The US Army got fire superiority first and then used the dozers. Russia can't seem to get fire superiority and keeps loosing men and supplies to artillery. Arguably, we could have taken those trenches with infantry, plowing them over just saved time and lives.
You mean suppress ATGM teams? Basically everywhere.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>where have they tried to use dozers? >dozers
1 year ago
Anonymous
Then see
The US army got fire superiority first and then used the dozers. Russia can't seem to get fire superiority and keeps loosing men and supplies to artillery. Arguably, we could have taken those trenches with infantry, plowing them over just saved time and lives.
Not my problem
You're right, which is why you're not in charge.
1 year ago
Anonymous
the people in charge seem to be saying the same thing tbh
Then Ukraine would retaliate with chemical weapons of their own. Russia would be in the worse position because of how many conscripts they're rushing in. They wouldn't be trained in chemical warfare.
No?
Why do you think that would solve anything when tanks are getting slammed, and tanks can mount dozer blades.
US did this in first Gulf War to Iraqi trenches, buried them alive
Yes and the circumstances are nothing alike.
The US Army got fire superiority first and then used the dozers. Russia can't seem to get fire superiority and keeps loosing men and supplies to artillery. Arguably, we could have taken those trenches with infantry, plowing them over just saved time and lives.
well there we go
suppress or eliminate the ATGM teams and then send in the dozers
Wow anon, why hasn't anyone thought of that?
Just shoot them all!
Just knock down all the pins next time!
That's what they're trying to do. It's not working. Ukraine has too much of a homefield advantage and Russia lost too much of their hardware.
where have they tried to use dozers?
You mean suppress ATGM teams? Basically everywhere.
>where have they tried to use dozers?
>dozers
Then see
You're right, which is why you're not in charge.
the people in charge seem to be saying the same thing tbh
Short answer, no. Dozers are valid targets for ATGMs even if they aren't tanks and that's assuming that they don't get taken apart by AMRs.
No but this would.
>Muh Geneva Convention!
More like Geneva Suggestion
Iraq used (American supplied) tear gas against Iranian human waves, which is apparently a Geneva Convention violation too
Then Ukraine would retaliate with chemical weapons of their own. Russia would be in the worse position because of how many conscripts they're rushing in. They wouldn't be trained in chemical warfare.
They're not trained in anything
The Battlefield is an Excellent Teacher.If you survive.
Not my problem