Why is it always the manlet carrying this shit?

Why is it always the manlet carrying this shit?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Manlets are stronger
    Shorter bones=shorter muscles=more muscle density

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Shorter bones=shorter muscles=more muscle density
      Dwarves sink faster fr

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Manlet here, I was the only one that actually wanted to carry the thing around when I was conscripted. The reason I wanted to carry it is that it was the biggest gun, with the biggest bullets and highest RPM, which made it more fun to shoot than the little pea-shooters the rest carried around

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      What country friend?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Sweden, so I carried the one that OP posted actually, or the Swedish variant of it, ksp58

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          What was your service like? Was it enjoyable or deplorable?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >look at me im special
      everyone thought you were a chode

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    manlet rage does wonders

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's hilarious.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Short people suffer less pressure on their spine while carrying heavy stuff constantly.
    /thread

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >This thread again
    Overcompensation

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lazy explanation, and doesn't really mean anything. That assumes that the smallest gun is the most "virtuous" gun, and that the largest man should gravitate towards the smallest gun because he has "nothing to prove"

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Make shit thread, get shit answer
        You could ask in qtddot, but no you have to make this thread. Also if someone is overcompensating for something doesnt mean that people that dont suffer from his problem have to go 180 in opposite direction, you know problem ->solution, no problem -> no need for solution. But seriously is most likely just army tradition

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >That assumes that the smallest gun is the most "virtuous" gun
        No it doesn't. The biggest and most attention grabbing gun is most appealing to the manlet, that's the only factor that matters to him. There's no hierarchy of gun virtue, because normal sized people don't view them in those terms and the manlet only cares that hes got the most impressive one.
        >and that the largest man should gravitate towards the smallest gun because he has "nothing to prove"
        If he has nothing to prove, he will use whatever is most prudent and appropriate. How people perceive his weapon will not be a consideration to him.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'd love to lug one around and fire them for once.

          Can't forget the tenderizing recoil, a real workout for the shoulder.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        There are dozens of quasi-true minor reasons which don't really make sense. The fact is it's simply a military tradition at this point.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    makes the gun look bigger

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's easier (and more fun) to tuck a small bastard in some unsuspected looking little hole and then allow him to assfrick incoming enemies with lead at the point blank range

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dwarves are short and strong and machine gun lets them get rid of grudges

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    we had a literal midget just a bit taller than it carry one

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    literally me. I had the nickname of rambo because I was insane with the thing. Perhaps manlet rage is a thing after all

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Machine guns are best served with manlet rage

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >RPG Missile inside a machine gun
      Is this something I'm too zoomer to understand?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, because that's a grenade not a missile.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >rocket propelled grenade missile

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Manlets have their center of gravity around their thighs. It allows them to carry heavy things like war hammers or an M60 without being at risk of tipping over as they sprint

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    So uh how small would be considered a manlet in the average army squad?

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I volunteered

    >t. 5'5

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    because giving the heaviest load to the smallest man will make him take any excuse to lighten it at cyclic rate

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because funni

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This nu-K is moronic. The original reason is because machine gunners are the first to get taken out, therefore the smaller the target, the harder he is to get hit. Not saying it's 100% effective, but that's the general logic behind it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      looks like the old k was moronic too then

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Give your highest casualty producing weapon to your smallest (and therefore hardest to hit) soldier.

    Also, this way, the machinegunner is the slowest mover in the fireteam, so it can kinda hang back as the other dudes get into to trouble in order to see where fire is needed, instead of charging ahead of the line advance in the hands of Chad Rambo, only to lose unit cohesion and face the enemy without support.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Funny

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Look at how fast manlets make gains as gym newbs on deadlift, squat, etc. compared to lanklets and you'll understand why

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's funny. Any other answer is moronic copium pulled straight out of people's asses.

    t. Platoon Sergeant who always makes manlets carry M240Ls

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine if you have a limit of 340 pounds per soldier for traveling by air. If I give the M240 to a soldier that weighs 220 pounds, plus all his gear, I can't take that much extra ammo.
    If I give it to a 140 pound lanklet soldier, I can ship a lot more ammo and extras with him on the plane.
    That's the secret.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Manlet here. Carried one of those frickers in a "light" line company for a year before promoting.

    240L is love. 240L is life.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Forgot a picture. Carried the SAW for a year before the 240L. SAWs are such shit weapons.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >tiny hobbit boots
        I believe you
        I sat around long enough looking at boots while doing nothing to recognize them

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        SAWs are based, your too fat and moronic to maintain and lay the scunion with it unfortunately

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    because the biggest guy has to carry the M2 and it's like karma than everyone should suffer equally.

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm 6five and had to carry it. The manlet was my simultaneous AG/AB. AG's are supposed to be considered vets but we just made him a pack mule anyway.
    Manlets cant carry the 240 through forest brush without the starter belt getting tangled on every branch. Top forbid use of nutsacks for them for the lulz.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Your first sausage is right, you can’t link into a starter belt in a drum

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I read one CO always had the smallest guys on it because they could hide behind it when suppressing so as to not get ventilated right away

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *