Why do so many tards say nuclear war or ww3?

How many conflicts were there in the entire coldwar and everything was fine?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    People want to manifest something to happen to break up the monotony of modern life

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This isn't even that far off, the collective unconscious knows something is about to break and wants to get it over with simply. Time isn't as linear as it's made out to be

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fair enough but at several points both sides seriously considered using nukes during those conflicts. You have to slip up once. And thus looking at those outcomes does not guarantee this time will be the same.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > both sides
      What? No...
      Come on, get back to reality. It's nice here.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia isn’t giving up their gains, any russian administration that would do this would be finished. They would rather use tac nukes to keep their gains.

    The west is just bluffing btw. Russia can use them freely in the Ukraine, the US or the EU wouldn’t be able to do shit. When the Ukraine counter offensive drove the Russians back, the US was begging India to stop Putin from nuking Ukraine, because they didn’t know how to handle it. Said they would sink some ships or whatever, but were unable to retaliate appropriately. No one is willing to go all in over the Ukraine, it’s just another money making scheme after the forever war in Afghanistan ended.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russia itself is unsure of the outcome so they have so far only threatened about using nukes. They might have to take the gamble once the hundreds of billions in arms for Ukraine are already send and operational within few months. Because the current static war is only possible because of the air force parity both are having.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        > this Black person thinks yids can manifest weapons out of thin air by printing USD
        Lmao.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong. The reason russia is not nuking the Ukraine is because of the implications it would have on their campaign going forward. You can’t claim to liberate and then go and nuke someone, especially not while being on an offensive. Chinese support is also necessary for Russia, they have made it clear that they want to see this conflict resolved by conventional means. Same goes for India and other countries the US could pressure into ceasing support, especially after the use of nuclear weapons. Another aspect is the future. The Ukraine conflict will end some day, the European political landscape will eventually change, the American hegemony will end. Using nukes would make any political move in the future indefinitely harder. Unlike most Western Europeans and Americans their geopolitical goals do not change every 4 years and they don’t just plan ahead for 2.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >When the Ukraine counter offensive drove the Russians back
      Based history rewriter

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, of course the Russians gave all that land up voluntarily, which is why they were running from encirclement and left large parts of the country they had occupied. Don’t kid yourself please, Russia wouldn’t have been able to hold these areas and the Ukrainian tempo campaign led to the over night abandonment of gear and positions that everyone who orderly retreats would have taken with him.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's not what the term "ukrainian counteroffensive" implies in this context

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Ukrainian_counteroffensive
          >operational failure

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I thought about you being a moron for a second and thinking I am talking about the 2023 whatever the frick that was „offensive“, but I thought you smart enough to understand that this was the second counter offensive, not the first one I am talking about. Maybe you recall that the Russians occupied Kherson for some time, before they fled.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >that this was the second counter offensive, not the first one
              As i said, based history inventer

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So when and why did the Russians give up Kherson, according to real history?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Does anyone find it funny that the only territory Ukraine got back during the war is the territory that the Russians abandoned

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The front moves back and forth, that's war. Retreating is a means if you are unable to hold certain positions, and the Russian army retreated without necessarily a major offensive of the Ukrainian army and vice versa. Otherwise you'd have to name hundreds of offensives (avdeevka offensive, bakhmut offensive) which would make the term obsolete.
                In your example, there was no Ukrainian major push, but a threat of flooding the area, which would make supplying the frontlines impossible. And this flooding actually happened in 2023

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So we just change the definition of an offensive and voila, there was no offensive?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well how do you define what's a counteroffensive, to begin with?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You occupy enemy land.
                >Enemy drives you off his land by … a counter defensive?

                An offensive is any organized military action to achieve an overarching strategic goal in a military conflict. The goal of the Ukrainians is to drive the Russians out of their territory, the concentrated efforts to do so started shortly after the peace talks in Istanbul concluded and Boris told the Ukraine that there will be no peace, that they should fight instead. The Russians could have chosen to fight the Ukrainians, stopping their counter offensive, but choose to abandon large parts of conquered land because of their disadvantageous positions.

                I still think that this was one of the greatest blunders in this war, because it gave the west and the Ukraine the false hope of being able to prevail. Suddenly everyone thought total Ukraine cictory is possible and military aid increased substantially. Russia should have crushed the Ukrainian offensive, drowning any hope of winning this conflict. Since I am no expert of Russian military strength and position during that time, I can’t say for sure wether or not this would have been possible. What I know is that the US begged India to keep Putin from pushing the button, because the loss of land was so substantial and involuntary, the Russians were pretty pissed.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Allegedly second best military in world
                >2 years and half a million casualties into the 3 day operation to take the poorest county in western Europe
                I'd be too embarrassed to post with that flag Ivan.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ukraine is funded by the west. Slavs die on both sides and this benefits all non-slavs.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A whopping 1.5% of our yearly military budget. Russia is a nation of war cucks

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Irrelevant in that context. what matters is giving all your shells and tech from 50+ years span, something that can't be replenished instantly even with unlimited funds

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Theres no consensus in Russia to use nukes in the ukraine as its seen as Russian land.
      Theres a strong consensus to bomb Netherlands that supplied scout planes and pilots/crews that were designating targets and did the targeting when stormshadow missiles destroyed one of the early detection of nuclear missile radar sites a few days ago.
      As it happened in combination with F-16s being moved to Poland and Romania airbases.
      Theres a consensus to bomb those airbases as well.
      Because the only one in west ukraine that could have been used is already destroyed and theres is 0 ukrainians that can pilot an F-16.
      While F-16 can be used as a platform for nuclear weapons.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're saying Putin is under thread of being deposed?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. The Russian losses are justified by the gains. Imagine they would have fought with such losses and lost Crimea. Putin would be finished.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Guess you are just an uniformed moron that has no data to reference on the conflicts and your brain is a mush so you cannot get proper conclusions even if you got the data.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because this is taking place in Europe, NATO is involved, and the Russians, moron, and I know you buttholes only shill like this because you are worried the goyim may push hard for peace before you have succeeded in killing off all the Ukies in your designated "Israel 2.0".

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "Cold war" never existed, USA and USSR were two parts of the same ZOG system.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How did Russians even take all that territory, then crickets for 2 years?

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >How many conflicts were there in the entire coldwar and everything was fine?

    None on the borders of Russia or the United States.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Death to JewSA

    There won't be nukes but Russia is obligated to provide weapons to your enemies so they can sank your ships

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how many of those involved direct attacks on the territory of the big players involved in the proxy conflicts?
    also unless you live under a rock you might have noticed that our leaders aren't the smartest bunch lately, you could even say that a lot of them have lost contact with the reality

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The United States will just have to give up and accept that the occupied part of Ukraine is now Russian territory.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *