If France recieved the same amount of
intelligenceb support from CIA and MI6, and the same amount of millitary support than sure. Otherwise Russia would win more times than not.
Aside from literally one-sided roflstomps against Indians and the retarded dysfunctional governments of third world shitholes. The US has never won a war since WW2, and has certainly never won a war without foreign assistance. >Korea: Draw, US/Coalition favour (and this is as generous as it gets) >Viet Nam: Loss, soldiers spat on in the street on their return >Somalia: World's most expensive helicopters shot down by illiterate nogs with russky crap. Dead US Servicemen paraded through the streets.
and lets' not forget: >Afghanistan: After 20 years, literally decides to just fucking hand over the entire country and mountains of modern equipment to the ragheads. Chinooks evacuate people from the embassy, Vietnam style and Joe Biden eats ice cream while he tries to remember his name.
Though, I do have to give them credit for their smashing successes in the ongoing war to propagate sodomy.
>Anyone says anything critical of US policy or US history or implies they are anything less than an invincible righteous military juggernaut with absolutely no underlying systemic issues, or any wrongdoings or atrocities under it's belt. >Mainstream media zombies bleat out "RUSSIAN RUSSIAN RUSSIAN RUSSIAN!"
That exact attitude is how the USSR imploded, so keep doing it.
To be considered a minor naval superpower a navy needs a minimum of 500,000+ tonnes of submarines + carriers + destroyers + frigates + corvettes + landship ships
To be considered a midsized naval superpower a navy needs a minimum of 1+ million tonnes of the above categories
To be considered a true global naval superpower a navy needs 3+ million of the above categories
So today:
US and probably China are true global naval superpowers, maybe Russia is midsized superpower but probably not
France is closer to Botswana navy than to the US navy
Every other nation is below 500,000+ tonnes of submarines + carriers + destroyers + frigates + corvettes + landing ships
Also, nuclear propulsion and weaponry are required to be considered a true global naval superpower
18 FREMMs as the fleet backbone + 12 PPA/FTI seem like a formidable force. But would it be enough to have just 4 AAW destroyers? Although, there is only one full-fledged aircraft carrier in the fleet...
at the moment I'd say France could easily trounce Russia in a conventional war
If France recieved the same amount of
intelligenceb support from CIA and MI6, and the same amount of millitary support than sure. Otherwise Russia would win more times than not.
Lmfao, keep in mind that the stereotypical France military flag is a white flag for a reason
>t. Cheeseburger eating surrender monkey
The US has rando national guard units that could conquer all of France inside a weekend let alone our proper military
The taliban now has an army worth of national guard equipment
Aside from literally one-sided roflstomps against Indians and the retarded dysfunctional governments of third world shitholes. The US has never won a war since WW2, and has certainly never won a war without foreign assistance.
>Korea: Draw, US/Coalition favour (and this is as generous as it gets)
>Viet Nam: Loss, soldiers spat on in the street on their return
>Somalia: World's most expensive helicopters shot down by illiterate nogs with russky crap. Dead US Servicemen paraded through the streets.
and lets' not forget:
>Afghanistan: After 20 years, literally decides to just fucking hand over the entire country and mountains of modern equipment to the ragheads. Chinooks evacuate people from the embassy, Vietnam style and Joe Biden eats ice cream while he tries to remember his name.
Though, I do have to give them credit for their smashing successes in the ongoing war to propagate sodomy.
>what Russian propaganda does to a mf
>Anyone says anything critical of US policy or US history or implies they are anything less than an invincible righteous military juggernaut with absolutely no underlying systemic issues, or any wrongdoings or atrocities under it's belt.
>Mainstream media zombies bleat out "RUSSIAN RUSSIAN RUSSIAN RUSSIAN!"
That exact attitude is how the USSR imploded, so keep doing it.
Dang you're posting some good bait
Pierre, can you describe France's airlift capabilities in detail for us please?
>If you ignore the wins, the US has never won a war!
Don't get me wrong, Anon, the way your industrialized nation slaughtered those stone age savages was very stunning and brave.
Foreigner opinions don’t count
you are a tremendously uneducated person
Post mali
Lmfao
To be considered a minor naval superpower a navy needs a minimum of 500,000+ tonnes of submarines + carriers + destroyers + frigates + corvettes + landship ships
To be considered a midsized naval superpower a navy needs a minimum of 1+ million tonnes of the above categories
To be considered a true global naval superpower a navy needs 3+ million of the above categories
So today:
US and probably China are true global naval superpowers, maybe Russia is midsized superpower but probably not
France is closer to Botswana navy than to the US navy
Every other nation is below 500,000+ tonnes of submarines + carriers + destroyers + frigates + corvettes + landing ships
Also, nuclear propulsion and weaponry are required to be considered a true global naval superpower
>source: my ass
18 FREMMs as the fleet backbone + 12 PPA/FTI seem like a formidable force. But would it be enough to have just 4 AAW destroyers? Although, there is only one full-fledged aircraft carrier in the fleet...
>I am forgotten
>ramps externally
My bad. (It's BIG, btw).
Where are the San Giorgios?