artillery, grenades, barb wire, guns you retard
[...]
do you retarded understand that mgs had no impact on it?
>what keeps the infantry from rushing you while you kill them with artillery?
do you retard understand what nonsense you wrote?
the answer is: artillery
>what keeps the infantry from rushing you while you kill them with artillery?
do you retard understand what nonsense you wrote?
the answer is: artillery
They got way more use in the past 2 years than I expected. It seems obvious how you could weaponize them now, but I would have only guessed at it as a thought experiment before the war. They always just seemed like toys
No, all they do is spot shit and maybe drop a bomb or two or ram themselves into enemy while carrying said bomb, not unlike fucking biplanes in ww1. As a concept it's still very much in its infancy
At best they're gonna need another 3-4 decades and possibly another world war until they're mature enough
machine guns had zero impact on ww1
yes, op made it up, your point?
WW1 was: arty, mgs, barbed wire
Bonus round: tanks
You naggers have to be trolling
>still doesn't answer what impact they had
Love how this thread was ruined after 1 reply
it was ruined by op being stupid
sorry chud you cant zero ww1 artillery on nonstatic targets thus you need machine guns to pin people down
that makes no sense chud
count the tanks and vehicles
"Same impact".
"Same"
>It's impact is over 9000!
Nope but yes (as observers impossible to stop).
drones are just mini airplanes and helicopters
airplanes resulted in AA development so will drones
>impact machine guns had
even in ww2 most infantry got killed by artillery
and what keeps the infantry from rushing you while you kill them with artillery?
Air filled with shrapnel and 10km of distance between us
artillery, grenades, barb wire, guns you retard
do you retarded understand that mgs had no impact on it?
>what keeps the infantry from rushing you while you kill them with artillery?
do you retard understand what nonsense you wrote?
the answer is: artillery
No.
Drones are poorfag's cope.
They got way more use in the past 2 years than I expected. It seems obvious how you could weaponize them now, but I would have only guessed at it as a thought experiment before the war. They always just seemed like toys
nothing beats over 1000+ arty pieces zeroing on your position doe
drone bomb kills probly make up like 5% of the deaths in this war.
Drone assisted deaths would be over 50%
Drones correcting arty is stupid strong
No
No, all they do is spot shit and maybe drop a bomb or two or ram themselves into enemy while carrying said bomb, not unlike fucking biplanes in ww1. As a concept it's still very much in its infancy
At best they're gonna need another 3-4 decades and possibly another world war until they're mature enough
homosexual forgetting they destroy equipment worth 10,000x their price