“Westerners” they were all Muslims coming from immigrant families and further proof that people from an Islamic background can never integrate into western society.
The “moderate rebels” thing has always been a joke because they never existed. The supposed Free Syrian Army who was championed as the “moderate group” quickly started doing ethnic/religious cleansings before breaking up into multiple Islamist factions and then finally becoming a Turkish proxy group
Probably because the FSA fell apart and the more extremist groups within and allied with the FSA did the shit you’re talking about. For a period of time the Islamic State state was allied with the FSA however they eventually cut ties and even ending up fighting eachother due to ideological differences like the extremity of IS.
Why is there factional infighting among the feds and why are towelheads being sacrificed over this proxy war between different branches of the US government?
Ethnic divisions with Kurds and Arabs, neighboring powers like Iran and Saudi Arabia funding their own groups, international powers like the US and Russia, residual skullfucking due to the Iraq War killing off any potential unified leadership for the better half of a decade.
Funfact, Russia created ISIS:
didnt do jack shit against ISIS, because they created them. ISIS was ment to bring trouble to Iraq and with that to the US, binding their resources and focus. Think about it, how could ISIS take over so Iraq so quick and so effective, when not with support and intel from Russia? It is unclear if they actually had Syria in mind or not, but sure as hell used them well there. Without ISIS it would have been rebels vs Assad, kurds and whole east Syria would have gone against Assad too, but with ISIS added to the play, everything changed. ISIS had taken over a lot of areas that were anti Assad and had oil refineries and they made no secret about that they would take over everyone giving the chance. They divided the anti Assad coaltions and gave Russia an exuse to expand in Syria militarily, while actually bombing rebels instead, so the last moderates leave the groups and radicals take over. Also it stopped the pipeline from Quartar and halted the one from Iran for many years, so Russia can stay the big gas seller in Europe.
>Accuses US of arming separatists in ukraine >Invaded ukraine first in 2014
Isn't the vatnik narrative that the US caused the war, by supporting Kyiv?
It makes sense in a juvenile kind of logic. >You started the fight by retaliating >If you didn't retaliate there wouldn't be a fight
Gee, who could be behind the cope threads about CIA arming ISIS when it has been proven that Russia was actually the one doing it. It doesn't take long to find out.
We did arm and train various anti assad fighter groups, that is a fact and since they were so shitty, or islamists we stopped funding them in 2016. OP is not saying "The CIA armed and created ISIS"
After Nazi germany was beat, did anyone ask themselves why Russia didn't do shit to stop Japan? They let imperial japan continue to operate in the area, deliberately to weaken America. End result was nuclear solution. So there is some truth to these vatnik projections about Russia being guilty of nuking japan .
>Accuses US of arming separatists in ukraine >Invaded ukraine first in 2014
Isn't the vatnik narrative that the US caused the war, by supporting Kyiv?
It makes sense in a juvenile kind of logic. >You started the fight by retaliating >If you didn't retaliate there wouldn't be a fight
This. It is clear that any time Russia blames the US for something, it is clearly based out of projections
>Accuses the US of bombing nord stream >Russia proven to be behind bombing nord stream
>Accuses the US of setting up ISIS >Russia proven to be behind ISIS from the started
>Accuses US of arming separatists in ukraine >Invaded ukraine first in 2014
>another vatnik cope thread
Getting pushed out of bakhmut again zigger?
I swear to god you retards turn every fucking thread on here into another shitty Ukraine was thread #24949402955503
Lack of education, lack of wealth, and pervasive levels of religious fundamentalism
How do those reasons explain all of the suburban westerners who volunteered to join isis?
I would consider those to be exceptions to the rule, but the religious fundamentalism part is definitely true in those relatively limited cases
Failure to launch with too much internet exposure.
“Westerners” they were all Muslims coming from immigrant families and further proof that people from an Islamic background can never integrate into western society.
People on 4chan shill the Taliban. It’s just gays who wanted to be edgy and cool and le evil bad guy
there's a difference between shitposting and actually flying to Syria to join a terrorist group
>there's a difference between shitposting and actually flying to Syria to join a terrorist group
They were doing it for the meme anon
winning
>shits on you
god I miss the Syrian war, even youtube was absolute kino
Because man cannot stand a meaningless existence. People would rather fight for something fucking stupid than nothing at all.
Just because they don't have those problems doesn't mean they didn't have any problems, anon .
To cause never ending war to insure there will never be a united resistance against Israel
Because everytime the glowies give weapons to one group they immediately fracture into a gorillion splinter groups that fight each other.
The “moderate rebels” thing has always been a joke because they never existed. The supposed Free Syrian Army who was championed as the “moderate group” quickly started doing ethnic/religious cleansings before breaking up into multiple Islamist factions and then finally becoming a Turkish proxy group
Probably because the FSA fell apart and the more extremist groups within and allied with the FSA did the shit you’re talking about. For a period of time the Islamic State state was allied with the FSA however they eventually cut ties and even ending up fighting eachother due to ideological differences like the extremity of IS.
Money
Why is there factional infighting among the feds and why are towelheads being sacrificed over this proxy war between different branches of the US government?
Was there any good faction to replace Assad?
No
countries need to produce more patriot pop music
Ethnic divisions with Kurds and Arabs, neighboring powers like Iran and Saudi Arabia funding their own groups, international powers like the US and Russia, residual skullfucking due to the Iraq War killing off any potential unified leadership for the better half of a decade.
Sykes-Picot.
My boy, if I lived in IRL Mount & Blade, I would have a militia or a warband of my own too.
>Why
Funfact, Russia created ISIS:
didnt do jack shit against ISIS, because they created them. ISIS was ment to bring trouble to Iraq and with that to the US, binding their resources and focus. Think about it, how could ISIS take over so Iraq so quick and so effective, when not with support and intel from Russia? It is unclear if they actually had Syria in mind or not, but sure as hell used them well there. Without ISIS it would have been rebels vs Assad, kurds and whole east Syria would have gone against Assad too, but with ISIS added to the play, everything changed. ISIS had taken over a lot of areas that were anti Assad and had oil refineries and they made no secret about that they would take over everyone giving the chance. They divided the anti Assad coaltions and gave Russia an exuse to expand in Syria militarily, while actually bombing rebels instead, so the last moderates leave the groups and radicals take over. Also it stopped the pipeline from Quartar and halted the one from Iran for many years, so Russia can stay the big gas seller in Europe.
Take your meds
This. It is clear that any time Russia blames the US for something, it is clearly based out of projections
>Accuses the US of bombing nord stream
>Russia proven to be behind bombing nord stream
>Accuses the US of setting up ISIS
>Russia proven to be behind ISIS from the started
>Accuses US of arming separatists in ukraine
>Invaded ukraine first in 2014
>Accuses US of arming separatists in ukraine
>Invaded ukraine first in 2014
Isn't the vatnik narrative that the US caused the war, by supporting Kyiv?
It makes sense in a juvenile kind of logic.
>You started the fight by retaliating
>If you didn't retaliate there wouldn't be a fight
Russia also nuked japan and invaded vietnam
>Contributed to the situation where Japan got nuked
>Invaded vietnam
Yes
>another vatnik cope thread
Getting pushed out of bakhmut again zigger?
wtf does this thread have to do with Russia?
Gee, who could be behind the cope threads about CIA arming ISIS when it has been proven that Russia was actually the one doing it. It doesn't take long to find out.
We did arm and train various anti assad fighter groups, that is a fact and since they were so shitty, or islamists we stopped funding them in 2016. OP is not saying "The CIA armed and created ISIS"
Russia lives in some anon's head rent from 24/7, that's why it has to be a topic in every thread ;D
*rent free
After Nazi germany was beat, did anyone ask themselves why Russia didn't do shit to stop Japan? They let imperial japan continue to operate in the area, deliberately to weaken America. End result was nuclear solution. So there is some truth to these vatnik projections about Russia being guilty of nuking japan .
I swear to god you retards turn every fucking thread on here into another shitty Ukraine was thread #24949402955503
You do realize the CIA works at the Pentagon right?
You know there are many rival groups within the Pentagon right?