Why has the M2 Bradley had more success then any other combat vehicle in this war thus far?

Throughout this war most of the combat footage we've seen of vehicles has been pretty shit for those vehicles.
>Leo and Abrams: Most if not all footage is them being disabled or in-direct firing or just driving around aimlessly.
>T-Series tanks: exploding or burning wrecks.
>BMPs, BMDs, BTRs: Burning wrecks with a side of burning corpses.
Only Bradleys have had good footage.

Why is that? what makes them so different? is it the numbers? the tech? or is it just blind fricking luck?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is there actual evidence of a Abrams being destroyed

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There's evidence of them taking damage. Vatnik shills are painting it like they were destroyed.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >taking damage
        /k/ek

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They were damaged and abandoned.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      At least 2 disabled and abandoned from what I've seen.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        In Russian hands now or recovered

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not in Rusnig hands, but unclear if they were recovered.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ok

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          probably still sitting in no man's land

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard wants everyone to sing the "second to none" song. Anyone ? Anyone at all (apart from him) ?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Anyone at all (apart from him) ?
      Multiple times? In a row?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They have a really reliable and accurate gun when compared to bmp/btr shit excluding the btr 4 which is endangered. They can take a beating without detonating violently like the soviet coffins generally do. Tanks are shit for open terrain without air superiority and the insane amount of fpv drones which is what both sides are suffering from.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The autocannon is making it particularly effective against the current russian army composition of old t-series, apcs and mobik waves.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It was built to not explode and it has decent optics and good FCS, also it was upgraded over the years. It can accurately engage on the move, it has real good thermal and night fighting equipment and the TOW's are just an added bonus.

    All of those do not apply to any slavshit, and even their upgrades are mostly a joke. They are built to be massed in a ball and uraaa'd at whatever the frick it is they are trying to kill. Over and over.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's trained crews with a human made vehicle armed with munitions capable of defeating their targets versus forcibly conscripted FAS-babies driving rusting jokes that were outmatched the day they came off the assembly line 50 years ago, with ammunition that's had its explosives stolen for more vodka money.

    The Bradley is a decent machine, but it performs like a war god against these cheap sitting ducks.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because most tanks fire at ranges where you can't make cool videos

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This. Bradley's are being used to ferry troops for close in assaults and provide immediate fire support and anti armor. They also do drive by's and blast into buildings and treeline at close ranges. This means that drones that happen to be in the area scouting for Ukranians will just so happen to see Bradley's far more than heavy tanks, which will be used a) more carefully after the earlier losses in the failed counter attacks and b) longer range support with their big guns. The Western tanks are also fewer in number so they're being used more carefully.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >they got a lot
    >they film western gear more
    >there are lot of videos
    I don't think the Brad is doing anything amazing compared to the BTR-4.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What a weird cope? The btr-4 hasn’t done much of anything. It’s a very lightly armored vehicle with glass windshields. You definitely won’t see the btr shrug off atgms like the Bradley does

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >cope
        Not everything is cope anon, the Bradley is doing good but if you think watching uploaded videos gives you an unbiased view of the battle you are moronic.
        Also the BTR-4 did a lot of great work early war.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >BTR-4
          It's shame we wont get anymore footage of BTR4 kino like the one from mariupol
          Having their production line so close to vatBlack personian mordor hellhole's border was a mistake

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It has shrugged off DhSK and autocannon fire which is more than can be said about any other slavshit meat carrier. Pretty impressive for a wheeled APC.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Russian and Ukie usage of armored vehicles is very sub-par. Probably hampered by just really low-tier C4 capabilities. Both sides should have the doctrine for their use developed over decades following WW2 by the Soviet military academia, but nothing how neither side can handle even with that Soviets routinely did in WW2. And we’re talking about vehicles and comms gear VASTLY superior to what the Soviets had. These are basically declined civilizations.

    Anyway, it’s true the Bradley has been very successful in what limited capacity it’s participated in the war because of two factors:
    1. They’re small in number and only for an elite unit of well-trained crews.
    2. They excel in the roles armored vehicles are assaigned in this war: battlefield taxi performing close-range direct fire-support.
    The M1’s gun system and optics are very good. An most importantly, in this war’s usage scenario, being able to protect the lives of the mounts is crucially important because these are used as independent gun platforms, basically the same as a tank would be used in this war. That means being exposed to enemy fire, which it can do much better than the bulk of Soviet-era vehicles it’s competing with.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There's a 4th C?
      Command
      Control
      Communications
      _?
      ...
      Profit???

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Computers

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The full term nowadays is C4ISR. Command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The combination with infantry, of course. The very design of an IFV enforces those who want to employ them to engage in combined arms thinking. MBTs would be even better. But all too often planners send them without infantry support and so they stay far below their potential.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Most if not all footage is them being disabled or in-direct firing or just driving around aimlessly
    Okay not to be that guy but like the first footage we got of Bradleys were that incident in Robotnye. All the kino only started happening after the 47th got deployed in Avdiivka. Also we have tank on tank combat footage for the Leopard

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because she has big breasts.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Hall of fame cope.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The Bradley is just better than most other IFVs. It’s simple really

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Sorry about the warrior education program. It seems to have broken you mentally

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I agree with you that bias is the biggest factor but if you think the Bradely doesn't have a significant advantage over BMP-1s and 2s you are delusional.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn’t

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So in your mind a 73mm firing 10 rounds per minute doesn't have any disadvantage against a 25mm firing at 300 RPM?
        If they each miss their first shot the brad gets off 30 rounds before the BMP-1 fires again.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you're right, I forgot to factor in improvement over time, e.g. from technological advances and implementation of gained experience
      the bradley beats the bmp-1 due to superior weaponry, but against a bmp-2 or bmp-3 the difference is much less notable. in the bmp-3's case, it can even go the other way depending on the situation and the variants of the vehicles in question

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Nope, the reason you see so many videos of Bradley’s fighting right alongside the infantry or right up in the face of enemy infantry is because it’s an amazing fighting vehicle. If other IFVs were as capable we would see videos of them doing the same thing because drones are always watching.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you can find plenty of footage of other IFVs kicking ass if you bother to search for it. (sometimes you do have to search for it: if it's a russian ifv shooting shit up then a thread about it will get pruned and deleted)
      I should also add that there's basically no footage of leos and abrams operating in Ukraine, but plenty of footage of T-72s, T-80s, etc, killing shit. nonetheless, I'll be told that soviet tanks are garbage and that western tanks are 10x better

      >our IFVs are just as good as the Bradley!
      >no we can’t prove it

      plenty of analyses prove it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > you can find plenty of footage of other IFVs kicking ass if you bother to search for it.
        No you can’t. It’s noticeable that you can’t post any. Post a few non Bradley /k/inos

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          How much evidence do you want? If it’s a small amount then I might post some, otherwise I don’t care enough to dig it up. No I won’t convert to webm unless it’s already in webm format

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You can’t dig it up because the Bradley is able to do stuff other IFVs can’t do because it’s a better design. Otherwise you’d post some other IFV /k/ino but you can’t because it doesn’t exist

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              how many bradleys they got? they also want MORE bradleys and the us got them.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          There was was Ukie BM2 that snuck up behind the T72 back in the Azov days. That was pretty kino.

          But yeah BMP1 ain't so good these days. I'd rather be in 113 and that's a low bar. At least the battle taxi doesn't go up so quick.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >we're still not going to prove it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >if you bother to search for it.
        how to spot a shill

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >our IFVs are just as good as the Bradley!
    >no we can’t prove it

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There was some great footage with BTR-4's at the beginning of the war.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the one where the russians tried to hide behind a bmp and got shredded anyway was pretty pog

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they have a lot of them. isnt there more bradleys out there than all other western ifvs combined?

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >plenty of soviet shit kicking ass in this war
    such as?

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It is footage, filmed for psyop.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yo why did mods purge so much of this thread that should've been unpurgeable? Weird.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    To be fair Leos have literally no combat footage available because the German government hates fun.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      not true. No governmental restrictions on combat footage exist

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Bradley is so popular that Russians stand in crowds to catch a brief glimpse as it passes on track track

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >track track
      Schizo

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        so nice you say it twice

        Bradley Bradley

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Kek the ziggers come to marvel western engineering

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bradley arrives
    mobiks die

    simple as.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Imagine you woke up in a house with no running water and you catch a glimpse of the most successful IFV to ever see combat. Must feel surreal

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you mutts are such delusional people

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Well he’s not wrong. The Russians haven’t been able to build an IFV even close to on par with the Bradley

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >focuses on the least delusional bit of that post
          did you really think that is why I call the muttoid delusional?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What other part is there? The Bradley being the most successful IFV to serve in combat? There’s no case to be made against it.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              the scene he is setting
              did you really need me to explain this to you?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                20% of Russians live without running water

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                post a concrete measure, and give the value for Canada and US for comparison

                I mean they are all crowded around a train car just to get a glimpse of the Bradley.

                >pretending to not understand
                k

                Russia is 2 cities. Everything else is an uncivilized shithole.

                everything else is towns and cities that range from comparable to Polish realities to pretty badly decayed, primarily the function of how large the territory is
                but if you prefer simplistic feel good fantasies instead, be my guest, I would be a fool to expect more from a muttoid

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >post a concrete measure, and give the value for Canada and US for comparison
                LMAAAAAAAAO. Bro, when just ONE place in the united states went without clean running water for 2 years, it became a national embarrassment. Only literal preppers do not have running water in the united states, because they purposefully build cabins in the woods.
                It is just so baffling to me that you guys can not comprehend the idea of universal utilities.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I mean they are all crowded around a train car just to get a glimpse of the Bradley.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Russia is 2 cities. Everything else is an uncivilized shithole.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because Ukrainians, despite being brave and resourceful, are fighting quite primitively, and it is very intuitive what the Bradley does well, while good tank assaults aren’t as obvious and simply rare in this war. Same with artillery, which is also basically anti-photogenic.
    Russians are beneath contempt. They’ll never produce anything good other than human wave footage.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Warrior could do the job better

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. "poser brigades" got them, units with other equipment just don't post videos of their battles as often
    2. they got a lot of them and in good condition too, I think ukraine now has more bradleys than any other "real" IFV

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the list of cope keeps growing

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What should I write for the Bradley’s wiki regarding the infantry mulching videos. My last entry was accepted on the main page of the Bradley under combat history

    > Ukrainian forces have used M2 Bradleys in ambushes and defensive fighting around Avdiivka. The 25 mm autocannon has been used to destroy three Russian MT-LB, IFVs, in one engagement while also engaging supporting Russian infantry. The enhanced optics allow for night attacks.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Great for mulching meatwaves, Russia likes meatwaves.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why has the M2 Bradley had more success then any other combat vehicle in this war thus far?
    Because he was always the real underrated mvp

    i'm so happy, he's so cute it's ridiculous.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because it was specifically designed from the ground up to fight a conflict in eastern europe against vatniks?

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's stylistically designed to be that way.

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A lot of thought was put into it. The armament is top notch and with protection packages such as BRAT it can take a beating.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bradley going to its new home in some Russian musem <3

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Judging by the way it forms a crowd everywhere it goes in Russia, it will be right at home in a museum. It must be like alien tech to the average Russian

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder if they'll keep it on display after they withdraw from Ukraine or try to memoryhole the whole thing.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      interesting how ukros removed homo-pads from the tracks

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They are removable because you don't want them in mud, the US would remove them when fighting in mud too.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Don't think you're supposed to run them without pads, never ever seen this before.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I have driven a lot of heavy tracked vehicles, pads are for protecting asphalt and concrete from the tracks and they reduce felt vibration on hard surfaces.

            What could the pads possibly do when travelling through mud?

            Large flat surfaces move less mud / dirt than the ridges designed to move a lot of mud / dirt.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What could the pads possibly do when travelling through mud?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They could just be driving the hell out of them for a year. Its not like they have real maintenance for them anyway.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They need an example of a fighting vehicle designed by people whose parents didn’t drink vodka while pregnant to show young ziggerneers. Glad they finally found one outside puccia.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I could consider that fair trade for the T-90s they've given the West.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >being poorly maintained in a Snowgerian museum
      Being stored in a boneyard in the Sonoran Desert is a better fate than this.

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >We-we captured a Bradley! That means we're WINNING!
    >We-we're laughing at YOU! You can't laugh at us!

    Do you have any understanding at all of how pathetic and childish you sound?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Do you have any understanding at all of how pathetic and childish you sound?
      They literally don't. Part of the russian war goals here is damaging ukraine for the sake of damage itself. These subhumans think that theres no reason ukraine should be better off than them, so theyre going to try to knock them down to the level of russian shitholes.

      Its why thou shalt not suffer the russian to live. They are a stain upon humankind to be removed.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Feel free to laugh at whatever you like. That’s the point of PrepHole

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You’re so upset about warriortard and the Bradley that you sound exactly like a Russian. Parading a captured vehicle as if it’s going to erase the videos of Russian infantry getting killed by accurate 25mm.

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Finland joining NATO and Sweden about to join NATO in a war that was supposedly about stopping NATO expansion isn't exactly winning. Neither is having virtually all of the armor and aircraft in your military wiped out with no means to replace them and geopolitically arranging yourself to be China's b***h for the next century. But hey they got some wheat fields in Donbabwe and Luganda. Big win.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You need to get it out of your system, just find a Warrior IFV and frick it in every hole.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He can't, her gapping 30mm hole is too big for him to touch the sides. This is the real reason he loves the 25mm so much more.

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >thread about Bradleys
    >starts sperging out about Warriors

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    True, but the M2 isn't as good as the Lynx or newer CV90, but then they're not in the zone of conflict.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Patently false, while not being superior to the lynx, the Bradley is the superior of the cv90. Both served in the same theater of combat but only the Bradley performed well enough. They choose not to operate the cv90 and that’s ok. You must be new, how did you confuse a regional jobs program vehicle with an actual fighting vehicle? Lurk moar I guess

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Whether or not the M2 is superior to the CV90 mkIV is debatable (though the smart money is on the CV90), but the Lynx has the M2 beat in every way.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It used to be debatable, both of them serving in the same combat zone settled the debate
          >the lynx is better
          Yes I agree but it is much more cramped in the back compared to a Bradley

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Of the 50+ CV-9040C supplied to Ukraine so far (Ukraine has sought more, and more have been committed by Denmark and Sweden) only 5 are out of action, of the 186 M2s, 68 are out of action. The CV-9040C is more survivable than the M2, but it's more of a problem of acquisition, M2s are superior because they are present in numbers that can actually have a positive impact on the front line, but as soon as more CV90s become available, they will become the superior platform for Ukraine.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah the Bradley is used more, not really a shock. We’ve seen CV90s get disabled by a simple rpg-7 and we’ve watched the Bradley shrug off lancet hits, atgms, mine strikes. It’s just an all around better vehicle

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >we’ve watched the Bradley shrug off lancet hits, atgms, mine strikes
                The attrition rate for the Bradley strongly implies that it is not that well protected, approx 10% of CV90s have been destroyed/abandoned, whilst 35% of Bradleys have been destroyed/abandoned. Ukraine will be better served by CV90s if (big if) they can acquire them in sufficient numbers.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You’re trying to compare attrition rate between a frontline fighting vehicle and a rear echelon troop mover. Lmao it didn’t work

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >rear echelon troop mover
                That's not what the CV90 does. Plus the latest raft of financial support from Sweden/Denmark makes provision for more CV90s of a higher spec, including commander stabilized thermal vision, which puts it at a massive advantage to any IFV in the conflict.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The real jarring fact is that of the 5 CV90s killed they have no confirmed vehicle kills attributed to them. The Bradley has killed multiple armored vehicles on video.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They aren’t optimized for killing anon. The cv that Ukraine has only has 1st gen thermals. In the one ambush video where the cv90 was disabled by an infantryman that was only 100 meters in front of it you can start to see how bad the situational awareness is on the 40s.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The real jarring fact
                Maybe to you in your bedroom, but Ukrainian commander are calling for more CV90s, and that's what they are getting. The CV9035NL will be the most capable IFV in the conflict by a long shot.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The commanders are calling for more Bradley’s. Only the manufacturing folks want a cv90 line set up. The military vastly prefers the Bradley

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Most capable after the m2a2 ODS that is. CV90s vastly outclass the warrior though so there is that

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The attrition rate for the marder stands at only 6% so marder is actually the best

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >2 more weeks and CV will reign supreme
              kek this has to be bait

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >casualty ratio: in Russia’s favor
    Sauce? That’s the opposite of everything I’ve seen so far

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It is favorable as long as it takes less than 100% manpower to take ukraine.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >absolute thirdoid take

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Success
    This is my weapon opinion. Stop crying.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >look, we captured the wreck of one after it killed hundreds of our men and destroyed dozens of our vehicles
      This post made me believe that Russia isn't actually a comically weak and inept clownshow.

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why do you think they wouldn’t perform well? What’s wrong with them?

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    That’s only because Sweden had to offer local production to make the cv90 competitive. If the British decided to offer local production the warrior would be the IFv of choice for Europe. It’s the same thing South Korea does to stay competitive. Countries are willing to buy and inferior product if it creates jobs in that country. This is why despite selling alot of CV90s, the country who designed and builds them just had to file for bankruptcy

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This thread.
    Warriortard gets argued into a corner, spergs out as usual.
    Now comes at least 2 hours of him talking to himself and spamming threads. LMAO
    Seriously based anon.

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    > The Warrior received next to no meaningful upgrade in its lifetime, and is now a relic of the Cold War.
    Still mogs the CV90. Not one of the major European militaries operates the cv90 and that’s the home market for it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, nice try.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody is saying the M2 is bad, but it's not best in class in Ukraine. Trying to deflect that by shoehorning the warrior into the discussion reeks of desperation.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Nice try trying to shoehorn the m2 not being the best in Ukraine. Holy desperate

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Especially m2a4s
    M2A4s aren't in Ukraine, and I've not seen anywhere that says they will be. Of all IFVs in Ukraine CV90 is the most potent, more so with the arrival of newer models.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Of all the IFVs in Ukraine the m2a2 is most potent. Tons of videos will back this up

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Of all the IFVs in Ukraine the m2a2 is most potent. Tons of videos will back this up

      >CV90
      >Bradley
      Either way, BAE is laughing all the way to the bank. I hope you guys have got stocks and shares to show for it, because you suck their corporate wiener a whole lot.

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Nah, Warriortard doesn't post that cogently.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    tank armor and anti tank rockets, not to mention that the gun seems pretty high compared to Russian ones so might be and advantage in a plain land

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I put it to you the cobbled together 3-4 rocket grad utility has had more consistent success OP. It's just less sexy.

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What I hate about Warriortard the most is that I like the Bradley and I would love to discuss it but I can't on this board. The conversation is always disengenuinous.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If you see him remember to do the needful and report him. He's currently ban evading and if the mods get annoyed enough they'll just rangeban him.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, the Bradley is genuinely a great bit of kit, but these threads are invariably about a British 1980s IFV design. What is so enthralling about the Warrior that would make him dedicate so much of his free time to it?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's probably something pretty mundane like someone making fun of his opinion or calling him dumb, but since he's a schizo it broke him mentally and now he is on a neverending crusade against it. You know, schizos gonna do schizo things.

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    its just a good, solid IFV

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You realise 69 of them have been lost don't you fart sniffer ? This is just another one of your bizarre obsessions like Cherry Bakewells.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Cherry Bakewells
      What?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *