Why isn't there a such thing as a top-loading pump shotgun? It seems like one of the more reasonable sci-fi / video game designs.
Why isn't there a such thing as a top-loading pump shotgun? It seems like one of the more reasonable sci-fi / video game designs.
Because ejecting shells out the top is asking for a jam.
No guns confirmed.
Suck my haveguns dick, lefty.
WHERE THE FRICK DO MOST PUMP SHOTGUNS EJECT? THEIR FRICKING LOADING GATE YOU STUPID FRICKING homosexual. Now frick off, dipshit.
>In a bold strat, anon doubles down on his moronation instead of just admitting he had a lapse of judgement.
>WHERE THE FRICK DO MOST PUMP SHOTGUNS EJECT? THEIR FRICKING LOADING GATE YOU STUPID FRICKING homosexual. Now frick off, dipshit.
>most
name five(5)
>doubling down on stupid
Double confirmed no guns homosexual. Most pump action shotgun do not. I think you should probably go to bed, the adults are talking.
May we see them?
chad face: Yes.
>tripling down on stupid
I knew I could count on you anon.
You didn't need to do this to yourself, anon.
wat.jpg
>wat
Look, I like Ithacas as much as the next guy, but come on now anon.
have a nice day.
No, they don't.
what does that have to do with
>top-loading
you dumb frick?
It does exist
It ejects out of the side, like a normal shotgun
>https://youtube.com/shorts/UFoY6tBGLR8?feature=share
Ask the guy I just posted
I thought that picture was frickin horse pussy before I clicked the thumbnail. Am very disappointed now.
>Because ejecting shells out the top is asking for a jam
It doesn't have to though?
That's why no guns have ever ejected out of the top
Quite a few guns have been top-ejection my dude. Generally older designs, but still.
Yes, you were merely pretending.
God I fricking hate zoomers.
>God I fricking hate zoomers.
Yeah, me too, but that's not top ejecting. That's clearly side ejecting. He's right and I'm here laughing at everyone saying he's wrong.
There’s zero reason that a top loading shotgun would have to eject out of the top. That’s why he’s a fricking moron.
If a bottom loader can eject out the side, why wouldn't a top loader also be able to eject out the side. Or bottom. There's absolutely no reason it would have to eject out the top.
Top LOADING anon.
I have been toying with basically flipping a mossberg 500 upside down the hard part is figuring out the trigger the rest is pretty easy.
There is, called the RMB-93
Came here to say this
>of course it was fricking Russians
USOG has a good video on it
and because he is the master of based, his is not the homosexual flip-stock version
The flood are here.
So I was always under the impression it was because to loading introduced a more significant risk of dirt and shit getting into the magazine but I have literally never held a shotgun in my entire life so take that with a grain of salt
Also, to continue this, what happens if something fricks up in the chamber and it explodes? Would a top loader be more dangerous in that situation because the loading gate is pointed up?
Wha...what? Why would the chamber explode? Chamber exists to contain and direct the explosion out the barrel. I have personally never witnessed or heard of a shotgun firing out of battery or shells going off in the mag tube. I don't doubt that a shotgun or two have been blown up by bubba's pissing hot loads but extremely extremely unlikely and would be user error
Wow what a great idea bro, I think all guns should be designed with your philopshy of "If it breaks and kills the operator that's fine because its his fault anyway"
I guarantee I can kaboom literally any gun you hand me. Idiotproofing can only be taken so far.
>Has literally never held a shotgun
>Thinks his opinions are worth anything
Most guns don't have "extra protection" for KBs because of how rare they are, with the only exceptions being a few bullpup designs (as well as a few designs based on ultra high pressure rounds, and a few designs from 100 years ago when metallurgy wasn't as good IIRC). Either way, something like >https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/11/20/colt-ar-15-kaboom/
is rare enough to be newsworthy, and the shooter was fine.
Uses an example of Kentucky ballistics loading dangerously over pressured rounds into a gun, after multiple issues with the prior rounds fired, proving the point that it was operator error
>I have literally never held a shotgun in my entire life
I am so sorry for you anon
It's basically long NEOSTEAD with a loading gate right? Biggest issue I can think of (assuming it works) is your center of mass being WAY far forward.
Why didn't the NEOSTEAD become more popular? At least as a prison guard gun (iirc it was its intended purpose).
IIRC the stock had issues with cracking right?
>Top eject!
Using this thread to say PSA needs to make copies of WWI trench shotguns.
I would buy one.
Because extended barrels are better on the bottom.
Wannabe gun designer here, do you guys think that something like an RMB-93 or a Neostead (albiet with one mag tube) would me marketable? Aside from the extra round you would get from a top-mounted magazine and the reduced OAL, the reverse-pump action would prevent KSG thumb.
https://youtube.com/shorts/UFoY6tBGLR8?feature=share
I don't see why not: by being top loading, you can move the action to over the trigger guard and partially into the stock. It would shorten the whole gun up a few inches.
Your height-over-bore gets hilariously large, but who cares: it's a shotgun.
OP takes loads from a top
i spit out my coffee