>mobile battle
tiger wins because it has a turret and doesnt need to strain its transmission to track targets outside a 30 degree arc in front of it
>ambush
goes either way because they can knock each other out easily and its entirely up to who sees who first
and in such a case, sides will be seen first, and further make the battle more skill/luck based rather than influenced by a machine
The one on the left looks bigger and therefore stronger so that's my pick.
I know fuck all about either so it might be a perspective thing but whatever.
Sort of depends but in most scenarios Tiger. Both vehicles can fuck each other up really good with their guns, so it's mostly up to mobility, optics, crew comfort and having a turret.
Definitely the tiger in the scenario described, the isu would stand no chance, essentially its a battle of the ranges and you're comparing a high velocity purpose made anti tank gun with single piece ammunition vs a multi purpose howitzer with 2 piece ammunition. In an urban setting the tiger would still have a slight advantage because of the turret, but the range could be nullified to a degree where the isu could potentially defend itself at least. Within 1000 meters the german tank commander wouldve sighted you easily, thanks to superior german optics, plus the tiger can penetrate the isu pretty much anywhere except maybe the gun breech, but if a hit is scored on that, then the gun is disabled and the tiger wins. Really the only chance for the soviet bunker buster to win would be a very close engagement ambush
>Functional fixedness is a cognitive bias that limits a person to use an object only in the way it is traditionally used. The concept of functional fixedness originated in Gestalt psychology, a movement in psychology that emphasizes holistic processing. Karl Duncker defined functional fixedness as being a mental block against using an object in a new way that is required to solve a problem.[1] This "block" limits the ability of an individual to use components given to them to complete a task, as they cannot move past the original purpose of those components.
in what scenario
Historical, pure tank vs tank combat on some open field in Russia in 1942, both have the chance to one shot the other one.
>on some open field in Russia in 1942
tiger, then
>mobile battle
tiger wins because it has a turret and doesnt need to strain its transmission to track targets outside a 30 degree arc in front of it
>ambush
goes either way because they can knock each other out easily and its entirely up to who sees who first
and in such a case, sides will be seen first, and further make the battle more skill/luck based rather than influenced by a machine
comparing tanks in 1vs1 empty field battle is retarded, left one is assault gun anyway
If War Thunder has taught me anything it would be the one on the left
The one on the left looks bigger and therefore stronger so that's my pick.
I know fuck all about either so it might be a perspective thing but whatever.
the Tiger has much greater rate of fire, up to 4 shots for everyone out of SU-152, but the short 88mm needs to be up close to guarantee penetration
>SU-152 sees Tiger first
it's over for the Tiger unless the SU-152 misses
>Tiger sees SU-152 first
it's over for the SU-152 unless the Tiger fucks up
does the SU-152 crew know how to do ranging with machine gun?
Sort of depends but in most scenarios Tiger. Both vehicles can fuck each other up really good with their guns, so it's mostly up to mobility, optics, crew comfort and having a turret.
Definitely the tiger in the scenario described, the isu would stand no chance, essentially its a battle of the ranges and you're comparing a high velocity purpose made anti tank gun with single piece ammunition vs a multi purpose howitzer with 2 piece ammunition. In an urban setting the tiger would still have a slight advantage because of the turret, but the range could be nullified to a degree where the isu could potentially defend itself at least. Within 1000 meters the german tank commander wouldve sighted you easily, thanks to superior german optics, plus the tiger can penetrate the isu pretty much anywhere except maybe the gun breech, but if a hit is scored on that, then the gun is disabled and the tiger wins. Really the only chance for the soviet bunker buster to win would be a very close engagement ambush
su-152 isn't even an AT gun, it's role is something else entirely.
>Functional fixedness is a cognitive bias that limits a person to use an object only in the way it is traditionally used. The concept of functional fixedness originated in Gestalt psychology, a movement in psychology that emphasizes holistic processing. Karl Duncker defined functional fixedness as being a mental block against using an object in a new way that is required to solve a problem.[1] This "block" limits the ability of an individual to use components given to them to complete a task, as they cannot move past the original purpose of those components.
The SU-152 was stupid fun in World of Tanks.
>Oh you're a tier V medium tank? Fuck you, I do 900 damage
The one that already won.
Yea.
>Which one would win and why?
In a 1v1 and they've both spotted each other? The Tiger because it actually has turret traverse
>Tiger 1
unfortunately can only do Tiger II
Whoever could get the first shot, in which 90% of the times it would be the Tiger I.
tiger's significantly more mobile, has a rotating turret, and way better crew vision blocks, optics and visibility.
I'm going with the tiger