Yesterday Russia dropped dropped 152 FABs, a new record. Does this signify an intensification of the air campaign?

Yesterday Russia dropped dropped 152 FABs, a new record. Does this signify an intensification of the air campaign? What is /k/'s assessment on using a high amount of air dropped ordinances in this war?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >It can reliably hit city-sized targets
      Perfect for Russians, I guess

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        and the IDF

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They've spent the last few months building a stockp- AAANNNDDDD it's gone.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Bro he is talking about dumb bombs with minor adjustments to make them less dumb not cruise missiles
      Russia will never run out of stockpile they produced them for all of the cold war duration

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia will never run out of stockpile they produced them for all of the cold war duration
        that's what everybody believed two years ago, but russia somehow managed to get most of this stockpile destroyed

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I hope they give them Meteor missiles for F16 so they start shooting down the pidors carrying these KWAB bombs

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >start shooting down pidors
      >start
      anon, i...

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    that would explain the hemorrhage of planes they are suffering.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >blyat if we lose half a squadron of aircraft every week we're winning
      i miss 2015 /k/.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You weren't here in 2015, Sanjay

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          i was, you weren't, moron.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Of which there is 0 material proof by the way. Ukrainian claims are worthless because they lie all the time.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Of which there is 0 material proof by the way. Ukrainian claims are worthless because they lie all the time.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You could have posted footage as refutation. But you didn't.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        oh, the classic

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No, really, where are they?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >dropped 152 FABs
        Of which there is 0 material proof by the way. Pussias claims are worthless because they lie all the time.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    why didn't we see this during the campaign for Kiev or the struggle for Bakhmut? It's not like these aircraft just rolled off the assembly line. Russia should've had an integrated air campaign from day 1.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Kyiv's AA is too good.
      As for Blacked Mutt, that's a good question.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        There's plenty of footage of Flankers flying over Kiev in the opening hours of the war. I don't think they had very much in those days.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They’re simply doing it now because Ukraine is running dangerously low on ammo and they’re trying to exploit it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia waited until every Ukrainian shell had killed a Russian citizen to start fighting for real
        but that doesn't make sense

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They didn't have these glide bombs then.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      while they were still heading to Kiyv, they expected the Ukrainian army to fold in 3 days
      Remember all the homosexual convoys getting bamboozled? Remember all the conscripts having no idea they are going to Ukraine to begin with? Running out of gas, packing provisions for 3 days, etc.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is just the best head cannon of the whole war to me
        >homos in full civilian beat up gear
        >hitting their batons in their hands
        >grinning
        >lusting over the prospect of beating up some hemoglobin leftoid democrats
        >suddenly get completely fricking SHREKD by mortars, machinations guns and organized resistance groups
        >...
        >motherfricking profit

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >head cannon
          PLEASE GIVE ME A WEAPON LIKE THE INFINITE POWER OF NANO AUGMENTATION

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            My post was severely fricked up by auto correct.
            Please accept my apologies.
            Nice answer tho

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Apology denied.
              Death to all phoneposters.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Total Artillery Death is finally kicking in and they can't rely on the big guns anymore so they are forced to use airstrikes instead

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        But what are they going to do after total fighter-bomber eternal flight?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        depots are still half full of inherited soviet artillery

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I bet after two years of cannibalizing that half is in such a great condition.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            does not matter much, they mostly need barrels

            https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/01/12/russia-needs-fresh-artillery-barrels-bad-its-yanking-them-off-old-guns-by-the-thousand/

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I love the way our western media writes shit like this and completely ignores the fact that Ukraine is suffering the exact same problem, while also putting the spin on it that this is a win for Ukraine.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                here we discuss why russia is throwing it's airforce away, fulfilling tasks usually done by artillery

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                But that's their doctrine isn't it? Throw shit at the problem till it goes away?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Because this creates the new problem of no planes and no pilots, what could russia possibly throw on this problem?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Throw shit at the problem till it goes away?
                The problem or the shit?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, it's because gliding guided bombs are now mass produced.
        Previously Russia didn't have them, attempts to bomb with iron bombs failed , and Russian AF retreated to never cross frontlines. They did some cope with lift FFAR launches (useless).
        But now technological solution in the form of long range glide bomb arrived and they can attack from relatively safe range.

        And this is concerning. Russian AF found solution to be actually useful, this changes balance of force much.
        Also worse mentioning that solution completely breaks Russian taboos and boomer delusions
        >no you cant use guided weapon they took expensive
        >no GPS guided bombs don't work against Real Enemy Iin Real Peer Conflict did you heard about Electronic Warfare?
        >no you can't attack frontline targets with guided bombs because only Human Eye of the pilot can see this target, no camera can replace Human Eye
        >only shturmovik can attack frontline targets, because it has Armor. Did you heard about Armored Shturmovik Legendary Il-2?
        >no you cant use consumers grade electronics in weapons, did you heard about Real Military Standards?
        >no you can't use foreign electronics in weapons desing, dis heard about Sanctions?
        Etc etc etc. Very Sprey like btw.
        But now all these idiottic boomer delusions are rejected in one go and Russian AF found their way spamming long range cruise missiles and long range gliding bombs. While primitive it works, unlike all boomer ideas they had before.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >But now technological solution in the form of long range glide bomb arrived and they can attack from relatively safe range.
          Russian bombers launch glide bombs absolutely within Ukrainian SAM range, but their air defense is just degraded and they lack the will to move assets from cities to the front line.
          F-16 won't change that because if lucky, they get AIM-120D, which do nothing unless they are fine with high risk engagements against R-37 all the time.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Russian bombers launch glide bombs absolutely within Ukrainian SAM range,
            If Ukrainimas move SAMs right next to frontlines, but this is exposes these SAMs to fires too. When these SAMs hang tens kilometers behind frontlines they don't have range to deal with bombers dropping glide bombs on frontline targets.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              The issue is that western shit is technically excellent, but totally unambitious concerning range and destruction. JDAM ER is a 250 kg bomb, while Russians launch Fab 1500 and outrange western air defense with both SAM and AAM.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >JDAM ER is a 250 kg bomb
                They make a wing kit for 2000 pounders

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >F-16 won't change that because if lucky, they get AIM-120D, which do nothing unless they are fine with high risk engagements against R-37 all the time.
            Not necessarily, platforms with the R-37 are limited in numbers and all the F-16 needs to do is be able to threaten the Su-34s enough to push them back 20-30km. Gripens or Eurofighters with the Meteor would be better though

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              daily reminder that the r-37 is a fricking meme of a missile that can likely be evaded by literally turning around.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Problem is you can't see missile coming

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you sure about that?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Missile coming at you ar 1.5M-3M with burned out motor? Pretty sure you can't see it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ...anon, these things have decent radar cross sections and higher level systems like patriot can see them when they're lofting. i am stunned you don't know this.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Problem is you can't see missile coming

                UNKNOWN TECHNOLOGY БЛЯTЬ

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you sure about that?

                If even you don't know where your missile is going, just imagine how much tougher it is for the enemy!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                all missiles are like that, the difference is how close you can approach before it's no longer possible

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >can likely be evaded by literally turning around
                suppression is the r-37 whole purpose.
                MiG-21s in Vietnam also were happy when enemy aircraft dropped their ordinance and turned away.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Took them a while to get those glide kits ready.
      It's only viable because they can release the bombs a few dozen miles away from the front.
      And to me it seems like they are trying to get some use out of their airforce before the Ukies get F-16s and actual air to air missiles.
      As of now they only have the gimped missiles the soviets gave their slave states.
      And having air based AA will always be superior to ground based in a scenario like this.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia should've had an integrated air campaign from day 1
      They didn’t even have adequate supply trucks on day 1

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the glide kits are a relatively new developement

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The glide kits let them operate far enough behind the lines that short-range SAMs can't reach them; possibly far enough that Based Buk and NASAMS can't hit them without coming well within drone/counterbattery range. Also, Ukraine has expended an awful lot of Buks and other medium-ranged SAMs over the last two years, so there may not be enough left to offer sufficient coverage. That means the primary threat to the Russians is long-range SAMs like Patriot, which are also needed to defend strategic targets, which means there aren't enough of them to go around close to the front.

      Despite all that, they've still managed to shoot down like a dozen assorted Sukhois in the last couple weeks; a few dozen more, and Russia will have trouble maintaining any sort of tempo.

      Now, one solution from Russia's side would be to attach a small rocket, GBU-15-style, to their kit-bashed glide bomb, in order to increase the launch range without having to increase manufacturing of actual jet engines for cruise missiles.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    may we see them?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        .

        ..

        ...is this all footage of the same strike?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It looks like that, 3 times the same strike or at least 3 times the same buildings.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          looks like it kek, i think the russians have actually hit the wall where their offensive operations are limited by a lack of artillery, so they're using air strikes as a replacement. this isn't sustainable.

          btw i shouldn't have to say this on /k/ - weapons of all places but 500 kg bombs being dropped on random ass factory buildings 300 meters from or directly on the front line is not impressive. aircraft are meant to be used 50 to 500 km inside enemy territory. russia has shown literally none of that and has successful lost 13??? aircraft doing what artillery could have done.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            i hope a vatnik says something like "xaxaxa but thats what american did in afghanistan" so i can post images of iraq btw
            pic related, baghdad

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              oh or a single fricking video of something like this. russia has the helicopters required to do something like this (this was by a chinook, russians have mi-26s which can CARRY CHINOOKS) and it has artillery of comparable weight (d-30s are only a metric ton heavier than m119s, pic related again), why have we not seen a single video of russians airlifting artillery?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i'm just samegayging now but this fricking boggles my mind. why didn't we see them do this during the kyiv feint??? a single artillery battery ne of kyiv would have skullfricked the ukrainians why didn't they do it?????????????

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >it wasn’t clear who were officers among them as they were all in camouflage Ratnik gear and lacking rank insignia. Approaching him, I said “Comrade lieutenant colonel, the battle is raging perhaps two or three kilometers behind the hill. Flares and smoke have been fired, both red and white. What do these signals mean? Perhaps they need our help there or is it Ukrainians?”
                He stared at me strangely, but expressively, perhaps trying to figure out who I was to do such a thing. His face was tired and there were drops of blood on his uniform. He had probably helped the wounded. The blood definitely wasn’t his. After a pause, he looked me in the eyes, then glanced at the hill and said “Frick knows what it means. We should get the frick out of here!”
                https://aul.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?context=L&vid=01AUL_INST:AUL&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&tab=Everything&docid=alma995895678006836

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i'm just samegayging now but this fricking boggles my mind. why didn't we see them do this during the kyiv feint??? a single artillery battery ne of kyiv would have skullfricked the ukrainians why didn't they do it?????????????

                I think the first three months of the war are what you get when you have intelligence officials plan invasions instead of generals

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                honestly yeah. i could see the officers low enough to be involved in actually organizing airlifting artillery being in the dark until the helicopters had already crossed into ukraine.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          hey you cant blame them
          it's a huge achievement for them to hit the intended target.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        .

        ..

        >the wrong side
        do they know?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      .

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ..

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      for the last fricking time nobody is impressed by that shit. come back with footage of a ukrainian patriot battery or military targets in dnipro being hit.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >cut aways
          >no aftermath

          Implessive

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I think it's cute how they added those little ua flags around the empty building

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >with a fricking krasnopol shell
          have a nice day

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why was a BUK so close to the front? Obviously to try and deal with the air assault.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              we're talking about air power here you fricking moron. buks hit by artillery shells do not count.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The BUK was in range of artillery shells BECAUSE it was being driven danger close to the frontlines to try and deal with that air power. Those KABa killed that BUK indirectly.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >indirectly
                shut the frick up.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                tell that to the hohols in the buk who got blown up

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                tell that to the hohols in the buk who got blown up

                No secondaries--no BUK missiles were hit. They hit an empty warehouse.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Uhhh...if BUK was hit were are solid propellant secondaries?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Nice one, good hitkmpjtr

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Tactical implications of posting the same building getting bombed from different angles over and over again?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it's a Bollywood thing

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nice job blowing up civilians in Sumy btw.
    Truly Russia is a righteous savior amd defender. The instrument of Jesus on Earth.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think this is the perfect weapon for this war, and Ukraine has no good response. We need to invent lasers that shoot down these kinds of bombs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ukarine's response has been to rapidly reduce the number of delivery platforms available to the Russian Federation. Unless they're building 10 Su-34s a week over there this isn't a sustainable loss rate.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I got a dumb question
        In theory, could Russia retrofit crop dusters and wildfire planes to drop glide bombs?
        I'm sure that this would impact range since they are so slow. And they would need some zigger rigged targeting system.
        But if you're willing to have b-17 level pilot casualties, why not?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You seriously think Russia has agricultural and firefighting planes?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >In theory, could Russia retrofit crop dusters and wildfire planes to drop glide bombs?
          no. they don't have enough ground clearance to take off while carrying a large bomb.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Mount the bomb on top of the wings. Take off normally, carry out bombing mission inverted.
            I see no flaws with this plan and have attached a preliminary mock-up for your consideration.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >range: <20km
              moron

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Oh, yes range might be a problem now, but luckily Russia is a oil rich country so we can just apply a load of drop tanks to the airframe to extend the range.
                As you can see I have also correctly addressed your next concern that it might take an excessive amount of runway to take off with the extra mass by also including a JATO unit to assist with that.
                When do we get cracking and get these out to the front lines?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Bonus: No need for a separate bombardier position, the Nordenski can be fitted to the pilot's console (upside down, of course).

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Well he's already got a glass canopy above him as you can see, so all you need is some rudimentary slavic moon runes etched onto the glass to function as a bombsight.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              That's a Lithuanian plane.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Its a Antonov An-2, they produced them at Dolgoprudniy in Russia, Kiev in Ukraine and Mielec in Poland?
                And think the Chinese pump them out to this day?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Its a Antonov An-2, they produced them at Dolgoprudniy in Russia, Kiev in Ukraine and Mielec in Poland?
                And think the Chinese pump them out to this day?

                Oh, I misunderstood, the error has been corrected.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It's missing the gay blowjob. The one with the bear.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Excellent work, anon. I'll forward the proposal to the UAC department heads.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Bonus: No need for a separate bombardier position, the Nordenski can be fitted to the pilot's console (upside down, of course).

              that's a marvelous idea and frankly Russia would have to be stupid not to do it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ukraine's response has been shooting down the planes lol

        aren't they mostly mspaint victories though? I think there was visual confirmation of 1 out of 10

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine's response has been shooting down the planes lol

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        On facebook, yes. Very effective. Doesn't help to reduce the number of sorties, but at least it still gives you the daily rush of endorphins.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ukarine's response has been to rapidly reduce the number of delivery platforms available to the Russian Federation. Unless they're building 10 Su-34s a week over there this isn't a sustainable loss rate.

      Ukraine's response has been shooting down the planes lol

      reminds me of operation linebacker except in tactical size instead of strategic.
      Not in its goal or scale, but in the mentality that expensive losses are acceptable and strategy wont be changed due to said losses because a goal needs to be achieved.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >So now they’re doing focused air campaigns.
    Where are the focused kills of meaningful resources (besides your own planes getting shot down homosexual)

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Kyiv implemented doctrine off digging in in a city instead of fighting in the open so this is Z counter measure.
    Sad shit is city gets destroyed for nothing really.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Frankly it's impressive how bad Russia is at waging war. They can't conquer anything, only destroy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's not that sad, people who lived there pre war were mostly retired anyways, nobody is coming back to live there post war it will be all agricultural exploitation and a couple mining town rebuilt and populated by central asian wagiesn

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is why F-16s, Tranche 1 Eurofighters and Gripens should have beennm ready a year ago. They need credible air patrols with proper air to air missiles to push the strike planes further back.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Armatard embarrassing himself
    OP is doing his monkey dance to embarrassed himself again

    >Poootij stronk Russia can manufactured 100 barrel bombs!! Even though fellas showed they have zero pallet
    You are brown, cope

    Even still /k/ remembered your soft doxxed this spada through your poops and embarrassed

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    (OP) #
    >Armatard embarrassing himself
    OP is doing his monkey dance to embarrassed himself again

    >Poootij stronk Russia can manufactured 100 barrel bombs!! Even though fellas showed they have zero pallet
    You are brown, cope

    Even still /k/ remembered your soft doxxed this spams, through your poops and embarrassed

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >What is /k/'s assessment on using a high amount of air dropped ordinances in this war?

    Russia risks irreplaceable planes and pilots to bomb civilians and buildings close to the front. Before they did it with artillery and rocket artillery.
    So I guess Russia got not enough of these any more.

    This way Russia lost 13 planes in 11 days (according to Ukraine). This is not sustainable.

    I guess they may still do it for about 2 weeks until their fake election is over. Then czar Vlad will declare another mobilization for fresh meat to throw in the grinder.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Then czar Vlad will declare another mobilization for fresh meat to throw in the grinder.
      Protip, the mobilization never ended.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Well it might increase and atcualy include Moscow and St. Petersburg

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not yet. Russia still has local minories left to genocide.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    polaks look just like russians, no difference really, it's the same people.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They're all slavs. Mutts call them subhuman because they're coping brownoids. Even their white recruitment has halved recently.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Wat u sey? Fak yuo polan is of stronk blood of rushians yuo bowrniod

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        polaks look just like russians, no difference really, it's the same people.

        Russians are not Slavs, that's a lie like everything else they claim.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >1/5th of the army is women
    >half is non-white obese mystery meat
    This is the army that will defeat Russia

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    puccians are also losing 1-3 planes per day

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Hmm, there's always a thread about this topic recently, after it goes dead a new one pops up instantly.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine is collapsing, it's painful to see

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    my pure guess is that monke threw Gerasimov out of a window and told Shogiu to secure donbass before victory day or else. Which has resulted in more and riskier sorties and subsequently russia losing a lot of planes

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >secure donbass before victory day or else
      I can believe it, after the previous final-final-final deadline passed without the area that is supposedly russia forever actually being under russia control even the most deluded supporter is starting to wonder if they are actually winning.
      Or was it the final-final-final-final deadline but I have lost count by now.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        But Zaporiozizhizhia voted 99.8% to join russia! The entire oblast belongs to Russia!

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How did they drop so many? Are the ground crews so poorly trained they're just knocking these things all over the place?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The alcoholics with enough money to bribe their officers tend to get given low-risk jobs like aircraft resupply and maintenance rather than frontline duties. Combine that with the captured hand-jacks (unknown technology) they use, and there's a lot of dropped ordinance.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    truly organically welded post

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      finest russian craftsmanship

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      finest russian craftsmanship

      >We need to spend extra time and money making a weld look pretty for something that's gonna just be blowing up.
      And the West wonders why Russia is out producing them in literally everything

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >We need to spend extra time and money making a weld look pretty for something that's gonna just be blowing up.
        this explains a lot about russian gear, actually

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Posts the tank played a huge role in defeating the Germans because they could produce so many
          Irony.

          >while you were making sure your weapons worked we pumped out dogshit by the millions.
          this isnt something to be proud of anon.

          Weird how Ukraine keeps running out of ammo and retreating now

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            its not weird at all but ok.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >while you were making sure your weapons worked we pumped out dogshit by the millions.
        this isnt something to be proud of anon.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Probably a mix of more glide bombs available, rest of the army not able to support as much and trying to take advantage of Adviivka falling so they push extra hard.
    How this all changes in the coming months will be interesting.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Do they post number of bombs they drop?

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >tried posting about a thread about the failed attack on Kerch
    >deleted instantly
    War is going great I see.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >post a non-weapon thread on a weapon's board
      >wonders why it gets deleted
      hello newbie

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I posted about literally 5 different weapon systems associated with the story:
        Storm Shadow
        Global Hawk
        P8
        MALD
        AD
        If that’s not /k/ where does it go?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          NTA this board has been getting spammed by not so subtle bad-faith zigger threads, with roughly 0 effort put into them by OP.
          So even of your thread was intended as a joke to mock the Russians' bogus story,
          The irony is likely to be missed. And it will get lumped in with the trash.
          Sometimes a decent convo develops before getting baleeted, and that seems to save it in spite of OP's gayging everything up.

          >war's going great I see
          >hur snark! Snark!
          Oh you'll probably ignore my explanation then.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yea the jannies on this board are Ukranian homosexuals or neocon boomers who can’t handle any sort of news regarding russian victories.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm amazed it's taken 2 years for Russia to start using the worlds 3rd largest air force against the worlds 33rd largest air force.
    As for what it means we are seeing the Russia do damage but also lose a lot of airframes fast, it'll be interesting to see how much of the new EU and US aid is SAMs / fighter related.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Actual losses are something like 4-6 planes, if that. Linebacker II was 12 planes lost over 11 days iirc but that was a very successful bombing campaign regardless.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >compairing 152 FABs to 20,000 tons of bombs
        Come on now.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *