Which one would actually work well in modern warfare?

Which one would actually work well in modern warfare?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Far right since it shoots 50% more bullet then the others.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can literally hand the middle one any gun you want, the gun can even be stripped of safety shit since it’s a dinky rig instead of floating vanity piece.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It was just a joke anon.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Left can't move off of paved surfaces. Middle just needs better targeting and it's perfect. It could use any weapon it's handed and calibrated to. Right only has one type of weapon.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If they were all A.I controlled?
      The Dalek would be gabage on most terrain, the battle droid might be useful if it was incredibly good at movement and observation and could actually preform like a human soldier.
      A turret is a turret. Put tracks on it and you have what the US military already uses.

      Daleks can't hurt anything that's more than about ten feet away and are extremely slow. I seem to remember that they can "fly" (hover) but still very slowly. Their defense is unmatched but at the end of the day you can pretty much just walk away from one.

      Battle droids canonically suck but there's no functional reason why they would need to. If we had the tech to make them able to move adeptly and not miss 99% of the time then they would be effective replacements for basic ground infantry.

      Portal turrets are completely unable to move, are wildly inaccurate, and do about as much damage as .22 LR. I can't even imagine what role they would fall into.

      Daleks can hover and move quickly (compared to fighter jets) in the air.
      Their deathray can destroy anything from other daleks (who are only destroyed by incredibly powerful direct energy weapons) to homes as well as people.

      They've also created weapons that can turn off the small-forces keeping atoms together - that worked across the universe.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >They've also created weapons that can turn off the small-forces keeping atoms together - that worked across the universe.

        homie they stole that shit from the Martians

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Daleks are lame and struggle to beat primitive screwheads and can only move on smooth power-transmitter floors (can't operate if the ground is blocked by so much as a cape).

        Anything other than that is just cancerous power level wank over the course of a television series that should have been cancelled years earlier.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >smooth power-transmitter floors (can't operate if the ground is blocked by so much as a cape).
          That was the first generation daleks, which are thousands of years old.

          The "current" daleks have time travel and have gone up against multi-verse level being.

          Power-wank or not, canon/lore wise they're the most powerful of the three.

          This is the feats of a very weak (casing built out of scrap metal) dalek:

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Just to clarify, I personally think the daleks are corny ass villains, but they are powerful.

            >death ray basically one shots anything
            >force field blocks all material weapons
            >armoured casing can no sell anything but the absolute highest powered energy weapons

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, but when that Dalek originally came to Earth it was defeated by a bunch of medieval armies. They managed to get through the Dalekanium casing and cut up the mutant inside.
            I just find it a major letdown.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It was one dalek and it required a combined assault of literally millions of people.
              I do still find it a disregard to it.

              >dies to RPG-7s
              >dies to baseball bats wielded by a stronk wymon
              kek

              >>dies to RPG-7s
              source?
              bat
              Empowered by a black hole.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >feats
            >multi-verse level
            Go back to your Death Battle website homosexual

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              This is a death battle thread, homosexual.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is /k/ post your firearm.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >dies to RPG-7s
            >dies to baseball bats wielded by a stronk wymon
            kek

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >requires jet engine to move on any surface that isn't perfectly flat
        The refuelling on those things must insane. Dalek logistics officers will take one look at their workload and shoot themselves before anyone else gets a chance.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >jet engine
          >implying THE DALEK use such primitive method of flight
          >implying your brain is even capable of understanding DALEK science
          EXTERMINATE!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Every two doctors or so we get a scene of a Dalek being defeated by unarmed humans. My favorite one was where the Dalek died by falling out a third story window.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What's the most humiliating one for the modern Dalek?
          I mostly stopped watching half way through the Matt Smith era.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You are spouting NuDrWho powerwank bollocks. In the original series a Doctor's assistant beat the crap out of a Dalek With a baseball bat and Dalakes regularly had their eyepieces shot out by british squaddies with sten guns. In Invasion Earth, Daleks could be destroyed by sneaking up on them, spinning them around and pushing them down a ramp so they fell over. They are just armoured mobility scooters with a mutated moron inside.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >crap out of a Dalek With a baseball bat
          Infused with the power from the Hand of Omega - which was charged up with the near infinite power of a black hole.
          >original series
          Daleks have undergone thousands of years of upgrades since then to take on multi-verse level beings (Timelords).

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Was the RPG a black hole too?
            How about the pavement that killed one?
            Oh, and the bricks, the bricks that killed current gen Daleks? Those all made of black holes too?

            Go frick yourself.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >you could kill an amoeba by looking at it the wrong way
              >humans must also be weak

              Each dalek iteration get's stronger.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >OG Daleks were weak
                >Classic Daleks were weak
                >Time War Daleks were weak
                >but-but-but I mean THIS ONE SCENE where- uh-
                The video posted earlier as three modern series Daleks being killed by chunks of the fricking scenery moving at less than the speed of sound.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >og daleks were weak
                Yes. But they were good at fighting a forever war where both sides were at the end days post nuclear conflight (WW4 will be fought with sticks tier).
                >classic daleks were weak
                They had crazy numbers and time travel. Not really weak.
                >Time War daleks were weak.
                They were multi-verse level threats.
                >video
                Post Timewar daleks are only defeated by incredibly powerful direct energy weapons, the time vortex, suicide, overloading of their own power sources (mini nuclear-style explosion), getting hit by a time machine.
                The ones in the asylum were decommission/already broken and left to rot for centuries.
                Obviously in a "good guy always wins" tv show they're going to get defeated, but that's a plot point and not reflective of their power level.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              When did bricks take out a Dalek?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >multi-verse level beings (Timelords).
            Will there ever be another race so dedicated to jobbing as the timelords are?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        Jesus Christ you never watched Dr. Who a day in your life. One wounded Dalek wiped out an entire military base. A handful were able to terrorize a city. They may be slow but their damn near indestructible, their guns kill anything in one shot, they can capture enemies to make more of themselves, and they can pretty much neuter any technology without even touching it.

        I don't know if you ever paid attention or if its bait but that depends massively on what version of Dr. Who we are talking about and what intel they have.

        If we are simply getting access to the frame, then sure, Daleks are great.
        But not because of the robot.
        Daleks are trashcans and can go in the trash.
        Their technological capabilities should instead be harvested and repurposed.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If they were all A.I controlled?
    The Dalek would be gabage on most terrain, the battle droid might be useful if it was incredibly good at movement and observation and could actually preform like a human soldier.
    A turret is a turret. Put tracks on it and you have what the US military already uses.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Daleks can't hurt anything that's more than about ten feet away and are extremely slow. I seem to remember that they can "fly" (hover) but still very slowly. Their defense is unmatched but at the end of the day you can pretty much just walk away from one.

      Battle droids canonically suck but there's no functional reason why they would need to. If we had the tech to make them able to move adeptly and not miss 99% of the time then they would be effective replacements for basic ground infantry.

      Portal turrets are completely unable to move, are wildly inaccurate, and do about as much damage as .22 LR. I can't even imagine what role they would fall into.

      Jesus Christ you never watched Dr. Who a day in your life. One wounded Dalek wiped out an entire military base. A handful were able to terrorize a city. They may be slow but their damn near indestructible, their guns kill anything in one shot, they can capture enemies to make more of themselves, and they can pretty much neuter any technology without even touching it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Remember that time a couple morons beat one with a rope.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine bragging about watching dr. literally who

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Only watches series once back when I was in high school. Haven’t seen any of the new seasons. But yeah 9,10,11 Doctor seasons were kino

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Jesus Christ you never watched Dr. Who a day in your life.
        No one with any taste, intellect, or self-respect would watch that cultureless british garbage.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The power level of Daleks varies considerably. In some episodes, they can fly and are impervious to projectile weapons in almost all areas of their robotic frame except their eye. In other episodes, a flight of stairs beats them.

          B1 battle droids are consistently shown to be pretty bad at serving in an infantry fighting capacity on an individual level. The advantage of them is that you can deploy thousands with relative ease. They would be like robot versions of human wave attacks.

          It really depends of what version of the Daleks you are talking about. If it's the Eccleston/Tennant era Daleks, they win hands down. If it's any other version, it's hit and miss.

          Christopher Eccleston, David Tennant and Matt Smith's runs on the show (Ninth Doctor to the Eleventh Doctor) are fantastic. Everything after is pretty bad, but the former three are absolutely worth watching.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Matt Smith turned the doctor into a huuuuuuge homosexual, and the show was always really struggling not to be gay as it was.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              His run had some of the best episodes in the entire series. The Van Gogh episode is a particular standout.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I dont see how you made it past the very first episode where he sashays up to a big eyeball and says "umm, I'm like the doooctor sweetie? You should like, totes run your fugly ass back to space or whatevs" then sucks ten wieners to completion.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You'd like Capaldi.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Jesus Christ you never watched Dr. Who a day in your life
        That's a good thing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the battle droid might be useful if it was incredibly good at movement and observation and could actually preform like a human soldier
      They have special models for that i think. This one is just made to be mass produced and walk in a straight line while shooting

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >This one is just made to be mass produced and walk in a straight line while shooting

        They're useless when run autonomously, but function really well when commanded by a tactical droid.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Didn't the first tactical droid pictured on screen stare at a grenade for three full seconds before deciding to move?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I honestly hate how the Clone Wars series made Battle Droids into comedic relief characters.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >I'm taking these people to planet C
              >Where are you going?
              >To planet C
              >Uhhhhhhhhh... You're under arrest.
              It started in Phantom menace with Qui Gon literally being unable to have a basic exchange with one in the hanger without it getting confused, and they just escalated from there. The more they talked the more air they felt they had to fill with "waaaaaaackyness".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Fair enough, they did have some silly moments in the movies. Episode 3 had the Elevator Roger Roger scene, but I felt it wasn't as bad in the movies.
                Then again maybe it's just because I re-watched Clone Wars as an adult, since I don't remember finding Clone Wars droids annoying when I first watched it as a kid.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      [...]
      Daleks can hover and move quickly (compared to fighter jets) in the air.
      Their deathray can destroy anything from other daleks (who are only destroyed by incredibly powerful direct energy weapons) to homes as well as people.

      They've also created weapons that can turn off the small-forces keeping atoms together - that worked across the universe.

      [...]
      Jesus Christ you never watched Dr. Who a day in your life. One wounded Dalek wiped out an entire military base. A handful were able to terrorize a city. They may be slow but their damn near indestructible, their guns kill anything in one shot, they can capture enemies to make more of themselves, and they can pretty much neuter any technology without even touching it.

      Dalek technology appears to have a problem with surviving blunt objects.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The turrets have canonically shit guns which is why Chel can handle being shot by them so much.

    The droids are decent enough for bulk troops capable of operating independently, probably more resistant to modern weapons than they are to blasters.

    The daleks are stupid and have received so much moronic power creep over the course of the franchise compared to their original appearance, they aren't even worth the time to talk about.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The turrets have canonically shit guns
      Don't they shoot the entire cartridge too, casing and all

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >spring launched bullets

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have no idea. I recognize the Dalek but I have no idea what its capabilities are because Dr. Who is stupid. I dunno about the other two. The middle one looks like Disney star wars. The one on the right looks like some video game bullshit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The one on the right looks like some video game bullshit
      post date of birth

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        1980.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        1966

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The tin can and it's not even a contest.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    middle one? mass produced and cheap, can fold for transportation, can operate most shit instead of humans, carry ammo for patrols, bait snipers. etc.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Daleks can't hurt anything that's more than about ten feet away and are extremely slow. I seem to remember that they can "fly" (hover) but still very slowly. Their defense is unmatched but at the end of the day you can pretty much just walk away from one.

    Battle droids canonically suck but there's no functional reason why they would need to. If we had the tech to make them able to move adeptly and not miss 99% of the time then they would be effective replacements for basic ground infantry.

    Portal turrets are completely unable to move, are wildly inaccurate, and do about as much damage as .22 LR. I can't even imagine what role they would fall into.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >and not miss 99% of the time
      That's a traditional problem for Star Wars. I'm not sure it will ever be resolved.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        To be fair its a traditional problem for ALL henchmen in media, they always massively outnumber the heroes but can never land a shot on them.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >To be fair its a traditional problem for ALL henchmen in media, they always massively outnumber the heroes but can never land a shot on them.
          Given what I commonly see at the range and that henchmen often seem to be lowest bidder affairs, I'm not convinced this is actually unrealistic. Like holy SHIT the number of people who look very pleased about 6-8moa at 100yd and that's "a good day" they don't even do that consistently what the FRICK.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        To be fair its a traditional problem for ALL henchmen in media, they always massively outnumber the heroes but can never land a shot on them.

        Daleks can't hurt anything that's more than about ten feet away and are extremely slow. I seem to remember that they can "fly" (hover) but still very slowly. Their defense is unmatched but at the end of the day you can pretty much just walk away from one.

        Battle droids canonically suck but there's no functional reason why they would need to. If we had the tech to make them able to move adeptly and not miss 99% of the time then they would be effective replacements for basic ground infantry.

        Portal turrets are completely unable to move, are wildly inaccurate, and do about as much damage as .22 LR. I can't even imagine what role they would fall into.

        >not miss 99% of the time

        (only the guy at the guard post talk like that yes)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        To be fair its a traditional problem for ALL henchmen in media, they always massively outnumber the heroes but can never land a shot on them.

        the starwars meme was because they wanted them to escape so they could find the rebel base that turned out to be on Yavin IV.
        so the troopers in the first movie are meant to be missing on purpose.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Don't be such a fricking moron. Stormtroopers, and just about everyone else for that matter, routinely miss man sized targets at rock throwing distance and get killed for it.
          In the opening shootout they still manage to miss at point blank range in a hallway. If they wanted those men alive they certainly didn't show it considering they killed them all. I dont think there's a single scene in which a stormtrooper shoots more than once and doesn't completely frick it up.
          Clone troopers manage to miss firing into droids walking in fricking parade formation.
          In that homosexual CGI series in the first season there's a scene where half a platoon of stormtroopers line up and fire at a protocol droid walking slowly towards them and they hit nothing but air.

          Whats next, comparing modern soldiers using suppressive fire to stormtroopers shooting at people they could read a name tag on? That's usually what comes next for you guys.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Daleks can't hurt anything that's more than about ten feet away and are extremely slow. I seem to remember that they can "fly" (hover) but still very slowly. Their defense is unmatched but at the end of the day you can pretty much just walk away from one.

            Battle droids canonically suck but there's no functional reason why they would need to. If we had the tech to make them able to move adeptly and not miss 99% of the time then they would be effective replacements for basic ground infantry.

            Portal turrets are completely unable to move, are wildly inaccurate, and do about as much damage as .22 LR. I can't even imagine what role they would fall into.

            https://i.imgur.com/dC6Q592.jpg

            >and not miss 99% of the time
            That's a traditional problem for Star Wars. I'm not sure it will ever be resolved.

            [...]
            the starwars meme was because they wanted them to escape so they could find the rebel base that turned out to be on Yavin IV.
            so the troopers in the first movie are meant to be missing on purpose.

            You don't understand, this is future technology.

            Every guns look big to begin with because they are all fitted with automated targeting system and recoil-canceler, no one civilized have ever fired a true aim-sighted weapon in centuries.

            Naturally everyone possess gimmick that interfere with automated targeting helmet, and well known organization are also subject to discreet computer virus that feed false data to integrated power-armor-visor system.

            If your own ship is being boarded your artificial gravity system recognize the aperture signature of guns that aren't your own, emitting weak gravitational pulse that deflect the shot.
            To resist this weaponization of artificial gravity, stormtroopers are trained to stand absolutely still, so their own armored-suit send signals that make the gravitic system confuse friendly/enemy guns, evening the odds.
            At least that's what the shipmaker say, it is absolutely not their artificial gravity system going haywire from weapon-like energy source pulse.

            Anyway, these methods work better on standardized weapons the like Stormtroopers are issued. This is a well known problem for the Empire and the Stormtroopers wish they were issued new equipment but bureaucracy slow the process.

            This is also why bounty hunters with obscure custom gun and equipments are less subject to jamming. Rumors say some of those bounty hunter do not even use integrated aiming system and recoil canceler in their weapons, who know how they even aim gun like that, Jedi magic maybe?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >this is future technology
              It's actually past technology.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              That's bullshit but I believe it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            its almost like the meme became a continuing theme past the first movie anon.
            or that mooks are meant to avoid killing the characters that are supposed to live
            gee. whoda thunk

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Maybe write a screenplay that does not include such improbable situations?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lucas seems to have done just fine with his screenplay ideas, but if you want to write him about it go right the frick ahead, dipshit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Stormtroopers really suffer from the Flanders problem.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This has always been cope by star wars turbonerds, they were shit all along.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i mean the battle droids are literally foot soldiers that you can program to perform whatever task you want on the battlefield
    Turrets are turrets, shocking i know
    not gonna talk about Daleks, they're too stupidly overpowered

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >not gonna talk about Daleks, they're too stupidly overpowered
      Actually over the past few years or so they've become pathetic, almost comic relief.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Excuse me, did you just admit to watching the last few seasons of Dr. Who?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I only watch dalek episodes

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        As somebody who always hated DrWho from the instant I read about it I find the attempt to make this shit serious leading to its destruction hilarious. DrWho is so libtarded it makes Star Trek look fascist. Or perhaps even worse than libtarded, North London Middle Class.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >DrWho is so libtarded it makes Star Trek look fascist.
          I've only ever watched a single episode years ago with some friends. The whole plot revolved around the moral dillemma of allowing some alien race settle on Earth despite some of them being bad actors/dangerous. I made a comment about how the whole plot was a painfully obvious metaphor for the rapefugee crisis in Europe still going on and my friends genuinely got upset and refused to believe it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            district 9 did it better

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Neil is so weird. D9 was the start of a fantastic career, but his other shit is just shit. Halo Landfall was dope but Chappie was mediocre. Demonic was horrible but his Oats studio shorts are insanely cool concepts. It's like he's never been able to graduate from an idea guy into a screenwriter.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Chappie was literally ruined because he wanted to frick that trash female singer so bad he gave them vast amounts of creative control.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i wonder why
                yolandi visser has always been fricking ugly

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Congratulations, your friends are uproariously stupid, really beyond belief.

            https://i.imgur.com/nnujOBx.jpg

            [...]
            i think you might be onto something here

            Yeah...onto some real imbecile friends.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              European carpenters had to invent ad hoc measurements more similar in structure to imperial and have been using them for years. You own no gun, and thus you don't belong here and nothing you say matters.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Star Trek is the literal utopian end goal of both Fascism and Marxism.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Also, the NWO, Star Trek is the Georgia Guidestones for space.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Georgia Guidestones
              A friendly reminder that fascists destroyed the guide stone because a world where everyone is happy and at peace is a world where fascists are in hell.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I hate the antichrist

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you hate Donald Trump?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Antichrist is by the book, loved by all. Was trump loved by all?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It sucks when you advertise your plans then the useless eaters talk about it so you have to deboonk it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's the idealized government all governments before it strive to be, whether it be through sacrificing time trying to tard-wrangle everyone, or blood.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >DrWho is so libtarded it makes Star Trek look fascist.
          I've only ever watched a single episode years ago with some friends. The whole plot revolved around the moral dillemma of allowing some alien race settle on Earth despite some of them being bad actors/dangerous. I made a comment about how the whole plot was a painfully obvious metaphor for the rapefugee crisis in Europe still going on and my friends genuinely got upset and refused to believe it.

          i think you might be onto something here

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          lol, its never been good in a /k/ sense and never will, but some of the moral dilemas and scenarios were entertaining.
          Granted I only watched the old era from the 4th doc with the gigantic scarf.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The daleks fall into comic relief started all the way back in The Chase in 1965

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'll take the turret. Fewer things to go wrong, just set it and let it murder

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Doctor who is so fricking gay

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Dalek would be either overpowered, potentially capable of winning wars alone, or silly comic relief stuck on stairs depending on iteration.

    Droids work as low cost massed units but a lone droid would be less useful than your aunt with a rifle.

    Turrets fire the whole cartridge with a spring.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Daleks do pest control, not warfare.
    Droids are useful at metal wave attacks and could be potent in modern warfare.
    Aperture Science turrets are pretty useless. Not utterly useless though. Some forces might find a use for them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Daleks do pest control, not warfare.

      "YOU DARE SAY FOUR DALEK WOULD DESTROY THE CYBERMEN?"

      "NEGATIVE. A SINGLE DALEK WOULD DESTROY THE CYBERMEN"

      The scene they mouth off each other was funny.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sentry

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    dr who is so fricking stupid bros

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Theme song is good

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >blocks the daleks, droids and turret path in your path

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Get outplayed marbe piece of shit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >n-nuh uh nuh uh cus... cus... cus they can like... point at things and warp the universe and- and everything that has a picture of them turns into them and... m...muh cracks in time...

        I assume is the reply someone's got drafted already.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        get outplayed, now the whole world wants surveillance big brother in every square inch of sky 24/7 to prevent any further invasion. globohomosexual achieved

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Dalek
    >Shit mobility
    >Shit psychology
    >Always feels the need to announce its presence for some reason
    >Still basically invincible until someone starts spouting technobabble
    >The newer ones fly

    Trade Federation Droids
    >Kinda dumb
    >Debatably self aware
    >Useless marksmen
    >Presumably you can field them in the tens of thousands
    >Comes with heavy support and aerospace fighter versions
    >Has tanks and artillery

    Portal Turret
    >Immobile
    >Beeps and uses very visible laser sights to telegraph their attacks and killzones
    >Comes in a variety of cool paintjobs (according to expanded universe materials)
    >Fires the whole bullet, for 65% more bullet per bullet
    >Shipped directly to your door

    If the Daleks get their full plot armour from the shows then they win hands down until The Doctor arrives to beat them for us. So it kinda has to go to the Star Wars Droids

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >*snipes all your infantry with precision accuracy from distances the cant retaliate with built in Ballistics computer*

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >*they

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Shame these things weren't good enough to render Napoleonic infantry tactics irrelevant.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Replace the cannon with pic rel

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Can you imagine how shitty or expensive this thing must be to not win a war where people line up to fight at rock throwing distance?

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Even an early series Dalek would fair well in a basically flat Ukraine. Immune to small arms fire, grenades, jamming. Pretty much perfect trench cleaners. They could even cope with artillery.

    Think the droids would just be more cannon fodder.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How do they get out of the trench once they kill everything inside?

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Attacking
    Battle Droids, assuming they don't just shut off after falling over like in the prequels
    >Defending
    Turrets, assuming their dogshit lethality is just a gameplay thing and that the spring launched cartridges are at least as effective as being hosed down with .22lr

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Middle would be amazing for modern combat.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      These homies miss standing targets at fifteen feet.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How well your infantry can land a shot isn't important

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Suppression only works because if the enemy refuses to be suppressed they think they'll be actually hit with something.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Wrong also see

            How well your infantry can land a shot isn't important

            shooting your gun is the least important job of the infantryman

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Wrong, see the dumb shit post you're responding to!
              Want to try that again with an actual argument?
              A slow, virtually unarmed moron is not an effective infantryman.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i would win sorry

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Get back on your feet soldier.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/48lHK25.jpg

      Get back on your feet soldier.

      I-is this a Droidworks meme? That game scared the shit outta me as a kid

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Left is more like a very shitty spacecraft and its weapons would be better serviced mounted on practically anything else. Right already exists to keep Norks from poking through the demilitarized zone, middle would be very good as each B1 has the programming to be either a crewman, an infantryman, a mechanic, or just an extra set of hands as the situation demands.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Left is as OP as the writer wants it to be in each episode. It can very from being killed by simple AT weaponry to being able to solo every army on earth.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    daleks occupied like half the universe - is this a serious question? the other shit would fall to them easily. their only weakness is that davros is kind of a moron. also genesis of the daleks is kino as frick - the doctor saves hitler's life.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nevermind that gays think a machine that can vaporize entire buildings and conquer reality missed two unaware people at a range of fifteen feet lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The Doctor had his sonic screwdriver on jamming obviously.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Actually making the wall scorched from the backblast

      Not too bad for such a goofy show, although it would have bounced back and wrecked them.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A single Dalek would defeat the entirety of the Confederacy of Independent Systems without breaking a sweat and then proceed to frick Count Dooku in the face and turn him into a human Dalek combining the genocidal psychopathy of the Daleks with extremely adept use of the Force would result in the Galactic Empire being ruled by Dalek Dooku rather than cuckold Palpatine and his test tube baby grand daughter.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah they could never hit him with anything as powerful as an RPG, a rope, or a twenty foot fall.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The Cult of Skaro alone would destroy anything that they come up against. The majority of them were only destroyed by Dalek weaponry themselves; the Daleks also have that neutron bomb thing (forgot the name) that Davros invented while being locked away in the basement of the Emperor's ship and that weapon erases planets and everyone on them to use as a giant weapon making the Death Star pathetic.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          And sometimes they can be beaten by rope and men pushing them out of windows.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          There's at least two Daleks of every generation who have been killed by physical impacts weaker than a tank shell.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Daleks just don't work because they're always balanced against the doctor's Bullshitium. They're less consistent than the Flash in strength.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How come you never see any battle droids in the later Star Wars movies, even if they are just rusting junk heaps?

    Seems like the rule of cool would dictate that at least one battle droid commander or something would gain sentience and become a bounty hunter, etc. Maybe it's a copyright issue. lol

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming far left can fly they'd be good but assuming there is no water in hell they'd suck. Right would suck on hard surfaces. Center should be functional in a variety of situations. Also if I remember correctly they're easily mass produced.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You homosexuals are so depressing. You know it's possible to watch something and not agree with it's political message but still enjoy it? You can even, for example, use a gun manufactured by a nation who's politics you dislike without supporting it. Crazy idea , I know.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's not the politics behind it. It's just cringe, like all British media.
      >le tardis
      >le daleks
      I hate Russia but I own 4 Russian guns. I also hate China and own 2 of those. I don't particularly like bongs either but I love my Parker Hale M82

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how does the darlek even get up and down stairs? the whole design looks flawed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They ELEVATE!

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ROGER ROGER

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    God would you shut up about your multi-verse level threats, its an utterly meaningless phrase.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *