why aren't soldiers in battle given a pistol?

why aren't soldiers in battle given a pistol? What if you're about to reload then a enemy shows up on your right and you quickly reach for your pistol only to realize you weren't issued one

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I would frick ya mudda

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    a homosexual as usual

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The 10 other dudes you're with shoot him.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      came here to write this. it's not a single player fps op you fricking moron. you are not a lone wolf (or if you somehow end up the last man standing you run, die, or surrender depending on circumstances).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they preoccupied or you've been seperated

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Then a pistol wouldn't have helped you anyways.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Then you've fricked up and are going to die if you can't kill them with your multi-tool. Never NEVER leave your battle buddy.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Then you're a fricking moron and deserve to die.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I think the French were standard issuing a side arm with their coalition forces in the middle east.

    I don't think I've ever seen anyone besides an MP or an officer wear a sidearm though.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    throw your knife at him

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    frenchbros... we got too smart

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >416's
      >SCAR
      >not 417
      it bothers me

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Why? Only the marksman needs the bigger bullet

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No I mean, they all have 416's instead of the DM who has a SCAR, instead of having a 417 to fit in with the 416s. It could have been nice and matching especially since they already had 417s

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I assume they already had SCARs.

            Looking at when they adopted both, they bought like 2000 SCARs in 2019 and the HK416 entered service in 2022

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I can find reports of them using the HK417 since around 2013-2014. and it seems the SCAR-PR is replacing the FRF2 so they probably aren't fulfilling the same role.
              I'm gonna have to call the graphic into question at this point without any cited source backing it up. I presume the SCAR is meant to be at platoon level and not squad level.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Are you the same guy who keeps his safety off because he almost shot a cat?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if you're in a situation where you can't reload then you won't be fast enough to draw your handgun

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Remember, switching to your pistol is always faster than reloading

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You aren't a bar of soap and real life isn't a video game

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >why aren't soldiers in battle given a pistol?
    I am more concerned why they aren't given rear sights even when they get pistols.

    Also ask yourself if you would rather have a loaded M9 or for less weight would you rather have an extra 2x 30rd mags of 5.56?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    they were up until like ww1.

    pistols became the new status symbol when the swords were gone.

    they would give the female staff ncos pistols and make the machine gunns carry A4s LOL.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *