Which nation has the most disgraceful military history?

Which nation has the most disgraceful military history?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bolivia.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      led by a bunch of morons, but at least they went down swinging
      which is more than can be said for some countries

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      By Finnish standards every one of those is a victory.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Are you talking about counting the winter war as a defensive victory where in the face of insurmountable odds you inflicted such heavy casualties on the enemy that they gave up on their original goal of total conquest and settled on a sliver of land for peace?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >great power makes territorial demands
          >refuse them
          >get invaded
          >six months pass
          >sign a peace treaty giving up the territories demanded pre-war
          Victory is ours!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            wish public education was better ngl

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            utter fricking moron

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah the Finns signed a treaty giving up 10% of their country because they were winning lol. They had so much fun winning the first time around that they decided to invade the USSR back a few years later just so they could give away even more land in the subsequent peace treaty.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >great power makes territorial demands
            >refuse them
            >get invaded
            >six months pass
            >sign a peace treaty giving up the territories demanded pre-war
            Victory is ours!

            The Soviet demans were very simmilar to what they had done in Lativa, Estonia and Lithuania wich lead to their anexations into the USSR. It is no mystery that uncle Joe wanted to restore the Imperial Russian borders, and that includes Finnland. The war was a Finish defensive victory because they prevented their annexation and managed to remain independent, even if they lost some nickle mine and their second biggest city through the process.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          BUCK BROKEN

          >great power makes territorial demands
          >refuse them
          >get invaded
          >six months pass
          >sign a peace treaty giving up the territories demanded pre-war
          Victory is ours!

          >give us this land
          *gives land*
          >ok, now give us this land also

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    chinks or italians

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      China ranks high up there, throughout their history in the rare instances when they fought foreign forces and not each other (no nation even comes close to having as many civil wars as china) they mostly sucked and in the 19th and early 20th centuries they sealed their status as a very minor power.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        china's entire history is being raped and subjugated by one tyrannical warlord after another

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Calling them civil wars is like calling European wars civil wars. China was only a little bit more united than europe for most of its history

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This chinese "muh 5000 year old history" is mind bogeling when you actually look at their history and dicover that There was less commonality then in Europe which never claimed to be a single nation.

          It has be another chinese scam like those thrash cryptos or NFTs where everybody knows its a scam but everybody wants to win the big price an scam the others

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >19th/20th century
        >very minor power
        >21st isn't included
        Idk man they're much the losers of the big 3 and that's saying something because Russia is in the big 3

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The Italians peaked in Rome, so you can't fault them for their later performances in civilization.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        i refuse to believe people as inept as italians ran rome

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >i refuse to believe people as inept as italians ran rome
          Just because Italians are half-Black, that doesn't mean they are inept or mentally challenged. They probably just had affirmative action and DEI programs that lowered the standards in the Roman Empire.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          They didn't. Italy has been invaded and conquered so many times they're not ethnically since then the same people anymore.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That's because Italians aren't Romans. The fall of Rome was followed by a period of great migration. The north was settled by germanic lombards and the south was regained by the greek eastern half of the roman empire.
          also the Romans themselves grew to be military inapt, by the end of the western empire they were husks compared to the republic's military prowess

          The Italians peaked in Rome, so you can't fault them for their later performances in civilization.

          >italians
          >romans
          bad bait, but there are morons who unironically believe it

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You ever seen those 3d models of restored roman emperors? They look exactly like modern italians.
            Maybe leave where you belong

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >can't even greentext properly
              >tell me to go on /misc/ because his feeling got hurt by learning that Mussolini was wrong
              wish I had a "bait or mental moronation" pic for that one

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I dont give a frick about mussolini you brownoid. Strawmanning moron
                I dont give a frick about "greentexting properly"
                Back to lurking little man

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              idgaf, kys

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >you ever see those unattributed random 3d models on the internet
              >this is proof that actually brown people are epic
              hilarious

              well its all on you to stop them

              stay tooned

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          the senate seems farely inept
          also
          >praetorian guard
          I wonder what their K/D ratio is
          or if they ever actually thwarted any assassination attempts

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Italians as a modern country are shit but as a race they're not too bad.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Italy

      Are you fricking moronic?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        romans didn't look like this

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You have never been to Italy

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            you wanna be white so badly. the cope is 1000x more pathetic than amerimutts

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Like I said, you've never been to Italy.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Romans are Italians
        Sorry but you don't get to claim that title, Tony

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      China ranks high up there, throughout their history in the rare instances when they fought foreign forces and not each other (no nation even comes close to having as many civil wars as china) they mostly sucked and in the 19th and early 20th centuries they sealed their status as a very minor power.

      Chinese has like 1 period they can actually be proud of in their thousand yr history. That would be them hitting their neighbor Huns and setting off the conditions for Attila in the other side of the continent.

      The rest of their supposed powerful periods like Tang, Yuan, Qing were ran by what they consider barbarians while the actual han chinese were bent over ass prolapsed

      Tldr: Proper chinamen are femboys

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Germany
    USA
    Russia
    Poland
    France
    Italy
    Spain
    Britain
    Japan

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      bad bait

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        War is evil

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          and u are gay

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Its actually how you find the good.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Austria-Hungary (just the KuK)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Haha kuk (means wiener in swedish)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ok, herr Wallin

        Russia

        this

        Russia has a ridiculously glorious military history and they've only ever once really lost a war (WW1). I think France and maybe Bongs can compete but that's it.

        low iq post

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      still mad about that little poison gas funtime giovanni? or wanna try a 13th charge against Austrian MG nests, without cover, for the old times?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Dude, you lost two count'em, TWO wars, IN A ROW, against FRICKING ITALY, you hilarious disgrace of a military force. If Italians are (deservedly) the laughing stock of Europe, you're DOUBLE the laughingstock.
        Go play Sisi dressup in Viena, it's the only thing you are good for.
        >B-b-but we won a bunch of battles against Italy in WWI1
        Nobody cares. Even the Italians got the ocasional victory in their books, that doesn't impress anyone. You STILL managed to be b***hslapped by the military zero of the world when you should have won, after all those "victories". You are the military NEGATIVE of the world, becaus you're less than zero.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    North Korea's crowning military achievement is kidnapping Japanese civilians.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They also defeated USA in a hot war.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Your dealer's giving you the good shit, man.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >3 million Chinese had to come help
        >still get shit on by frozen GIs
        >muh win
        Commies got fricked in half.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Sure they did, buddy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Obviously the ones that no longer exist due to losing wars, for example, confederacy and nazi germany. It doesn't matter how good you are tactically if you frick up strategically.

      NK artillery and nukes strategically ensured the country will at least not be attacked, because Seoul will be flattened by artillery alone.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    China, they are only good at killing their own people.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Germany, basically lost every war since its formation and ended upsplit in half and the puppet of a nation not even on the same continent.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      b-but muh wehrmacht, muh nazinos muh T I G E R S

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I think it's their diplomacy. They keep using the strat of allying with tards and then fighting half the world at once.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It almost worked the first time.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Militarily they did quite good. Politically, they should be a puppet rules by EU council

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No modern White nation makes the list and no intelligent person would put one in their list, as every modern White nation is more accomplished (the lack of accomplishment being my definition of disgraceful as it isn't subjective or 'moral' measurement and one was not provided) than virtually all nonWhite nations besides China.

      Rather, how about Zimbabwe or Haiti, which now lack significant militaries and their only accomplishments were to destroy their own lifelines and ultimately fight for their starvation and savagery?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        idk I think poland makes the list
        they haven't won anything in centuries

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Greenland. Useless. Never conquered anyone.
    Disgraceful.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not a nation

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "Why should we Pashtuns, who have never lost a war, take military advice from the Pakistanis, who have never won one?"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      10k Pashtuns got fricked up by 24 dudes. They lost 600 men before they were able to take the fort and kill them all.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What battle are you referring to? Hill 3234?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Saragarhi
        It was actually only 21 dudes, my bad.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Sepoy Gurmukh Singh, who communicated the battle to Haughton as a signalman, was the last surviving defender. His last message was to ask for permission to pick up his rifle. Upon receiving permission he packed up the heliograph and held the door of his signalling shed. He is stated to have killed 40 Afghans and the Pashtuns were forced to set fire to the post to kill him. As he was dying, Singh is said to have yelled repeatedly the Sikh battle cry "Bole So Nihal, Sat Sri Akal!" ("One will be blessed eternally, who says that God is the ultimate truth!").

          Not to denigrate the Sikhs but I kinda have a hard believing you could kill 40 men with a Martini-Henry alone in a confined space.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            He was in a tower as they tried to set fire to it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Not just a confined space. A confined space with only one entrance that is at the top of a staircase.
            Manned by a pissed off sikh with a bayonet.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's really not that hard to kill a man in a dress with a 16" blade on the end of 5 ft staff

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              The problem is when there's 40 other guys trying to do the same to you.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They had to go up a tiny staircase and push through a small door into a room with an angry Sikh who had a fully loaded Martini Henry with a bayonet at the end. Frankly, 40 ragheads is a pretty believable number because after the first couple they then had to try and fight into the room over top of the corpses while being shot or stabbed or both.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        But did they lose the war?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    India
    Shitaly
    France
    Mexico
    Argentina (and every other latam shithole except Chile)
    Ireland
    Germany
    Poland
    Turkey

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >except Chile

      Expound plz

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Chile kicked the shit out of all their neighbors in the Pacific War

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Ah, that's a bit old news but okay

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            South America doesn't have a lot of international conflict and when it does its almost always unimpressive

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              At least they seem to accept the fact themselves too, which makes it less appealing to egg them on it. I guess that Paraguayan war drove home the point that any major multinational clashes in such geography and political environment just end up plain badly, so you get smaller border wars at max.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That was before an emergence of national identity of their neighbors and the construction of the Panama Channel, by the 20th century the story would be quite different, there was a point when things got so bad due chilean socialists CIA had to assasinate a peruvian dictator to avoid peruvians launching a full scale invasion to retake Arica, there is a declassified report from the Agency published online which states Peru could have sustained a war both against Chile and Ecuador and at least finish off one country while containing the other, Argentina picking on UK rather than Chile was another string of sheer dumb luck Chile had, nowadays they still have Pinochet's legacy but that's something which suffers the risk of existential failure every time Chile elects a leftoid government. Truth be told at the current date Chile's shouldn't have much to bother about unless Peru ends up run by some revanchist willing to rearm them, not sure if this time US would bother coming to the rescue, as it appears there is less and less interest from Washington to intervene outside very specific hotspots, although, Chile will have plenty of time to see an incursion coming.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        he's chilean, there isn't any deeper reason

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Turkey
      Are you Greek by any chance?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >turkish immediate reaction is to call someone Greek
        are the Greeks in the room with us right now roach?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Because no one else is that butthurt
          >West gangs up on ottomans, turns the country a husk of what it was
          >Gives greeks the chance to redeem themselves by attacking weakened turkey
          >Greeks still frick it up
          >Image of greece is in shambles, west considers turkey a crucial ally
          >Greece gets downgraded to lapdog status
          >Fast forward 40 years
          >Tries to remove kebab, kebab removes half their island without even breaking a sweat
          >Fast forward 40 more years
          >Turkey is mogging greece on every chance
          >Penetrates greek airspace almost daily
          >Literal drilling operations in greek eez
          >Greece cant do shit other than complain because 60% of their army would be pummeled into nothingness within the first hour of a potential conflict
          >Only greek deterrence is the thousands of us troops in their military bases, hoping that turkey may kill a us soldier and start a bigger war with us

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            American here, your country is a fricking joke

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            the greeks revolted on their own before the west gave them any support, in fact the entirety of Europe condemned the Greek revolution, but changed their minds when they saw it was successful
            greece defeated turkey in WW1 by tripling its territory and turkey did not even take part in WW2, they declared war on germany 2 weeks before the end of the war only to be on the winning side LOL fricking pussies
            cyprus was a greek frickup, not a turkish victory, the turks walked in with no resistance and barely fought at all
            turkey has agreed to stop entering greek airspace and signed an agreement, it hasn't happened in months
            there are no drilling operations happening, there were plans but they also stopped after pic related
            greece is getting the F-35s that turkey paid for because you are moronic Black folk
            seethe

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >a country so strong, so rich, so powerful and so proud
            >that they would prostitute out their mothers, sisters and daughters in the mere hope off getting to live off of german welfare

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ah Ireland beat the British Empire. Are a neutral country. The one large engagement they did have they also work a force of 150 faced off against a force of 3,000 took no losses and inflicted heavy losses on the opponents which included french, Belgian and Rhodesian mercenaries. Duke of Wellington was Irish. One third of his army was Irish. One third of Nelson's fleet was Irish. The Irish hold the most Victoria Crosses and most Medal of Honours per head of population etc etc. General Kitchener famously said the Irish won the British Empire and if the United Kingdom lost Ireland they wouldn't hold their empire. How right he was!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If we’re going by overall Ireland hasn’t been impressive but had moments here and there. I’ll give them expelling the Vikings and finally kicking the English out

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          So you're discounting all of the above. Hmm you don't know much so. For a country which for the majority of it's time has less then 5 million people those are some big achievements and I dare you to find any other similar sized nation with a better record. Also holding more Victoria Crosses and medal of honours to this day per head of population then the natives of those countries is just embarrassing for bongs and mutts

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >>>So you're discounting all of the above
            I didn’t say that. Just overall they had their shit kicked more than dishing out pain

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Did they? Given the size disparity between the two populations and the campaigns the Brits had to wage ever 50 years over the course of 800 years just to hold on to the place would say otherwise

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >>Also holding more Victoria Crosses and medal of honours to this day per head of population then the natives of those countries
            Please tell you are actually not counting diaspora

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Fine if you don't want to count Irish diaspora they still have 40% of MoH and the VC stats still hold true. Again very embarrassing for natives of those countries.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >they still have 40% of MoH and the VC stats still hold true
                >source: my ass

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >>Also holding more Victoria Crosses and medal of honours to this day per head of population then the natives of those countries is just embarrassing for bongs and mutts
            You mind getting some proof paddy?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              So you're own shit work mutt. We're richer then you now do you work for us

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >can’t provide any proof
                lol cry more esl gay

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They are now utterly dependent on the British for both naval and aerial security, lacking the ability to patrol either the air or the sea within their own borders. For a country that draws so much of it's identity from beating back the British and gaining independence, this is and should be a national embarrassment.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it would be, if we gave a shit.

          who the frick is gonna invade or attack an island - with no natural resources other than alcoholism, violence, and singing - that sits between the US, the UK, and France? Let the UK play at 'defending' Irish airspace; buck broken fricks may as well be good for something.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The Royal Navy literally had to chase a Russian submarine out of Cork harbour as recent as last December. You are dependent on the UK for security and Russians would run free in your waters and airspace otherwise, I'm sorry this upsets you.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              It was not in Cork harbor. I checked. Did you expect no one would when it takes seconds?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >ackshually it wasn't IN the harbour it was.... directly outside the entrance to it
                Do you think being pedantic changes things? The reality remains the same, Ireland as recently as December had to rely on the Royal Navy to chase off a Russian submarine because they lack the ability to do so themselves. That is a huge embarrassment for Ireland no matter which way you cut it.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              doesn't upset me. my point is we don't really give a shit. the russians come in to test the Brits, the Brits go out to chase the russians... it's all a game of silly buggers that's been going on for decades now. if you want to portray that as 'reliance', then fine. we still don't give a shit.

              youngsters get whipped up by online gays larping as strategic defense specialists on YouTube or tiktok and start crying about how we need to 'play our part' or some shit and join NATO or some EU army, blah blah blah.

              We're not going to. we don't owe anyone anything, and we'd have frick all impact even if we did.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >we don't owe anyone anything
                Effective summary of why Ireland has always and will always be a shithole

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            There is no "we" here you fricking homosexual, any Irish person with any hint of pride and balls knows we should be contributing fairly to the European Defence Sphere

            >"but muh neutrality" Ireland is not and never was neutral, because to be neutral you have to have the means to defend neutrality, which Ireland does not.

            Unironically kys. Actually do it.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Ireland is not and never was neutral, because to be neutral you have to have the means to defend neutrality, which Ireland does not.
              That's not what neutrality means
              Neutrality means neutrality
              Do you think the netherlands had the ability to defend themselves against the german empire in the great war? Or sweden against the germans or soviets in WW2?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They're not neutral in any meaningful sense of the word unless you consider being dependent on your historic oppressor for all of your defence needs "neutral". Neutrality shouldn't entail disarmament, currently they amount to little more than a British protectorate.

                doesn't upset me. my point is we don't really give a shit. the russians come in to test the Brits, the Brits go out to chase the russians... it's all a game of silly buggers that's been going on for decades now. if you want to portray that as 'reliance', then fine. we still don't give a shit.

                youngsters get whipped up by online gays larping as strategic defense specialists on YouTube or tiktok and start crying about how we need to 'play our part' or some shit and join NATO or some EU army, blah blah blah.

                We're not going to. we don't owe anyone anything, and we'd have frick all impact even if we did.

                >it's fine for Russian subs to sit in torpedo distance of our harbors because idk frick the brits
                The absolute state. Countries with smaller populations and smaller budgets manage to piece together actual defence forces, it would be trivial for Ireland to procure a small amount of ASW frigates and fighter jets.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                What defence needs you spastic
                The Russians aren't going to invade ireland, take your meds

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Of course you're right, Russian submarines sitting within torpedo range of your harbours whilst you're powerless to stop them poses no security risk whatsoever.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're in range of all their strategic weapons right now, moron
                Stop reading mutt media, the russians aren't going to attack fricking ireland

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >they could nuke us anyway so it's fine for them to sit at the entrance of our harbours uncontested
                Ireland is genuinely worse than New Zealand for this level of spinelessness and resignation. It's embarrassing beyond comparison.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're a spastic
                What are they going to do in your harbour, break down?
                They have no reason to go to war with you and you have no reason to go to war with them
                Ireland picking a fight with anyone is a moronic fricking idea and anyone backing it is a cretin

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              yeah keep dreaming about the 'European Defence Sphere' - whatever the frick that is - while you wax those balls of yours for daddy.

              We're not going to pay for shit. If the RAF or RN wants to play hide the sausage with 50 year-old Russian planes and boats, off with them. They only come near us to tickle the Brits. Frick them, frick the Brits, and frick you.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                doesn't upset me. my point is we don't really give a shit. the russians come in to test the Brits, the Brits go out to chase the russians... it's all a game of silly buggers that's been going on for decades now. if you want to portray that as 'reliance', then fine. we still don't give a shit.

                youngsters get whipped up by online gays larping as strategic defense specialists on YouTube or tiktok and start crying about how we need to 'play our part' or some shit and join NATO or some EU army, blah blah blah.

                We're not going to. we don't owe anyone anything, and we'd have frick all impact even if we did.

                Normally I would dunk on you for being paddies but in this case, frankly, based. Stay as far from the eurobolsheviks and hamburger defence scam as you can, lads. Nothing good ever comes of it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Still not "we" Black person, and still rope yourself

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        God bless.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Duke of Wellington was Irish. One third of his army was Irish. One third of Nelson's fleet was Irish.
        Ah the old
        >Everyone of note, who isn't a "villain" in British history was actually Irish/Scottish/Welsh
        Yet simultaneously they're all oppressed by the evil anglo who is woefully incompetent and constantly needs the enlightened Celt to do all their thinking, fighting and building.

        Sorry bogtrotter but this fantasy of yours has never been true.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        All of your flexes is that the Irish died for the eternal Anglo though which is kinda funny if not tragic. Storied military heritage, under the people they hate

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        After the flight of the wild geese almost all Irish military history is in the service of countries other than Ireland. A surprisingly large number of the conquistadors were Irish, as were the Irish Brigade and Hiberian Regiment etc etc

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >France
      Pick up a book.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I hate Shitaly so much. Imagine being so proud about throwing noodles in tomato sauce and acting like its some grand culinary masterpiece and getting all assblasted when it gets "Americanized" or whatever. Lol frick off you sketti Black folk, its not that god damn special

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >i refuse to believe people as inept as italians ran rome
        Just because Italians are half-Black, that doesn't mean they are inept or mentally challenged. They probably just had affirmative action and DEI programs that lowered the standards in the Roman Empire.

        jump off a cliff homosexual

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Lol guinea

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            whiter/blonder than you mutt

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              a fine addition to my collection

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i don't want to be a brown person

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I believe in you, through exercise and faith in God you can overcome this

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                grazie

                also the lower area is dark because of the shadow

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                oh really? I thought you were half black

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                i posted my dna already

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                did you take a sample from the lower half of your foot? think you have a chimerism situation going on

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                it was years ago and they just kept updating it every few months so i forgot where. I basically a moor

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Genetic makeup of the minotaur abomination that dwells in the labyrinth?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Poland
      Brown hands written that post

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        To be fair Poland has been the designated whipping boy of Europe for past four centuries. Even WW2 which they nominally won had them lose the most people percentage-wise out of any country that took part and had them lose half the country and become a Communist puppet. The only genuine victory they had was 1920 but that is pretty much forgotten anywhere outside of Poland.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The poles haven't won anything in centuries
        Also, the commonwealth was cringe and its destruction was a good thing

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair Poland has been the designated whipping boy of Europe for past four centuries. Even WW2 which they nominally won had them lose the most people percentage-wise out of any country that took part and had them lose half the country and become a Communist puppet. The only genuine victory they had was 1920 but that is pretty much forgotten anywhere outside of Poland.

      The poles haven't won anything in centuries
      Also, the commonwealth was cringe and its destruction was a good thing

      braindead mutts and their american education kek

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    China. The only enemy they've ever been able to defeat has been themselves. They've been bodied by everyone else.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Russia

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Russia has a ridiculously glorious military history and they've only ever once really lost a war (WW1). I think France and maybe Bongs can compete but that's it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia has a ridiculously glorious military history and they've only ever once really lost a war (WW1).

        What?
        They got their asses handed to them regularly e.g the Russio Japanese war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Japanese_War
        But there are MANY other examples, a bunch of mercenaries sized Moscow. as did the french who burnt it Then Russia lost the Crimean war
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War
        Russia has lost a vast number of other wars such as the polish soviet wars and of course the disastrous humiliation of the winter war, the collapse of Russian forces in ww2 when Stalin ally Hitler attacked etc etc Russian military history is generally very embarrassing and when it is not it is because the Russian military has foreign Generals

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Russo-Japanese and Crimean wars ended is basically draws, and WW2 and the Napoleonic wars ended with Russian troops marching in Berlin and Paris respectively. Russians have mastered the skill of losing battles but winning the war.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Russo-Japanese and Crimean wars ended is basically draws
            Except they did not. Russia lost both, by quite some margin. Not even close.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              How was the Crimean war not a draw?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Japanese_War
            Result
            Japanese victory

            Treaty of Portsmouth

            >Russia has a ridiculously glorious military history and they've only ever once really lost a war (WW1).

            What?
            They got their asses handed to them regularly e.g the Russio Japanese war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Japanese_War
            But there are MANY other examples, a bunch of mercenaries sized Moscow. as did the french who burnt it Then Russia lost the Crimean war
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War
            Russia has lost a vast number of other wars such as the polish soviet wars and of course the disastrous humiliation of the winter war, the collapse of Russian forces in ww2 when Stalin ally Hitler attacked etc etc Russian military history is generally very embarrassing and when it is not it is because the Russian military has foreign Generals

            >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War
            Result Allied victory
            Territorial
            changes Russia loses the Danube Delta and Southern Bessarabia.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >WW2

            >he Napoleonic wars
            If you think Russia won these you are deluded, go read a book. Stalin started ww2 as Hitlers ally and wound up begging America for help. Without Allied help Russia would have been crushed and still wound up under stalin, that's called loosing, There were no Russian troops on the field at Waterloo either

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Russia didn't win the Napoleonic wars
              >Loosing
              New butthurt belt insanity just dropped.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not to mention Afghanistan, which was debatably even more embarrassing than the US occupation.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Not to mention Afghanistan, which was debatably even more embarrassing than the US occupation.
            To be fair the Russians were facing a mujahedeen that had the full support of US glowBlack folk. Kind of hard to invade a mountainous country when your helicopters and CAS aircraft get instantly deleted by an endless supply of modern MANPADS.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The Russians were winning Afghanistan until the Muj got Rambo's support (and cutting edge American stinger missiles that hard-countered their hill fort strategy)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Their national anthem is literally about gaining independence from Poland

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          which one?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Dogger Bank incident
        >Russian fleet en route to the Far East to reinforce Vladivostok
        >unironically afraid that the Japanese Navy have deployed mines and torpedo boats to the North Sea - some 20,000 miles away from Japan
        >captain of a supply ship radios that the fleet is under attack after spotting a passing Swedish vessel
        >fleet spots a group of British fishing trawlers shortly thereafter, which they mistake for more Japanese boats
        >start blasting, sinking one and damaging several others, and killing several British sailors
        >in the confusion they start shooting each other too, killing an Orthodox priest
        >several Russian ships claim to have been torpedoed, while another believed that it had been boarded by Japanese sailors
        >fortunately for everybody involved, further loss of life was largely avoided by the Russians' terrible aim
        >one ship in particular fired 500 shells without scoring a single hit
        >months later the fleet did finally arrive near Japan, just in time to be destroyed at the Battle of Tsushima

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why would Japanese ships even be in the North Sea lmao

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why would Japanese ships even be in the North Sea lmao

          To be fair, it was during Anglo-Japanese alliance

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The idea that japan would send a significant portion of it's fleet to England in order to attack the Russian fleet in the North Sea is still ludicrous. You really do have to be Russian to be so delusional and paranoid.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              well the Russians did send their baltic fleet to Japan so...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >another believed that it had been boarded by Japanese sailors
          How do you come to that conclusion anyhow?
          I can understand confusing a boat.
          I can even understand panicking 'sailors' thinking a ship noise or a round impacting their armour was a torp impact.
          But how do you get the idea that you've been boarded?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You look around the deck and suddenly spot a group of armed asiatic sailors. Wait not that might just be Sergei and Kuzhuget.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not even half the shit the second pacific squadron got up to.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Bruh the Polish burned Moscow.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Defensive victory for Russia, the capital burned but Russia remained.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Uh oh we didn't lose because they only occupied us for 2 years so it didn't count
            Are you serious right now?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia has a ridiculously glorious military history
        Lol
        Lmao even
        Only someone who get their historical education in Russia can believe that.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >only lost once
        another bad bait
        France doesn't compete, it beat everyone else. No other country had that many war and a favorable winning rate. Half of France was owned/controlled twice by their enemy and they won both war, first against the plantagenets followed by the british during the HYW(basically round two). morons with short memories only think about ww2 but France is also one of the oldest country in the world still here.
        Meanwhile russia has been fighting leftovers from the mongol empire until the swedes to frick up poland before they could finally expand toward Europe and not a huge empty wasteland. Their europeans wars are basically them fighting against weaker nations like sweden during the napoleonic wars who was way past their golden age or the Ottoman who were described as the sick man of Europe for a reason.
        inb4 muh napoleon
        Ah yes, the war that had basically all of Europe against France and made the Russians burn down moscow in fear

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You can tell this post is accurate because of all the seething replies
        >You see Cleetus, Russia became the world's largest country by losing all their wars

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        epic-level +10 bait

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Well Germany's record is 0-2 overall, which is pretty bad. Finland is 0-1 with 1 moral victory.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >having IQ this low
      Imperial German army literally mogged everyone. Lol. Fricked up frogs, limeys, Romanians, Russians, Bosnian, and like 3 other minor powers in 3 years of war. While dealing with Conrad Von Hotzendorfs insanity. Calling that disgraceful is just a low IQ cope and seethe.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Germany went down swinging both times, which, while embarrassing that it happened twice, is not disgraceful

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I wouldn’t count the First World War as a “went down swinging” since they never really were invaded.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ancient Greeks
    >dying in internecine wars all the time
    >(kinda) unite as a collection of city states and vanquish fricking Persia, the biggest empire known to Man at the time
    >go back to dying in internecine wars until irrelevance
    >be conquered by people who lack a culture, so they copy yours
    >refuse to elaborate
    JUST

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    france.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      moronic mutt

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        still lost

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >still not disgraceful

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >posts an italian

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        corsican doe

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >coping manlet

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >corsican pimp

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ya no, France probably has the most impressive military history over a series of centuries. Only Romes, republic and empire combined probably beats it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        France never invaded Poland

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Duchy of Warsaw stronk!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        they were always cowardly opportunists trying to frick austria and spain over whenever they were busy elsewhere

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    paraguay
    italy
    germany
    china
    russia
    japan

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Iceland

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      silly brits

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Rólegur Kiefer! Ægir var ekki svona stór.

        -Þakkir, Fyrrum LHG (Óðinn og Týr)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >silly brits
        The last time we invaded Iceland, we built you an airport.
        Then, when you became an American vassal, they built you an even bigger airport.
        If anyone in the Chinese military is listening: Iceland will roll over and play nice if you build them an airport. They are airport prostitutes. Easy win.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Easy win
          >Lose 3 wars to fish trawlers
          Nigel bros???

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's gotta be the Aussies. Cheeky c**ts had some shining moments but you cant lose to Emus and be taken seriously anymore.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ukr- (You have been banned for this post)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >tiny nation resists huge oppressors
      >not even a guerilla war
      >just straight up middle fingers and total domination for years in a straight fight

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Definitely Paraguay. Those frickers learned their lesson tho.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They fought the equivalent of a vicky II death war, they literally just refused to surrender even though the entire country was razed to the ground, and then their president waged an 8 month guerrilla war in the mountains and then died in a duel against a brazilian brigadier general, straight up went down like a medieval king. The country was left so depopulated that the woman had to resort to polyandry with the remaining men

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Although it's true that the Paraguayan war was the last time in history that two generals met on the battlefield and dueled to death with swords on horseback, that wasn't Solano. He was killed speared by a regular brazilian soldier while fleeing.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I need more literature on 19th century South American military history. Do you know of any interesting works you could recommend?

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Me looking at the ungodly amount of smegma accumulated around my dick's head when I pull back the foreskin for the first time in a whole year.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Almost certainly China. They have absolutely nothing to be proud of; their military history consists exclusively of incompetently managed and ill-conceived, sadistically genocidal, and self-cannibalizing (most often literally) civil wars, or else being brutally conquered by other countries as a result of their grossly foolhardy and myopically shortsighted and insulting diplomacy.
    Every other country in the world has at least some brief interlude of martial prowess or some rare miracle of outstanding heroism to the betterment either of their own nation or humanity at large; for example Russia can at least point to Peter the Great's victory over Sweden, India can look at the admirable conduct of their colonial service in the world wars, Arabs can bring up the Muslim conquest of the near East and North Africa, spearchucking Zulus can reminisce about Isandhlwana. China has nothing but self-destructive massacres and idiotic blunders.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't matter, they'll just jack off to the most recent copy of Romance of the Three Kingdoms and forget the rest.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    We had this thread on his and agreed on India.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      why is it india?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        India has basically never defeated an external enemy and has in turn been humiliatingly btfo'd by its neighbours on several occasions.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Pakistan tho?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That's not even a real country, neither is india, just brown gobbeldyasiatic invented by the british to minimize paperwork

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >"Paperwork could be here" he thought, "I've never been in this subcontinent before. There could be paperwork anywhere." The hot wind felt good against his bare chest. "I HATE PAPERWORK" he thought. The screams from the race war outside reverberated his entire office, making it pulsate even as the $9 curry circulated through his powerful thick veins and washed away his (merited) fear of paperwork after dark. "With a pen, you can draw anywhere on the map you want" he said to himself, out loud.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I count that as an internal conflict, especially as Pakistan got a shit ton of migrants from the rest of India during the partition.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          They did keep the mongols out of southern India

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        see

        https://i.imgur.com/JGEFmWL.jpeg

        Yeah India's history is just getting btfo'd by every outside force.

        Aryans, Persians, Alexander, White Huns, Arabs, Turks, Turks again, Mughals, Iranians, Europeans, Brit Buttfricking.

        The only thing Indians can do is beat other Indians... they never successfully expand outside of the shit subcontinent

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        India literally never won a war against invader. Even the meme answer in this thread like germany have some wins in history like their victory in Franco Prussian war or invasion of poland and France in early WW2. I have never see any indian military victory ever, even their independence was a gift from Britain instead of an earned victory like how vietnam get theirs.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >literally never won a war against invader
          The mongols

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Mughals?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >India literally never won a war against invader.
          >what is the Kargil War

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        they couldn't even unite their country(based on cultural borders), they needed the muslims and the brits to do it for them

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah India's history is just getting btfo'd by every outside force.

      Aryans, Persians, Alexander, White Huns, Arabs, Turks, Turks again, Mughals, Iranians, Europeans, Brit Buttfricking.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You forgot 400 Portugese defeating an Indian army of 24000 despite the latter being equally if not better armed.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Marathas whipped the moguls, thoughbeit

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Which nation has the most disgraceful military history?
    England

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Russia's military history is fine.... it's no Western power like France or the UK but it's fine.

    India's shit history blows it out of the water and only people invested in the Ukraine war think otherwise.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia's military history is fine
      Military literally deserts during WW1 because gommunism
      Looses against the Japanese in 1905 even though they had just emerged from caves
      Has its capital burned by the french
      Allies with Hitler, then gets invaded by Hitler
      Its a lot of humiliations for one nation.
      Russia was at its best genociding reindeer herders,

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >wins against Napoleon and Hitler
        Yeah you are a just a tard with the ukraine war

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Austria defeated Napoléon and you were allied to Hitler and then saved from him by the Americans.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >rises from the ashes of the most brutal invasion in human history to become the biggest European state by population and square mileage
        >tames the hordelands
        >bullies Caucasian tribes
        >genocides Siberian savages for pelts
        >seizes Outer Manchuria from the Chinese despite being outnumbered 150:1
        Russia had some embarrassing defeats but they only came against states with more sophistication, and Russia ended up winning those wars anyways (until WW1)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        genociding reindeer herders whilst suffering 5:1 losses XD

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Germany's entire history, not just military, is just ruining western civilization

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This. It is impossible to refute the fact that without Germany, Western civilization would be far more advanced and secure. Marxism alone set us back centuries and will probably lead to the West's fall by being the only ideology (apart from Judaism) that calls for the mass importation of unintelligent, violent shitskins that outbreed the native population.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I never knew Marx told the pilgrims to settle North America... or was it Catholicism?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        what actual piece of Marx's writing outlined mass immigration as a means to achieve communism??? you make racists look moronic

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    India

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Aztecs, mayas (millions against a a thousand Spanish dudes)

    practically any African country,

    Most of south east Asia besides Vietnam.

    I don't understand people saying Italy since they only did badly in WW2 while they where ruling the known world for over about a thousand years.

    China also has won loads of wars to be as big it is historically. They absorbed almost all white skinned asians within their country. They have sucked badly in the last century but now they are not a joke anymore either.

    Cambodia is also amongst those countries that after being an empire for centuries lost just about every war:
    Losing wars and land against both Thailand and Vietnam, invite the french to make them a colony in exchange of kicking out the Thais, fail to revolt against the french later, finally get independence without a fight just to be successfully invaded by the vietnamese again and have the Khmer rouge get in power, vietnamese invade again and defeat the Khmer rouge after they side with the Chinese. Khmer rouge remnants are again defeated by UN blue helmets.
    Cambodia has lost so hard they went from being the pearl of Asia and a major tourist attraction with the likes of Charlie Chaplin coming to visit Angkor temples to one of the poorest countries on the planet. Things are getting better now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >ruling the known world for over about a thousand years.
      Romans did. Then romans got conquered by barbarians and their culture and language were wiped out.
      "Italian" was not even a concept other than geographical one before 19th century, people had regional identities.
      Italians have always sucked at war

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Italy only got unified in the 19th century so if you count their military achievements from there it's very shamefull and I'm saying this as someone who likes Italy.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Roman culture and language
        >wiped out

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Aztecs
      It was masterful how Cortes got all the smaller tribes on-side to btfo them but he absolutely could not have done it without them
      >Mayans
      were already basically non-existent as a civilization before the Spanish arrived, perhaps you are thinking of the Inca

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Chinese, they are so bad they have been losing to the Chinese for millennia.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The whole history of Iraq, that said, since the British created it in the interwar period. Not a single victory in the gozillion wars they fought until 2024

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The United States.
    And it's not because their military sucks, pretty far from it.
    It's because every war they won has been a disgrace to the whole world and the common folk everywhere.
    The only people who benefit from wars won by the US is rich people who have connections with the MIC or the DOD.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >It's because every war they won has been a disgrace to the whole world and the common folk everywhere.
      post hand

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That’s not true the common man benefited from the defeat of the redcoats. But in you measure by inverse military expenditure divided by wars won I bet we are the worst

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >the common man benefited from the defeat of the redcoats.
        Debatable honestly.
        The majority of founding fathers were businessmen or the wealthy upper class looking for freedom from legal bindings, and the British politics, culture, and even Royalty at the time were all remarkably libertarian.
        Some historians argue that the only reason the US managed a secession was because King George was a believer in that kind of thing himself.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >the common man benefited from the defeat of the redcoats
        Recommended reading. RW mostly benefited the wealthy coastal trader class.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'd argue WW2 was a moral and military victory for America though they've also done immoral things to get there

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        6 million...too many...
        the lampshades...don't forget the lampshades...

        I dunno I think I probably benefit from a world where the US has guaranteed safe sea trade for basically anyone who isn't openly slaughtering people on a daily basis. Who else am I supposed to root for, the people who think Bronze Age "lmao I'll just kill you for your 10 acres" strategy is morally just in the 20th-21st century?

        As an empire we just want to buy your shit, and you buy ours. We don't want to annex you. We don't want you to annex anyone else. We don't want anyone else to annex you. In America's perfect world everyone just fights through money and trade and courts, and if we have to bomb the odd nation that decides to start a rogue nuclear program then so be it. Unfortunately that system relies on a lot of rational actors deciding that wars aren't poggers, and we got too reliant on non-rational actors to be participants. So now we get chimpouts over Israel, over Ukraine, over Taiwan, insert some random ass holy land hill that looks like every other muslim holy land brown dusty hill etc.

        >muh current year
        lmao

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The kind of people who hate America for being an Empire are those who deserve its boot on their throats the most, becuase they only see the US as stopping them from imposing their own Imperial rule.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I think the word you're looking for is "self-determination".

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              welcome to the independent state of no one is coming to help you

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Oh no!
                Like I give a frick. I'd prefer to not be a pit for nuclear testing thanks.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                well its all on you to stop them

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm a bong but it's pretty clear to see that out of the realistic candidates for countries to be global military hegemons, basically all of them would have exploited the position more than America has
            A few wars on terror here, a few domino theories there, some propped-up dictators and some funded terrorists
            It's all small fry bullshit compared to what Russia, or Germany, or China, or Japan would have done with basically incontestable global power. America has never done anything as nakedly evil as the Opium War, which a hegemonic power can get away with from time to time.
            If you were to try to make some sort of quotient that measures the volume of military exploitation a country commits by the volume of military exploitation they were actually capable of, America would end up looking good compared to most countries outside of the basically pacifist countries we see today in Europe and Japan (who get away with this stance precisely because they know America has their back).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I dunno I think I probably benefit from a world where the US has guaranteed safe sea trade for basically anyone who isn't openly slaughtering people on a daily basis. Who else am I supposed to root for, the people who think Bronze Age "lmao I'll just kill you for your 10 acres" strategy is morally just in the 20th-21st century?

      As an empire we just want to buy your shit, and you buy ours. We don't want to annex you. We don't want you to annex anyone else. We don't want anyone else to annex you. In America's perfect world everyone just fights through money and trade and courts, and if we have to bomb the odd nation that decides to start a rogue nuclear program then so be it. Unfortunately that system relies on a lot of rational actors deciding that wars aren't poggers, and we got too reliant on non-rational actors to be participants. So now we get chimpouts over Israel, over Ukraine, over Taiwan, insert some random ass holy land hill that looks like every other muslim holy land brown dusty hill etc.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Paraguay.
    >yfw their female/male ration is still fricked 200 years later

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If they have no incels in paragay then it's heaven on earth

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Australia

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Australia

      Reddit's that way

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Hey we have some victories under our belt

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >le emu war
      I can't wait for this dumb meme to die.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        well you'll have to win a war

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    China. The only success they've ever had is when they're butchering each other (insert 8 gorillion civilians cannibalized), faced with external threats they just get rolled over.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Probably turkey
    >ongoing insurgency on turkish soil for 45 years

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      forgot link
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdistan_Workers%27_Party_insurgency

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Prussia, later Germany, despite all the hype it gets, lost the vast majority of wars it was involved in, their only victories were due to their enemies either being pathetic weaklings at the time or them being carried by actual strong nations.
    Russia in close second, we're currently seeing a live example of how pathetic Russia is at war.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >we're
      No, khohol, we are not. Go to draft center, your shithole need your help.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >imagine being this delusional
        go back to /chug/, sister

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    romania in fww1 .we lose the hole country for one year

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you never had a chance
      you had to fight him

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Eh, at least they did not let a traitor take control, as in Hungary.
      >tl;dr: pacifist cucks, israelites and the likes think the best way to negotiate peace by surrendering and letting everyone take whatever they want (Trudeau must have learned it from Hungary after WWI).

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Australia

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    France
    >Lose ww2
    >Switch sides
    >Lose ww2 again

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      france before 1870 was absolutely chad thoughever

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >lose 10 wars to the brits straight

        don't think you read the books correctly.

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Argentinian Army in the Falklands. Their conscripts were poorly led. They also fired blindly until the bongs were on top of them and then they suddenly tried to surrender. The bongs had none of that and shot them. Their Air Force was top tier though and very nearly turned the tide.

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    jews

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    France

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    For the post-napoleon era, when it comes to big european countries, it has to be Spain by far.
    After we Vietnam-d the french, we basically lost every single war to this day and half the major wars the country fought were civil wars (carlist wars, The Civil War, a buncha big revolts, etc).
    The country was basically africa-tier militarily in the mid-late 1800s and only went back to being half decent in the 1960s. The only reason we didn't get humiliated by other countries too much is that we lost everything that a foreign power could be interested on aside from Cuba and the philipines which took some time to lose just because the USA got distracted with other shit.
    Spain has to be the once-major-power with the worst set of rulers and politicians historically.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The XIX was an absolute disgrace of a century for us. If only the inbred Bourbon fricks had been forever removed after the frick ups of Fernando VII and his moronic father...

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw Germany won WW1 because the British and French intended to take Berlin but after desperate defense of their they just signed unfavorable peace terms and continued to exist as a sovereign nation

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lithuania

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Russia
    Russia
    Russia
    And Russia

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The US has not won a war since they fought Mexico.

    >B-but muh WWI
    Entered at the end when it was already won
    >B-but muh WWII
    Teamwork with UK and USSR. US didn't "win" it, any more than UK "won" or USSR "won"; no country can say they alone won that one.
    >B-but muh Korea
    Drw, and an expensive one
    >B-but we won Vietnam
    Don't embarrash yourself
    >But Granada...
    Do you REALLY want to count that one? OK, be my guest.
    >And what 'bout Iraq? Afghanistan? Iraq again?
    US won battles there, not wars. Failed to attain objectives in the first Gulf war, failed to do so with extreme prejudice in Afghanistan, and made it even worse in Iraq the second time (as did that "to ensure our national security and those of our allies" and managed to turn the area into a stirred hornet's nest that made a security nightmare for Western interests in the area for decades)
    >AH, the war on drugs, tha tone we won!
    Nope. STill full of people so high as a kite as to the point of climing Eartgh is flat.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You forgot about Spain.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      man you are one ass-blasted mongoloid
      Can't debate with your tard logic
      Gold medal level mental gymnastics
      10/10 bait

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      WW1 -- The St. Michel offensive was seriously fricking the Entente, the French were already suffering Army-wide mutinies, and Germ troops were now free to focus entirely on one front. The issue was very much in doubt before the US entered the war.
      WW2-- If you remove the UK or USSR from the equation, the USA still wins WW2. Can't say the same for the reverse situation if the USA decides to sit that one out.
      Korea-- Met all stated objectives, denied the enemy from achieving *any* of their objectives, and gained new territory for ally in a defensive war. Calling that a draw shows you're either moronic or actively deepthroating Xi as we speak.
      Vietnam-- Not an argument. But if you had made one, US bled the NVA white and forced them to sign the PPA, then left. Three years later, in an entirely different war where the US was not involved, the NVA overran South Vietnam. Calling that a US Loss is like saying Cortez was defeated by Montezuma because at some later point in time Mexico was no longer controlled by Spain. It's moron talk.
      GW1 - Literally all objectives achieved, Kuwait liberated, the RG units destroyed. Ouster of Saddam and invasion of Iraq en-masse was never an objective as was frequently stated. Cope harder.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Agree with most of what you said but
        >the French were already suffering Army-wide mutinies
        Even the largest mutinies only included a few units. It wasn't anywhere near collapse, but it did make command reluctant to launch large offensives.
        >The issue was very much in doubt before the US entered the war.
        Absolutely not. Germany had already lost the war by 1917. You can debate back and forth whether it would have been pursued to such a conclusive end, but to say the outcome of the war was in doubt is nonsense.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >WW1 -- The St. Michel offensive was seriously fricking the Entente, the French were already suffering Army-wide mutinies, and Germ troops were now free to focus entirely on one front. The issue was very much in doubt before the US entered the war.
        Is that what they teach in America? Hilarious. In the real world, however, that's nonsense.
        >If you remove the UK or USSR from the equation, the USA still wins WW2
        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >assblasted demilitarized islamopoor has no response
          thanks

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Really though, thanks for the laughs
            I can always count on an American trying to accurately recount history to be an absolutely hysterical joke

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        WW1 was over before America even joined the war. Germany's supply lines were broken, and the Allies were starting to field tanks and apply combined arms. The only contribution America really made was a faster end to the whole affair.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Tanks were fielded since 1916 and had negligible impact.
          What really defeated Germany was treachery from within.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >but muh WWII
      >completely forgets the pacific theatre

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    China by such a massive margin it's not even a question. The opium wars alone are so spectacularly embarrassing it's no wonder they call it the century of humiliation. Outnumbering your opponent by orders of magnitude every single time and yet rarely inflicting even double digit casualties. It's impressive that they managed to frick every single battle so thoroughly.

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mexico has to be up there. From the Conquistadors to the Mexican American war was pretty much one national humiliation after another. Their professional army beaten by a much smaller force volunteer farmers in Texas is probably the low point, especially their best general getting caught disguised in a Private's uniform attempting to flee.

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mexico, although winning a guerilla war against France is something at least

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    syria
    >fricked by brits
    >fricked by isreal 5x
    >fricked by egypt
    >fricked by turkey
    >fricked by isis
    >fricked by fsa
    and that is only the last 80 years

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Which nation has the most disgraceful military history?
    Russia

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Arabs

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Definitely France.

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Israel
    >btfo by the Phoenicians
    >btfo by the Egyptians
    >btfo by the Babylonians
    >btfo by the Greeks
    >btfo by the Romans
    >btfo by the Vandals
    >btfo by the Visigoths
    >btfo by the Byzantines
    >btfo by the Almohads
    >btfo by the Latins
    >btfo by the Spanish
    >btfo by the Ukrainians
    >btfo by the Russians
    >btfo by the Germans
    >btfo by the Polish
    >btfo by the Ukrainians again

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    sicilian woman

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's gotta be Russia, China, or India
    just perennial lolwuts

  58. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Current Russians. All the rape of the Monguls, without any of the competence or courage. only good for shooting security guards in the back.

  59. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Japan

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *