Why has there been zero Bayraktar footage since August? Did they all get shot down?
Why has there been zero Bayraktar footage since August? Did they all get shot down?
Why has there been zero Bayraktar footage since August? Did they all get shot down?
Turkey said they don't want Ukraine to publish anymore of their TB2 videos. Sames as with Germany and their PZH2000 and Gepards.
Doubt OP is asking genuinely, but others might actually wonder why it's the case.
The warmongers realised only after the fact that sending weapons will have consequences and now they're trying to pretend like those weapons don't exist, hoping Russia will spare them.
But it's too late, they made a powerful enemy and they will pay the price once Ukraine is dealt with.
>they made a powerful enemy
Whom?
>they will pay the price
can you explain how this will happen?
>once Ukraine is dealt with.
can you explain when this will happen?
> How will it happen
Missile attacks will destroy the Ukrainian power grid, crippling their industry. As we know, domestic production makes up nearly all of Ukraine's military industrial capability. It will also freeze Ukraine into surrendering since Southern Europe is infamous for being a freezing wasteland, global warming is a hoax, and- oh, right, it's Spring. Never mind.
> When
Precisely 336 hours from now.
my post was referring to the "warmongers" supplying ukraine with weapons "paying the price once ukraine is dealt with" and i wanted some clarification on that in particular, but i have read your post and i now understand that ukraine cannot win since this scenario will occur 20160 minutes from now. i am now demoralized
Lol
My retirement plan is to become a minor warlord in the post-collapse Russian Federation
I can't tell if this is supposed to be sarcastic parody of vatnik posting or actual vatnik posting.
o/
The eye patch is lifting
>once Ukraine is dealt wit
Oh no. The debts we will have to pay to Russian in 3-4 hundred years. Unimaginable!
>hoping russia will sp-ACK
turkey cucked russia multiple times already
>The warmongers realised only after the fact that sending weapons will have consequences and now they're trying to pretend like those weapons don't exist, hoping Russia will spare them.
>But it's too late, they made a powerful enemy and they will pay the price once Ukraine is dealt with.
its this
whats hilarious, is the the same reason BayrACKtar is now gone, is the same reason you do not see "israeli" weapons in the ukraine
>they are fucking pathetic western cope failures
and exposing their "real-world' performance would utterly evaporate any future sales, because the performance is so bad, they are basically only useful in punishing un-armed goat-herders, not actual peer enemies
the entire wests arsenal is for MAXIMUM punishment of the unarmed, with impunity.
ZERO western equipment is designed for the peer theatre
>made a powerful enemy
who would that be exactly?
>now gone
they had 50- 14 are lost. TB2 isn't much use for trench warfare and the ukies have lots of other toys. TB2 will come back to combat if Ukes make a large frontal assault on a specific hard target
correct
>the entire wests arsenal is for
>the russian cries out in pain as he strikes you
no sugar for you, vanya
lel
there was one reported shot down a few months ago - guess it was in on a mission before that.
It's likely they only had a handful to start with.
What happened to those raghead balsa wood drones Iran got a bunch of fighter jets for?
Posting the "August video" because OP is a gay
There is one from september
There's been a few during the Izyum counteroffensive too, yeah
They were effective in the early days because the invasion was chaotic and Russia's anti-air was suffering from their own jamming
Once they got their AA up properly, lingering Bayrakters were pretty easy to shoot down so they're mostly relegated to scouting missions now
>In January prior to the invasion, the spokesperson for the air force command Lt. Col. Yuri Ihnat confirmed that "Ukraine has approximately 20 Bayraktar drones, but we will not stop there".[117]
So you had about 20-30 prior to the war, operating against some of the hottest air defense zones in human history for a full year now, with a least a couple shot down. Do the math OP, they're destroyed.
Turkroach RC plane performed well in the begining of war but we haven't even seen 1 single video in the last 6 months.
They were effective only when the Russians were in front of their AD umbrella.
Thing has been totally useless for 9 months.
Because they have lost their effectiveness. They were good in the beginning, but when the enemy managed to set up their AA weapons they lost some of their effectiveness. I don't know if that points out how good the drone is or how bad russian AA is.
one was shot down last week. the diy drones are the new fad for posting which is why you don't see footage from the bayraktars.
As a side note, do you have any object permanence? have you spent your life wondering where your parents disappeared to during peakaboo?
saving up for the offensive
they're used mostly for recon now
Because the front collapsed so hard that all fighting now takes place too close to russian air space and territory, making it much more dangerous to operate them there.
DJI Mavic drones have proven to be better in every way, more relaible, cheaper, harder to see and shoot down, a loss of one isn't the world, and they're just as deadly.