surprised you didn't know that since it was on reddit.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        That doesn't even look comfortable and he looks like a schizo lunatic who does a true damage to the gun rights movement. Why do you need to carry four handguns, I live in Iowa and there is very little violent crime here, why not carry one, even better if it's concealed.
        Lmao the cope of this thread by the way is insane, there a reason why people don't like AR-15s when they see mentally unstable people shoot up schools and they see some stranger standing at the bus stop or walk into a grocery store with an AR, I can see why some people want them banned. And no, I've heard the cope
        >I'm normalizing people to seeing guns like my Gucci ARs and pistols in society
        Lmao it is just straight bull, it's like when a women dresses like a prostitute and uses the excuse of dressing that way because it just making her feel good or it's comfortable. It's because they want attention, their just too ashamed to admit that they're too much of a loser to get attention in a healthy manner. And then are dumb enough to wonder why all these suburban moms (a swing voting demographic by the way) join gun control advocacy groups.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The long and short of it is that it doesn't matter. I wouldn't be caught dead looking like that in public, but it's not my choice to dictate how others behave. It is indeed some woman's right to dress like a prostitute, just as it's anyone's right to complain about it. It's not an excuse at all, it's the plain truth. The plain truth is also that people need to be vocal about their rights, and staunch. There is absolutely nothing that is going to sway suburban moms into liking guns, they either realize they are a necessity or they do not. If something such as this could change their minds then they did not understand gun rights in the first place.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            And tolerance for guns drops. Thanks for participating.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Tolerance for gun owners drops regardless. It is not my job to convince people what are and are not valid rights. A right is a right, when you niggle about the details you are engaging in a game you can never win.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Sperg

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're the poster child for tighter gun laws. Sometimes in the interest of self preservation alone it makes sense to have positive community outreach instead of antagonizing people.
                >muh rights
                They're mine too dickhead and you're making it harder for both of us.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            You pretend like there isn't blowback or a response to things like this when they drift to far in one direction politically. Women acting and dressing in the manner has led to dumbfrick over correct redpill worship of guys like Tate same as morons walking to the coffee shop with an M1014 semiautomatic shotgun causes people to want to ban guns. Is this response really all that surprising for normal people who just want to buy a coffee without wondering if your intent at the coffee shop is to start blasting people? For them why else would you bring a firearm like that with?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              You're the poster child for tighter gun laws. Sometimes in the interest of self preservation alone it makes sense to have positive community outreach instead of antagonizing people.
              >muh rights
              They're mine too dickhead and you're making it harder for both of us.

              Again, I'm simply not interested in being the spokesperson for a movement. If you want to do that then that is fine. I am not saying that reactionary movements will not occur in response to anything. Regardless of whether Andrew Tate became popular or not the right remains for women to behave as they wish, as it should be. The same is true of gun rights. I have had friends plain stop speaking to me when they found out I am a gun owner. Many people are uncomfortable with the concept of firearms to begin with, it's not my job to convince them guns are fine. I'm not a representative of anyone other than myself. If I feel like exercising a right I have I will do it. I am too old to care how people feel about what I do.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Sperg still has no social IQ

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >COMPLY COMPLY COMPLY COMPLY
                I will continue to own and carry whatever gun I want because it's instrumental to a functional society. You, the ADL and ATF will continue to cry about it.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm simply not interested in being the spokesperson for a movement.
                We're not asking you to speak for us, we're telling you your flippant attitude fuels gun banning. People in the middle who were not involved in politics go to city hall when a stranger starts bringing guns to the bus stop. I didn't read past the first sentence I'm sure you understand.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >your flippant attitude fuels gun banning
                I don't care. Let people look at the data that clearly illustrates the main cause of gun violence is inner-city Black folk and cheap handguns sold illegally out of garages. My rights don't end where your feelings begin.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't care.
                I know
                >Let people look at the data
                This will not happen no matter how much you want it to.
                >My rights don't end where your feelings begin.
                This is exactly where they will end.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                How are they going to end? Anyone who tries to forcibly take them will be shot by the better-equipped populace. Sounds like a good way to create a second balkanized Confederacy except this time they win, since every blue state is a shithole propped up by thirdies who will flee the second shit gets hot.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Death by 1000 cuts. I have fewer rights than you do because of shootings driving laws against guns. I won't oppose an awb either because I can't justify my libertine positions anymore and I interact with people who are unable to demonstrate any social understanding. It's a good reminder that people with antisocial tendencies have almost free reign to get and misuse guns.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Let people look at the data that clearly illustrates the main cause of gun violence is inner-city Black folk and cheap handguns sold illegally out of garages
                You're dealing with people who think "guns bad" is a legitimate belief, backed up by SCIENCE (tm).

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't care. I am never going to care. If I have the right to do it and I want to do it I will do it. It's your right to whine about it to your heart's content.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >then your rifles will be on your fricking rack when you stop in for slim jims and a big gulp
        Sounds like a good way to get your car window busted in by some little niglets you gungrabbing homosexual

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >millions of people with gun racks
          >still have guns
          okay, buddy

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Millions of people forget to lock their doors overnight and don't get robbed, does that mean it's a good idea to leave your door unlocked when you go to bed?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        That doesn't even look comfortable and he looks like a schizo lunatic who does a true damage to the gun rights movement. Why do you need to carry four handguns, I live in Iowa and there is very little violent crime here, why not carry one, even better if it's concealed.
        Lmao the cope of this thread by the way is insane, there a reason why people don't like AR-15s when they see mentally unstable people shoot up schools and they see some stranger standing at the bus stop or walk into a grocery store with an AR, I can see why some people want them banned. And no, I've heard the cope
        >I'm normalizing people to seeing guns like my Gucci ARs and pistols in society
        Lmao it is just straight bull, it's like when a women dresses like a prostitute and uses the excuse of dressing that way because it just making her feel good or it's comfortable. It's because they want attention, their just too ashamed to admit that they're too much of a loser to get attention in a healthy manner. And then are dumb enough to wonder why all these suburban moms (a swing voting demographic by the way) join gun control advocacy groups.

        Post gun

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm at work right now, I have a G48 in the glovebox in my car and several handguns, ARs, Shotguns, Hunting Rifles, and old milsurp services rifles at home, I'll post this evening once I return.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      He’s not doing anything illegal.

      >but it makes people uncomfortable
      Not my problem.

      based
      [...]

      [...]
      european

      See

      Is this a psyop to raise support for stronger gun control measures? Why would anyone think this is a good idea otherwise?

      . If this was just about gun rights he wouldn’t be wearing the Maga hat, the only reason someone would do this is if he were trying to look like some bizarre caricature of Republicans.

      This is on the same level as that teacher who wore those fake breasts while pretending to be a troony so mainstream dems would go out and defend him and wind up making themselves look unhinged in the eyes of normalgay voters.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >This is on the same level as that teacher who wore those fake breasts while pretending to be a troony so mainstream dems would go out and defend him and wind up making themselves look unhinged in the eyes of normalgay voters.

        That was in Canada, but your point stands

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, this checks out. Maryland has a fair share of sovereign citizens and magaronies. Gov just signed some law so you can't bring guns into nursing homes and hospitals or something so people are getting uppity.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Maryland is also full of insane democrats who would die for the DNC

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >What do you mean I can’t carry a rifle into the cancer ward?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Hospitals are usually private property where people cant just walk around in willy nilly and can just ban guns outright, this means nothing its just moronic dems being ignorant of the law.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      He’s not doing anything illegal.

      >but it makes people uncomfortable
      Not my problem.

      Based and freedom pilled.

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    He’s not doing anything illegal.

    >but it makes people uncomfortable
    Not my problem.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      based

      https://i.imgur.com/Jgyg1pz.jpg

      You guys don’t actually do this, right?

      in America, do they put the program times as math challenges to make sure that bots don't watch the news?

      european

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Severely autistic

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It makes people uncomfortable, who then vote for gun grabbers to make the scary black rifles go away. Meanwhile you keep screeching about muh rights like the low functioning sperg you are.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        What do you care? You're not American, and you don't own guns. Stop concerntrolling, vatnik.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        They were going to vote to make them go away whether people were open carrying them or not. The only people they’re okay with having them are the people who stand guard outside drag shows, everyone else is an enemy to them.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >everyone is for me or against me; undecided voters do not exist

          Does your case worker know you’re on the internet?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >he still thinks voting matters

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yes yes, good goy, do NOT vote, do NOT exercise your rights, just accept what happens

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Voting won't make any difference as long as the entire process is controlled by the people who already have power. What we need is to hold people with power accountable by refusing to work if they don't pass sweeping reforms that get money out of politics.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Don't make the people who want you dead mad or they'll vote harder
        Lol

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, but showing up with an AR to a school bus drop off sounds like an attempt at suicide by cop/good samaritan

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You sound like one of those redditors who believe you should be able to kill someone for open carrying a pistol in a hip holster.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          OC is moronic so that sounds based

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >he doesn't wear his gun outside his pants for all the honest world to feel
            take the panchopill

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              One day, you'll meet your match, you know that, right?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not if he splits for Ohio

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          What are you, moronic? Carrying a rifle around school children in suburbia is a good way to get wasted by a cop, it's a simple observation

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're arguing against flaseflagging vatniggs, of course they're moronic

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              see

              What do you care? You're not American, and you don't own guns. Stop concerntrolling, vatnik.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >n-no u
                Post gun
                Here's my most recent build, yes I posted it yesterday and once in the ar general before I realized that shithole is a glorified discord server

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I took this like 10 days ago.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ok based
                Is that the PA scope mount?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah, it's bretty gud for what it is

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think the difference here is that the guy with the AR doesn't even have kids on the bus, making it purely autistic.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          > Open carry in a holster or a slung rifle is the same as showing up to a kid's bus stop at low ready
          Internet debate and it's consequences have been disasterous for the human race.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sociopath.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't have to be illegal to be inadvisable.
      It's inadvisable for a number of reasons, the most important being that it gives gun-owners a bad look.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >gives [them] a bad look
        dumb zoomer detected

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >A phrase new to me must be a new phrase
          People have been saying it since at least the mid 2000s, dipshit. Maybe if your third-world ass had an internet connection around then, you'd be familiar.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why would you do this

      Just doesn't seem appropriate

      Not really the place to protest

      Let alone to stand around with a gun

      Being kind and courteous to others is important

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Why would you do this

        a desperate cry for attention

        we all have a right to be stupid

        [...]
        perfectly legal to be an idiot

        >A desperate cry for attention

        Alright this is making sense now

        Still just not responsible and downright weird

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >infringing on my rights is kind and courteous
        and so is not exercising my right to free speech, don't want to offend or upset anyone, right? let's do away with that
        oh and refusing to let officers buttfrick you and search your home? really rude don't you think? let's get rid of that

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          The government and politicians passing liberal gun laws doesn't mean that random kids who are just trying to go to school should have some Zion Don wacko standing there with an AR.

          I think the NFA is unconstitutional, but a protest is a protest. So is open carry. So it's technically legal, it's just not courteous to random people, especially peoples families. This "one man protest" is just a guy acting sketchy at a bus stop and doesn't help any cause really.

          It does make him look like a wacko, but he doesn't represent me and I'm not a GOP/DNC voter. I don't vote, I don't trust politicians, and I only carry a rifle in appropriate contexts for legitimate and useful reasons. It's my right to open carry, but I live in a state that rejects the entire NFA.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          You do know the world allows for cases beyond all-or-nothing. We can still have guns and not have some random dude open carrying by a school bus stop like a lunatic. Sane people recognize brandishing a weapon as a threat. You’ll probably say
          >no uh it makes people safer
          but then run on here asking about the easiest way to kill someone without going to jail if a dude stood 2 feet from your driveway holding an AR and staring at your house.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        why do you type like that?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why do you type like that?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Gun grabbers also not doing anything illegal.
      >But muh right to have guns reee
      Not my problem.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Constitutional rights overrule your discomfort.

        Cope.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Constitutional rights
          That can be amended. How fricking stupid are you?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nta and not for scaring kids with a rifle, but good fricking luck amending out the 2a

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              keep doing stupid shit and karens might actually vote for it. they did for alcohol lol

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >alcohol is a constitutional right
            Maybe the real moron is you

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone who says "muh freedoms" instead of "our Civil Rights", mocking the very concept of human liberty itself is being anti-American and endorsing tyranny and despotism. Endorsing evil and dictators.

        You are either openly ignorant or dishonest about having a mentally disabled level of understanding of the most basic rights in our Constitution, which is the foundation of the entire nation and federal government.

        You think your political feelings are more important than human liberty and rights. I think this guy on the corner is a wacko honestly, needs to be respectful of his neighbors and not do stuff like this. But you don't think at all, you just let people tell you what to think and feel, and gloat in willful ignorance. It's like a game to you, you are like a pawn.

        Your thoughts and opinions are predictable, easy to program, and of little worth or consequence. There may be little to nothing of serious value dwelling in your mind, and I do not feel anger towards you but a deep pity and compassion towards your plight. Like a mentally moronic animal that cannot figure out what is going on, just suffering until death.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          While said in a PrepHole-way, I think the other anon actually has a good point anon. We live in a democracy. "Rights" aren't some law of physics, they're social constructs that a sufficient majority have agreed to go along with as a package. And it's moronic how a lot of modern zoomer gun people have come to ignore that. Yes, our Constitution works, correctly, to ensure that 51% can't just stomp all over the rest, that cities can't totally dominate all rural folks, etc. But it's not designed so that an unlimitedly large majority can be thwarted by a few percent minority indefinitely. If 60-70+% of the population starts opposing us that's bad. And Amendments are only one vehicle. There have been no relevant changes to the Constitution between right now and 1960s/70s era max controls, merely changes in SCOTUS. And that in turn is a lot easier to change. Congress is ultimately the most constitutionally powerful body, it can just impeach everyone else if it wants and nobody can gainsay that except voters the next election.

          We don't need to have 70% in favor (though that'd be good), but we need more than 10%, or 20%, or whatever the critical margin is too. So yeah politics matter. In terms of "ban all guns" sure that isn't happening, but majorities DO support things like red flag laws or whatever. I'm not convinced the level of purposeful antagonism and LULZ I CAN DOS WUT I WANT towards fellow Americans that shows up on pro-gun forums a lot nowadays is good long term. And it's definitely harmful in terms of positive changes that need legislative action like removing suppressors from the NFA.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >the level of purposeful antagonism and LULZ I CAN DOS WUT I WANT towards fellow Americans
            I agree it isn't politically productive, but is an understandable angry reaction to decades of encroaching gun control

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              I understand your fears of encroaching gun control, especially if you live in a state like IL or WA but pro gun right has won big in the last fifteen years after the DC v Heller decision. Constitutional carry is the norm and concealed carry permits which were almost impossible to source 20 years ago in many states the prohibition are now relegated to a couple states (NJ, MD, HI for now) and some counties of even firearm unfriendly states like CA, NY, etc. IMO the 90s were a much worse time for gun rights than today, we have built a lot of cultural support to stand as a base. That said lunatics strolling around city parks with an AK do little to win over people, these people need to be called out and shamed for acting irresponsibly and for basically making us look bad, they give the gun control advocacy complex an easy target to point at for "the average gun owner".

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I apologize for using such language as "mentally disabled" or "mentally moronic" as accusations of ignorance, it was just rude and mean.

          It's not fair to mentally disabled or mentally moronic people to associate them with such a spineless bootlicker. The kind of person that would comply to the actual German nazis because "it's the government" and "do we really need these rights?"

          The exact kind of soft man that ruins societies and makes evil dictators possible, complicit to evil because it's powerful and they are mentally weak and afraid.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are drag shows illegal?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Depends on the state I suppose

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I know right? Tacticool butthole threatening a school - "who cares this is America he is free to do what he wants" Drag queen - "NOOOOOO THIS HURTS MY FEELINGS YOU NEED TO BE CONTROLLED"

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Seething this hard you cant push scat porn on kids?

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I’m sure you feel tough in your plate carrier watching Timmy get on the bus

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              You're so brave being a pedophile

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >gay=pedophilia
                That's a very nice tactic, huh? Goes easy on your typical tradLARPer brain

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Give the school shooter a gun and a dress and the right will be pissed about the dress and the left will be pissed about the gun.
          Strange times.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            And you fricking better not misgender the shooter

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              But did they have a famas?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Did you care when people stood outside them with ARs?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          You didnt when Antifa showed up with ARs

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            They didn’t do that in my state. Wonder why.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Neither in mine. Its got stand your tround and constitutional carry laws.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bad PR

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Cutting off your dick and dressing like a woman in public is legal. Doesn't mean you aren't an autistic freak who should be shunned if you do it, though.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It being perfectly legal to be a giant moron who is an active liability for his own cause doesn't make him any less of a giant moron who is an active liability for his own cause.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Same, that’s why I dress in drag around children

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They/them.

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is this a psyop to raise support for stronger gun control measures? Why would anyone think this is a good idea otherwise?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They are trying to pass gun control laws with or without any specific incident, have you been paying attention at all?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I could’ve sworn the daily mass shootings had something to do with it

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Oh, I’m sure all those laws being passed since at least the 90s certainly had to do with those “daily mass shootings” /s.
          Stay out of US politics you 3rd world trash.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >ignores the massive crime wave in the two decades preceding the 90s
            >ignores that the 90s also had mass shootings and bombings

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            The name Columbine doesn’t mean anything to you does it

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Can you at least use a example that didnt glow? That whole shitshow was a mess

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Thr 1994 AWB passed years prior to that event and it still happened. Really jogs the noggin.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah but those are just general incidents now. Not specific!!!

          They are trying to pass gun control laws with or without any specific incident, have you been paying attention at all?

          It's Baltimore dude what do you think?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I generally don't believe on conspiracy theories but this is such a lazy/harmless way to gain sympathy for a cause that I'd believe it. You can't even really identify the guy from the blury picture and the shadow cast by the hat.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Seriously? You talk to people like this all day on this board. You can see his face plainly in his TV news interview.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The CTE moron who shot up a bank in Kentucky a few weeks ago did it because he was a shitlib from plebbit who thought it would make the government enact more gun control.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      There are some try hard open carry people out there thinking they are helping.

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    in America, do they put the program times as math challenges to make sure that bots don't watch the news?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think that's saying they'll have the segment at 5, then again at 6

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    He has breasts

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like an odd place and counterproductive way to protest against legislation.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >no optic/sights
    100% he's trying suicide by cop.

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is a bad idea, naturally. he shouldn't do this, I don't expect anyone that may reply to my post is sound in mind, genuine, or even a real person. You can not say standing with a gun every day at a bus stop for school children (that you don't even know I might add) is a good idea, unless you hate children and humanity in general and see nothing wrong with subjecting people to undue stress. You could also just be ignorant to children, and normal things like courtesy and standing upright.

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand how holding a rifle like that isn't legally considered brandishing. If it was slung behind his back it would be a valid use of open carry, but keeping it in a ready position is undeniably threatening.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I agree. Brandishing has become a common occurrence among people that are irresponsible with firearms and don't understand or respect what they represent when present in a public scenario.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      He gets away with it because he's a democrat false flagging

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >le nothing bad ever happens to <thing i like> because everything bad is false flagging
        Grow the frick up
        And/or take meds
        IDK which is right for you and IDRGAF either

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      An anon with a brain

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The only thing that protects him is he isn't showing intent to use it or directly threatening anyone. It's basically a public nuisance law where there's open carry

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What a sperg

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >redditors crying over a black man with a gun
    the irony

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      As if right wingers are happy when BLM, SRA, John Brown clubs etc strap up.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not really impressed when those groups carry guns at the ready as cover for their thugs to pepper spray women they don't like

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          [citation needed]

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            here you go little girl

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Guys either a turbo autist or its just another dirty dem false flagging

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't doubt that. People are more underhanded than ever these days when trying to serve the advance of their stupid political party.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The maga hat and moronic airsoft tier setup make it very sus.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Or MAGA people are morons and this is exactly something they would do. “This is too stupid to be real” doesn’t work as a defense when the people are in fact that stupid.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          okay vlad

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >5+6pm
    So 11pm broadcast?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      USA has multiple timezones.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why using addition then?
        Should be something like 5*6pm, no?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          If it's timezones them generally do say "6 PM/5 Central

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Okay.
            6pm local time and 5pm central, so other regions can easily convert?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, in the US we tend to air at the same time in Eastern, Central, and Mountain Time(6/5/4 for example, but 3 hours player 5 for the west coast because you get better tv ratings in California that way

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >3 hours player 5
                3 hours later* I must've been on drugs when I typed that

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Eastern time is the only time that matters.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >coastal elite getting uppity again

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Indiana
                >Ohio
                >KY
                >MI
                >WV

                >coastal elite

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, this is not about time zones. This is a news channel saying they will talk about the story at 5pm AND 6pm. It's common for local stations to start their news "on the hour." So they will run the story at 5:00, and run it a second time at 6:00.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Using the "&" would clear this misunderstanding before it even happened.
        Or are those two different stories of the same topic, so I'd have to see them both?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's the same story twice. They might run through a bunch of stories in 15-20 minutes. The + is read as & so it shouldn't confuse local speakers. The spacing is weird though.

          Maryland is also full of insane democrats who would die for the DNC

          It's also filled with tacticool tough guys like Dan Bongino. It's a mixed bag.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Using the "&" would clear this misunderstanding before it even happened.
      Or are those two different stories of the same topic, so I'd have to see them both?

      kek, ESLs are so silly

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The only silly person here is the native speaker using his own language in a deliberately confusing way.

        It's the same story twice. They might run through a bunch of stories in 15-20 minutes. The + is read as & so it shouldn't confuse local speakers. The spacing is weird though.
        [...]
        It's also filled with tacticool tough guys like Dan Bongino. It's a mixed bag.

        >The + is read as &
        Why not using "&" from the start?
        Clearly someone is being silly (not me).

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          We don't use ampersands often. It is seen as old fashioned. It's mostly used in brands to make a company look like it has been around for a long time. Smith & Wesson is an old brand by our standards. m&m's candy is also older than most.

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Idk why incels don't do this. Instead of actually shooting up the school and getting shot/life in jail why don't they just stand outside in combat gear with an AR-15? They will never be bullied again.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Feds wouldnt get their gibs

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Knew a guy that did this back when I was going to elementary. He lived across the street from the school. Somebody had egged his car so he would stand in his driveway with a m14(or maybe a m1 carbine, I was a fricking kid). The second day he did this the bus driver went and talked to him. Conversation went like this-
    "Sir, the children are scared you're going to shoot someone"
    "They should be scared-"
    Bus driver doesn't even let him finish, just starts pummeling the guy. The sound of that fat little greek driver wheezing as he fought is still burned into my memory.
    >smack, smack, wheeeeeeze
    >grunt, groan
    >pant, smack, wheeeeze, smack , smack
    Some parents eventually broke up the fight and that was that. No idea if the police ever got involved. Never saw the dude with the gun again. Bus driver showed up the next week and only said that everything was cleared up and that they were friends now. (which in retrospect was obviously a lie so we wouldn't be afraid)

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >which in retrospect was obviously a lie so we wouldn't be afraid
      I think the driveway guy had immense respect for the bus driver's willingness to use violence to defend the kids in his care, and they forged an unbreakable lifelong bond

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why not protest outside the governors house or get the kids into air soft?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly maybe he's a fed?

      Or just one weird dude.

      People defending him are weird.

      It's counter-productive in the end.

      Which might be the goal.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        stop fricking typing like that you newbie holy shit, use a comma or period instead of a line break.

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course not, I'm not black

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >black
    >maga hat
    >maryland

    The falsest of flags

    Amazing how they don't even have to try and can get away with it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      That looks like a white guy. If it was a black skinny guy I could probably name him.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Frick outta here, is a white male.
      Its called shade. Like the brim/visor of his hat is intended to do, and is doing.
      What is it with you people and wanting to see pavement apes everywhere, despite claiming to hate them? I’ll never understand you zoomers

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't say anything because I thought my eyes must be broken with everybody saying he's black, I'm glad to see I'm not hallucinating. Or at least that I'm not the only one hallucinating

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/o5qJe6Q.jpg

        [...]
        [...]
        googling the story it seems to be a swarthy individual named J’Den McAdory

        I didn't say anything because I thought my eyes must be broken with everybody saying he's black, I'm glad to see I'm not hallucinating. Or at least that I'm not the only one hallucinating

        Kek, never mind, we were hallucinating

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          yea i googled it cause i couldn't really tell from that pic either, could've been shade

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      That looks like a white guy. If it was a black skinny guy I could probably name him.

      Frick outta here, is a white male.
      Its called shade. Like the brim/visor of his hat is intended to do, and is doing.
      What is it with you people and wanting to see pavement apes everywhere, despite claiming to hate them? I’ll never understand you zoomers

      googling the story it seems to be a swarthy individual named J’Den McAdory

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    In my district, I would be advised to not stop and keep moving while notifying dispatch of the armed man near the bus stop. Treat him like you'd treat any other suspicious person. That said, I respect him standing up for what he believes in.

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Something like that but it's more akin to neighborhood watch

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >stand around school children wearing a maga hat with an AR 15
    Might be the worst possible optics available right now.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like what Democrats would do honestly.

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If a person kneels, peacefully, during the national anthem before a sporting contest it provokes outrage to bring attention to "the plight of blacks in America " and is therefore an effective form of protest.

    If a person stands, peacefully, holding a symbol of violence and independence on a street corner in the morning it provokes fear and outrage, bringing attention to the attempted subversion of our inalienable rights it is an effective form of protest.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you think the attention it brings is people waking up to the subversion of the 2A, and not deciding that pro-gun people are lunatics who shouldn't be allowed near their kids, you've failed to carry a number somewhere and made a catastrophic error in your calculus

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        He’s just severely autistic like everyone else defending that moron ITT

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's a level of autism that surpasses even my own, like even if you think he's based you at least have to acknowledge he's a based moron at best

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well what road map do you propose to snap people out of whatever stupor safety and plenty has put them in?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't have the answers for you, but I can promise you that making people feel like you're threatening their kids with an AR is the gets you the bad ending

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I suppose its the person doing the threatening. As stupid as it sounds these people were equally "threatened" when someone kneeled before their sports game

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              That sounds very stupid.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >people were equally "threatened"
              It's not remotely equal. They might have been offended by the kneeling, but feeling their kid's lives are in danger is a very different level

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >mfw the kicker punts a ball right into my kid's face because I stood for the anthem

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                If this homie actually threatened anything he would be in jail, because that's fuggin illegal. People feel threatened about their kids in the same way people feel threatened about losing their good boy patriot points or losing their football. It's imaginary and if they were anything other than domesticated things they would do something about it, like I dunno, talking to the guy to figure out what he's doing and why. I feel a little bit bad for the children though, they're too young to have developed the emotional maturity for something like that.

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I enjoy seeing posts saying "I have the right"
    Rights are often lost when they're abused

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Rights are often lost when they're abused

      Which ones has the US lost?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        The right to drink and drive.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      But enough about child grooming in schools.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Then it wasn't a right.

      Hospitals are usually private property where people cant just walk around in willy nilly and can just ban guns outright, this means nothing its just moronic dems being ignorant of the law.

      Yeah that's the weird thing. I don't think this law really does anything in real terms. It is (or was) almost impossible to get a carry license in Maryland anyway. I've have been following the law for years. Oh and the new law adds some additonal requirements to be able to buy handguns and maybe adds more restrictions against people with a psyche record. This is all hearsay from me.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I've have been following the law for years.
        I mean I have not been following the laws for years, so I can't say for sure what is allowed. I don't think the new law changes much though.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Then it wasn't a right.
        It was a right till the law changed. That's how the US's government works.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Trust me, I live here. The Constitution is based on a concept of Natural Rights, which are reflected in law. They do not come from the law itself but writing them into law protects their practice. What country are you from? You're coming from a very different way of thinking about government.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            No it isn't you fricking tool. Did you not take high school civics? The constitution can be amended.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Natural Rights are a thing, but not in the pseudomystical way a lot of folks like to imply. It's just shit folks considered basic to life and liberty. They talked it out, reasoned and argued philosophical bullshit, and came out with a handful or so of thing that governments should get fricked for trying to ban.
              keeping your government in check is a separate issue, that could use a lot more citizen oversight and cross-aisle rights activists.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah none of that nonsense means anything. The only thing that matters is the amendments and the articles in the constitution.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                yes, only the shit in the law can be enforced. the idea of natural rights is why we demand it. unless you think we just randomly tossed some shit in the constitution on a whim

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The point is they're in the Constitution because of the way people see them. Laws are written by people, they don't come out of nowhere.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              You're not listening. Yes, it can be amended in theory. Yes there is a legal process for it. No, it will not happen. There is a more complicated discussion behind the why.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Alright don't listen to me. Your babble is meaningless. The 2A is an amendment was added to the constitution and it can be removed.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Natural rights aren't real.
            They are, nice as they are, ultimately legal fiction.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              laws and countries are also fictions we adhere to because we communally agree to
              >and we kick the shit out of dummies that pretend otherwise

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >laws are also fictions we adhere to because we communally agree to
                Yeah, that's the point. Get enough spergs to stand at school bus drops offs brandishing firearms for long enough and people will comunally agree to do away with the second amendment.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              It doesn't matter. Saudi Arabia is run by Mohammed's rotten corpse because people believe in it. Our country is run by natural rights because people believe in it. I can't tell what country you're from anymore but there's a reason the declaration of independence is considered a founding document even though it is in no sense a legal document. It explains the mentality of our country and people still believe it. Until this country changes its mentality the law will stay within a certain framework. Don't hold your breath.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              You're standing in a church yelling "God's not real!"
              Nothing changes.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Then it wasn't a right.
              It was a right till the law changed. That's how the US's government works.

              No it isn't you fricking tool. Did you not take high school civics? The constitution can be amended.

              All rights are nothing more or less than acknowledged threats of violence from the governed towards the government. All laws are violent threats from the government towards the governed.

              Your rights are what the government believes a large enough amount of the population would violently rebel over, and only that. The second the threat disappears the right disappears, striking it from the record is just a formality.
              The same with a law: a law without the threat of lethal violence backing it up simply does not exist.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Then it wasn't a right.
        we have a right to free speech, but its got limits and punishments if you use it to slander, threaten or cause panics.
        just pointing a weapon at someone is currently illegal, for good reason, regardless of limiting your right to do whatever you want while bearing arms
        rights aren't magic. they're demands citizens make of the government

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shoot him.

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    As Euro I think some sensible gun rights are possible with some strict licensing and moron filters.

    But watching you defend nutcases who threaten children with guns makes me think America is a lost cause and too irresponsible to have guns.

    The 2nd amendment was added to your construction and can be removed the same way. You'd be just one of a million examples of the government having to limit things because morons fricked it up for the society.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >As Euro
      Opinion discarded

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Thank you for defending the right of the mentally ill to own unlimited quantities of firearms and ammunition.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The euro is still posting

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not even him but there is literally nothing wrong with requiring a mental health evaluation or inquiry before letting someone buy a gun

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Just pass these test by a group of people who are adamant against gun ownership!

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >just prove you’re not a schizo who thinks the israelites are in his walls

                I can see why you’d have a hard time with this

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Taking somebody's guns (at least temporarily) if they're diagnosed with a legitimate mental illness, sure, I'll concede that. But not even places like Canada require a mental health evaluation before buying a gun, and we have a permit system for all gun ownership, like Illinois. There are a lot of things mentally I'll people shouldn't have, but we don't make people carry around a clean bill of health from a shrink to buy fertilizer or gasoline

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              > Issue clean bill of mental health
              > 6 months later, client does something horrible in a murder/suicide
              > Have your professional life destroyed by public and media because you didn't predict the future and now that the perpetrator is dead, they need someone to vent their frustrations out on

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Just because some schizos pass through the gap in the moron filter or become schizos after the filtering doesn't mean a filter is a bad idea.

                It takes effort for morons not to be filtered and some are incapable of it, furthermore you discourage people who'd might fail from even applying.

                Unless you think guns in moron hands are good, stop concern trolling.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Just because some schizos pass through the gap in the moron filter or become schizos after the filtering doesn't mean a filter is a bad idea
                It does for the people doing the filtering.
                His point is that mental health providers would be putting their careers and professional lives on the line by signing off on people, because if they do something later, the blame is going to come back on that provider. The result being that they will be reluctant to sign off in the first place.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Requiring people to get mental health evaluations before buying guns is essentially a total gun ban, because everybody knows that the only people who will "pass" the mental health exam are whomever the state wants to have guns (cops, feds, etc.)
                >but it's not like that in my irrelevant yuro shithole
                Don't care.

                I can't buy a gun without also buying a brand new approved lock for that gun from the dealer. I consider it an infringement.

                We're not talking about locks. We're talking about slings.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                See

                >just prove you’re not a schizo who thinks the israelites are in his walls

                I can see why you’d have a hard time with this

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                most guns come with a lock, but not slings or holster, how strange

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                > Most guns come with a lock but not a holster
                It would be a God damn nylon Uncle Mikes and we both know it.

                But I'm fine with lambasting rifle manufacters for not tossing in a sling with their rifle. Wooden stuck rifles that don't even come sling studs attached should be harrased mercilessly and informed that their barbecue sucks too.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Take meds, schizo. If you believe israelites are in every wall you rightly will be filtered.

                Normal, apolitical, professional medical bodies making a peer-reviewed decision that can be challenged in court are the norm. Why should it be different for guns than say for a driver's license or heavy machinery license or whatever?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Man, and you call others delusional.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Heh, I’m not delusional, there’s a nation wide conspiracy against me to prevent me from owning guns.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah how delusional. Just let Dr. Goldstein pick your feeble goy mind for a bit to decide if you're worthy of exercising your basic constitutional rights. You're also required to give him your social media accounts and passwords.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, yeah see you failed already:

                >just prove you’re not a schizo who thinks the israelites are in his walls

                I can see why you’d have a hard time with this

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Are you saying you need to take a psych test for a drivers license in your country?
                >Why should it be different
                Because in America it's a constitutional right.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I agree, we should do psych evals for drivers licenses.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry

                Mental health checks would just be another level of bureaucracy that anti-gun states have at their disposal to arbitrarily deny people their natural rights. Tackling mental health issues is harder than just denying people access to firearms.

                The reasonable way to do it is to run your name in the involuntarily committed database. If you've ever been legally crazy let's give it a second look.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >involuntarily committed database
                Do tell. Last I saw, NICS lookups were not allowed to the public.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                When you apply for your gun you'd have to authorize your consent for the check I guess. As per current state if you've been committed you can't buy.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the public.
                And naturally state police are the middle man for everything.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong board
                Wrong board
                >>>/t/

                [...]

                you don’t belong here

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                We're talking about "accessories."

                most guns come with a lock, but not slings or holster, how strange

                State approved bore lock essentially. I have two locks per gun thanks to that.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Good luck with requiring people to pay for a medical assessment before they can use a constitutionally protected right. Maybe you could levy it as a requirement to purchase from an FFL, but I doubt it. Private sales? Nope. Simple ownership, aka, inplicit federal firearms license? Hell no.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry

              Mental health checks would just be another level of bureaucracy that anti-gun states have at their disposal to arbitrarily deny people their natural rights. Tackling mental health issues is harder than just denying people access to firearms.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nta but:

                Take meds, schizo. If you believe israelites are in every wall you rightly will be filtered.

                Normal, apolitical, professional medical bodies making a peer-reviewed decision that can be challenged in court are the norm. Why should it be different for guns than say for a driver's license or heavy machinery license or whatever?

                Just try (I know, it’s hard) to shutup about the israelites and the WEF and the NWO or whatever for 20 minutes and you’ll be fine.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Literally no one is talking about the israelites but you moron.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              Well good news, anon. Question H on a 4473 is just such a thing, punishable by up to 10 years in a federal prison if you knowingly lie on the form. I'm sure you can rest easier knowing the ATF and the federal government has your back here.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        But he's ultimately right, even though I think euros broadly (I know laws over there vary country to country) go too far in restrictions, why should I defend the firearm rights of urban crooks and rural meth heads to shoot each other up (and normal people) and allow for crazies to get their hands on ARs to go blast children during recess? Frick both of them and also frick the schizos that run around open carrying ARs for attention. The morons always frick things up, we need to punish them so they don't soil the rights for the majority that don't commit crime and don't act like they belong in an asylum. The question is how to do that while minimizing the amount of infringement for moral and responsible people that enjoy the recreation and ability to defend private property if it comes to that.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          People looking at you can't tell if you're dangerous or just exercising your rights/cowadooty larping if you are holding a gun in your hands. Just make it illegal to publicly "open carry" a longgun in your hands like the guy in the OP pic and this fatass who got shot defending BLM. You can still carry it on your back with a sling, but walking around with it in your hands like that is threatening and no different from waving an unholstered pistol around in public. A rifle sling is the equivalent of a holster for a handgun.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >crying that he isn't using a sling
            low ready is not brandishing
            requiring a citizen pay money for accessories so you feel safe isn't just an infringement, it's racist
            just like waiting periods, fees for carrying, etc.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              > Requiring a holster is racist, friend
              > Just put that Glock in your pants, it'll be f-BANG
              Your sling is your rifle's holster. Nobody wants you flagging them with your rifle when you need to pick shit up or open a door. If you're going to pay the $500 for your PSA, you can afford a $30 sling.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >low ready is not brandishing
              It literally is.
              >requiring a citizen pay money for accessories so you feel safe isn't just an infringement, it's racist
              shit bait

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                it's not, it's presenting
                >waiting period is an area with high crime and slow police response time
                racist
                >demanding people who aren't rich to pay for their right to carry a firearm
                racist
                >demanding people buy a holster or sling to keep their firearms out of their hands
                racist
                shit for brains

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                So Black folk can't afford slings and holsters? have a nice day moron.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                keeps adding hoops/fees for people to jump through to be allowed to exercise their rights bootlicker. please an hero as soon as possible, preferably without the use of a firearm

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Black folk and poor people shouldn't have rights. If you can afford a gun and ammo, then you can afford a $30 holster/sling so you don't even have a point anyway. kys

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Hypothetically a person buys a force multiplier due to whatever circumstances they face in their lives. Now you're demanding they sink more money into personal protection that does nothing but make you feel secure. Take your feelings and an hero midwit.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                His hand is on the grip, that’s brandishing. He can carry it by the receiver and not be brandishing, and also not have to spend $30 of his scratchers and loose cig money on a nylon strap.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's not brandishing
                https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/brandish
                Maryland has no brandishing laws, but by all means find me a statue that doesn't exist. If you want to start a gofundme and start handing out slings go nuts. They aren't a requirement

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is on the level of saying it's racist to expect Black folk to get IDs to vote or to maintain their cars and ensure the brakes work because the constitution grants them freedom of movement. If you're so poor that you can't afford a string to tie around your rifle to keep it slung over your back rather than muzzle flagging everyone in a quarter-mile radius, then your life is not worth protecting anyway.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >requiring a citizen pay money for accessories so you feel safe isn't just an infringement
              Not him, but that's a pretty weak-ass argument. You should have a sling anyway and the only people who I can accept can't trivially afford one for their rifle are Keltec owners

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I can't buy a gun without also buying a brand new approved lock for that gun from the dealer. I consider it an infringement.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'll tell you what, I live in MD and our laws are more restrictive than most but after watching the country slide after New Town into whatever the frick Texas is doing I've come to appreciate not having mass shootings all the time. Stay out of Baltimore and you're fine. I still think some restrictions are onerous and they're written by people who don't handle them but there's a middle ground and they mostly don't affect people without a criminal record. The laws get worse for every time a Texan shoots his neighbor so stop doing that please.

          Oh and another thing the new law does is it makes you lock up guns in your home if you have kids. That one really gets people mad.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I'll tell you what, I live in MD and our laws are more restrictive than most but after watching the country slide after New Town into whatever the frick Texas is doing I've come to appreciate not having mass shootings all the time
            I'm glad to live in a rural upper Midwest state that historically took a middle ground approach but rarely ever makes the news for mass shooting despite how liberal our gun laws are now days. I actually don't like constitutional carry, the permitting process was fine and served as a quick filter for police to be able to shake down crime commiters for guns and confiscate and charge them to prevent future crimes, they had pistol purchase permits here until a couple years ago as another barrier. I don't know what the hell is wrong with TX but it seems like a 50-50 these days of someone shoots up a Walmart or a Elementary school.

            >Stay out of Baltimore and you're fine. I still think some restrictions are onerous and they're written by people who don't handle them but there's a middle ground and they mostly don't affect people without a criminal record. The laws get worse for every time a Texan shoots his neighbor so stop doing that please.
            Yeah, I mean Baltimore is kind of a dump, I visited a few years ago, good crab cakes but holy hell it's a top five homicide capital of the country almost every year. Rest of the state seems pretty comfy otherwise. I think AW bans are ineffective but we probably should be more cautious with semiautomatics and handguns in general to prevent loons from having access since we no longer institutionalize them.

            >Oh and another thing the new law does is it makes you lock up guns in your home if you have kids. That one really gets people mad.
            Really? Gun safes are already pretty cheap, I keep all my firearms except a handgun in a safe, seems like the responsible approach to avoid incidents with kids in the house. I'm perfectly content punishing people who don't keep rifles stored under lock and key.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >The governor also signed into law another bill that strengthens storage requirements for firearms. Under the law, a person can't store a loaded firearm in a place where the person knew or should have known that an unsupervised minor has access to a gun
              I understand the kneejerk resistance to oppose anything that affects inside the home but that seems fairly restrained. Texas kids are shooting each other too.
              MD loosened carry issue restrictions per SC but raised handgun licensing requirements to include x hours of formal training. Apllication fees and such go up as well.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I understand the kneejerk resistance to oppose anything that affects inside the home but that seems fairly restrained.
                I understand, I don't know how it's actually enforceable in practice regardless I think it should be an action taken with kids in the house. Kids are curious and that can obviously end badly if loaded firearms are stored and handled improperly but it seems many parents these days lack the foresight to mitigate the risks of them hurting themselves or others. The problem it seems to me is that there is no trust between gun control advocates and progun movements which explains why putting any legislation is so difficult, even if it seems like an intuitive and fairly restrained solution to a problem that exists. Maybe as I've gotten older I have lost faith in the average person to be able to act in a responsible manner which necessitates the laws to be passed in attempt to force people to take basic precautions.

                >MD loosened carry issue restrictions per SC but raised handgun licensing requirements to include x hours of formal training. Apllication fees and such go up as well.
                I actually felt like the NJ/MD historic approach to concealed carry was excessively restrictive so I'm glad to see them move to a shall issue permitting system due to Bruen. That said my state went to Constitutional carry a couple years ago which I also feel is excessive, so many people just aren't responsible enough (or lack the self control) to handle concealing a deadly weapon so I think a shall issue semi-restrictive permitting system is ideal, shooting tests, regular training, background checks, etc. Should be considerations to acquire a permit.

                I'll get a lot of hate for this but I'd be okay with requirements to join a shooting club to own semiautomatic rifles, it forces people that own these type of firearms to be a part of a community that can act as a moderator or early alarm for mass shooter types. Clearly status quo isn't working as mass shooting are common

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >join a shooting club to own semiautomatic rifles
                Would you really expect that to change anything? You don't need a semi-automatic rifle to kill a classroom full of kids. You could do that with a Lee Enfield. Trying to get out of this by focusing on the guns themselves is not going to help.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                To some extent it clearly is, obviously if there were no guns mass shootings wouldn't happen. I'm not arguing to remove guns from society as I think there are a lot of benefits to having armaments from shooting, hell the financial damage this would do to me would be biblical as I own several dozen firearms as a collector and participate in local range 3 gun competitions. Clearly the European's don't have issues like we do with this despite the fact that we have significantly higher purchasing power than 75% of Europe, even countries like Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, etc which allow AR15s don't have a school shooter problem so something is obviously going wrong somewhere. I'm not trying to ban semiautomatics, I want to keep the public on our side and solve a problem that seems to terrorize a swing demographic (white suburban women), partially solved by involuntarily institutionalizing severely mentally ill people (which became unpopular in the 80s) is causing some amount of the crime but there are some filters on firearms we can put in place to help mitigate the risks while retaining the rights of the morally upstanding majority.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, etc which allow AR15s don't have a school shooter problem
                Exactly, that's my point. What goes along with that, like I said, is that you don't need an AR-15 to commit a mass shooting. You could cause every semi-auto in the country to disappear tomorrow, and these massacres would just be happening with lever guns instead. I agree there is an obvious problem, I'm just saying I don't think things like a club membership requirement for semi-autos would make an ounce of difference, even if it was constitutional.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >lever guns
                yeehaw

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't know how it's actually enforceable
                It's probably not tbh but if something does happen they'll bring down the hammer.
                >Maybe as I've gotten older I have lost faith in the average person to be able to act in a responsible manner
                Yeah, there's something to that. I don't mind people killing themselves through negligence but I can't trust them not to shoot up a crowd anymore.
                I agree with you 100% on cc. We're too close to all the government for one thing so we get more restrictions.
                I'm not on board with requiring membership in a club. My thoughts on capacity limits and semi auto rifle restrictions are more complicated than they used to be. Small mags are annoying at a range and it's the easiest thing to bypass with ill intent. If I had kids I'm sure I'd have a stricter take on rifles especially.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >mass shooting are common
                They're not common outside of ghetto shitholes governed by antigun politicians. The idea that you should be forced to join a shooting club (i.e. paying boomers $1k per year so you can shoot 1 round every 30 seconds benchrested) to own a semi-auto is asinine and only something a yuropleb would consider acceptable.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They're not common outside of ghetto shitholes governed by antigun politicians.
                Politically speaking nobody gives a shit about black blood gang members gunning down the rival black crypt gang members anymore so yes the mass shooting numbers are hyper inflated but guys going into a local elementary school with an AR-15 with the intent to kill as many people as possible seems to not happen in the Czech Republic. What is unique about the USA that we have people wanting to massacre grade schoolers?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What is unique about the USA that we have people wanting to massacre grade schoolers?
                We lionize violent freerange schizos instead of throwing them into looney bins where they belong. If you defend yourself from them like Kyle Rittenhouse, Daniel Penny, Ian Cranston, etc. then you will have your life ruined by the injustice system.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >We lionize violent freerange schizos instead of throwing them into looney bins where they belong. If you defend yourself from them like Kyle Rittenhouse, Daniel Penny, Ian Cranston, etc. then you will have your life ruined by the injustice system.
                Okay, I agree with you to a large extent but it's unconditional since '75 as

                The ACLU got the SCOTUS to make it illegal to keep schizos locked up in mental hospitals unless it's pretrial detention.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Connor_v._Donaldson

                points out so now what?

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao google auto correcting un-constitutional to unconditional.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I think AW bans are ineffective but we probably should be more cautious with semiautomatics and handguns in general to prevent loons from having access since we no longer institutionalize them.
              Unfortunately, blue team is all or nothing. I live in MA and it's non stop gun control despite already having all the gun control. There is one moron that submits a bill to ban all semiautos every year.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I slept, ate, trained and patrolled with an assault rifle as a Marine officer
                I swear to God, I fricking hate politicians and antis in general who talk up banning rifles but feel the need to throw in these boomer-ass humblebrags. It's like, do you think you're making your soccer mom voting base wet when they read this? There's nothing like hearing that the guy who wants to take your gun thinks only he's fit to handle it

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >expecting a muhreen to not tell you he's a muhreen

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                I know, that's the comment I made is that there is no trust between the two sides at this point which that lack of trust obviously exists for a reason. I don't consider myself a Democrat nor Republican, I have no interest in supporting a blanket ban of so called assault weapons or semiautomatics but you have to admit, for as wealthy of a county we are, the fact we can't control the flow of firearms to lunatics and crooks/gangbangers is embarrassing. In fact I'd probably be most apt to support restrictions on handguns since statistically they're the most likely to used in crimes but there's no public appetite for that because guess what, some suburban women want to buy handguns for self defense.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the fact we can't control the flow of firearms to lunatics and crooks/gangbangers is embarrassing.
                It's hard to do that when half the people in the country vote for a political party that platforms on keeping violent schizos and gangbangers out of prison.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                And the other party won't pay to put them in asylums. We're at an impasse.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                The ACLU got the SCOTUS to make it illegal to keep schizos locked up in mental hospitals unless it's pretrial detention.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Connor_v._Donaldson

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's hard to do that when half the people in the country vote for a political party that platforms on keeping violent schizos and gangbangers out of prison.
                That's true and frick those states and their wet noodle DAs for letting their standards slide so much that people can't be expected to not steal, deal drugs, strip copper pipes from houses for meth money, or murder. We have to deal with the world in which we exist rather than the one we wish we had. If those states don't want to lock up violent criminals that spread like a cancer their criminal behaviors interstate, guess what, the federal government needs to come in to deal with them but dumb frick libertarians and suburban progressives block this sort of action because
                >Government bad and muh poor oppressed minorities
                So I propose rallying people of any political alignment to make changes in their own states to overrule these types to lock up criminals and keep them away from polite society since they clearly demonstrate a lack of remorse and a willingness to reoffend consistently.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >is on board dedicated to guns
                >lives in state where you functionally may never own one

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >is moronic
                >is poor

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry I live in Florida, MA is inferior to my state.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      This will be hard to understand but the guy is not trying to threaten children. This is, to him and people who think like him, the same as people who video tape the police, or who burn the Quran. It is the idea that the only way to keep your rights is to exercise them. He thinks he is doing a public service.

      About the Constitution, it is hard to make amendments these days. It would not be possible to change the second amendment at this time and trying to could actually start insurgency or lead up to civil war. Really.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't say he is trying to threaten children (his intention) but he's threatening the children (objective outcome). Every child's reaction to a deadly weapon that isn't fear is fricked up.

        The history books are full of laws that have basically been "it's my right to do x!" - people think you're being a Black person - they vote for you not to have the right to do x anymore.

        If public nudity was legal you think he should have the right to stand there with his erect schlong out?

        If the gun community wants to keep guns, they need to cease being Black folk to the point that the community thinks the current gun rights contribute more to society that they take away. If you cease Black personing and supporting people like this, you may end up like Switzerland or Czechia, with a live gun culture with common sense restrictions.

        If you keep being Black folk the endpoint is Britain and that's exactly what you currently deserve.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          More likely Mexico

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I will. the fricktard is obviously trying to scare and threaten the kids to cause a scene to get attention in the worst possible way. if the point wasn't to scare the kids, he wouldn't be targeting them for his little protest, he'd be menacing around near the politicians he's upset with. of course, politicians have bodyguards that will flatten your ass, and kids don't. fricking pussy.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're a big pussy too, as am I, we're both bigger pussies than this guy.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              being mentally incapable of processing the idea of consequences tends to give a false air of bravado

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
                You're right, of course.

                https://i.imgur.com/o5qJe6Q.jpg

                [...]
                [...]
                googling the story it seems to be a swarthy individual named J’Den McAdory

                I believe it. He looked white to me but I don't know why tf suddenly PrepHole thinks black people don't own guns. Whatever fits the narrative at the time...

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is why adolescents and young adults typically lead the charge in social movements because what the frick do they have to lose, and what are the feds going to do, imprison and alienate an entire generation, and why all of the institutions that educate them turn them into the giantest pussies.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            b***h ass Black person

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          You're right, concerned people should wake up early every morning and stand armed vigil in front of political and bureaucratic buildings while the grabbers come in to work, and not make children feel feels. How long until somebody finds something every concerned person is guilty of though?

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    This man has his gun at low ready. I dunno man, kinda seems like brandishing to me

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe he could not afford a sling.

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course /k/eddit is seething about this guy exercising his 2nd Amendment rights. The real reason why he's wrong is because his rifle doesn't have a sling and he's black.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Calls him out for not having a sling before calling him out on not having sights
      Is it amateur hour

  28. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    based. he should walk into a school or a bank like that, show them libs what's up.

  29. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Express your rights

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      That woman must be nearly 80 years old. This country, man.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        some old people retire and realize they like to work and socialize. My dad is a retired cop at 60 and started to work at walmart at 65 because he was bored all day

  30. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wait is there more than one anon in here line-breaking like a moron

  31. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    i definitely dont support this. it only hurts gun rights. just because you have freedom of speech doesnt mean it should be used at inappropriate times and in inappropriate ways. similar to gun rights. also, open carrying in most public contexts is just stupid anyways

  32. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I own a sling so I don’t have to carry my rifle at low ready all the time

  33. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Smack him in the back of the head with an extendable baton. You now have a free rifle and the admiration of every parent in the area

  34. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    homosexual can at least be classy and have it slung on his back. fricking lolbertarians man they're nuts

  35. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >There is absolutely nothing that is going to sway suburban moms into liking guns
    Maybe not, but there are things that can radicalize them against guns, and motivate them to take action against them.
    >If something such as this could change their minds
    I think you're underestimating how many minds it could change.

  36. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >MIGA cap in 2023
    Deserves to die, unironically

  37. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    open carrying rifles outside of hunting/hiking is peak moron
    >inb4 sperg replies to this post sperging out about muh rights

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I disagree. I think it's fine.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      hikers would tell you you're a sperg for carrying in the woods. what are you going to tell them? i-it's muh right? go be a homosexual somewhere else

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I can't imagine what kind of a psycho you'd have to be to carry on hikes where I live. This isn't the rockies.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I can't imagine what kind of a psycho you'd have to be to carry bandaids where I live. There are hospitals for that kind of thing.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are you going to get raped in the woods or is a deer going to get you?

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              The deer is going to rape me

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              I'm raping the deer at gun point, obviously

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I can't imagine what kind of a psycho you'd have to be to carry on hikes where I live. This isn't the rockies.

        >not being prepared for bigfoot
        ngmi

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Snallygaster here.

  38. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fricking hell, im glad i dont live in that shithole.

  39. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >nooooo our optics!
    >we have to play by the rules bros!
    >we MUST comply, we MUST win the rigged electoral system!
    Go cry to the blacks, mexicans and israelites who view you as lower than dirt. The rest of us will ignore gay blue laws.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Go back to whatever shithole you came from you twitter screenshots posting nobody.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm going to enjoy watching your fat ass evacuate your bowels when you're hanged and they don't bother to snap your neck, you diversity hire fed. Laws begin and end with demographics. Aristotle was right.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm sure you'll die of an aneurysm long before he eventually has kids

  40. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >You guys don’t actually do this, right?
    On the one hand, I do whatever the frick I want.
    On the other hand, I don't want to do that.

    In fact, I would say it's enough of an evidence for mental disorder to warrant investigation of that individual. Not long ago in our history, mental illness was the equivalent of low moral character. I think that was a correct way to look at it.

  41. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just feel like a false flag/glowie dude... open carry near kids, red hat. Unlike this moron who just showed up with an AOW to protect Marine after recruit office got shot up.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      I remember that vividly. It happened a lot on Virginia and the military had to politely tell all these social maladepts their services weren't needed and they were making things worse.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh yeah there were some gems out there... like this guy SKS with history of slam fire.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          SKSs don't slamfire unless the cosmoline wasn't cleaned out of it, or you're using soft commercial primers. It's not like they're all ticking time bombs waiting to go full auto

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/Jgyg1pz.jpg

      You guys don’t actually do this, right?

      Don't people like these have better things to do?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        No they don't, they are virtual signaler from the right side.

        Look at this old timer... slide fire with no rear sight... I guess he will just walk it in when he shoots

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah but check out that marine corps tm trigger discipline.

  42. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    No sights or optics. Sus

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      no toyota hilux though

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Here is more footage, I guess from a different day

      https://www.fox19.com/2023/05/19/man-with-ar-15-seen-school-bus-stop-maryland/

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *