Would everyone really be better off if we gave up on society and went back to hunting and gathering?

Would everyone really be better off if we gave up on society and went back to hunting and gathering?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Although agriculture can be retained. We must ban all technology including internet.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      WRONG

      transitioning to a diet that consists primarily of grains is where it all went downhill

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        We've been eating grain since Man was expelled from Paradise.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Internet itself wasn't bad until Web 2.0, moving mainstream services to internet ruined it. It's just interactive TV nowadays

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    nah

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, because without animals raping each other continuously we would just kill all the animals. 8B people on the planet. It's not possible to go back. We fricked up and depended too hard on modernity for us to live. I see no other option than the system itself breaking down entirely. : (

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Industrial revolution was a mistake. We have to end civilization before it ends us.
    Try to spend less time online and more time outside.
    Try to consooom less and become more self-sufficient.
    Try to be less tied to your possessions because they can be taken from you at any time.
    We must actively bring about the end of civilization through sabotage of electric grid etc.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Society falls to shit once communication is mainstream through the internet because there's too much room for disinformation. Small pockets of people 100K or less in one area keeps the government from infiltrating through media and social dissolution.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's just unbelievable, internet was meant to get through the official propaganda, it backfired so badly

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    We should have more farms and men should like each other and society would go back to being wonderful.

    The thing that actually keeps the human race from killing itself is each man's real liking of his neighbor, the diversity programs of israelites has destroyed this, I think they did it on purpose to start fights so they can use the chaos like a female to manipulate the fighters and enslave them both, but now that men no longer like each other suicide threatens to unpeople the planet and the israelites will have no slaves.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    probably. but it wouldnt be like night and day. the optimal solution is to harness technology under the guidance of god and the bible. the fact of the matter is god put us here as we are, this configuration at this moment in time, on earth with satan at every corner on purpose. he told us we will suffer on earth and its because we have accessed knowledge we should not have. he never said we can't use that knowledge now, only that satan will trick us with it into committing evil instead of good. so u need consistent powerful rituals, traditions, and faith to exercise technology in a responsible manner. for example, women should have no decision on matters of technological developments or applications. and the men should be pious enough to not fall a fool for a woman's whims such that he develops technology in a manner he should not. like when he makes something evil for sins of greed or lust as his true soulful motives, like to impress women or gain power over others. or the technology could be developed from a motivation of the sin of sloth, wherein they see short sighted opportunities or advantages that will improve their lives without considering the mainframe of the system and what that technology's proliferation will make on reprogramming that mainframe to create an existence that is not consistent with our morals, values, and faith.

    men are gifted and natural tinkerers and creators and allowing pious technology only ensures technology meets all common sense requirements a true conservative will have - ecofriendly, efficient, modest. it would integrate with the technology we have created this far. we have already unleashed it and we have perhaps only begun to pay for that, but those with level heads still can prune, sanitize, and curate the technology we have access to now and redirect it towards this optimum future i'm talking about

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Technology (the product of modern science) is Satanic and has roots in the occult. Technology = sorcery. Sorcerers are in the lake of fire in revelation. Those who produce this sorcery are active participants in evil.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        a fire for warmth alone is technology. if u read my post correctly, u would see the technology has to be moral and it will not free us of suffering. because to be moral is to accept suffering.

        what u dont realize is the informational universe can be manipulated by humans. this is a feature of our existence on earth as a matter of fact. and what u also dont realize is the informational universe, its laws allow for bubbles and pockets of constrained information and this is dependent on information gradients and densities. for implementation of pious technology, u need an informational bubble that will support the full load of the society that is operating it. what i'm saying in laymen terms is this is a conservation law and as long as proper moral information densities and gradients dwarf the technological information's, then the technology is nothing more than a sophisticated practice of husbandry with animals, where good practices lead to productive and healthy stock. u dont frick ur cows and horses. the bible says u dont. so u wont frick ur latex in the form of dildos and veganas because the bible says u dont. latex has useful purposes. all facets of its industry must be pious in order for the end technology to be considered pious technology. or u may consider it a graded metric where quality of pious technology depends on the quality of its constituent efforts of implementation. think if we developed a new IEC standard on pious technology.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >a fire for warmth alone is technology

          Yes. It was also given to mankind by the devil according to Greek mythology. There is a reason Prometheus is analogous with Satan and fire represents forbidden knowledge. Knowledge of good and evil was why this shit-show began to begin with. Every time we grasp at more and more power over this world we are making deals with the devil. There is such a thing as "holy technology" but it is not materialistic. It relies on man's relationship to God and on holy rituals, which are a temporary solution to man's seperation from heaven. These holy rituals like prayer, and in the old testament sacrafice and cleansing rituals, were a form of positive technology.
          Pretty much all the technology today is irredeemably evil though.
          The difference between holy miracles or ritual participation in reality to access the sacred vs manipulation of reality to access the demonic is essentially important and the difference might just save the human race.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Also the universe is not "information" per se. That doesn't really make sense. Information communicates a reality. Information is not itself reality.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            i disagree. a reality is a manifestation of information. i use information as synonymous with logic. the only thing needed before logic is god and numbers. god created numbers to create logic. with numbers in existence, they are both discrete and continuous. they include the prime number structure that we humans are given access to at least be aware of its existence, but we do not probably ever have the abilities needed to say certain facts about them. Once u have numbers u already have establish a base logic as well, because the numbers have unlimited access to eachother. u can transform and image and holomorph to ur hearts content in this realm. and so u can think of numbers as a graph structure where the entity is not just the individual nodes but also their relations/edges which can be infinite in the greatest way possible to express infinity. the numbers are also enough by themselves to create symbols in the most abstract sense, which are then enough by themselves to extend logic which are also extended to create information.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Thanks Tyce. Who is the one who brings chaos into order? Who is the one who forms solid things? Who makes the visible visible and the invisible invisible? Who is the craftsman of the firmament on which the shadow of the world is cast?
              >And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us;

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                the word is logic. numbers are the purest and most fundamental description of plato's theory of forms. let me put it this way, ur soul is a subinfinity of the entirety of numbers. here is a practical example: what is 2 + 2 - 2? its 2. i just made another 2 out of 3 2s, or out of using the same 2 3 times. that might sound trivial or like a trick, but its a trick that would be actually real if u believe me on this, where only god understands why all these tricks are the way they are. anyway, numbers are infinite and god sits outside of numbers, he is not numbers himself but numbers are him as a matter of his will. even our arm or an atom on our body is a subinfinity of the greatest infinity set possible of numbers. and next what u need to know is a way to call these subinfinities is infinity context. think of an infinity context as a tv channel u tune to watch and if ur infinity context is misaligned, basically the logic quality is changed from what the infinity context ur trying to describe and u can get anything from tuning into a channel u didnt expect to getting static fuzz u cannot manifest any pattern of information out of. so a context destiny is similar to the idea of the goldilocks zone for life on planets to accurately define a human's consciousness and soul. and this information, all contexts being unique, but not necessarily mutually exclusive, will have angles that intersect between contexts

                in this way i am telling u numbers are real entities. like as real as u and everything u experience, or even more real if u take a hierachical approach. just as there are infinite connections of any sort, remember these relationships can be ANYTHING that numbers can be. and numbers have an element of them that is not containable or describable by logic alone. have u ever seen a perfect circle in a real example on earth? no u have not. god operates outside of all possible paradox to be emergent from a set of logical expressions.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                “Perfect” circles don’t exist. The idea of the “perfect circle” exists, but a perfect circle doesn’t exist.
                All created things are created by the Creator.
                Time doesn’t exist; only now does. The past isn’t still happening somewhere, you can’t travel there, there’s no timeline to ‘rewind.’ There isn’t a future anywhere, because it hasn’t happened yet.
                God didn’t once create the world. God ever creates the world.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                what im telling u is perfect circles dont exist to US as humans, but they do to god. and they do to us indirectly, as in god supplied enough logic for our common reality (intersecting infinity contexts) such that we do have access to glimmers or incomplete notions of the perfect circle. just like i said we are able to access the prime numbers, but does not mean we can ever know certain things about primes; we cannot make certain proofs even if everything else we know about them tells us we should be able to make those certain proofs. but we cant not even after infinity years. its a computational problem.

                there is also a future as in a destiny but also that is not accessible to us as we exist in the present. we actually can exist in multiple times at once and essentially experience as having 3 brains and 6 eyes for example. this is something likely to happen when u get to heaven, where u can be eating ur favorite meal, playing ur favorite game, and snowboarding down a mountain slope simultaneously and process a coherent experience from their components.

                so yes the universe - which ur changing the definition once u step outside ur infinity context for the present - is both static and dynamic. it has both time and timeless aspects to it. and only somebody like god would get that, only he would understand why and what that means. we just know it is something we can say is true but maybe cant prove it.

                how is it that we have freewill but also we have a destiny? well this is a paradox for humans so im not going to try to pretend to know for sure why really. but god exists beyond all paradox and has access to all loopholes of logic defining the surface of an infinity context envisioned as a bubble of numbers surrounded by other numbers.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Mathematics tells you the logical structure of things but it does not tell you what those things are. If I say 1+1=2, 1 what? 1 apple. The elements of set theory (the basis of mathematics) have to be more than just abstract singularities for math to mean anything. Math is the structure of things, but quality, the substance of things, is just as important.
              Think of this as well: there are also relationships between things which are not of a type that logic can comprehend. Example: why do the notes in classical music combine to evoke a certain emotion? Logical structure of the notes and essential quality of the notes do not contain this emotion. It is supralogical. It transcends logic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                a number by itself is a number. 1 + 1 = 2 is telling me 2 numbers can be logically expressed as a 3rd number. or 1 number referenced twice can be logically expressed as a 3rd number. and the reason they do not tell u what they are is because by themselves they are pure and cannot be defined beyond an abstract method that is compatible in our human language. what im telling u that is supralogic is numbers and thats all u need to know. there is also other supralogics but is almost nonsensical to try to talk about things we do not even have the brains to be aware they exist even with infinite time.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      More information on occult ties:

      C.S. Lewis also warned about it:

      "There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious-- such as digging up and mutilating the dead.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        "If we compare the chief trumpeter of the new era (Bacon) with Marlowe's Faustus, the similarity is striking. You will read in some critics that Faustus has a thirst for knowledge. In reality, he hardly mentions it. It is not truth he wants from the devils, but gold and guns and girls. 'All things that move between the quiet poles shall be at his command' and "a sound magician is a mighty god'. In the same spirit Bacon condemns those who value knowledge as an end in itself: this, for him, is to use a mistress for pleasure what ought to be a spouse for fruit. The true object is to extend Man's power to the performance of all things possible. He rejects magic because it does not work; but his goal is that of the magician. In Paracelsus the characters of magician and scientist are combined."

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what i'm telling u is that pious technology is not a part of applied science. and CS Lewis is a simpleton blowhard charlatan.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    David duke 2024

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No. Well after the mass extinction.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Compared to the tech slavery that you can’t escape coming your way, yes.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Only if a massive die off happened because there is no way in hell we could all do it with our current numbers.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    we'd be better off if we just deleted social media

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it was shit before 2005 moron

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't matter - read his new book, even Uncle Ted points out that it's an impossible for this to happen on a large scale unless everything completely collapses everywhere in a huge disaster like scenario. If one society tried to drop out, it would simply be cannibalized by another one that's more technologically advanced in due time, so we're in this weird state of constantly over consuming resources to stay as the top dog. What matters is how you feel anon, do you feel more at peace with yourself when you're innawoods or do you have to stay jacked into the system constantly stimulating yourself?

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No.

    However, whats left of humanity will do so, again.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone goes back to being hunter-gatherers
    >civilization eventually re-emerges
    >primcucks get conquered

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    we already are back to hunting and gathering

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes

    Hunter-gatherers are more in tune with nature and the natural world. They know how to read the signs of the animals and the land, which helps them to be more successful in their hunts. They also know which plants are edible and which are not, which is critical for their survival.

    Hunter-gatherers are more mobile than people who live in settled communities. This means that they can follow the herds of animals and are not tied to one particular area. This makes them less likely to experience famine or other disasters that can occur when people are dependent on a limited area for their food supply.

    Hunter-gatherers also have a more equal society, with less social stratification. This is because they share everything they have, including food and shelter. Everyone in the group has a role to play and everyone contributes to the survival of the group. This makes for a more cohesive society and a better sense of community.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Revolt. Question your public governments lead through recent time slips.
    Time slips are caused by mass public government employees using previously used dates on legal document signature fields like previously used dates are current date. To say this again, there is a current date, but a previously used date is used on legal document signature fields. A public government employee walks into work, looks at cell phone, news paper, and television. The public government employee sees wrong date. Anyone looking at mainstream newspapers, nationally broadcasted television, or syncronized cell phones? You see a wrong date. Mass public government employees use wrong date on the legal document date field.
    Public governments can address liability. Here are three options. Public government stop relying so crucially to private companies for calendar keeping, and public government compensate victim loss. Stop time slips, and redress grievances. An other option? Public government stop collecting taxes, and public government stop spending taxes. Cede opportunities to private companies. The third option? Public government employees quit public government jobs, and public government employees forfeit public government job pay. Dissolve government..

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ya i mean everything would be better, unless u like globohomo

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I think it would allow men and women to return to their true nature. Women would appreciate men for catching food for them and they would just raise kids. Everything about this modern world is twisted. Women used to be impressed with men for hunting and providing food for them and their children. Everything about modern life and relationships is fricked up.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    there is not enough wild resources
    you would have to kill 99% of population first

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Which is exactly what the elites are trying to do...

      Wait. Are the elites secretly based and followers of Uncle Ted's manifesto? Are they trying to return us to a preindustrial existence by first killing off all but 500 million people worldwide?

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    DESTROY THE FRICKING HORRIBLE THING QUICK!

    >182. We have no illusions about the feasibility of creating a new, ideal form of society. Our goal is only to destroy the existing form of society.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, only the strong. The weak would suffer.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    DESTROY IT!

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Let's just ban israelites from government, media, finance, law, and education first and see where that gets us.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *