Why doesn't Ukraine just destroy this bridge?

Why doesn't Ukraine just destroy this bridge? It would instantly cripple supply lines to Crimea and allow a much easier time of starving them out/sieging.

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hohols don't have the equipment, skill or intelligence, they also know it would lead to Russia actually declaring war and finishing them off in a few weeks.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nice, nu-K celebrating war crimes again.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          As usual, the February tourists have killed this sub

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the russian invasion and its consequences have been a disaster for PrepHole

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          seethe harder

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Was old PrepHole any different?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >war crimes
          at this point i think trying to win the war is a war crime

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Since when is bombing soldiers a war crime?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Booby traps are war crimes? Since when?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There is no war. Russia has not declared war. They are engaged in an act of perfidy and their soldiers are acting as terrorists. The Geneva Convention doesn't apply to them.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Special operation crime you mean.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Calling everything a warcrime has been my favorite meme of this war.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the only good vatmoron is a dead vatmoron

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >PrepHole
          >enjoying rekt gifs
          >nu
          Return whence ye came.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >nu-K celebrating war crimes again
          You must be new if you think old PrepHole didn't celebrate war crimes

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Blood for the blood God, ave nex alea

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Hello tourist. You may not believe it but a few years ago when that stuff was hot people would analyze in detail Taliban sniper pov videos of American soldier getting fucked while sleeping and the most you would hear was "wow that sucks" and then it was all business.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >be ukrainian helifag
          >see vatniks screetching
          >they see you and try to run
          >you kill them
          >it's somehow a war crime to cum /chug/gers
          based ukrainian helifag do it again

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          When will dumb morons realize retreating soldiers are still valid to be killed?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They think you're only meant to do it to your own retreating soldiers

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Enlist in the special military operation, vatnik.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >killing clearly armed and uniformed soldiers is a war crime now

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If they're russian yes.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why did they get in, start driving, and then stop and wait for multiple seconds before they got hit?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe the engine turned off and they couldn't start it quickly because it's a stolen car?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Stalled vehicle. The fifth column forces are even worse mechanics than actual Russians.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nice, nu-K celebrating war crimes again.

        [...]

        ACCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKK

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What the fuck is flying towards that car at the start? a bird bomb?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Biolab pigeon HATO superweapon. Clear war crime on Donbass people

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What the fuck is flying towards that car at the start? a bird bomb?

          Biolab pigeon HATO superweapon. Clear war crime on Donbass people

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that smoooker was not dropping his ciggy

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why do they do this?
        So many vids
        >retards standing around in the open
        >ordnance goes off close to them
        >run and panic
        >stop and go back to where the first explosion was
        >get blown up
        They just showed you they can hit this position, why wouldn't you just GTFO as fast a s you can?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          One of the 4 ran into the bushes so the rest were trying to yell at him to get into the car so they could leave.
          Ironic that the one time the Russians don't abandon their allies they die.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine would LOVE for Putin to declare mobilization as it would accelerate the political disintegration of Russia. Putin is doing everything possible to delay that call. Russia simply doesn't have the time or resources to meaningfully make use of mobilized manpower, and it would totally tank the Russian economy (manpower would evaporate) and destroy the pretence or normalcy in Russia.

      I really think Ukraine's bear strategic move right now is a direct assault on Belgorod since it would force Russian mobilization and set in motion the clockwork of Russia's total collapse.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        best move*

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I really think Ukraine's bear strategic move right now is a direct assault on Belgorod
        That would also halt most foreign support and be a nightmare for optics. It's the last thing they'd do.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Quick observation, it will be much harder for Russia to mobilise in winter, fairly obvious I know much mass training an out of shape civilian army in minus 30 with obsolete vehicles is not going to work

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Uhm no stupid hohol, Russians have special racial affinity to winter. When winter arrives, HATO globohomo europe will freeze to ice and glorious Russia can just stroll into Berlin. You hohols think winter will be your ally, but Russia was born in it, malded in it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      weren't they people who stole stuff during emergency?

      nice, nu-K celebrating war crimes again.

      i wish they would commit actual war crimes

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        those are marauders, looters and shoplifters. since it was chaos at first and police were busy with more important shit people had to catch those cunts themselves. didn't happen in my city tho

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes and old gypsy babushkas were whipping their asses

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You stupid fucking moron. Do you really think that the two pictures in your picrel are equal? You stupid fucking moron. Allow me.

      On the left are innocent small children hung to their death by nazis

      On the right are thieves that were caught stealing and were taped to a pole and released about 2 hours later.

      The fact that you don't see the difference makes you a russian.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >nazi's
      >'s
      kys

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I know you are just trolling but even then I kinda wish a bus hit you

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    oh fuck that's a great idea anon why did no one thought of this before

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's why I'm asking

      https://i.imgur.com/ZN3ABoj.jpg

      Hohols don't have the equipment, skill or intelligence, they also know it would lead to Russia actually declaring war and finishing them off in a few weeks.

      >Russia actually declaring war
      What would be the difference?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >What would be the difference?
        Eyebrow could be raised another 13 centimeters. It is illegal for Putin to raise his eyebrows more than 5 cms during peace time.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >What would be the difference?
        Russia cant currently conscript unless war is declared

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Why doesn't Ukraine just destroy this bridge?

        They have nothing to reach it with. Even if the US gave them the ATACMS, their 200 km range just falls short of reaching it.

        Russia would amass it's fleet of strategic bombers about 100 of them and start carpet bombing Ukraine into the stone age, while taking out the entire electric grid.

        Sure, they could lose some bombers, but hey, they can always make more.

        Or, they could just start sending in Kinzal missiles to eliminate ukranian military and civillian leadership. I'd prefer this one, cz it would bring this war to an end faster.

        Even if Russia used a tactical nuke the US would to NOTHING besides complaining. Take these words to the bank.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          russia is rolling out ww2 era planes and putting modern electronics in them. do you really think they have that capability?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >can always make more
          >of a Soviet legacy design
          Lmao moron are you serious? Because if you are, I have a (pontoon) bridge to sell you

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia would amass it's fleet of strategic bombers about 100 of them and start carpet bombing Ukraine into the stone age
          You seem to be under the impression that the reason the russians can't carpet bomb the ukes with strategic bombers is that they haven't declared war. Mind explaining what lead you to this conclusion?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Sure, they could lose some bombers, but hey, they can always make more.
          no access to electronis or other high tech stuff, nonexistent industry with zero innovation since cold war
          they wouldn't be able to mass produce fucking il-2 sturmovik

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >no access to electronis or other high tech stuff

            Last I looked, China was still on their side....and please name any piece of electronics that is NOT made in China.

            You guys are seriously dumb if you think just cz Taiwan makes the best chips, that means others can't make chips that are close to that quality.

            Andrei Matryanov is right, fapping to western military porn has clearly reduced your IQ to about room temperature.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Dude, they shouldn't believe in their own shit.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          100 bombers isn't that many for wwii style air raids. also they would lose 95 of them on the first run

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Even if Russia used a tactical nuke the US would to NOTHING besides complaining. Take these words to the bank.
          Did you know that the US spends more on maintaining its nukes than Russia spends on its entire military? Your whole post is stupid, but this snippet took first place.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia would amass it's fleet of strategic bombers about 100 of them and start carpet bombing Ukraine into the stone age, while taking out the entire electric grid.
          how exactly does your plan keep the big, loud, slow bombers from being swatted when even the fast, low, small fighter jets can't even penetrate uke air far enough to launch with precision

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia would amass it's fleet of strategic bombers
          UA has AA
          >but hey, they can always make more.
          the made like one in decades

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    with what? it took them dozens of himars hits to sufficiently damage the bridges in kherson, not to mention the fact that kerch is out of reach unless they retake berdyansk/mariupol

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >with what?

      Russia must be sending ammo trucks and train carriages across the bridge everyday. Hit one of them and multiply the boom.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Hit one of them
        With what?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why doesn't Ukraine just destroy this bridge?
    With what? The only way to deal significant damage to it is with heavy aerial bombs, but for that you need to clear all the anti air around (which is far from the front lines and not currently reachable with basic HIMARS missiles).

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      frogmen commandos

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they could've done it day 1 of the invasion and I was seriously disappointed they didn't prepare something like that

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you're a genius. you should call ukraine and tell them this idea. could be a game changer

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >It's hard to destroy
    >It takes away further economic potential of a possibly retaken Crimea
    >It would provoke further attacks against civilians
    I'd destroy it if I got the chance tbh. But there are reasons not to and it's not easy either.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Menacing it is better anyway. Force the Russians to commit forces to defending a fucking BRIDGE instead of attacking Ukrainians.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>It takes away further economic potential of a possibly retaken Crimea
      the only economic potential for that bridge is trade with or through Russia, which is impossible while they are enemies and Russia is occupying it.

      retaking crimea sooner has much more economic potential than the bridge itself

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>It takes away further economic potential of a possibly retaken Crimea
      Which economic potential?

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    - getting accurate sat intel on vatnik movements is far easier when they all move through the same chokepoint that's long enough regardless of cloud cover instead of various dispersed harbors
    - expensive piece of infrastructure which ukraine also wanted built and intends to capture
    - humanitarian corridor when the fighting advances to crimea
    - leaving vatniks with an escape route makes resistance softer
    - crimea is fucked regardless once the territories north of it are back in ukie hands
    - paradoxically the bridge is more useful to ukies intact

    ukraine might end up destroying it once recapturing crimea is topical, but right now russian logistics are so laughable that they don't need to

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you destroy the only escape route for the rats when the counterattack in the South starts?

    Vatniks are going to lose that AZOV sea land bridge and you don’t want them to fight you to the death for it. Always leave a way out for the enemy.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AZOV sea

      Why did Ukraine rename a sea after a neo-nazi group anyway?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Why did Ukraine
        because they're nazis. the real question is why russia renamed a city after a neo-nazi group?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it's the Azov denazification camp

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          many such cases

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >ywn shoot up with ukrainian cosplayers in a roach-infested hovel

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >tattooed up drug addicts
    >wearing pink frilly clothes
    lynchian

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's like boats don't exist.
    How do you think the peninsula was supplied before the bridge was completed?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    this is what every average American girl is like these days based off their Instagram accounts

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    derbies from the bridge may obstruct boats traveling to and from the Sea of Azov,
    however the peninsula can still be re supplied via ports in the east of the black sea,
    or via the Isthmus of Perekop if some control of the land north and east of that area is maintained.

    in Crimea seems to be surrounded by many choke points,
    and the sea ports themself would also create a high concentration / traffic jam if any rapid movements are required.
    >pic unrelated

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The supply line is Rostov, and not the Kerch straight.

    If you start lobbing missiles at the bridge you'll expose civilian and government targets in Kiev to Russian MRBMs, and achieve nothing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you'll expose civilian and government targets in Kiev to Russian MRBMs
      Russia is already doing this lol

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you must destroy it at the right time when you take kherson and start the invasion of the south, that way all the increased logistics load in the south, the chaos, the retreat disease infecting, thats when the Russian army will fall to pieces

    its about timing, thats why I have a lot of kids but they dont know i am their daddy

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Chongar strait looks neat

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's the issue, starving them out could be an issue. If they cut off the russians in Crimea and surround them, then they'll have tens of thousands of hungry, desperate russians looting and raping everything. Imagine what they do now but actually worse. Then there's the issue with leverage. Russia knows that they are essentially dependant on the bridge, so Ukraine can use that as leverage. Take the bridge away and there is no longer any leverage. Russia could even ramp up the attacks again in order to break the encirclement. Even though the success of such an attempt is unlikely, it still means war and fighting on ukrainian soil and at that point I would assume Ukraine also retook Donbass, so Ukraine's interest would actually be to stop the fighting.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because either they can’t or want Russia to have a way to leave

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >want Russia to have a way to leave
      This. They want Russian soldiers to flee so they don't have them cornered and willing to fight. More importantly, they want any treasonous fuckbags who actually cooperated to scurry across that bridge too. Once that's all said and done, THEN they'll blow it up.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Once that's all said and done, THEN they'll blow it up.
        You do realize the rail span is separate from the cars/trucks span, right? With GPS-guided missiles, Ukraine can blow up the rail line first and let all the scared little ratnik vatniks flee in their cars.

        If anyone wants to bet on it:

        https://www.betmoose.com/bet/will-kerch-strait-bridge-be-attacked-by-end-of-october-5851

        https://www.betmoose.com/bet/wil-the-kerch-strait-bridge-to-crimea-get-blown-up-5841

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    >ywn shoot up with ukrainian cosplayers in a roach-infested hovel

    [...]
    >tattooed up drug addicts
    >wearing pink frilly clothes
    lynchian

    https://i.imgur.com/vkaFiFF.jpg

    [...]
    this is what every average American girl is like these days based off their Instagram accounts

    >They don't know

    Firstly those are trannies

    Second, they're Russian

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Firstly those are trannies
      That was obvious from the facial structure.
      >Second, they're Russian
      That was expected from the krokodil use.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it wouldn't be helpful at this point. They'll probably destroy the bridge after they cut the Russian lines between Crimea and the Donbas, but if they do it now then the russians will make that harder to do.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would be better to blow up the railway side with cruise missiles.
    Though doing that without fucking the entire structure would be pretty difficult

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    political reasons. it would bring massive hardships (food shortages etc) for the crimean population. seeing how zelensk is dead set on retaking crimea: keeping pro-ukraine sentiments alive on crimea is more important than dealing another blow to the already awful russian logistics.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >when the counterattack in the South starts?

    When is the counterattack in the south gonna start? As soon as Zelensky goes to bed at night and falls asleep? That's the most realistic time.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    to use it as a bargaining chip
    >all russian soldiers in crimea, surrender now or face utter destruction
    >haha fuck you hohol's russia strong
    >*blows up bridge*
    >surrender now, there is no escape, the only way back to your motherland is either through a POW camp or a body bag
    they're holding off until they can collapse the southern front to where russians on crimea can't escape unless they surrender

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would cum buckets if a train full of ammo would blow up while crossing the bridge

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      don't give it away, retard

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because that bridge makes tracking logistics a breeze.

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    idk anon did you google it?

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there's no point in destroying it yet. If and when the battle for Crimea starts, that bridge allows civvies and vatniks to run away. Without it, they'd have to stand and fight.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why are ukrainian girls so cute

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've not seen many cute ones, idk

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Leave open an escape route so the already demoralized men don't fight as hard. It's also free infrastructure, when and if they do retake Crimea. Then there's the 'existential' question and tactical nuke use by Russia -- denying the peninsula by spamming intermediate yield missiles because they can't conventionally resupply or relieve Crimea would be their only option apart from unfavorable diplomatic concessions. That, and Crimea's its own discrete kettle that has to be resupplied, and can be pressured to force more troops that might be committed elsewhere (like Donbass) -- its fresh water has to be piped in from the mainland since Ukes dammed up river. More POWs, more of the 2 million > women and minors forced relocated into Russia out of Ukraine and POWs of their own to trade for.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's easier to retake crimea when russia has an easy escape route back to mother russia. and besides, you can always destroy it with some ATACMS you accidentally bought on the black market. why do it immediately when you can wait for a better time to strike?

Your email address will not be published.