Why is this drone so effective? Never seen anything like it.

Why is this drone so effective? Never seen anything like it.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    By what measure is it effective?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Pajeet traction.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It has destroyed at least a dozen S-300s this week alone.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        i've seen exactly 2, where are the other 10+?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          you know it in your heart. The one and only place that posts a lot of good stuff western media is trying to cover up. Just tap your heels three times and say the magic words: much obliged.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          There aren’t even 2. Those are vatnik fakes.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          They're still being edited, please be patient.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I dont know, decimating ukrainian armor and artillery as evidenced by a literal shitton of videos maybe?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, but why? What makes it different compared to Shaheds?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's way smaller and definitely less noisy. The only problem it's the small bomb it carries

        • 11 months ago
          Indian Shill

          Better guidance system and western style electronics not chinranian tech and electronics.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Same 5 videos over a year of conflict

        you are brown, never forget it.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        May we see the shittons of videos?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        "Decimating armour" bit of a stretch. Can barely scratch a gepard.

        It's "cheap" and hard to counter, and it strikes less protected high value targets in the rear. Just watch DARPA create a shit tonne of anti drone warfare next year.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >one more year

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            oh its coming alright

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ukrainian armor
        its ok at popping AA missiles on launchers and artillery ammo - but heavier armor of gepard is out of their league - and it is based on leo1 laughed at for its paper thin armor...

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >a literal shitton of videos
        May I see them?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Might want to read the tread bucko.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        you mean the 50 videos of them turning into a anoyying white cloud?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      hectars of hohol military graveyard

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      it provides rare moments for russian propaganda online

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    looks like fairly primitive technology you would expect from Iran

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      you mean like switchblade 600 too?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        switchblades are portable though
        not saying it's bad, they're relatively inexpensive
        the technology just isn't very impressive, that's all

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          lancet is also portable...

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            the wings look fixed to me chief

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              they arent fixed tho
              tho im not sure if they can fold completely

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's a perfectly normal drone, probably far inferior to all the western systems. It's just that noone has sufficient defenses even against shitty drones ready.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just think they're neat

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Armatard sucks donkey dicks.

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's fine but it's nothing more than a flying HE round, literally never seen it blow up anything tougher than an aluminum van.
    Meanwhile, stuff like the SPIKE can do much more and actually have destroyed tanks.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >SPIKE
      how does the wireless long range version of the spike compare stats rise with the LANCET
      one thing that pisses me off about the lancet is its rly anemic warhead that probably isnt even mission killing half the vehicles it hits

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        ok I looked it up
        SPIKE ER can do about 25km, LANCET can go out to 40km

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        ok I looked it up
        SPIKE ER can do about 25km, LANCET can go out to 40km

        The spike NLOS has a range of 25km and it can be steered on the commander hatch of a tank, moreover it actually works against tanks.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          has it actually been used against armor or is this promotional footage

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            There's a lot of footage of it in action and the aftermath

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >25km
          thats the official range we know they have fired it from 32 and 50km
          the greeks tested it from an f16 and it flew for 49km

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            It probably depends on the launch altitude since it glides for most of the time, probably 25km is a reference for land launches

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          lmao why can't puccia produce something like this? Lanklet looks like shit in comparison and has to use another drone for target locking

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    ok but what the frick is phoenix ghost
    any knowers itt??

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >can't even pen a fricking tor and gepard
    >effective
    What did the lancetgay mean by this

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nice little compilation of strikes.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It doesnt leave a mark tho

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        So why worry? 🙂

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nice ERA detonation, moron. Ever wonder why there's rarely "lancet aftermath" videos and everything cuts immediately after impact?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >NOOOO IT DOESN'T MATTER EVEN IF THE TANK CLEARLY BLEW UP THERE'S NO HECKING DETAILINO AFTERMATHINO IT DOESN'T COUNT NOOOOOOO

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              From that angle it should've cooked off the ammo if it didn't penetrate the ERA, moron

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      must construct additional shorad
      what's with the shitty dissonant mongoloid dirge ?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        its a meme

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's poor man's hellfire, they use some nvidia board for target recognition on the last meters because it is ust losing control there

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can anyone tell me why *ndia is raiding this place again? Did anything happen?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are those injuns in the rooms with us, anon?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Even worse: it's replying to me.

        Oil depot in Sevastopol is currently returning to port under its own power after a Ukrainian drone strike

        Based.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oil depot in Sevastopol is currently returning to port under its own power after a Ukrainian drone strike

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Might also be picrel. This is now a jeet and pidor cope thread.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I reckon 1 million russians will die before the war concludes. And that's a good thing!

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Light refraction, reflection on the bright white surface from the sides and the design ensures whatever light hits it on the wings is going to bounce between the surfaces and cause as much blinding from the sides as possible as a visual. Just my speculation.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oh shit. Oh shit. They are coming from the left side now? I didn't plan on that!

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    when did they get all these? I didn't see any a while ago but now they're everywhere

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's been a regular stream of Lancet videos for months now. What are you talking about?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it missed
        That's a lancet alright.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >There's been a regular stream of Lancet videos for months now. What are you talking about?
        same moron reposting the same videos

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Oh?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >2.0
            What happened to the OG ZSU hunter? did they get droned?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Who knows.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Missed

        Oh?

        >Missed

        Who knows.

        >Minimal damage
        Implessive

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Weapons aren't 100% effective in use. Shocker, right?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            But these are all videos the Russians chose to release. If the highlight reels feature near misses and dubious results, it suggests the rest of the footage is even worse.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >highlight reels
              These are just regular daily use vids.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                jesus christ every lancet video I see makes me *less* impressed by its capability. never got that from any other system; lancet it's just near miss, glacing blow, scratch, near miss, glancing blow, scratch on repeat... I honestly thought they were alright before this thread but every single clip is more disappointing than the last

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah the guidance does seem inaccurate ngl

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah the guidance does seem inaccurate ngl

                yeah they miss quite a lot

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They're really inconsistent. Sometimes it looks like it has the effect of fireworks and sometimes it has really good penetration
    8

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Best part it's like only counter battery fire that Russian poses, without lanclet NATO artillery would be almost indestructible for russian war machine. And also I would like to look at real statistics because what we see are cases where lanclet hits or almost hits something, we didn't see failures, spotter drone getting destroyed etc. Kinda like with fpv drones or drone bombers

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    you are a worthless moron

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why didnt Russia help Armenia with their drones when they were getting bodied by Turks?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because the Armenians acted in the same dumb way as the Ukrainians. Pashinyan's government started signalling to the West that they wanted to re-align, which is the most moronic thing they could have done from a realpolitik point of view, as Russia also has amiable relations with Azerbaijan. They willfully isolated themselves from the one friend they had.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The impression all these videos give me is that it's an inaccurate piece of shit unable to run squarely into a completely stationary target. I never see worthwhile answers posted but is it a shaped charge or HE?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >unable to run squarely into a completely stationary target.

      Almost as if some of the effectiveness rests on the operator on the other end, huh?

      >I never see worthwhile answers posted but is it a shaped charge or HE?

      It's been answered ad nauseam. Both.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Here's a video of a Lancet destroying SPG "Krab". Note the secondary explosions after impact that were filmed by another drone in the area.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Drones seem really accurate but 70/80% of videos (I'm being kind here) follow the quick cut formula and also get followed up by ukranian photos of the actual damage so I rly don't know what to make of them. In some cases they have less effect than a molotov

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    why is this drone so ineffective? even in the best footage they're willing to show it misses half the time, and the other times it leaves a little white cloud and the vehicle hit doesnt explode or catch fire, hell it doesn't even smoke. along with that all the embarassing edited ones.
    why must you embarrass yourself like this?
    why are you so desperate to convince everyone that this is a good weapon's system when all your evidence speaks against you?
    i think i've seen like 5 videos where it actually properly damages something, like when it popped a tire on an m777, and even those usually get repaired. the best it's done is occasionally popped an exposed air to air missile.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's okay anon, mission kills can't hurt you.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is really scary. I should call my representative and ask why we aren't sending more long range ammunitions to Ukraine, so they can counterstrike against this deadly threat

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        literally proving my point as we speak, i accept your concession.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          lol

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            implessive, exactly what my post entailed, concession accepted.
            btw are you going to ACKnowledge all the fake edited ones or is that too difficult for your ego to process?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Are these fakes in the thread with us right now?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                YES THEY ARE LMAO

                They're still being edited, please be patient.

                i will accept your lack of acknowledgement as another concession, your arguments in favour of this little vatBlack person drone aren't helping if you keep conceding that you're wrong in the same post anon.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                anon...
                look at this
                you really should stop posting these, you're actively worsening it's reputation with every post.
                lancet was literally seen as more credible when they just started being posted, because at least some decent percentage of the early ones were temporary mission kills. barely any of the video's you've posted are.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                lol lmao

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                We've been over this, there's a bunch of glitched footage.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                i meant look at this

                jesus christ every lancet video I see makes me *less* impressed by its capability. never got that from any other system; lancet it's just near miss, glacing blow, scratch, near miss, glancing blow, scratch on repeat... I honestly thought they were alright before this thread but every single clip is more disappointing than the last

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >last frame before explosion is like 5 meters away from the vehicle
            >no secondaries even though it's carrying big frickoff missiles
            uhhhh... slava puccia?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            this has to be a falseflag, pajeet-anon wouldn't be moronic enough to post this as a counter-argument, would he?

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why is this drone so effective?
    It is thoroughly mediocre. "Ok" against light vehicles and towed artillery pieces, but so are cheaper and more quickly procured FPV drones.

    A 4/10 drone in a sea of 1/10 vatnik slop makes it shine.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *