Why dont we just...

Why dont we just...

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Physics, mostly

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    One chinese hypersonic missile would sink it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      implessive

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    One word

    Vasa

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >gets caught in a mild storm

    >top-heavy ultra pagoda snaps the fuck off and crushes the ship under the weight

    >the toilets for all 3 million crew stop to work, mass panic ensues, everyone goes feral in the seas with no fast way out

    Actually, this would make a good horror movie

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I recall reading something about some techbros trying to buy a ship to create their bitcoin powered ancap paradise so I imagine someone trying to make a floating island and such a scenario taking place.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Surely this time they'll build it, right?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Sers you must immediately invest in RanjeshCoin. You will be rich when it moons and have sex with white women, but only if you invest in RanjeshCoin. Partnership with Microsoft, India and Vishnu confirmed, you must do your own research on that sers. Sincere apoligies for no picture of green frog Pepe The Frog, posting from different Internet Cafe. Only RanjeshCoin will make you rich like Elon musk.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know if this is a shitpost or a real pajeet, good show.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Their ambitions weren't even remarkably close to this monstrosity. They tried to buy a 30 year old cruise ship and planned to have people follow along in their own boats so that you could come and go as you please.

          They couldn't get the certifications and other stuff they needed to even go out at sea. Then again, I can't imagine what a budget, above water Rapture would be like.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          For comparison, the largest cruise ship currently in existence

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, I doubt they plan anything beyond scamming investors

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >6 record breaking waterslides
            what's excatly record breaking about them?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              it's a surprise 😉

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              deaths

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't understand why these pieces of shit are still legal
            they pollute as much as a small city, fuck up whole ecosystems, give nothing but trouble for the locals and even before the chinkflu they were breeding ground for diseases
            like just go to an actual zoo and waterpark

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              who are you gonna call? ocean police?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I would call some pirates on them

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Italy mostly.
              They "thrive" off Cruise revenue.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              if they were to be set up on nuclear reactor power the pollution would not be half as bad. Running gigantic hulls like that on low grade fossil fuels is just pure decadence

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >if they were to be set up on nuclear reactor power the pollution would not be half as bad.
                Fuck why can't the USA retrofit an old nuclear carrier to be US merchant marine cruise ship
                >nuke power
                >steam catapult converted to launched roller coaster style 'plane' in the style of an old mustang along rails along side of ship
                >convert to trimaran style with fuck-huge ama outriggers on sides to get additional deck space and stability, and windows, and waterslides
                >decks for days
                >historic as fuck
                >plumbing and degeneracy only slightly higher than current cruise ships

                Don't scrap the USS Enterprise bros, make it a commercial enterprise

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Don't scrap the USS Enterprise bros
                >all the epic awe inspiring carriers of my youth are being turned into scrap
                Feels bad man.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I unironically would enjoy and feel safer on an old converted carrier than a cruise ship.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Ironic that environmentalists are directly responsible for limiting nuclear.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Ironic that "environmentalists" are directly responsible for limiting nuclear.
                It's oil companies astro-turfing fake news.
                Lern 2 conspiracy theory, its /k

                But for real I am pretty fucking green but love me some nukes, as long as we use a breeder reactor style so we burn out all the wastes down to something with a short half life, cause otherwise the waste sucks to deal with.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i want to be used by a breeder

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I imagine some wh40k horror shit of what a breeder would like kek, like the tit demon from berserk

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                We just need a cheap enough solution for blasting nuclear waste into a Solar orbit. I propose bringing back Sea Dragon

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >We just need a cheap enough solution
                Since we can bring back thing that didn't get past the drawing board, I propose bringing back an orbital ring system.

                It annoy me to no end that people only know of the "space elevator" when a ring would
                - be actually feasible as material go
                - require less material on the first try
                - have a less dangerous safe-mode
                - be more practical since it can deserve all the equator, or more later.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >It's oil companies astro-turfing fake news.
                It’s both sides, politically

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >breeder reactor
                PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP MAKE POWER

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Golden

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It was much more than just hippies of the 60s-70s.
                It was a lack of understanding the newer tech
                It was as another anon put it misinfo from big oil
                And most importantly it was Russians having the worst incident of that time to really spread the panic.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                vatnik agitprop from that era specifically targeted nuclear as a way to undermine wests stable energy independence. This continued on into the russian "federation" period where the KGB ruling class just repurposed it to make westerners addicted to their cheap energy and fill their wallets

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >And most importantly it was Russians having the worst incident of that time to really spread the panic.
                tbf, we couldn't replicate Chernobyl if we wanted to because the Soviets used an entirely different type of reactor

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I get where you're coming from but I don't want nuclear powered ships crewed by italians and third world retards wandering about the oceans unsupervised.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Bunker fuel is some nasty shit, I guess some has to buy it though.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >they pollute as much a small city
              Don't these useless homosexualboats pollute more than all cars on the planet combined?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Individually?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                maybe not individually, but like the top 10 largest cruise ships

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Individually?

                >they pollute as much a small city
                Don't these useless homosexualboats pollute more than all cars on the planet combined?

                no, that's disinfo. pic related - note the SOx being used as a proxy for "pollution". that's key.

                the original point was that big container ships produce more atmospheric sulphur than all cars combined, and so therefore environmentalists are dumb for caring about electric vehicles. it's an attempt to feed into the narrative that greenies are smelly hippies with unserious ideas who can be ignored - basically a sop to the superiority complex of rural and midwestern retards by telling that that liberal elites have lost their minds.

                in reality it's true that the biggest container ships do produce more atmospheric sulphur than all combined, but it also doesn't matter. atmospheric sulphur isn't the problem causing climate change, it's carbon dioxide (mostly). and the biggest container ships produce nowhere near as much carbon dioxide as cars.

                but the disinfo has worked, because here you guys are and you have no idea what point was even made and even less of an idea about the context around it. all you remember is "pollution from cars isn't the REAL problem" and so every time you see a greenie hippie telling you it is you will just tune them out, because you read somewhere that... and liberal elites have lost their minds...

                this is the playbook that the fossil fuel industry has been using since the 1970s. literally. just wait until i tell you how nobody ever believed in global cooling, lmao. or how the idea of your individual climate footprint was actually a big oil invention - because if it's an INDIVIDUAL problem, we don't need government regulation...

                it's all so tiresome.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                cheers anon

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Good. I support no government regulation in most things, cars and boats included.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's a defensible position to hold and it leads to a world that nobody wants to live in.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'd live in a world like that

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Liberal elites know precisely what they're doing, and it has nothing to do with environment. And electric cars ARE a joke. The problem is city planning that makes cars mandatory. No one in their right mind would design their life in such a way that it would require many hours daily for JUST getting from home to work and back. But (specifically USA) cities are made in a way that long commuting to work or school is unavoidable. Design cities well enough and people will barely use cars, electric or other.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                How the fuck can you produce as much smoke as 2000 cars and not make your guests feel like they're staying in a ashcan?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                combined with if you're staying in one place the big engines aren't running and if you're moving you're leaving the smoke behind you.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              B51 and a half

              Icon of the Seas has Wärtsilä's new multifuel engines (LNG or diesel). Claimef 48% efficiency. Plus hydrogen fuel cells for onboard electrical system. And theyre experimenting with some new technology of creating an air barrier around the hull to reduce friction. Its not a lost cause

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Royal Caribbean
            >American company
            always makes me chuckle.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >longer than an aircraft carrier
            Burgerbros... you can't fall behind like that

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Had the pleasure of seeing her leave Turku for the maiden voyage.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              how the fuck do these floating skyscrapers even leave the baltic sea
              the bridges over the straits of denmark arent high enough right?
              the kiel canal?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                jesos thats a shave

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I thought that style of ramming bow was illegal because you couldn't see how far it protruded under the water?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              God, i can feel the nonstop screaming kids and loud smelly boomers through my screen
              Don't do cruises, just rent a townhouse somewhere for a week, better for your sanity

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >250,800 Gigatons

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              That's Gross Tonnage landlet.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Not impressive for an asteroid but still pretty big for a ship

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Cruise ships should just euthanize every piece of shit subhuman who books a trip.
            >"This year we we went to-"
            No you fucking did not, you were sitting in a glorified floating hotel sipping shit ass drinks while doing the travel equivalent of watching tiktok videos.
            Go to a real vacation you lazy homosexual fucks.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          All the original people behind this proposition have to be dead by now, right? I literally first saw this back in 2001. I remember watching the old boomer who was pitching it to a small room of other old boomers talking about how it would require the total world's output of cement for one year and a bunch of other insane shit to actually build it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          > No brothels
          Needs improvement

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's ancap land, all you have to do is go to a daycare.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Sounds brilliant.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        classic

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      High-Rise: High Seas
      Coming Soon

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>All toilets stop working

      Indian seamen don't even notice as they defecate along the designated shitting starboard ledge.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Bro c'mon you can do that joke better. God has given you the naval term "poop deck", use it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So basically Pandorum, but on a boat.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imperial Nipponese mindset

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I unironically enjoy AIslop
    What was the prompt

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Just found it out there in the aether

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Here's some slop OP

        Shame

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >a carrier big enough to have its own parade grounds
          fund it

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Looks like broadsides are back on the menu

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/bQwXJ2f.jpg

          Why dont we just...

          Challenge for effort posters: Name these, crew them, list weapons and capabilities

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >still has a cope slope

              Bongs eternally btfo

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You need help, because it doesn't it's a battleship. This seething about bongs is unbecoming shitsniffer.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/bQwXJ2f.jpg

            Why dont we just...

            NWES Devastation
            crew: 35k
            role: tactical dreadnought, minor capital ship
            weapons: 45 909mm main railguns, 205 406 mm hull laser secondaries, 1206 99mm recoilless AAs

            https://i.imgur.com/hOP5NAw.jpg

            Here's some slop OP

            Shame

            PACS Yu Huang
            crew: 56k
            role: hybrid mega carrier/LHD
            weapons: 75 ionic cannons, 30 caseless 381 mm rapid fire auto turrets, 5 MAC 5 heavy bomber squadrons, 3 attack helicopter squadrons, 5 hydrogen/neodymium transport subs, 200 amphibious walkers

            https://i.imgur.com/PNg6sgF.jpg

            Pax Aeterna
            crew:125k
            role: indipendent ship state
            weapons: 303 hypersonic launchers, 180 HLPAS nuclear launchers, 11035 77mm flaks, quadruple quantic force field generator, 1.2 Teraton singularity warhead as self destructive device

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/PNg6sgF.jpg

          The thing that frightens me about this images is that this is exactly how a human child would see the actual ships.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          A broadside from that thing would make it barrel roll each time, sinking enemy fleets while also keeping the super carrier sparkly clean

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >What was the prompt
      Kuznetsov like imagined by Putin

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, your planes are fucking...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            In Russia the planes fuck each other for morale and discipline purposes, it’s not gay like gachimuchi western planes

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Needs shitty asphalt, run down Kamaz snow plows and potholes on runway.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/AzkzInY.jpg

            is it really like that or are these pics edited to make it look worse than it is? because holy fuck this looks horrible even for russian standards KEK. No wonder they're taking a beating down there in Ukrolandia, if their most prestigious kit is like THAT, then god forbid the rest of their military...

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I'm going to really enjoy the future where we can't actually tell what is real and what isn't.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                A lot of people never could.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                A lot of people are
                >NPCs
                >have no internal monologue
                >can't visualize the apple
                >don't have souls

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >It's another episode where vatnik pretends to be a NAFOGOD and acts retarded to smear their image
              Why don't you give up? Nobody's buying it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                He just wants to post it as a screencap elsewhere

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/KZWEhuJ.jpg

          https://i.imgur.com/AzkzInY.jpg

          more smoke
          make a hole in the ozone layer to melt the enemy

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I got this with "warship in the style of star wars spaceships"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              That ones got a starship vibe, nice

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Is the wake supposed to be in front like that?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Uhoh lads, I fucked up
    >Image from the inside of a F15 cockpit FPV as the pilot, outside of the window is the deck of a huge aircraft carrier with hundreds of planes and the plane you are in looks like it's taking off

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Woman Pilot.
      >About to crash a naval aircraft.

      Wow, this AI is getting more and more realistic.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        not a woman. pilots just have soft hands.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        hilarious i also hate women

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Me three.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      WE GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Generates an actual David Clark headset with the correct color.
      Even though the mic is on the wrong side, that is still fairly impressive attention to detail (other than the fact the the airplane is definitely not an F-15).

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It’s a tank.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    On the one hand this is ridiculous on its face.
    On the other, I want to see live reactions from the first poor brown country we roll up with it.

    FUND IT.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI was a mistake

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly, it make sci-fi movies about human resistance against AI war machines more realistic

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bigger is not necessarily better, we can outfit smaller battleships with flamethrowers to make the more effective in roles we cannot fathom as of yet. We learn as we fight.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      For example, it could possibly be a formidable anti air platform.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >anti-air

        I suppose it does kill the surrounding air

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        AA flamethrowers were tested in WW2

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagonda_flamethrower

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    probably would have kicked ass in 1910, not so much these days

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine a bunch of those, flying german flags, blowing the shit out of british ships at Jutland.
      Vgh, what could of been...

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    THE LADY'S NOT FOR TURNING

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus Christ Is that Thatcher?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >mouth opens
      >wave motion gun fires
      Space Battleship Thatcher

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The Iron Lady.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Holy fuck my sides. Bongs need to build this and send it towards Argentina. I would pay to see the amount of pants shitting.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      HMS Panzersnatcher, aka "the Iron Lady"

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      B51 and a half

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fun fact: A loaded C-130 take off and landing distances are so small, it can do carrier landings without arrestor gear.
      >“The last landing I participated in, we touched down about 150 feet from the end, stopped in 270 feet more and launched from that position, using what was left of the deck. We still had a couple hundred feet left when we lifted off. Admiral Brown was flabbergasted.”

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        c-130s are the most based aircraft in existence ``

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      modern day doolittle autism

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is literally the worldbuilding in Girls und Panzer

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, we're skipping straight to helicarriers, broseph.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ship longitudinal strength.

    google it. Beyond 400m in length overall, you are entering a world of pain.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Just need it balanced using balast, then you're all good.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Long vessels, such as ULCC and VLCC tankers have very few loading cases defined. For 30 years of economic life, the vessel is loaded with the same load configuration so the vessel doesn't break into pieces. There is absolutely zero flexibility because the vessel can be broken by a simple wrong ballast/deballasting operation.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    for me, it's anzio

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I like this kind of autism

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        guptism really does hit like nothing else

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Curses your path

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like a bastard child between Topol-M and Moskva.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Any particular reason not to do this irl?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's basically what missile cruisers are. Just without the exaggerated looks. And if you're thinking of full size ICBMs - they can already reach anywhere on their own, so you need to move them only enough to avoid direct targeting.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          put these bellow deck you have VLS cells

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >virgin VLS cells
            >vs chad phallic erector launcher
            I bet you wouldn't make your missiles more pointy either...

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >missile hits ship
    >10k seamen dead
    >less than 0.1% of total ship's area affected
    >ship continues operating as if nothing happened

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What if we...made our aircraft carriers submersible?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's possible. But it will launch VTOL drones rather than a fighter.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        just make the submarine big enough and you can have fighter runways

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    sorry we just accidentally your boat

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks to israeli sponsored welfare, we don't have the combined industrial capacity to build OR maintain one

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >what if we made out boat....not a boat
      Now, I know WHY we don't do this, because only water can handle something as heavy as these ships without it falling apart. But a man can dream.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Soulless AI shit

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How has Pioneering Spirit not come yet? The actual largest ship ever made.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >fires all guns at once
    >every single person onboard immediately gets hit with the permanent EEEEEEEEE

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Name it the USS economy
    Because if you sink it
    You sink the entire US economy

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Be my guest.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Having conventional guns on a ship that huge and expensive is just stupid looking

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I didn't know the Empire built water-based Star Destroyers.
    >the more you know...

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    didn't have to cuut me out

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the size and smell of the blood mushrooms.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the blood mushrooms
      the what?

      Also, actual Hydnellum peckii look impossibly vibrant IRL. Pictures don't do them justice. They make the forest around them look colorless in comparison.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the what?
        Hello newfriend.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous
  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    needs more sawdust

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ummmm US bros? How do we match the shipbuilding ouyput of China?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm more worried about whatever massive vehicles they are using to somehow tow a parade of full size warships through a city

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ship gets hit with a one-off superweapon
    >you have now lost a quadrillion dollars
    It dies and you have brought irreversible financial ruin to your country. It's putting all your eggs in one basket but the eggs are your economy.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *