Why was this ship considered such a dangerous threat? It's a fucking WW2 era gun cruiser.

Why was this ship considered such a dangerous threat? It's a fucking WW2 era gun cruiser.

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are guns a threat in the hands of a Black?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      fpbp. Always remember: Around Argie, No Lethargy.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because it had Exocet missiles strapped to it and and large calibre guns that could threaten troops on shore. A thread died for this.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >why was an enemy combatant sunk during war
    Dunno, retard, guess it'll be a mystery forever.
    Herb this slide thread.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I just don't get why it was hyped up as a dangerous threat when it was clearly very outdated.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because otherwise people would have complained when we blew it up.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I just don't get why it was hyped up as a dangerous threat when it was clearly very outdated.

          Also it was their flagship so an excellent morale booster for the boys and morale shitter for the Hispanics.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It also caused Argentina to send its carrier back to port, and *that* was a serious threat to the fleet.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Argentina had two boats that could be a problem.
              Belgrano put it self in a place that made it the easiest target and the rest of the fleet ran away and hid.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              The carrier already aborted the pincer maneuver because it couldn't get it's planes off the deck because they needed cooperating weather to even take off so the Belgrano and the carrier had already aborted the mission when it got sunk.

      • 2 months ago
        parsley

        I'd love to see your retarded ass in Ukraine delicately avoiding shooting at outdated stuff because "hurrdurr very outdated weapons are no longer a threat"

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Chat shit, get hit. Anyhow this is a slide thread, what has just happened to Russians?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lovely boat and what not but why is the navy pretending to be pirates?

      • 2 months ago
        sage

        Afaik standard procedure after a sub kill, UK and USA

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        British submarines do not fly the naval ensign, they have always flown the Jolly Roger because during ww1 they were advocating for submarines to not be labeled as "naval vessels" because they wanted an excuse to blow up U-boats without observing normal naval ROE

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    even gun cruisers are a strategic asset that can perform shore bombardments and carry anti-air and anti-ship missiles, they're old but they're still a threat

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >nooooo why did you sink my heckin warshipino, it wasn't dangerous at all, it just wanted to play, you clearly wanted it to happen

    It's just like listening to a niggbull owner when his beast gets shot during the failed attack.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    HOW ABOUT YOU JUST READ A FUCKING BOOK moron

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because the British were shockingly bad at actually responding to direct threats to their ships once they actually got into range during that war, and also shore bombardment is scary.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *