Why aren't there female Navy Seals?

Why aren't there female Navy Seals?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Women don't belong in the military let alone combat

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Discrimination

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's the Navy. Girls are icky.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Vast majority of women have about 1/3 the muscle mass of the average man. This means that women basically CAN'T compete with men on any physical level. Most countries have enough males to recruit into combat roles, so throwing women into the mix just doesn't make sense (especially when sex, or sexual assault allegations are possible).

    The SEALS are one of the most difficult teams to become a part of, so women joining is practically impossible.

    Besides, if a woman won the genetic lottery and had was able to develop the same muscle mass as a man, why on earth would she join the SEALS? Why not become an athlete and make boat-loads of money?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      YOU CAN'T SAY THAT!!!!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And muscle mass is only part of the story when it comes to strength. Testosterone better enables a mans nervous systems to exert muscles fully, far further than an womans can. Women can do more RPE10 sets than a man can during a session, because RPE10 for them is a lesser rate of exertion from a biomechanical perspective. Training narrows the gap but not fully.

      When talking averages , only 1/1000 women are stronger than the average man of any given group.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Don't women also have like ~200ms slower response time? It's funny to show women how slow their response time is. Nobody ever talks about that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no shit, my gal is like 0 for 60 in dodging my fists

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Holy frick. Women are truly pathetic.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    better question is why there are any navy seals at all

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because women are not the same as men. Men have several thousand years of evolutionary selection (or divine mandate depending on who you talk to) in order hurt people from other tribes. Its the same exact reason why there arent any female construction workers or deep sea welders. Women are categorically disqualified from work that is dangerous and physically demanding because they cannot hope to be competitive.

    Try as she might, she will always have to exert more effort than the average male in order to acheive comparable results

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sexism, we ought to demand more female seals (so I can give them my club [by club I mean wiener])

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    better question would be, is there any roles that women would be better at than men in special forces operations?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >is there any roles that women would be better at than men in special forces operations?
      No but women have served in Army Civil Affairs SOF, PSYOPs SOF and the 160th SOAR

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "Women" is too broad a group for such a specific niche role. A better question is "would any women qualify in a truly unbiased mixed-gender SF selection process?" and the answer is "we have no idea because it's never been managed without allegations of bias in one direction or another."
      In the most general terms, it might be the case that women could do things men couldn't on a social level (go into women-only spaces, pick past cultural norms) and that might be relevant to a small number of specialised tasks.
      On the gripping hand, there's no reason to bar women outright from applying for roles like piloting where physical fitness need only be at the base military level (easily applicable to women) and intellectual/academic capability is more important.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Thats not enough for "that" section of political influence now. They will never accept any natural basis. It will always be some kind of instituional "ism" Even if their applicants are insuffciant it will be ok to waive them. Nevermind the fact that it would be unthinkable to let a man pass with similar scores. No one would consider a man performing as poor as a woman to be successfuly but somehow its ok for a woman to pass through lowered standards.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          We've gone straight from prejudiced frickwads to revenge-seeking frickwads and skipped the actual balance point in the middle. I have no idea how to stop the pendulum in the middle.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Reality doesn't really matter anymore. I feel my blood boil whenever some Paton Manning looking MF in makeup Captain gives me a breifing about extremeism. I lost my intel job because I asked for help with drinking. Meanwhile there are fricking troons lecturing us about loyalty. Some fricking degnerate that would've been institutionalized has "his" TS clearance but I've been cast aside.

            I'm so fricking done with this. I'm glad you frickers have a recruiting problem. I am not fricking reenlisting. Suck my fricking wiener. You motherfrickers deserve everything you're dealing with now.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              There’s only one way the brass will learn, and that’s when the recruiters run dry and the reenlistments stop. Spending 20 years doing frick all has tanked faith in the military, and I bet even war with China won’t help. I know they could always fall back on the draft but that will really frick their image that they’ve been building, and now the meat being sent to the grinder will just be rainbow colored if the worst comes

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You have no idea how fricking angry I am. I never got paperwork. I've never done anything to be counseled but you're gonna make me scrub C-130 cargo bays with tooth brush for 12 hours a day. You mean to tell me that I'm worth less than some fricking degenrate that would've been sent to a sanatorium.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You have no idea how fricking angry I am. I never got paperwork. I've never done anything to be counseled but you're gonna make me scrub C-130 cargo bays with tooth brush for 12 hours a day. You mean to tell me that I'm worth less than some fricking degenrate that would've been sent to a sanatorium.

              Seeking help like talking with EBH or self referring for substance use shouldnt prevent you from maintaining a clearance unless there was some sort of an "incident" or patterns of misconduct or repeated signs of abusing drugs or alcohol. Sounds like there might be something else going on..

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I had to get a waiver when I enlisted because my parents had tricare and I saw a school psychologist for anxiety when I was 8. It stayed on my record and fricked me in the ass 12 years later.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Still, clearance authorization is usually just put on hold if there is anything that is a "red flag". Speaking with whoever is the S2 can tell you what would hold it up and usually just requires a statement from you and supporting documentation from command/treatment facility to justify your need for clearance and the nature of the subject that would or would not allow you to keep it.

                Also, women are untrustworthy and one of the biggest factors for a special operations team is trust. If women hadnt been proving themselves to be such weak, kniving, self serving cumbawds for so many years they might have a shot. Everyone looks at physical and mental prowess. No one thinks about if that person is a literal piece of shit or not lol

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >I lost my intel job because I asked for help with drinking
              Lol. lmao moron. Just don't drink.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >On the gripping hand, there's no reason to bar women outright from applying for roles like piloting where physical fitness need only be at the base military level (easily applicable to women) and intellectual/academic capability is more important.
        You have never driven a car and I am beginning to doubt you have ever left your house alone

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Hey, I only said they should apply. Passing or failing is up to them. There are woman racecar drivers, and they seem to be at least OK.
          Regardless of gender, the average moron will never be able to carrier-land an F14. That doesn't mean it's impossible for anyone ever.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Barracks b***h.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Human intelligence. People are generally more willing to cooperate with women.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Women are useful in undercover roles as they can blend in better and look unthreatening.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Reconnaissance_Unit

      Special forces selection does not accept women. Full stop.

      >*American Special forces selection does not accept women.

      "Women" is too broad a group for such a specific niche role. A better question is "would any women qualify in a truly unbiased mixed-gender SF selection process?" and the answer is "we have no idea because it's never been managed without allegations of bias in one direction or another."
      In the most general terms, it might be the case that women could do things men couldn't on a social level (go into women-only spaces, pick past cultural norms) and that might be relevant to a small number of specialised tasks.
      On the gripping hand, there's no reason to bar women outright from applying for roles like piloting where physical fitness need only be at the base military level (easily applicable to women) and intellectual/academic capability is more important.

      >never
      Wrong.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Special forces selection does not accept women. Full stop.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Misogyny obviously, we just need to lower the standards!

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because they suck and men dont trust them even in basic military roles. They would be peered out in selection, not because of their sex but more than likely their attitudes and not being able to really bring anything to the table for an effective team. Essentially they would be a walking liability, dudes get the boot from selection all the time even though they can physically and mentally complete the tasks. Their team mates just dont get along with them or fully trust them.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Women don't belong on the battlefield, but they also don't belong in thr ktichen or bedroom either. They belong in my anime snd the 2d world where they can't hurt me but I can pretend to make a meaningful connection in relative safety.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    female bones are brittle. no, seriously. Every female that attempts any form of hard labor ends up going home every now and then because they get injured. Men suck it up and get things done.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wow, zoomers just think everything before 9/11 was fog and mud.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Women can't even make it through infantry training without being waved through, what makes you think that it would even be possible for a woman to ever make it as a SEAL?

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *