You are a given complete command of any army or faction within the last 1,000 years of your choosing.

You are a given complete command of any army or faction within the last 1,000 years of your choosing. Assume that regardless of your choice, your troops represent the cream of the crop of that faction, and are absolutely loyal to you.

The catch is that you must fight and defeat an enemy army from at least one hundred years into the future of equal number. They are entirely average for the era in their training and loyalty. You get to choose the faction but they must be at least one hundred years more advanced than your army. Hardmode-- reduce the time frame to the last 500 years instead of the last 1,000.

What faction/era do you choose? Who do you fight?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ah yes, sloppery sloppa

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Give me the men of MACV-SOG and put us in the triple canopy of the Tri-Border of Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I choose to lead 1000 US Marines from 1924 vs. your mom leading the brigade of shitposters making slide threads in 2024

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    realistically it has to be from before 1700s since that's when exponential growth in military capability really took off and avoid any large technological leaps like the adoption of plate armor or crossbows. A cheesy option would be picking a european army for yourself and a non-european one to fight since that's technically allowed and a guaranteed mogging throughout history

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >technological leaps like the adoption of plate armor or crossbows
      >t. doesn't know anything about crossbows not taught to him by fantasy movies

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Genoese crossbowmen routinely got gutted by English longbowmen and arquebusiers

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Routinely
          >French adopted the longbow and then abandoned it going back to the crossbow

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >French adopted the longbow
            >realised exactly how much training is involved and that the only people capable of getting them up to speed were absolutely uninterested in doing so or even just giving them the 20 years of peace it would take to produce competent archers
            >and then abandoned it going back to the crossbow

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't think you understand what I was pointing out.
          The crossbow is much older, and much less significant of a "leap" than the first poster is aware of.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The English lost the whole ass war where "muh longbows" became a thing, you do know that, right? They literally won one individual singular battle because "muh longbows" and then catastrophically lost, losing their most valuable territory, and forever forfeited their claim to the French throne.

          >muh longbows
          Is literally just British propaganda meant to obfuscate this fact. There is nothing special about longbows and they are the oldest and most primitive form of bow.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Frog cope

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Thread solved.
      Just pick a european country in the 16 or 17th century and conquer a new colony.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the tank battalion that was immobilized when the shabbos goys stormed the beach of normandy

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I choose the israelites. SpaceBlack folk wont know what’s hit them.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      OP didn't specify in what timeframe you had to conquer your enemy so you win by default. Time period also doesn't matter though I recommend you take em from the 1950s.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I choose current day NATO, the enemy is the Vatican Guard.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Any WW1 european army with those caveats could beat the shit out of ten times their number in any current African Army.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What faction/era do you choose?
    IRA 1920

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >IRA 1920
      Vs
      Protestants of the New Zealand Defence Force (current)

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        New Zealand still has a defense force? New Zealand still has protestants?

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I pick the Confederates and save Anne Frank from the Nazis.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >What faction/era do you choose?
    An army of English archers and men-at-arms circa 1346.
    >Who do you fight?
    An army of French dogs circa 1446.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    NS Germany vs israelite managed brown gay alien feminist troony allies

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    british colonial army from 1800 vs african tribal army from 1900

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    mongols of 1200
    vs
    aztecs of 1500

    and just to make it interesting: batlefield will be in hawaii

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mongols of 1200 dumpsters everyone up until the 1800's.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >"Mongols of 1200 dumpsters everyone up until the 1800's."
        >gets blown the frick up by cannons

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Aztecs of 1500 were less advanced than Genghis' horde, largely because of metallurgy and horses

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mongols knew about diseases and fully expoilted them

      this would be like curbstomp x100

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hardmode
    I choose the Australian Imperial Force of 1918 against the modern day tribesmen of North Sentinel Island.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      kek

      https://i.imgur.com/v8A2f6p.jpg

      You are a given complete command of any army or faction within the last 1,000 years of your choosing. Assume that regardless of your choice, your troops represent the cream of the crop of that faction, and are absolutely loyal to you.

      The catch is that you must fight and defeat an enemy army from at least one hundred years into the future of equal number. They are entirely average for the era in their training and loyalty. You get to choose the faction but they must be at least one hundred years more advanced than your army. Hardmode-- reduce the time frame to the last 500 years instead of the last 1,000.

      What faction/era do you choose? Who do you fight?

      I choose WW1-era Canadian infantry vs modern CAF

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I choose WW1-era Canadian infantry vs modern CAF
        kek

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Give me one of Basil II's imperial tagmas from 1024 and I can take on any 1000 army from 1124.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Do you also listen to the British autist like I do

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I have no idea who you're talking about, I've just read a lot of Byzantine war manuals over the years.
        Most of those were written in the reigns of Nikephoros II Phokas, John I Tzimiskes, and Basil II Porphyrogenitus, so they're relevant to the question at hand. My favorites were written by Nikephoros himself.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I assume he's talking about the history of Byzantium podcast. It's pretty good, but not as good as the history of Rome podcast that it seeks to emulate and continues the narrative of.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Give me one of Basil II's imperial tagmas from 1024 and I can take on any 1000 army from 1124.
      Uh as long as they're not Turkic lmao.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/nczDraI.jpg

      The army of Basil II Porphyrogenitus, I fight the T*rks and win thus saving the ERE and all of Europe from centuries of menacing by the eternal K*bab. gg ez

      Damn I didn't even see this, nice to know someone else had the same idea lmao

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    probably some musket infantry from the late 17th century since they'll have flintlocks and an army from the late 18th wouldn't be too different in terms of armament.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    British cavalry from the 1918 hundred days vs the modern "army" of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (the taliban state)

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    WW1 Germany VS Modern Somalia.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I choose the Landsknechts.
    and I will defeat the tacky ho-ass Black folk of the Army of Republika Srpska in a fashion show walk-off.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would just be nice to everybody who accepts Christ as thier savior and kill the rest who don't in the name of love. Poor heathen bastards are better off dead anyway.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I want Edward the Thirds English army circa 1350 to fight against any late medieval army

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Gg, ez

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Me in command of the Persian Immortals vs. the Zulus during the Anglo-Zulu War.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    509th Composite Group vs middle east

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is basically childs play if you just pick any white army and put them against any brown army 100 years later.

    Turbo easy mode is Africa, can anyone even find a single example otherwise?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm pretty sure the Chadian army of the Toyota Wars or Rwandan Light Infantry would still BTFO of most Euro colonial armies 100 years prior simply because of their mobility.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wouldn't be very mobile after a Maxim got done putting .45" holes into them. They still can't fricking shoot for shit.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >t. moron

          Stop coping. Race war agitprop bullshit aside, HMGs were not deployed widely enough in 1860-1880 to make a serious difference when your enemy has vehicles, helicopters, and each soldier has the firepower equivalent of 10-15 of your own men. RLI were objectively well-trained even by western standards and the Chadians don't need to be with such overwhelming technological superiority. You would get bodied by Black folk in technicals with autcannons long before you could mount an adequate defense with the technology of the day, especially before trench warfare tactics were developed. Maybe read up on the conflicts I'm referencing before offering your uneducated opinion.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >1860-1880
            Late 1880s you mean, and we're talking about an army here not some shit-tier colonial police outfit. They have fricking big boy artillery too.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Race war agitprop bullshit aside,
            Brown cant fight.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Maybe read up on the conflicts I'm referencing before offering your uneducated opinion.
              Meanwhile every single time africans have fought ever, on camera
              >UNGA! UNGA UNGA BUNGA! *twerks and fires AK into the air to frighten the enemy* KQUA KQUE KWUE! *eats one of his own child soldiers* I HAV DA POWAH OF DE DEVOL *dies of HIV*

              Right so basically you couldn't actually come up with an argument against the specific examples I referenced so you started screeching. Doesn't exactly make you look smarter than the average subsaharan African.

              For a good example of what happens when you assume racial superiority will win regardless of all other factors, look up what happened to the British army in 1842 in Afghanistan. The guys who you would put up against AKs, technicals and air support got absolutely raped by illiterate Afghans with Jezails.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >look up what happened to the British army in 1842 in Afghanistan
                That was the East India Company army you moron. They were fricking Indian troops.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Maybe read up on the conflicts I'm referencing before offering your uneducated opinion.
            Meanwhile every single time africans have fought ever, on camera
            >UNGA! UNGA UNGA BUNGA! *twerks and fires AK into the air to frighten the enemy* KQUA KQUE KWUE! *eats one of his own child soldiers* I HAV DA POWAH OF DE DEVOL *dies of HIV*

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Gonna go with 1000 cossacks (1919)
    Vs
    The 1000 man army of nugget owners in the US

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Too easy
    Standard mode:
    1,000 of the best men from the Battle of Yehuling 1211: Genghis Khan, Subutai, and his most elite men.
    Pit them against a standard Muscovite army of the 1300s and they'll wipe the floor with them

    Hard mode:
    Pope John XXIII of the Royal Italian army of 1918, as a single member of the army, by himself against an equal number (1) of the 2024 Vatican Swiss Guard. The guard isn't gonna kill some confused cleric shouting latin at him, and John will take the chance to gut and kill him.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Napoleon's Grand Armée right before the invasion of Russia vs all of modern day Sub-Saharan Africa.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Polish-Lithuanian-Hungarian-Bohemian-Croatian Union in 1443.
    DEVS VULT

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    1804 grande armée vs 1904 Qing Empire. I just teach them to smoke their clothes to avoid typhus and let them do the rest.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The army of Basil II Porphyrogenitus, I fight the T*rks and win thus saving the ERE and all of Europe from centuries of menacing by the eternal K*bab. gg ez

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Otomo clan Samurai in 1587, seasoned veterans of the Kyushu campaign, at the zenith of their power, armed with copious amounts of guns
    vs.
    >Tokugawa Ashigaru in 1687, probably never seen combat in their lives, at the beginning of Japan's military decline, probably armed with nothing but some spears and arrows, maybe some paltry pieces of armor
    Time to praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    WW1 Germans vs Modern Day Russians. US aid to Ukraine will make up for any equipment shortfalls and even then some of it won't even be needed.

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    goddamn that is a Kino statue.

    Ri'n ni yma o hyd, e gwaetha pawb o phopeth.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *