Why did it fail so hard?

Why did it fail so hard?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can't make a jet engine out of monkey metal. You can make something that looks like a jet engine, but you can't make something that works like a jet engine.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ok asiatic

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Weakness in its metallurgy and design points. There are videos on it that goes into much details.

      Toshi-sama, is that you?

      >everyone itt talking about china
      >japanese text in image and searching xf9-1 brings up ministry of defense for japan
      Am I being memed or are you guys moronic?

      /k/tards gonna /k/tard

      https://i.imgur.com/hn5edLP.jpeg

      Cope

      https://i.imgur.com/9E4hmkC.png

      [...]
      There was only one booth for all countries, so you can keep coping. Please show any RR engine model displayed at any booth at any event.

      Of course they need western help as usual.

      https://i.imgur.com/TGWz3Yj.png

      Because Japan, ever since they fell behind economically, reverted to being the bad-quality producer they used to be in the 1970s

      China is advancing, while Japan is stagnating and now resorts to cheating and faking data.

      >China is advancing, while Japan is stagnating
      kek, they are getting mogged by superior HAN CHINESE MASTER RACE engineering. So much that even toyota is now licensing and using Chinese automotive platforms.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Unsourced small snippet of text
        I am demoralized and actually China is very strong
        >pic rel you guys were too moronic to build pens without import parts until 2017.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          moron, the XF9 is practically the only working real 5/6th generation fighter engine outside of the US, which is why bongs wanted to cooperate with Japan in the first place. Rolls Royce's embedded power generator is neat but not essential whereas a compact super high performance engine core capable of outputting 33,000-44,000 lbf is in building a capable 5/6th gen fighter, especially when it's built with the the superior YAMATO metallurgy, material science/technology, and engineering, without compromising endurance unlike chink-asiatic garbage.

          Japan's weakness if any is the extreme pacifist policies and arms export restrictions, which always make production volume very small, pushing up the unit cost, that's why they formed GCAP in pursuit of economy of scale.

          >t.toshi-sama big mad

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Those ballpoint pent stories missed the point why this was basically a relevant thing in China.

          In China the story was used to provide an example of a hidden champion - a company no one knows being the dominant market leader of a very specific niche.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        moron, the XF9 is practically the only working real 5/6th generation fighter engine outside of the US, which is why bongs wanted to cooperate with Japan in the first place. Rolls Royce's embedded power generator is neat but not essential whereas a compact super high performance engine core capable of outputting 33,000-44,000 lbf is in building a capable 5/6th gen fighter, especially when it's built with the the superior YAMATO metallurgy, material science/technology, and engineering, without compromising endurance unlike chink-asiatic garbage.

        Japan's weakness if any is the extreme pacifist policies and arms export restrictions, which always make production volume very small, pushing up the unit cost, that's why they formed GCAP in pursuit of economy of scale.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >XF9 is practically the only working real 5/6th generation fighter
          >practically
          >real 5/6th
          lol, the cope on this one is rich

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It is, Japan keeps it low key for obvious reasons but it's a super high performance fighter engine actually, can achieve F119 to F135 class thrust with a compact platform and 14% better fuel economy thanks to the new generation materials, that's why bongs wanted the tech even when Tempest and F-X were separate programs.

            Picrel is more direct than

            https://i.imgur.com/hn5edLP.jpeg

            Cope

            >translation: we want XF9's compact high power core tech to develop the Tempest engine

            I do understand this makes chink/asiaticshills seethe though, keep seething lmao

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >thinks all shitposts are chinks/asiatics
              yeah, no doubt your a jap

              PrepHole isn't used by people who watch anime or read manga anymore
              even PrepHole is fricked, only holdouts are hentai lovers, but they only pay attention to the pixelated pussy

              this place is filled with trannies and all sorts of maladjusted weebs. try hanging out on other boards and you'll clearly see it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >your
                ESL pls go

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I do understand this makes chink/asiaticshills seethe though, keep seething lmao
              Also bongshills since it means RR has to get help from Japan, not the other way around like it's "supposed" to be.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He said fighter ENGINE you disingenuous c**t.

            Further it's the ONLY non-US/Chinese/Russian engine of that thrust class that has been publicly confirmed.

            If Rolls Royce or Safran wants to come out with some test data of their own, they're free to do so, but it's been 6 years since the XF9 first ran, and we've seen nothing from the European engine manufacturers that comes anywhere close to XF9 performance.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >If Rolls Royce or Safran wants to come out with some test data of their own, they're free to do so, but it's been 6 years since the XF9 first ran, and we've seen nothing from the European engine manufacturers that comes anywhere close to XF9 performance.
              Say it louder for the bongshills in the back

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because state of the ART doesn't happen when you kill everyone but the obedient proletarian masses. To push limits you must allow personalities who have the courage and ability to cross limits flourish. Probably a somewhat clever party servant was in charge and compromised on critical aspects.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone itt talking about china
    >japanese text in image and searching xf9-1 brings up ministry of defense for japan
    Am I being memed or are you guys moronic?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nu-/k/ can't discern which moon runes are which

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Caring which brand of asiatic is making trash

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          don't tell this guy where most high quality optics glass comes from

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ...Germany? If you're going to make something for lithography, it's coming from Germany.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              > Le make lenses
              https://www.haythink.com/chinas-leading-manufacturer-of-ultraviolet-optical-processing-and-coating-optical-materials-and-large-aperture-high-precision-lenses-successfully-developed-the-core-precision-optical-components-of-l/

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > Le make lenses
            https://www.haythink.com/chinas-leading-manufacturer-of-ultraviolet-optical-processing-and-coating-optical-materials-and-large-aperture-high-precision-lenses-successfully-developed-the-core-precision-optical-components-of-l/

            tell me where ASML sources their optics from then? hint: it's zeiss. of course it's fricking zeiss.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >all big scary symbols
        It's Chinese.
        >big scary symbols but with little cute ones in between
        It's Japanese
        >the characters are making faces
        It's Korean

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1/3 got it right

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not counting this moron:

        the chines try to take a design of another country and make it with their materials without realizing the materials are what made it possible to begin with

        they're missing large pieces of the puzzle and large pieces of research and development, trying to make 5th gen designs... and they think they can take taiwan lol

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          sorry i dont speak asiatic

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Good thing it's not in korean. Stupid motherfrickers can't even get their slurs right.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Pavlovian reflex to start philosophising about what's wrong with the Chinese system and then it turning out to not even be a Chinese engine at all was hilarious, top bait from OP

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Am I being memed or are you guys moronic?
      you are just now realizing that like 50% of the people here are psyops agents with highschool educations?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That sounds high.
        Specifically, you sound high.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      PrepHole isn't used by people who watch anime or read manga anymore
      even PrepHole is fricked, only holdouts are hentai lovers, but they only pay attention to the pixelated pussy

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the chines try to take a design of another country and make it with their materials without realizing the materials are what made it possible to begin with

    they're missing large pieces of the puzzle and large pieces of research and development, trying to make 5th gen designs... and they think they can take taiwan lol

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What failed? Seems development is ongoing.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Failed?

    It's the base for the new GCAP fighter's engine.

    RR and IHI will make some changes before it actually gets finished design, but the XF9 is only turbine core outside of the US/Russia/China to hit those temps and thrust figures

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's the base for the new GCAP fighter's engine.
      No, it's not.
      >RR and IHI will make some changes before it actually gets finished design, but the XF9 is only turbine core outside of the US/Russia/China to hit those temps and thrust figures
      Achieving a high temperature is easy, but the problem is the reliability. Chinks failed at it all the time despite the fact that they literally spent trillions of dollars on it.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Cope

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why is it that every single thread about GCAP or related topics resolves into these dumb arguments about whos doing what, your article mentions nothing about building the new engine for whatever main fighter comes out of the GCAP project directly off of the XF9 engine core just that RR and IHI would cooperate on the engine bringing the knowledge that both these companies have together to create a new engine which yeah, no shit sherlock thats kind of the point of cooperation. Japan chose to work with the UK because unlike the USA which hoards technology and at most is willing to offer Japan a variant of an existing jet (F22/F35) and licenced production everything else at best, the UK is actually willing to co-develop new IPs and do ToT with partner countries. The demonstrator aircraft will fly with EJ200s in 2027 assuming the timescale doesnt slip so we will likley have to wait for the first pre-production aircraft to actually see the new engine in use.

          Wow, good job outing yourself as the asiaticshill.

          Yes, it is the base for the GCAP fighter, to claim otherwise means you believe a SIMULATED ENGINE that has NEVER run is being used as the base even though Rolls Royce spent over a year working with IHI specifically on the XF9 engine core.

          This sounds very similar to the French cope back when they were a partner in the Eurofighter project, they demanded that the project use their engine made by Snecma as after all RR had nothing concrete at the time but the other partners chose RR which turned out to be the correct choice as they came out with the EJ200 based on the XG40 core which is a better engine in every metric compared to the M88 and has seen an increase of ~15% thrust over its lifetime.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The demonstrator aircraft
            You're already showing you don't know what the frick you're talking about.

            The British flying demonstrator might use those engines, but the Japanese have their own flying demonstrator.

            One of the things japan stipulated in joining GCAP is they'd develop a flying demonstrator IN japan. The UK also wants to build a flying demonstrator, so there will be two. One in the UK, one in Japan.

            This will also allow them to do flight testing in both the UK and Japan, theoretically allowing a flight test in the UK during the day, and that night another flight test in Japan (during their daytime hours) allowing better use of time as theoretically, GCAP project groups can work 24/7 due to the time zone differences.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Now show me the source where the Japanese will be using different engines.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go ahead and show the source that says they won't.

                Why the frick would they keep developing the XF9 platform if they weren't going to use it?

                Why the frick do they keep showing the XF9 at GCAP trade shows if they're not using it?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Go ahead and show the source that says they won't.
                Bravo, what a way to go.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Why the frick would they keep developing the XF9 platform if they weren't going to use it?
                They've already developed a pseudo-fighter jet and a passenger jet for fun.
                >Why the frick do they keep showing the XF9 at GCAP trade shows if they're not using it?
                Source?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Source?
                This was shown at DSEI at the GCAP booth

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >This was shown at DSEI at the GCAP booth
                Yeah, at the Japanese booth. They just want to keep coping like you.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, the Japanese GCAP booth.

                It's an IHI engine, why would it be at the British or Italian GCAP booths?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/9E4hmkC.png

                [...]
                There was only one booth for all countries, so you can keep coping. Please show any RR engine model displayed at any booth at any event.

                Mitsubishi owns the right for the asian market, so they're probably marketing their own product together.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, the Japanese GCAP booth.

                It's an IHI engine, why would it be at the British or Italian GCAP booths?

                There was only one booth for all countries, so you can keep coping. Please show any RR engine model displayed at any booth at any event.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why does every 5th gen look the same as the americans

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you want aerodynamic and stealthy, turns out there isn't a ton of options when it comes to the look/shape.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              They won't be making two demonstrators of the manned aircaft unless they are subsequent evolutions - which is extremely unlikely given the use of a digital design environment.

              Japan might make the flying demonstrator of the loyal wingman. But Tempest was a pretty mature airframe design before GCAP started.

              GCAP is essentially picking technologies to go inside the airframe.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Again, with what engine would Japan fly its demonstrator with if not the EJ200? You dont seem to understand that the XF9 engine was always intended only as a developmental project and any engine that would have come out of the program may have used the same core as is common but the actual production engine would be very different to its initial prototype and would take a few years to come to fruition. We have heard nothing about a planned production engine from IHI although I dont read Japanese so maybe there are articles out there that mention it and the new engine being cooked up in the collab would not be ready by 2027 for the demonstrator so if Japan builds its own demonstator vehicle it will either have EJ200s or a licence built American one, which makes more sense to you?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >We have heard nothing about a planned production engine from IHI
                We haven't heard shit from RR about a production engine either.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ??? but we have, they are working with IHI on developing the new engine that will outfit the fighter component of GCAP. You dont seem to understand that I am specifically talking about the engine for the initial demonstrator aircraft set to fly in 2027, Japan does not have an existing engine other than licence built American engines to outfit the demonstrator with as you dont outfit a tech demo aircraft with prototype engines, for example the initial versions of both the Eurofighter and Rafale were powered by RB199 and F404 respectively.

                https://i.imgur.com/0bXmxUC.png

                >XF9 engine was always intended only as a developmental project
                No it wasn't. It was always planned to be further developed for the next fighter. The ultimate goal has always been to keep developing it until it hits 20t of thrust.

                You said it your self "It was always planned to be further developed for the next fighter" planned being the keyword, dont get me wrong im sure they are still working on things in the background just as RR have been but since they unveiled the XF9-1 in 2018 there has been no news on it. Considering that Future Fighter project has been merged with GCAP the engine that IHI would have eventually developed would be massively different to the engine now intended for GCAP as they are now partnered with RR, im sure both companies will bring things to the table for this new engine but one will take the lead whether it be official or unofficial and something tells me its going to be the company that has a history of successfully integrating engines into projects and the decades of RnD to back it up. The next few years will be interesting although we will get few details as everything will be heavily classified unless of course one of the team members on the project happens to play Warthunder.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Japan does not have an existing engine other than licence built American engines
                IHI F-7

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thats high bypass which wouldn't work. Still Japan has built the J0, J3, F3, F3-40, XF5. The issue is the other moron is acting like the moment the XF9 gets mounted on an airframe its going to explode or something. The XF9 is still a valid airframe to make flights on.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                An engine for a fighter is massivley different to an engine for any other aircraft, and you know I was talking specifically about fighter engines. Also what a moronic idea, yeah I want nacelles on my stealth fighter, genius really.

                Thats high bypass which wouldn't work. Still Japan has built the J0, J3, F3, F3-40, XF5. The issue is the other moron is acting like the moment the XF9 gets mounted on an airframe its going to explode or something. The XF9 is still a valid airframe to make flights on.

                Never said that they would explode you mong just that it isnt something aircraft companies do especially not for modern jets, dont want to risk a £1+ billion demo aircraft and a setback of 1-2 years by using untested engines considering they are, you know quite critical to it not crashing. Engines go through very rigourous testing exactly for this reason and are usually flown on a testbed aircraft as an additional/replacement engine first so if a failure does occur its not the end of the aircraft, which IHI has not done yet for XF9 and so far has no public plans to do so. To end this roundabout conversation, the GCAP tech demo will fly with EJ200 or a variant of it, any other opinion is cope.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If they're taking the turbine core from the XF-9, then no matter what name they give it for GCAP, it's still XF9 based and claiming it isn't simply because they joined up with RR is just moronation on a level i haven't seen in awhile.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Where does it state that the new engine is based on the XF9 core?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's the ONLY non-US/Chinese/Russian engine to EVER publicly disclose thrust figures in the realm required for 5th and 6th gen fighters.

                So what turbine core are they going to use if NOT the XF9?

                Does RR have some sekrit turbine they've just decided to never talk about and never disclose even in budget documents?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As I have said previously, it will likley be a completly new engine design as many of the technologies they want to incorporate into it such as embed generators will almost certainly require it. Also I dont understand why you think everything needs to be in the public eye for it to exist but to sate your thirst for sources here https://www.rolls-royce.com/products-and-services/defence/future_combat_air_capability/orpheus.aspx. Oh look at that, RR put together and tested an 2 engines in less than 2 years, and wow look at that its a "small-core" based and scalable engine which they have been spamming as a buzz word in all their articles for the last few years. Also see

                https://i.imgur.com/Mxqyij9.png

                Also pic related,https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/dsei-japan-2023-ihi-rolls-royce-progress-gcap-fighter-engine.

                , the initial testing for the new engine will be done in the UK, surely if it was based on the XF9 core then it would make more sense to start testing in Japan?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Applications
                >unmanned, small engine market
                It's literally just an engine for loyal wingman. Wow they built 2 small low performance drone engines. It doesn't even match the renders they gave for the XG240 which was supposed to be the engine RR was making.
                >the initial testing for the new engine will be done in the UK, surely if it was based on the XF9 core then it would make more sense to start testing in Japan?
                Because not every test can be done in Japan. Japan is already doing radar, data link, FBW, and central computing testing this year.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >to start testing in Japan?
                RR went to japan with dozens of engineers for months. RR has only publicly shown off fancy air ducts and talked about how they're doing advanced electronics to turn the engine output into electrical output for computers and sensors.

                https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/column/henshu/20230818-OYT8T50066/

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but we have, they are working with IHI on developing the new engine that will outfit the fighter component of GCAP.
                Source? Other than shitty exposition pictures this time.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks for confirming that you are moronic

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Also pic related,https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/dsei-japan-2023-ihi-rolls-royce-progress-gcap-fighter-engine.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >XF9 engine was always intended only as a developmental project
                No it wasn't. It was always planned to be further developed for the next fighter. The ultimate goal has always been to keep developing it until it hits 20t of thrust.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >GCAP demonstrator will fly in 2027
            >Thrust is the only acceptable indicator of an engine's performance

            Audibly kekd, Bongshill never disappoints

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'm a bong citizen and even im not that stupid.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's the difference between shill and normal citizen

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'm a bong citizen and even im not that stupid.

              That's the difference between shill and normal citizen

              Jesus its like im talking to a group of tards, were are your wranglers and why are they allowing you access to the internet? I like how none of you have posed a counter to what I said. Where did I say only thrust matters, in fact the only metric we know about XF9 is its thrust (We dont even know the circumstances that this thrust was achieved under so for all we know it could be the absolute maximum not its actual performance) coincidently which seems to be the main point that you weebshils are pushing. I mentioned the 15% increase of thrust as a bonus but even the original version of the EJ200 is superior to the M88-2 in every metric even if only marginally in some.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >We dont even know the circumstances that this thrust was achieved under so for all we know it could be the absolute maximum not its actual performance
                They published both dry and wet thrust figures from the public test info they released

                > 107.9kN dry
                > 147.1kN wet

                Though that's from 2017/18 testing and we have no idea what if any advances they've made since, especially as they started working with RR in 2019/20.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                [...]

                Jesus its like im talking to a group of tards, were are your wranglers and why are they allowing you access to the internet? I like how none of you have posed a counter to what I said. Where did I say only thrust matters, in fact the only metric we know about XF9 is its thrust (We dont even know the circumstances that this thrust was achieved under so for all we know it could be the absolute maximum not its actual performance) coincidently which seems to be the main point that you weebshils are pushing. I mentioned the 15% increase of thrust as a bonus but even the original version of the EJ200 is superior to the M88-2 in every metric even if only marginally in some.

                this article goes into more details on the testing/development of the XF5/9 though it's only in moonrunes.

                >to start testing in Japan?
                RR went to japan with dozens of engineers for months. RR has only publicly shown off fancy air ducts and talked about how they're doing advanced electronics to turn the engine output into electrical output for computers and sensors.

                https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/column/henshu/20230818-OYT8T50066/

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >in fact the only metric we know about XF9 is its thrust
                We know the thrust, inlet temps, and cross sectional size. Now provide the data on just one of these on RR's new engine design.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yea but Rolls Royce is anglo/white.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Japanese military jet engines follow the US MIL standards, MIL-E-5007D, so those are specs under the same standard test condition.

                Here's an interesting pic from some ATLA (Japan's defense procurement and technology agency) presentation materials from circa 2016, the time before they started to use ambiguous figures like 15+ tons, 15 tons or more, etc., which shows the thrust of production model F9, referred to as Future Fighter Engine, and how it compares to F119 (156 kN or 35,000 lbf) referred to as "the same thrust engine" as XF9-1 prototype. It reads 168-169 kN (38,000 lbf) and says 14% more fuel efficient, and I don't think it's a class EJ200 (20,000 lbf) can reach even with some performance improvement taken into consideration.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Fair enough on the testing, I never would expect the EJ200 to meet the performance of the XF9 considering its almost 2 decades older and a smaller engine overall though. Most people dont understand that there is a key difference between prototypes and production engines, one is built to exceed a requirement and the other is built to a specification. With GCAP there seems to be a focus on fuel efficiency, TtW and range so its likley that whatever engine they cook up for the project will not have as huge an increase in thrust as we may expect, I have also seen a lot of Net Zero crap advertised on RR/BAEs side at least so its likley it will get converted to run off Hydrogen fuel at some point as RR has been big on this tech recentlY.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Japan has been planning for ~360kw power capacity for their sensors, radar, computers, etc. Based on two 160kw XF9 class engines.

                I doubt this has changed significantly with the shift from the F-X program to GCAP. Japan has been adamant in regards to range and payload capabilities, I doubt they'd budge on power capacity as that's essential for the sensor fusion and manned/unmanned teaming that the platform is supposed to be capable of.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >160kw
                180kw

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This opinion peice from 2 years ago isn't a source

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wow, good job outing yourself as the asiaticshill.

        Yes, it is the base for the GCAP fighter, to claim otherwise means you believe a SIMULATED ENGINE that has NEVER run is being used as the base even though Rolls Royce spent over a year working with IHI specifically on the XF9 engine core.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's the base for the new GCAP fighter's engine.

      Trust me bro

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When will it all end, only 4 years ago I wasn't nearly as surrounded by mouth breathing morons like ITT. Frickers dont even know anything about what a asiatic or chink or zipperhead or whatever the frick else these clowns get confused.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Once the war in Ukraine ends the level of moronation will decrease.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did it?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, it's being incorporated into whatever engines get put into GCAP.

      It wont be an exact copy of the XF9, but it will be largely based on it with rolls royce having been working on inlet ducts and the electrical generation portion of the engines.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Keep dreaming.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russians cant into engineering, its that shrimple.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    probably had too much agent orange from the vietnam war or something.
    >JPN tjv

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looking back in retrospect, jet engines and also CPUs are ayy lmao tech, it's no surprise that counties still struggle hard to develop these techs, it just has to be.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I get CPUs but how are jet engines ayy tech when IC engine has been existing for a very long time. Instead of using the hot expanding gas to push rods they just flush it out instead.
      Also no one cares about plane going supersonic anymore. Wasn't there a Rotating detonation engine breakthrough few months ago?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Wasn't there a Rotating detonation engine breakthrough few months ago?
        Kind of, but breakthrough doesn't mean they suddenly become cheap, mass produced and most importantly reliable.
        Give it a few years.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        cpu is just a piece of silicon etched with laser and covered in thin metal film. There used to be a frickton of cpu manufacturers in the 80's and the 90's cause it isn't that difficult to produce
        The problem starts when you need to make a modern cpu that would be competitive on the market

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the best part is that moores law is a self fulfilling prophecy based on economics. If any company wanted to put the resources into it they could have made 5nm chips 40 years ago.

          Which anyone smart enough to realize how important AI and CAD is they would have done so immediately, especially for military development. Creating a super intelligence would be an arms race equal to the atomic bomb.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Creating a super intelligence would be an arms race equal to the atomic bomb.
            Back to lesswrong, moron

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >If any company wanted to put the resources into it they could have made 5nm chips 40 years ago.
              you're pants-shittingly moronic.

              >This law is an empirical relationship that's based on historical trends and production experience, rather than physics.
              Durrr maybe if you morons did any research on the subject you would have a clue.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                adding, the first known 5nm test chip was created in 2000, 24 years ago. It just wasn't commercially viable and there are current 1nm chips already. Physically, there is nothing stopping them from doing this even earlier. As I said before, moores law is based off of economics not physics.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >If any company wanted to put the resources into it they could have made 5nm chips 40 years ago.
            you're pants-shittingly moronic.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Looking back in retrospect

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >engine, japan
    😯

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Everytime i meet a nip my mind goes to nuke instinctively, i like a lot of them but nips make me think of buxk broken nukes, mix of feeling sorry for them and laughing at their pathetic lot having to spread cheeks to the us to this day

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      asiaticshill don't you have a KF-21 thread to make?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Same here anon

      USA! USA! USA!

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not enough hydraulic lines

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the core temps on that b***h is beyond what material sciences can keep up with. it's like a k20 civic running 25PSI boost

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The US uses meme magic on their turbine blisks that china and russia can only dream of.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the XP9 is like 2/3rds the size of the F135 but trying to make the same thrust

        I mean theoretical you can, just way more risk of a KB

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why did it fail so hard?
    It blows up if you use it for only 10 seconds, and if any of the parts falls into lava, you have to find a new part, forcing you to haul ass all the way to get it back (and you can only carry one part at a time teehee)

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm convinced that failures like these are just the result of not speaking English. Seriously. Jap programmers are also shit. You know when they're good? When they speak fluent English. It's a mindfrick, but I am fully convinced that English unlocks some part of your brain that suddenly makes you good at whatever technical task you are doing. How do I know this? I'm ESL.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because Japan, ever since they fell behind economically, reverted to being the bad-quality producer they used to be in the 1970s

    China is advancing, while Japan is stagnating and now resorts to cheating and faking data.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Implessive.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      China is our greatest adversary but would trust chinese shit more than jap garbage

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Aready do every day.
        My country has Chinese built metro system and it's literally the cleanest and most reliable piece of hardware we ever had.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Disgusting

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >China is advancing
      only as long as they have competitors to steal from
      >Japan is stagnating
      unfortunately true

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We nuked the japs only for shits and grins and to test out the newest toy given the nips were trying to surrender for months before the nukes, thought about it against the chinks but decided they were not as subhuman as nips so gave them a pass

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Nips are trying to surrender, but also keep their entire shitty system
          Ya nah the surrender had to be conditional or risk future shenanigans.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >trying to surrender for months before the nukes,
          lol no. They were preparing for a mainland invasion. One of the commanders wanted to use every aircraft in their arsenal as kamikazes to cause to much damage on the initial wave of invaders that the US wouldn't want to invade the mainland anymore. None of the other commanders agreed because they wanted to draw the conflict out longer. They were literally teaching school children how to charge US soldiers with pointy sticks during the invasion.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the nips were trying to surrender for months
          This has gotta be one of the more delusional reinterpretations of the end of World War 2

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unless Rolls Royce actually shows one of their own engines doing thrust figures similar to the XF9 I'm going to believe that's what GCAP will be using (or at least using it as a base for the GCAP engines)

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >/k/ has become so gay that gays on this thread are shilling chink shit and disparaging well documented jap tech
    The ukrainian war and its consequences...

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Chinese rune :l
      >Chinese rune, Japan :O

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah but in this case we actually have some good info on Japanese engine development and we figure it's pretty trustworthy.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The steel was only folded 999 times.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This entire thread reeks of the asiaticshill and his eternal butthurt and seething at the Rising Sun and the Yamato Master Race, and is a manifestation of his country's suffering from no-engine in the disguise of chinkshills suffering from shit-engine lol

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Meanwhile, in America;
    re: XA102 - May 8th 2024
    > GE Aerospace has logged hundreds of hours of rigorous, system-level performance and operability testing, far exceeding the required baseline testing. GE Aerospace has the empirical knowledge of adaptive cycle engine architectures and the transformational capabilities they offer.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *