Why is the Scud missile so dangerous?

Why is the Scud missile so dangerous?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's a big missile.
    Besides that it's nothing special honestly.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What about the Skub missile?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I am anti skub

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Only Black folk are against skub. Skub is the white man's choice.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      k has always been pro skub

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Frick off skubtard, /k/ has always been antiskub you fricking skub tourist

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what about the chud missile?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    check out my dub missile

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What about the chub missile?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why is this short range ballistic missile that is virtually undetectable, can launch at any time and from anywhere so dangerous?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >virtually undetectable
      is this true?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not necessarily but firing a missile that can have a nuclear payload very quickly can be dangerous for detection systems.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what about the "wut?" missile

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Any SRBM is dangerous.

    >The best scud was the worst scud, the iraqi modification that fragmented just before impact.
    >iran didn't use scuds but something larger/far more modern

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      US failure to disperse was stupid. Always spread out in tent cities and avoid structures which are not hardened.

      Fixed fortifications are hard to missile kill if built thiccly.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What is that, fricking Waco?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Feb. 25, 1991, a Scud missile fired by Iraq got through the Patriot batteries and hit a U.S. military barracks near Dhahran, Saudi Arabia killing twenty-eight Army reservists.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >twenty-eight
          The sheer fricking hypocrisy of thirdies to brag about something like this as their armies get borderline genocided each time they bare their teeth.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >xaxaxaxaxaxaxa we killed 28 (twenty-eight) Amerisharts but got genocided in response and occupied for over a decade, that'll show them

            To be fair, one American is worth about 100 members of any dirka-dirka, eek-ook, or ching-chang military.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >xaxaxaxaxaxaxa we killed 28 (twenty-eight) Amerisharts but got genocided in response and occupied for over a decade, that'll show them

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >xaxaxaxaxaxaxa we killed 28 (twenty-eight) Amerisharts but got genocided in response and occupied for over a decade, that'll show them

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    dangerous to whom ?
    i suppose it is also dangerous for the operating crew who got to handle its nitric acid oxidizer

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >launch missile
      >get hit by big whiff of sissy poppers
      >launch crews keep turning into sissies and have to be rotated out and replaced by new crews just for the cycle to repeat

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because you can load HE or anthrax warheads

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >muh WMD justification
      lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        newbie.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i would rather load my anthrax distribution box on a cruise missile
      rather than a ballistic missile warhead that heats up considerably on its mach 5 descend

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Anthrax missile ready
      >Release the SCUD!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Colon Powell? Is that you?

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There are a lot of them I guess. More explosives means more danger.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The people who operate them being unhinged religious fanatics is the only reason they're dangerous

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because it can miss the target and damage bystanders

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    its pointt y so it will hurt when it hits the when it is when they touch the pointy bit

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If twitter tankies are to be believed, its because their solid steel hull construction is too tough and orky for the weak and fragile overengineered Patriots to destroy or knock out of course. How much of that is true is debatable, but it fits their vibes-based worldview of "DA RESISTANCE" beating the big ebul empire with low-tech solutions.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Scud

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Scud

    Believe it or not both ukranian and russian military found that it would've been a better investment to upgrade the older, shorter ranged Tochka missile (better navigation system, fin servos) than Scud

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Scud was even older than Tochka
      thats why the Tochka has better accuracy, even with shorter range (because it is a tactical ballistic missile, not a short range ballistic missile)

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Same reason "barrel bombs" are so dangerous, it's a weapon our enemy had so it was a horrible weapon, you could ask any of our propagandists and they'll tell you how bad it is.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Scuds in numbers are a nightmare.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *