i don't know nothing about navy capabilities but the french and italian navy combined would be twice the size of the british navy right? so i guess uk could be blockaded and starved into submission
It's an actual issue with the new Risk board where placing any large amount of troops in a European sector leads to them crossing over the boarders so you cant always tell what's supposed to be where and people can easily cheat.
>UK in the short term due to the EU being a political and economic union with no (standing) military force.
You do realize that the EU is made of countries with actual armies right?
So what? France is already on par with the UK, add to that 450 million people, the huge EU economy and industrial capacities and then add to that the combined military power of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Finland, Poland, Sweden, etc.
Are you fricking stupid? You realise there is a body of water between the two and the EUs capacity for Amphibious warfare doesnt exist. It did when the UK was part of it but now they've left they aren't going to assault themselves.
They have no way to launch an invasion. Nazi Germany failed miserably imagine the state of the current EU trying the same.
>EUs capacity for Amphibious warfare doesnt exist.
You're telling me that the combined navies of Italy, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands etc aren't capable of launching operations from Ireland to the UK?
Stop deluding yourself britboi
1 year ago
Anonymous
Are you crazy? Frick no. You need an advantage of 3-1 for a land invasion to succeed and Amphibious one is even bigger.
In no way would it be possible for the EU to build up that many troops and equipment for an Amphibious assault without the UK wrecking them in the sea before they got there.
they can still blockade the uk and slowly grind it to death
Oh yeh it would take a long time and you would have to attack Canadian or US which they brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate like the attitude of the US if the UK took Ireland.
With the support of EU's navies and airforces? Not a fricking chance, the UK simply do not have the numbers to take over a country the size of ireland.
They don't need to take it over just maintain strategic points of interest to stop troop build ups and landing points. Ireland doesn't have a Navy or an Air Force they couldn't stop the UK doing that if they tried.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Are you crazy? Frick no. You need an advantage of 3-1 for a land invasion to succeed and Amphibious one is even bigger.
I'm not crazy, you're delusional. The combined armies of EU countries easily reach that ratio when it comes to navies, airforces and manpower.
>Oh yeh it would take a long time and you would have to attack Canadian or US which they brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate like the attitude of the US if the UK took Ireland.
The US and Canada are not part of this scenario. Don't move the goalpost.
>They don't need to take it over just maintain strategic points of interest to stop troop build ups and landing points. Ireland doesn't have a Navy or an Air Force they couldn't stop the UK doing that if they tried.
Again, the UK doesn't have the military capacity to securize Ireland while defending from continental Europe. British arrogance has no limits.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Easily reaches that ratio
The combined militaries of the EU amount to France being competent and the rest being an absolute clusterfrick never tested so pipe the frick down. >Do not goal post shift they are not part of this scenario
I literally said "brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate" you fricking idiot how is that goalpost shifting >Ireland
Gets wiped by the UK in a week. They have no military its 7000 men and 80 LAVs. The UK does the security detail for Ireland on Sea and the Air.
The EU could not sneak equipment there without them being waxed. You haven't a clue. >British arrogance
Tell me your nation homosexual when was the last time you sailed 8000 miles to fight 3 - 1? Ohhh never? Right.
It tells the opposite. Germany alone was enough to bring UK to near collapse. Without massive US aid, there's no way UK would last as long as it did. Now add to that Every other EU nation and remove the US aid.
Where does OPs post say the UK is cut off from its imports? The EU couldn't physically stop them from happening in the Atlantic so they resume. Don't goal post shift.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>The combined militaries of the EU amount to France being competent and the rest being an absolute clusterfrick never tested so pipe the frick down.
Are you implying the UK has more experience in conventional warfare than other european countries? Obviously not, also you couldn't disprove that the EU easily reaches the necessary forces to do so. >I literally said "brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate" you fricking idiot how is that goalpost shifting
That's called moving the goalpost. moron. >Gets wiped by the UK in a week.
lmao and russia took over kyev in 3 days and of course EU countries will do nothing about it.
and then brits accuse the french of being arrogant lmao
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Are you implying the UK has more experience in conventional warfare than other european countries?
Is this a joke? Lmao ofc it's not even close hahahahaha
How many TOTAL tanks has the EU ever deployed in a theatre in the past 35 years? The UK has deployed more vehicles in combat than the EU combined. Won more Naval victories, sank more ships more submarines downed more jets etc etc your all a pathetic excuse bar a few nations. >That we can't calculate
They never shifted idiot >Russia Kiev 3 days >EU countries did nothing about it
Wow is your memory so short??? Do you have dementia you stupid prick lol the UK was the main supplier of AT to stop that invasion Poland and Denmark did abit too it wasn't for months before good weapons came from the bigger EU countries. We're are you from your arrogance is amazing.
Frog right? France is the biggest coward on the Continent, scared to confront Russia, has a history of running away when times get tough. You and your entire generations are weak ass losers. What did your family do in 1940?? Hide in a barn? Kek
1 year ago
Anonymous
>UK was the main supplier of AT to stop that invasion
I know rewriting history is like a thing that comes with inbred English genes but the invasion was stopped on Day 4, "UK" weapons did not arrive for another week and a half.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>British transport aircraft are now in their third day of delivering “thousands” of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine in the face of a massive build-up of Russian troops.
Minister James Heappey told Times Radio that the Ministry of Defence has given “thousands” of anti-armour weapons to Ukraine. According to a statement given by the Defence Secretary in the House of Commons today, the 17th of January 2022.
Leave the thread or reply I'm sorry NLAW I was wrong about you being delivered 2 weeks before the invasion started.
You absolute cretin jump off a bridge.
UK offensive is impossible
UK defensive is easy EU lacks capacity for offensive war they would collapse with infighting day 1 over who's language they would use for radio commands
1 year ago
Anonymous
jfc what is this subhuman?
french would delete his navy with 50 year old missiles alone lmao
1 year ago
Anonymous
UK navy has more VLS than Europe navies combined kek
1 year ago
Anonymous
stop lying
1 year ago
Anonymous
Completely wrong lol.
ATGMs were all over Ukraine by the time of invasion.
A major but overlooked factor that caused monke to pull the lever on the Ukraine bowl was ATGMs
The Bidet admin had signed off on ukros being able to use javelins in the Donetsk conflict zone a year before the invasion.
Which freaked the Russians out and was why they had top attack cope cages going in.
They figured it was better to strike now than wait until UKR got even more western ATGMs.
Nigel had also been lending ATGMs to Ukraine and they did work, despite your seething.
1 year ago
Anonymous
When I said UK was main provider of AT it was in reply to a guy talking about EU. I did not factor in the US in that it was a European ranking.
If I did it would be
1. US
Gap
2. UK
Everyone else.
1 year ago
Anonymous
britian had been supplying ATGM's for months before the invasion, did you memory hole the whole russian border buildup
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Is this a joke? Lmao ofc it's not even close hahahahaha >How many TOTAL tanks has the EU ever deployed in a theatre in the past 35 years? The UK has deployed more vehicles in combat than the EU combined. Won more Naval victories, sank more ships more submarines downed more jets etc etc your all a pathetic excuse bar a few nations.
So it's time you make up shit? Weird cope but ok. >They never shifted idiot
Read OP, moron. >Wow is your memory so short??? Do you have dementia you stupid prick lol the UK was the main supplier of AT to stop that invasion Poland and Denmark did abit too it wasn't for months before good weapons came from the bigger EU countries. We're are you from your arrogance is amazing.
I was refering to the fact that EU countries wouldn't let the UK take over Ireland without doing anything about it and I was mocking your arrogance when it comes to UK's military capacities. moron. >Frog right?
Dutch. But I'm glad to see frogs live rent free in your head.
You're also fricking seething which is hilarious.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Dutch
Kek opinion and posts disregarded, stay bellow sea level clam your scum isn't welcome here. I will be along in the summer to degrade your capital with my friends.
I mean, the irony in this post is delicious.
https://i.imgur.com/anJxdKQ.jpg
>How do we factor in French homosexualry, EU infighting, German feet dragging and Polish nationalism into the hypothetical then innit klaus?
And how do we factor the ethnic and religious factors within the UK?
Seething about your contribution to ww2 is normal, I mean lots of Euro nations threw in the coward towel and give up you can be forgiven though for you are not anglo.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Kek opinion and posts disregarded, stay bellow sea level clam your scum isn't welcome here. I will be along in the summer to degrade your capital with my friends.
Be careful, you're so mad you're becoming a Black person. If only you were so brave when it comes to defending your daughters from paki rape gangs...
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Ohhnoo british people are fricking up my city that's main economy is sex and drugs
Imagine the irony, your pathetic little submarine country was made to be fricked, it likes it and even profits from it.
Germany ALONE dwarves the british economy. You're so fricking delusional lmao
Did you read what I said? >No2 financial power >2
Germany is 1, you are so hurt you forgot how to count kek.
stop lying
My guy come back when a European nation sinks an enemy ship, submarine, blows up a tank etc etc your all sat finger in bum on base doing frick all.
We kick started the response in Ukraine, not the homosexual EU, we are the blood thirsty ones you are just the inciny bitsy homosexuals lol
1 year ago
Anonymous
Spirit of Helsinki, ever heard of it?
1 year ago
Anonymous
>A difference of .002bn >Even after leaving the EU
lol
Lmao >United Kingdom (€3.2 trillion), >France (€2.7 trillion),
Lol
1 year ago
Anonymous
>what's that, I lost a third of my wealth? >unleast I'm not far off from my neighbor!
1 year ago
Anonymous
>IN 2016
Lmao did you even read the article >Five years back when Britain voted to leave the European Union its stocks were worth $1.5 trillion more than France's now it is a little behind. Paris now has a combined value of $2.823 trillion while the UK market is worth $2.821 trillion altogether.
You had your jump now it's closing fast Frances gdp is shit compared to the UK
1 year ago
Anonymous
2 more weeks until total frog death!
1 year ago
Anonymous
>2 more weeks!
Your joking right that's the line you literally just used except it was "5 more years until UK collapse!"
Tell your grandparents to come out from under the floor boards the Germans have gone home
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Imagine the irony, your pathetic little submarine country was made to be fricked, it likes it and even profits from it.
Holy shit, literally frothing at the mouth lmao
Imagine losing an argument so hard you become mindbroken.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Y-your so mad cause reasons!
Yeah, sure thing my guy. Got any /misc/buzzwords for the group?
1 year ago
Anonymous
Well you are objectively fricking mad my dude.
Read your posts and tell me that's an appropriate emotional response. I bet your hands are shaky right now. Because of a thread on PrepHole /k/.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>YOUR SO MAD THATS RIGHT
Lmao what is this delusion? Are you high clog walker?
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Kek opinion and posts disregarded, stay bellow sea level clam your scum isn't welcome here. I will be along in the summer to degrade your capital with my friends. >Imagine the irony, your pathetic little submarine country was made to be fricked, it likes it and even profits from it.
Yeah you're totally calm and reasonable lmao.
We're reaching Black person levels of fuming.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Germany was busy fighting off the entire soviet union
Don't post again you stupid c**t BoB was before that. The fricking state of eurohomosexuals, sorry we were still fighting while your Grandpa was busy getting bummed in the occupied Continent.
[...] >Active nuclear carrier
Kek is it out of repair? We have 2 you have 1 old ass submarine reactor powered shit tip with legacy jets. >US supply ships
It's no secret the UK imports food and goods from abroad what part of OPs post said supplies would stop? Cope.
>Who would win, chicken vs fox >The chicken can have a human with a gun to shoot the fox therefore chicken wins
That's not the point of the hypthetical, innit george?
Kek look at Ukraine, how many people shit on Germany and France etc Europe would not unify in a war. The British would perfidiously exploit this to the max and cripple the EU lol
https://www.politico.eu/article/polish-president-accuses-germany-of-breaching-promises-on-ukraine-related-tank-deliveries/
No there's no infighting here
They won't post where they are from, only the Frogs have the stomach for that. It's usually some irrelevant nation that rides le EU military meme like Belgium or Holland.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Yeah totally i hope you know saying moronic shit only makes you look moronic. Also i'm German even though it's irrelevant in this discussion.
1 year ago
Anonymous
>I'm German
Condolences anon, I hope one day your balls will grow back and you are capable of fighting a well funded high school
1 year ago
Anonymous
I hope one day you won't be ruled by indians and pakis anymore. (not happening)
1 year ago
Anonymous
>Be Germany >7 million Turks 1 million Syrians >Be UK >1.4million Indians 1.1 million Pakis
Shut the frick up you dumb /misc/tard lmaoooo my guy just threw an entire quarry in his glass house
5.5 millions. And now they rule over you like you ruled over them a few decades ago. What a pathetic downfall lmao
1 year ago
Anonymous
My guy? I thought you were German can you not read or are you also a Turk?
Break down the 5.5 million into categories you simple c**t you have 1.5 million more Turks alone compared to out entire Asian population (That's anything from the Asian continent) lmaooo
What a self own. Stupid klaus.
1 year ago
Anonymous
Oh and BTW, that Indian PM of ours also rules over you too in a way seen as how he controls the British overseas bases in your occupied shit hole lol what an embarresment
>Is this a possible scenario
You'd think no, but kek ww1 and ww2 show Europe can go to shit fast. >who would win
No one, if the UK could manage to get supplies from abroad and could sustain its population.
The UK would be impossible to mount an Amphibious assault too from Europe. Only the US could probably attempt that from Ireland after a build up but even then it would be bloody.
The UK however couldn't invade Europe, best case is they take Ireland and its a stalemate from there on.
>The UK would be impossible to mount an Amphibious assault too from Europe. Only the US could probably attempt that from Ireland after a build up but even then it would be bloody.
ireland is part of the EU, fricking idiot
With the support of EU's navies and airforces? Not a fricking chance, the UK simply do not have the numbers to take over a country the size of ireland.
WW2 tells you defeating the UK is practically impossible. The UK wouldn't be able to take the EU via invasion so it would just be a WW1 tier slog forever.
It tells the opposite. Germany alone was enough to bring UK to near collapse. Without massive US aid, there's no way UK would last as long as it did. Now add to that Every other EU nation and remove the US aid.
>WW2 tells you defeating the UK is practically impossible.
it was impossible since Germany was busy fighting off the entire soviet union while the brits were hiding on their island, waiting for americans to come and do the heavy lifting
>Operation Sea Lion, also written as Operation Sealion[2][3] (German: Unternehmen Seelöwe), was Nazi Germany's code name for the plan for an invasion of the United Kingdom during the Battle of Britain in the Second World War. >during the Battle of Britain
Kys >As a precondition, Hitler specified the achievement of both air and naval superiority over the English Channel and the proposed landing sites, but the German forces did not achieve either at any point during the war
Your country is ruled by foreigners, ypur military uses foreign controlled equipment, your cities are foreign, your stock market was beaten out by French, your car industry is French-Germ-Indian owned etc etc etc
>Germany was busy fighting off the entire soviet union
Don't post again you stupid c**t BoB was before that. The fricking state of eurohomosexuals, sorry we were still fighting while your Grandpa was busy getting bummed in the occupied Continent.
>best navy in europe
Post active nuclear carrier george >US ships
Not part of OP, dot move the goalposts.
>Active nuclear carrier
Kek is it out of repair? We have 2 you have 1 old ass submarine reactor powered shit tip with legacy jets. >US supply ships
It's no secret the UK imports food and goods from abroad what part of OPs post said supplies would stop? Cope.
>legacy jets
lmao, should have they bought foreign equipment and tear down their industry, like you? Also, modern jets are what they carry, not what they are, stupid frick.
>we were still fighting
You weren't doing shit you jackass you're multiple generations removed from the random civvies who were getting bombed.
>Italy >Atlantic >North Africa >Middle East >Far East
Ah the sour sound of jealousy
Germans arent "euro".
Your country is ruled by foreigners, ypur military uses foreign controlled equipment, your cities are foreign, your stock market was beaten out by French, your car industry is French-Germ-Indian owned etc etc etc
Ok /misc/ thanks for the update welcome to 2023 I guess. Your mom has an onlyfans account I get it.
>b-but look at that plan that never happened!!
>b-but look at that plan that never happened!!
Why didn't it happen dumb frick? Because they got raped in the sea and the air just like the homosexual EU would today.
[...] >Who would win, chicken vs fox >The chicken can have a human with a gun to shoot the fox therefore chicken wins
That's not the point of the hypthetical, innit george?
How do we factor in French homosexualry, EU infighting, German feet dragging and Polish nationalism into the hypothetical then innit klaus?
Seems like alot of butthurt in here without any actual discussion of how when and where? It's clear Europeans as individuals are great but try to combine them as a single military force and you will see a bigger clusterfrick than Russia lel
>How do we factor in French homosexualry, EU infighting, German feet dragging and Polish nationalism into the hypothetical then innit klaus?
And how do we factor the ethnic and religious factors within the UK?
>just blockade the best Navy in Europe with the best submarines
Lmao your a moron >Engage US ships bringing supplies trigger WW3
Congratulations you have made the same mistake as the Nazis
is this some kind of "britain rules the waves"! delusion? the uk navy cant compete with all of europe
also stop thinking america will always be there to save your sorry ass
>Is this a possible scenario?
No. >Who would win?
Realistically they would enter a sanctions war, and given their current spat, it's fairly obvious the EU would win, by a lot. >What if there is a HOT war?
There wouldn't be, but EU would still win, simply due to size. When the nukes inevitably fly the EU has more spots they fly from and way more spots that would require to get nuked to disable them, so they have a massive advantage in the wmd period, and after that it really wouldn't be much of a conflict. >Who would win in a CONVENTIONAL war?
Who does USA back? >No external intervention!
Ok, ok... Why tf would 2 nuclear armed allied superpowers get into a conventional war is beyond me. But still, EU. Way larger industrial and economic bases, way larger armies, navies and air forces. Also EU armies are considerably more diversified (tho this is just due to, yknow, not being one single army) so they're harder to counter. Plus, most EU armies have a strong defensive bent, which may look like an issue, and it would be if UK was located on the other side of the globe, but with UK being at their doorstep, it's exactly what they've been designed for. The larger airforces with way more air superiority assets would establish dominance very early and the British navy doesn't even come close to standing a chance against the combined EU fleet, so past that point the land army matters little. Even if short term they don't manage to desert storm it, long term they can completely shut off travel to GB and do an attrition and bombardment campaign. And even beyond the usual issues with being on the receiving end of such a scenario, GB actually depends on imports for some of its food supply, it doesn't make as much nutrition as it requires. So starvation alone would be devastating.
But again. This assumes EU and UK go to war, and it goes hot, and no one intervenes, and no wmds fly. Which is just funny.
They would struggle against France only, I can't imagine against the combined EU.
Also your question doesn't give enough information, what is the situation? Is the UK attacking the EU? The opposite? A dispute over something else where there is an exchange of hostilities? The only scenario where the UK has some hope is if it just defends its country, but even then it doesn't look good.
No person outside bongland considers Britain to be the most powerful military in Europe, you have no land warfare capability, Poland would dismantle your parade garrisons alone.
>Poland would dismantle your parade garrisons alone.
Realistically speaking even the Finns could give them a run for their money, this thread is utter nonsense, either the answer is too obvious for the thread to exist or you're British.
Iceland is actually number one globally and it's not like it's some Luxembourg type shit, how the frick
1 year ago
Anonymous
like 300k citizens all owning houses and having good wages does that to a nation
1 year ago
Anonymous
It seems like they get butt raped rather often by their small one note economy going haywire more often than most but they've always managed to come out on top and the bad times never lasted too long, pretty impressive honestly.
1 year ago
Anonymous
> In 2015, after the 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis, the government of Iceland considered "a revolutionary monetary proposal" to abolish private money creation and to end to fractional-reserve banking.[3] Similar to the Swiss Sovereign Money Initiative, this plan would remove the power of money creation from the commercial banks and give it to the Central Bank of Iceland.[3]
Must be a coincidence.
I'm liking it. Good morning read.
The obvious and simple answer is "whoever the US backs", but something deep within me wants to watch euros fight amongst themselves.
Most certainly and that's what most people did, even our pentagon experts.
Still, I'd put my money on the EU without a doubt because blockading and suffocating the UK would be easy.
I doubt the euros could touch the UK despite paper stats they aren't a competent force capable of cooperation the UK military despite memes is a well sharpened too capable of fighting with odds stacked against it.
But your right, whoever has the US backing would win.
>I doubt the euros could touch the UK despite paper stats they aren't a competent force capable of cooperation the UK military despite memes is a well sharpened too capable of fighting with odds stacked against it.
lol
if the EU and UK were readying for war in a clear way like China and Taiwan the EU would figure out a cooperation deal
there's already been lots of talks about a standing EU army when the invasion of ukraine happened, and the EU wasn't even involved or threatened directly.
the EU is becoming a big federal state, if you think the threat of destruction of one of its members wouldn't get them all together you're an idiot.
Lol your the idiot fren, thinking the EU could form one military bloc when you have in reality the polar opposite Poland buying Korean Arms etc etc the bongs left but the EU has to speak English to avoid falling out. Its a shit show.
>PLEASE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND SAAR >GREAT BRITAIN RULE THE WAVE GREATEST EMPIRE ON EARTH SAAR >INVINCIBLE ARMY SAAR PLEASE DO NOT REDEEM THE INVASION SAAR >SHIVA BLESS THE QUEEN SAAR
if it were to play like an RTS game scenario the brits would be fricked. >start with enemies on two sides >island is a thin limb of land which means it's difficult to defend in depth and difficult to relocate production to a safer area >EU has lots of room to move production to >british supply ships can be disrupted easily, while the EU can easily move supplies on land >440mln europeans vs 70mln brits
if you start counting all the ships, airplanes, submarines and all that im pretty sure britain comes out at a significant disadvantage, it would take time but in the end the UK would be isolated and starved out
>is this a possible scenario?
don't see a reason why the EU and UK would want to go to war right now.
>Goes on le epic troll, grammar and spelling attack offensive
Then says >All you did is proving
Hahahahaha mate your trying too hard pls state nation so I can laugh and don't say Dutch my sides have already left after that guy piped up
>Goes on le epic troll, grammar and spelling attack offensive
Then says >All you did is proving
Hahahahaha mate your trying too hard pls state nation so I can laugh and don't say Dutch my sides have already left after that guy piped up
Nice to see you've gone from trying to defend the EU to then /misc/ing it up and now falling back on the spelling front.
Britain's best move in this situation is to use their free move to withdraw all armies except one to Iceland, so they can only be attacked once per turn while maintaining defensive roll advantage and preventing yellow from consolidating Europe and getting the bonus armies next turn. Hopefully they are allied with or already control North America, or else they are still in a precarious situation. Europe is always the most difficult continent to control due to the high number of access points.
The EU as a political entity poses no military threat as they are too disunited and there's too much self intrest. The UK is the biggest military power in Europe by some margin but a continent vs country comparison is clearly lopsided if you were to look at the EU countries individually.
Presuming British morale didn't collapse then britain should be able to outlast the eu. Neither side could feasibly launch a ground invasion against the other. Everyone would get sunk in the channel or destroyed after landing.
>UK invades Ireland >Extreme Irish seething without parallel in history, becomes like Afghanistan >Mass rioting ensures, brits get scared and start killing civilians >US intervenes and opens up a mega can of whoopass for the next presidential election >UK forces shattered and retreat
Doesn't matter if you say NOOOOO THE US IS NOT IN THE SCENARIO, it would play out the same up to the US intervention and if the UK thinks it could waltz in and hold no problem they are beyond delusional in thinking their tiny army could contain 6 million raging drunken paddies in any way, when anything they try will only anger them even more.
Well the EU has the combined power of a bunch of tiny former muslim countries in the balkans
a bunch of slavlets
germany and france
dont get me wrong thats a lot of homosexuals and ancestral losers
but i still think britain would come out on top, britain is the only european country thats won a war since the late 1800s
>everybody trying not to escalate things with russia because of muh 30 year old nukes
>somehow functioning modern nuclear submarines wouldn't result in a radioactive belt from paris to berlin
Like I'm sure the french would launch theirs too, but why the frick are we even entertaining this scenario? is this another russian D&C shill that hopes for NATO infighting?
i don't know nothing about navy capabilities but the french and italian navy combined would be twice the size of the british navy right? so i guess uk could be blockaded and starved into submission
I don’t like where that middle yellow cannon is placed. Place it in the middle of the province.
autism
he's right THOUGH
It's an actual issue with the new Risk board where placing any large amount of troops in a European sector leads to them crossing over the boarders so you cant always tell what's supposed to be where and people can easily cheat.
EU in the long run due to geography and economic scale.
UK in the short term due to the EU being a political and economic union with no (standing) military force.
>UK in the short term due to the EU being a political and economic union with no (standing) military force.
You do realize that the EU is made of countries with actual armies right?
None with notable achievements or any relevant combat experience aside from France
So what? France is already on par with the UK, add to that 450 million people, the huge EU economy and industrial capacities and then add to that the combined military power of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Finland, Poland, Sweden, etc.
Are you fricking stupid? You realise there is a body of water between the two and the EUs capacity for Amphibious warfare doesnt exist. It did when the UK was part of it but now they've left they aren't going to assault themselves.
They have no way to launch an invasion. Nazi Germany failed miserably imagine the state of the current EU trying the same.
>EUs capacity for Amphibious warfare doesnt exist.
You're telling me that the combined navies of Italy, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands etc aren't capable of launching operations from Ireland to the UK?
Stop deluding yourself britboi
Are you crazy? Frick no. You need an advantage of 3-1 for a land invasion to succeed and Amphibious one is even bigger.
In no way would it be possible for the EU to build up that many troops and equipment for an Amphibious assault without the UK wrecking them in the sea before they got there.
Oh yeh it would take a long time and you would have to attack Canadian or US which they brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate like the attitude of the US if the UK took Ireland.
They don't need to take it over just maintain strategic points of interest to stop troop build ups and landing points. Ireland doesn't have a Navy or an Air Force they couldn't stop the UK doing that if they tried.
>Are you crazy? Frick no. You need an advantage of 3-1 for a land invasion to succeed and Amphibious one is even bigger.
I'm not crazy, you're delusional. The combined armies of EU countries easily reach that ratio when it comes to navies, airforces and manpower.
>Oh yeh it would take a long time and you would have to attack Canadian or US which they brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate like the attitude of the US if the UK took Ireland.
The US and Canada are not part of this scenario. Don't move the goalpost.
>They don't need to take it over just maintain strategic points of interest to stop troop build ups and landing points. Ireland doesn't have a Navy or an Air Force they couldn't stop the UK doing that if they tried.
Again, the UK doesn't have the military capacity to securize Ireland while defending from continental Europe. British arrogance has no limits.
>Easily reaches that ratio
The combined militaries of the EU amount to France being competent and the rest being an absolute clusterfrick never tested so pipe the frick down.
>Do not goal post shift they are not part of this scenario
I literally said "brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate" you fricking idiot how is that goalpost shifting
>Ireland
Gets wiped by the UK in a week. They have no military its 7000 men and 80 LAVs. The UK does the security detail for Ireland on Sea and the Air.
The EU could not sneak equipment there without them being waxed. You haven't a clue.
>British arrogance
Tell me your nation homosexual when was the last time you sailed 8000 miles to fight 3 - 1? Ohhh never? Right.
Where does OPs post say the UK is cut off from its imports? The EU couldn't physically stop them from happening in the Atlantic so they resume. Don't goal post shift.
>The combined militaries of the EU amount to France being competent and the rest being an absolute clusterfrick never tested so pipe the frick down.
Are you implying the UK has more experience in conventional warfare than other european countries? Obviously not, also you couldn't disprove that the EU easily reaches the necessary forces to do so.
>I literally said "brings other details into the scenario we can't calculate" you fricking idiot how is that goalpost shifting
That's called moving the goalpost. moron.
>Gets wiped by the UK in a week.
lmao and russia took over kyev in 3 days and of course EU countries will do nothing about it.
and then brits accuse the french of being arrogant lmao
>Are you implying the UK has more experience in conventional warfare than other european countries?
Is this a joke? Lmao ofc it's not even close hahahahaha
How many TOTAL tanks has the EU ever deployed in a theatre in the past 35 years? The UK has deployed more vehicles in combat than the EU combined. Won more Naval victories, sank more ships more submarines downed more jets etc etc your all a pathetic excuse bar a few nations.
>That we can't calculate
They never shifted idiot
>Russia Kiev 3 days
>EU countries did nothing about it
Wow is your memory so short??? Do you have dementia you stupid prick lol the UK was the main supplier of AT to stop that invasion Poland and Denmark did abit too it wasn't for months before good weapons came from the bigger EU countries. We're are you from your arrogance is amazing.
Frog right? France is the biggest coward on the Continent, scared to confront Russia, has a history of running away when times get tough. You and your entire generations are weak ass losers. What did your family do in 1940?? Hide in a barn? Kek
>UK was the main supplier of AT to stop that invasion
I know rewriting history is like a thing that comes with inbred English genes but the invasion was stopped on Day 4, "UK" weapons did not arrive for another week and a half.
>British transport aircraft are now in their third day of delivering “thousands” of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine in the face of a massive build-up of Russian troops.
Minister James Heappey told Times Radio that the Ministry of Defence has given “thousands” of anti-armour weapons to Ukraine. According to a statement given by the Defence Secretary in the House of Commons today, the 17th of January 2022.
Leave the thread or reply I'm sorry NLAW I was wrong about you being delivered 2 weeks before the invasion started.
You absolute cretin jump off a bridge.
UK offensive is impossible
UK defensive is easy EU lacks capacity for offensive war they would collapse with infighting day 1 over who's language they would use for radio commands
jfc what is this subhuman?
french would delete his navy with 50 year old missiles alone lmao
UK navy has more VLS than Europe navies combined kek
stop lying
Completely wrong lol.
ATGMs were all over Ukraine by the time of invasion.
A major but overlooked factor that caused monke to pull the lever on the Ukraine bowl was ATGMs
The Bidet admin had signed off on ukros being able to use javelins in the Donetsk conflict zone a year before the invasion.
Which freaked the Russians out and was why they had top attack cope cages going in.
They figured it was better to strike now than wait until UKR got even more western ATGMs.
Nigel had also been lending ATGMs to Ukraine and they did work, despite your seething.
When I said UK was main provider of AT it was in reply to a guy talking about EU. I did not factor in the US in that it was a European ranking.
If I did it would be
1. US
Gap
2. UK
Everyone else.
britian had been supplying ATGM's for months before the invasion, did you memory hole the whole russian border buildup
>Is this a joke? Lmao ofc it's not even close hahahahaha
>How many TOTAL tanks has the EU ever deployed in a theatre in the past 35 years? The UK has deployed more vehicles in combat than the EU combined. Won more Naval victories, sank more ships more submarines downed more jets etc etc your all a pathetic excuse bar a few nations.
So it's time you make up shit? Weird cope but ok.
>They never shifted idiot
Read OP, moron.
>Wow is your memory so short??? Do you have dementia you stupid prick lol the UK was the main supplier of AT to stop that invasion Poland and Denmark did abit too it wasn't for months before good weapons came from the bigger EU countries. We're are you from your arrogance is amazing.
I was refering to the fact that EU countries wouldn't let the UK take over Ireland without doing anything about it and I was mocking your arrogance when it comes to UK's military capacities. moron.
>Frog right?
Dutch. But I'm glad to see frogs live rent free in your head.
You're also fricking seething which is hilarious.
>Dutch
Kek opinion and posts disregarded, stay bellow sea level clam your scum isn't welcome here. I will be along in the summer to degrade your capital with my friends.
Seething about your contribution to ww2 is normal, I mean lots of Euro nations threw in the coward towel and give up you can be forgiven though for you are not anglo.
>Kek opinion and posts disregarded, stay bellow sea level clam your scum isn't welcome here. I will be along in the summer to degrade your capital with my friends.
Be careful, you're so mad you're becoming a Black person. If only you were so brave when it comes to defending your daughters from paki rape gangs...
>Ohhnoo british people are fricking up my city that's main economy is sex and drugs
Imagine the irony, your pathetic little submarine country was made to be fricked, it likes it and even profits from it.
Did you read what I said?
>No2 financial power
>2
Germany is 1, you are so hurt you forgot how to count kek.
My guy come back when a European nation sinks an enemy ship, submarine, blows up a tank etc etc your all sat finger in bum on base doing frick all.
We kick started the response in Ukraine, not the homosexual EU, we are the blood thirsty ones you are just the inciny bitsy homosexuals lol
Spirit of Helsinki, ever heard of it?
>A difference of .002bn
>Even after leaving the EU
lol
Lmao
>United Kingdom (€3.2 trillion),
>France (€2.7 trillion),
Lol
>what's that, I lost a third of my wealth?
>unleast I'm not far off from my neighbor!
>IN 2016
Lmao did you even read the article
>Five years back when Britain voted to leave the European Union its stocks were worth $1.5 trillion more than France's now it is a little behind. Paris now has a combined value of $2.823 trillion while the UK market is worth $2.821 trillion altogether.
You had your jump now it's closing fast Frances gdp is shit compared to the UK
2 more weeks until total frog death!
>2 more weeks!
Your joking right that's the line you literally just used except it was "5 more years until UK collapse!"
Tell your grandparents to come out from under the floor boards the Germans have gone home
>Imagine the irony, your pathetic little submarine country was made to be fricked, it likes it and even profits from it.
Holy shit, literally frothing at the mouth lmao
Imagine losing an argument so hard you become mindbroken.
>Y-your so mad cause reasons!
Yeah, sure thing my guy. Got any /misc/buzzwords for the group?
Well you are objectively fricking mad my dude.
Read your posts and tell me that's an appropriate emotional response. I bet your hands are shaky right now. Because of a thread on PrepHole /k/.
>YOUR SO MAD THATS RIGHT
Lmao what is this delusion? Are you high clog walker?
>Kek opinion and posts disregarded, stay bellow sea level clam your scum isn't welcome here. I will be along in the summer to degrade your capital with my friends.
>Imagine the irony, your pathetic little submarine country was made to be fricked, it likes it and even profits from it.
Yeah you're totally calm and reasonable lmao.
We're reaching Black person levels of fuming.
>Who would win, chicken vs fox
>The chicken can have a human with a gun to shoot the fox therefore chicken wins
That's not the point of the hypthetical, innit george?
they can still blockade the uk and slowly grind it to death
>None with notable achievements
>UK
>achievements
Huh?
Good post until you ruined it with the last three words
>actual armies
May I see them?
sure go ahead buddy
Can't find any.
i'm afraid you might be moronic lil bro
>Who would win between the UK and the EU?
The EU of course, how is that even a fricking question?
>Is this a possible scenario?
No.
The real question is would the US intervene in this war ,or would they sit back like pussies playing both sides?
>Europeans spend their entire existence stabbing each other in the back
>Infighting magically isn't a possible scenario anymore
Kek look at Ukraine, how many people shit on Germany and France etc Europe would not unify in a war. The British would perfidiously exploit this to the max and cripple the EU lol
Europeans have been living in peace and harmony for 80 years.
>BUT LE INFIGHTING!!
Ultimate cope.
>Europeans have been living in peace and harmony for 80 years
>what is yugoslavia
something no one cares about
>NotRealEurope
Here we go.
Wasn't even part of EU back then and they're still irrelevant to this day. Find another cope, rajeesh.
https://www.politico.eu/article/polish-president-accuses-germany-of-breaching-promises-on-ukraine-related-tank-deliveries/
No there's no infighting here
>political disagreements
>infighting
Totally the same thing, war is clearly about to break out between poland and germany
Totally dude like for real, nation?
They won't post where they are from, only the Frogs have the stomach for that. It's usually some irrelevant nation that rides le EU military meme like Belgium or Holland.
Yeah totally i hope you know saying moronic shit only makes you look moronic. Also i'm German even though it's irrelevant in this discussion.
>I'm German
Condolences anon, I hope one day your balls will grow back and you are capable of fighting a well funded high school
I hope one day you won't be ruled by indians and pakis anymore. (not happening)
>Be Germany
>7 million Turks 1 million Syrians
>Be UK
>1.4million Indians 1.1 million Pakis
Shut the frick up you dumb /misc/tard lmaoooo my guy just threw an entire quarry in his glass house
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/bulletins/ethnicgroupenglandandwales/census2021#:~:text=The%20largest%20increases%20were%20seen,%25%2C%20564%2C000%20in%202011).
5.5 millions. And now they rule over you like you ruled over them a few decades ago. What a pathetic downfall lmao
My guy? I thought you were German can you not read or are you also a Turk?
Break down the 5.5 million into categories you simple c**t you have 1.5 million more Turks alone compared to out entire Asian population (That's anything from the Asian continent) lmaooo
What a self own. Stupid klaus.
Oh and BTW, that Indian PM of ours also rules over you too in a way seen as how he controls the British overseas bases in your occupied shit hole lol what an embarresment
No one. UK spergs and fires 260 nukes at Europe, France fires theirs back.
>Is this a possible scenario
You'd think no, but kek ww1 and ww2 show Europe can go to shit fast.
>who would win
No one, if the UK could manage to get supplies from abroad and could sustain its population.
The UK would be impossible to mount an Amphibious assault too from Europe. Only the US could probably attempt that from Ireland after a build up but even then it would be bloody.
The UK however couldn't invade Europe, best case is they take Ireland and its a stalemate from there on.
Orrrr yano, nukes...
>The UK would be impossible to mount an Amphibious assault too from Europe. Only the US could probably attempt that from Ireland after a build up but even then it would be bloody.
ireland is part of the EU, fricking idiot
Ireland doesn't have a military it would be immediately squashed in this scenario imbecile.
With the support of EU's navies and airforces? Not a fricking chance, the UK simply do not have the numbers to take over a country the size of ireland.
It’s also part of the UK and it’s airspace and waters are protected by the UK
WW2 tells you defeating the UK is practically impossible. The UK wouldn't be able to take the EU via invasion so it would just be a WW1 tier slog forever.
It tells the opposite. Germany alone was enough to bring UK to near collapse. Without massive US aid, there's no way UK would last as long as it did. Now add to that Every other EU nation and remove the US aid.
>WW2 tells you defeating the UK is practically impossible.
it was impossible since Germany was busy fighting off the entire soviet union while the brits were hiding on their island, waiting for americans to come and do the heavy lifting
The Battle of Britain happened before Operation Barbarossa.
The Battle of Britain was a bombing campaign moron
Are you high?
>Operation Sea Lion, also written as Operation Sealion[2][3] (German: Unternehmen Seelöwe), was Nazi Germany's code name for the plan for an invasion of the United Kingdom during the Battle of Britain in the Second World War.
>during the Battle of Britain
Kys
>As a precondition, Hitler specified the achievement of both air and naval superiority over the English Channel and the proposed landing sites, but the German forces did not achieve either at any point during the war
The euro fears the Anglo
Germans arent "euro".
Your country is ruled by foreigners, ypur military uses foreign controlled equipment, your cities are foreign, your stock market was beaten out by French, your car industry is French-Germ-Indian owned etc etc etc
>b-but look at that plan that never happened!!
What if I told you there was no Battle of Britain?
>Germany was busy fighting off the entire soviet union
Don't post again you stupid c**t BoB was before that. The fricking state of eurohomosexuals, sorry we were still fighting while your Grandpa was busy getting bummed in the occupied Continent.
>Active nuclear carrier
Kek is it out of repair? We have 2 you have 1 old ass submarine reactor powered shit tip with legacy jets.
>US supply ships
It's no secret the UK imports food and goods from abroad what part of OPs post said supplies would stop? Cope.
>legacy jets
lmao, should have they bought foreign equipment and tear down their industry, like you? Also, modern jets are what they carry, not what they are, stupid frick.
Sorry I hurt your feelings I guess
>we were still fighting
*hiding
ftfy
>Italy
>Atlantic
>North Africa
>Middle East
>Far East
Ah the sour sound of jealousy
Ok /misc/ thanks for the update welcome to 2023 I guess. Your mom has an onlyfans account I get it.
>b-but look at that plan that never happened!!
Why didn't it happen dumb frick? Because they got raped in the sea and the air just like the homosexual EU would today.
How do we factor in French homosexualry, EU infighting, German feet dragging and Polish nationalism into the hypothetical then innit klaus?
Seems like alot of butthurt in here without any actual discussion of how when and where? It's clear Europeans as individuals are great but try to combine them as a single military force and you will see a bigger clusterfrick than Russia lel
I mean, the irony in this post is delicious.
>How do we factor in French homosexualry, EU infighting, German feet dragging and Polish nationalism into the hypothetical then innit klaus?
And how do we factor the ethnic and religious factors within the UK?
>/pol/
>even ahead of the English themselves
The absolute state...
>we were still fighting
You weren't doing shit you jackass you're multiple generations removed from the random civvies who were getting bombed.
>but muh amphibious landing difficulty
Lmao just blockade them and watch them surrender. War is an economics affair.
>just blockade the best Navy in Europe with the best submarines
Lmao your a moron
>Engage US ships bringing supplies trigger WW3
Congratulations you have made the same mistake as the Nazis
>best navy in europe
Post active nuclear carrier george
>US ships
Not part of OP, dot move the goalposts.
is this some kind of "britain rules the waves"! delusion? the uk navy cant compete with all of europe
also stop thinking america will always be there to save your sorry ass
Didn't Napoleon try that?
And Germany.
Both ended badly, Bongland once blockaded Germany though fricked them thoroughly.
>Is this a possible scenario?
No. Frick off and die vatBlack person
If EU orders me to war against UK and threatens me with jail or death if I refuse
I would sabotage and spy for UK as long as I could. Frick EU. FIXIT when?
just hoping rishi can get his act together so we can go about mogging the euros again
What the frick? No.
Frick the rest of EU, France alone could send them back to dark ages without nukes.
>Is this a possible scenario?
No.
>Who would win?
Realistically they would enter a sanctions war, and given their current spat, it's fairly obvious the EU would win, by a lot.
>What if there is a HOT war?
There wouldn't be, but EU would still win, simply due to size. When the nukes inevitably fly the EU has more spots they fly from and way more spots that would require to get nuked to disable them, so they have a massive advantage in the wmd period, and after that it really wouldn't be much of a conflict.
>Who would win in a CONVENTIONAL war?
Who does USA back?
>No external intervention!
Ok, ok... Why tf would 2 nuclear armed allied superpowers get into a conventional war is beyond me. But still, EU. Way larger industrial and economic bases, way larger armies, navies and air forces. Also EU armies are considerably more diversified (tho this is just due to, yknow, not being one single army) so they're harder to counter. Plus, most EU armies have a strong defensive bent, which may look like an issue, and it would be if UK was located on the other side of the globe, but with UK being at their doorstep, it's exactly what they've been designed for. The larger airforces with way more air superiority assets would establish dominance very early and the British navy doesn't even come close to standing a chance against the combined EU fleet, so past that point the land army matters little. Even if short term they don't manage to desert storm it, long term they can completely shut off travel to GB and do an attrition and bombardment campaign. And even beyond the usual issues with being on the receiving end of such a scenario, GB actually depends on imports for some of its food supply, it doesn't make as much nutrition as it requires. So starvation alone would be devastating.
But again. This assumes EU and UK go to war, and it goes hot, and no one intervenes, and no wmds fly. Which is just funny.
They would struggle against France only, I can't imagine against the combined EU.
Also your question doesn't give enough information, what is the situation? Is the UK attacking the EU? The opposite? A dispute over something else where there is an exchange of hostilities? The only scenario where the UK has some hope is if it just defends its country, but even then it doesn't look good.
>this thread
oof
br*toids are high on their own farts
>No1 Military Power in Europe
>No2 Financial Power in Europe
>Not even in EU
My guy you would too, enjoy your girls club I heard Syria wants to join.
No person outside bongland considers Britain to be the most powerful military in Europe, you have no land warfare capability, Poland would dismantle your parade garrisons alone.
>Poland would dismantle your parade garrisons alone.
Realistically speaking even the Finns could give them a run for their money, this thread is utter nonsense, either the answer is too obvious for the thread to exist or you're British.
Germany ALONE dwarves the british economy. You're so fricking delusional lmao
>No1 Military Power in Europe
>No2 Financial Power in Europe
>Germany (€4.0 trillion),
>United Kingdom (€3.2 trillion),
>France (€2.7 trillion),
He's right you know
>European Union's: $16.6 trillion
Here's the important number
>GDP
Yes, I too love to brag about nebulous transactions between stock markets, banks, in-state commerce and government spending!
ICELVND and the Swiss going hard.
Belgium is very surprising.
Iceland is actually number one globally and it's not like it's some Luxembourg type shit, how the frick
like 300k citizens all owning houses and having good wages does that to a nation
It seems like they get butt raped rather often by their small one note economy going haywire more often than most but they've always managed to come out on top and the bad times never lasted too long, pretty impressive honestly.
> In 2015, after the 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis, the government of Iceland considered "a revolutionary monetary proposal" to abolish private money creation and to end to fractional-reserve banking.[3] Similar to the Swiss Sovereign Money Initiative, this plan would remove the power of money creation from the commercial banks and give it to the Central Bank of Iceland.[3]
Must be a coincidence.
I'm liking it. Good morning read.
The obvious and simple answer is "whoever the US backs", but something deep within me wants to watch euros fight amongst themselves.
The obvious answer is the EU if you're not a delusional britard. This thread is a pathetic display of insecurity.
Bet russians would have said the same about ukraine and people might have believed them a before a couple years ago.
Most certainly and that's what most people did, even our pentagon experts.
Still, I'd put my money on the EU without a doubt because blockading and suffocating the UK would be easy.
I doubt the euros could touch the UK despite paper stats they aren't a competent force capable of cooperation the UK military despite memes is a well sharpened too capable of fighting with odds stacked against it.
But your right, whoever has the US backing would win.
Who needs to invade UK using conventional means? Restart the IRA until they beg for forgiveness.
>I doubt the euros could touch the UK despite paper stats they aren't a competent force capable of cooperation the UK military despite memes is a well sharpened too capable of fighting with odds stacked against it.
lol
if the EU and UK were readying for war in a clear way like China and Taiwan the EU would figure out a cooperation deal
there's already been lots of talks about a standing EU army when the invasion of ukraine happened, and the EU wasn't even involved or threatened directly.
the EU is becoming a big federal state, if you think the threat of destruction of one of its members wouldn't get them all together you're an idiot.
Lol your the idiot fren, thinking the EU could form one military bloc when you have in reality the polar opposite Poland buying Korean Arms etc etc the bongs left but the EU has to speak English to avoid falling out. Its a shit show.
>Lol your the idiot fren
>your
>Spell checking on 4chin
>le epic troll
Thanks for proving my original comment right eurotard
>can't speak his own language
>calls other people moron
All you did is proving you're a fricking idiot.
holy brexiter seeth, a FUMING so intense it can only be produced by a broken and insecure nation
>Who would win between the UK and the EU?
The EU
> Is this a possible scenario?
The EU would implode if the eternal continental got that belligerent.
>PLEASE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND SAAR
>GREAT BRITAIN RULE THE WAVE GREATEST EMPIRE ON EARTH SAAR
>INVINCIBLE ARMY SAAR PLEASE DO NOT REDEEM THE INVASION SAAR
>SHIVA BLESS THE QUEEN SAAR
The Calais tunnel is deep under the water, and exits in France. The UK could just blow it up and drown the EU under water
When was the last time a country in Europe fought in a war involving more than 10000 troops?
Bongland excluded they did it regularly.
How about a war where they didn't need daddy USA to guide them every step? We'd go way before WW2 for UK.
if it were to play like an RTS game scenario the brits would be fricked.
>start with enemies on two sides
>island is a thin limb of land which means it's difficult to defend in depth and difficult to relocate production to a safer area
>EU has lots of room to move production to
>british supply ships can be disrupted easily, while the EU can easily move supplies on land
>440mln europeans vs 70mln brits
if you start counting all the ships, airplanes, submarines and all that im pretty sure britain comes out at a significant disadvantage, it would take time but in the end the UK would be isolated and starved out
>is this a possible scenario?
don't see a reason why the EU and UK would want to go to war right now.
is the UK being supplied? if so maybe if they can keep shipping lanes open, if not the fricking continetals will win
the fooking continentals mate
>British AShM against EU ships
untested
>EU(french) AShM against British ships
very effective
>Goes on le epic troll, grammar and spelling attack offensive
Then says
>All you did is proving
Hahahahaha mate your trying too hard pls state nation so I can laugh and don't say Dutch my sides have already left after that guy piped up
>your trying
Imagine not being able to form a correct sentence in your own language.
Nice to see you've gone from trying to defend the EU to then /misc/ing it up and now falling back on the spelling front.
Accept it Continentals are homosexuals.
Why can't you speak your own language properly?
>Who would win between the UK and the EU? Is this a possible scenario?
How is this even a question? One is a sovereign country and the other one is Economic Zone #57.
Britain's best move in this situation is to use their free move to withdraw all armies except one to Iceland, so they can only be attacked once per turn while maintaining defensive roll advantage and preventing yellow from consolidating Europe and getting the bonus armies next turn. Hopefully they are allied with or already control North America, or else they are still in a precarious situation. Europe is always the most difficult continent to control due to the high number of access points.
The EU as a political entity poses no military threat as they are too disunited and there's too much self intrest. The UK is the biggest military power in Europe by some margin but a continent vs country comparison is clearly lopsided if you were to look at the EU countries individually.
Presuming British morale didn't collapse then britain should be able to outlast the eu. Neither side could feasibly launch a ground invasion against the other. Everyone would get sunk in the channel or destroyed after landing.
eu would blockade the uk and patiently wait for it to collapse, it's that easy
>Be EU
>Gets submarined
>only the uk has submarines
you moronic or something?
>Only the UK has good submarines
Ftfy also
>Only the UK has used submarines in anger
Kek sad all your little show militaries
Nice cope
Can you tell me an EU nation thats sunk anything with a nuclear submarine? No? Didn't think so. Lovers.
Bruh can we do Anglos vs the World next? Sheeeeeiiiiiiit imagine to curb stomp
>replies:156
>posters:34
Holy macaroni
statistically the 3 cannons win against 1 cannon 99.90% of the time
>UK invades Ireland
>Extreme Irish seething without parallel in history, becomes like Afghanistan
>Mass rioting ensures, brits get scared and start killing civilians
>US intervenes and opens up a mega can of whoopass for the next presidential election
>UK forces shattered and retreat
Doesn't matter if you say NOOOOO THE US IS NOT IN THE SCENARIO, it would play out the same up to the US intervention and if the UK thinks it could waltz in and hold no problem they are beyond delusional in thinking their tiny army could contain 6 million raging drunken paddies in any way, when anything they try will only anger them even more.
Well the EU has the combined power of a bunch of tiny former muslim countries in the balkans
a bunch of slavlets
germany and france
dont get me wrong thats a lot of homosexuals and ancestral losers
but i still think britain would come out on top, britain is the only european country thats won a war since the late 1800s
>everybody trying not to escalate things with russia because of muh 30 year old nukes
>somehow functioning modern nuclear submarines wouldn't result in a radioactive belt from paris to berlin
Like I'm sure the french would launch theirs too, but why the frick are we even entertaining this scenario? is this another russian D&C shill that hopes for NATO infighting?
britain
canada
australia
new zealand
vs
people that dont even speak each others language
>britain
>canada
>australia
>new zealand
Only 1/4 is in the UK, moron