which nation has the best regular infantry? what makes a good infrantist these days? what do you think?

which nation has the best regular infantry?
what makes a good infrantist these days?

what do you think?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    omae wa mou shindeiru

    NANI?
    >bullet between the eyes
    >explodes

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think we should brace for a thread full of bullshit.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Something something vatnik something something

      https://i.imgur.com/PT7CmE3.jpg

      which nation has the best regular infantry?
      what makes a good infrantist these days?

      what do you think?

      The answer is the US of A and any American who claims otherwise is a filthy traitor.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >which nation has the best regular infantry?
        the UK

        retard mutt

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >UK
          Your shit hole hasn't been relevant since WW1.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm an American. UK infantry are commonly regarded as better-trained than their American counterparts.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              except that they lack the gumption and pluck of american troops

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                One of the most fake things in show based on plagiarists hacks book. Everything in that episode of Band of Brothers is essentially fiction. There were no Tigers, just a platoon of PzIV's and platoon of JgPzIV's. Brits lost a single Sherman as catastrophic loss, another as mobility kill and third as operational loss after its turret jammed when it took non penetrating hit. There was absolutely no close combat, mostly infantry machine gun and snipers and tanks exchanging fire at long range. Regular riflemen mostly just firing in general direction of enemy. Bongs lost 3 KIA and 3 WIA. Americans lost 4 or so KIA and couple dozen wounded. Krauts lost 3 three tanks, but that is because if you retreat, mobility kills become total losses. Oh, British tank company commander alone probably had spent more time in combat on front lines than entire Easy company.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Oh, British tank company commander alone probably had spent more time in combat on front lines than entire Easy company.
                and he still managed to fuck up royally. says a lot about the british ability to adapt.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >and he still managed to fuck up royally. says a lot about the british ability to adapt.
                He didn't fuck up in anyway. Most of the episode is pure fucking fiction. Fun thing here is that it is all due to how Stephen Ambrose was utter fuckup of a historian, preferring oral history as told by already bit demented about 80 year old veterans over archive sources. You know, all after action reports are consistent over what really went on there. American, British and German. All those say whatever went on Nuenen was quite different from what the hell happened in book and even more so the tv-version.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                hated how they all act like they love each other and are good people

                also hated how they shit all over sobel, dick is a pice of shit. Sobel went on to fight in korea and ended up with a higher rank then dick

                dick was just a bully

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                But he e didn't get the higher rank until after the war, whilst serving in the National Guard?
                And it'snot like a higher rank is indicative of better quality?
                What axe you got to grind against Winter? Genuinely curious

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                British troops STILL do bayonet charges if the chips are down. Call that some fucking gumption.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Last bayonet charge was in 2005 at the battle for Danny Boy,a British location in Iraq.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                gayonet charge

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Obviously,you were there,in the thick of it.
                Thought not.
                Ignorant cunt.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >bants being this lazy
                age and location checks out

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                nobody gives a shit about "bants" outside of the pedoph-isles you dumb foggot.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Ah, the old "you're not kicking my ass hard enough" defense. I hope it works out for you.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              doesn't matter when they have to stop for tea every hour.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              So you're a filthy traitor, got it. Move to the UK if you love them so much, homo.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sure they're irrelevant, but that's because of their lack of infantry quantity. They may well have higher quality infantry.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          france probably has better infantry than the uk

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            France has an awful officer corps who have the Russian "mission is sacred" mindset with no flexibility, so it severely diminishes their infantry capability.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Implessive

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I vaguely remember the actual scene of this video. It was something about that soldier’s gun being defective, the soldier’s justification was that only he knows how to work with that defection and that if any enemy picks up that rifle, they wouldn’t be able to use it well. Then he goes on to prove to that general he knows how to shoot his specially gimped gun.
      Really retarded.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So the moral of the story is that having defective equipment is actually good and builds discipline? Definitely seems like a chicom parable.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Lol the repeated cuts to the one pla soldier who can't suppress the grin makes me cackle like a warlock every time

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I vaguely remember the actual scene of this video. It was something about that soldier’s gun being defective, the soldier’s justification was that only he knows how to work with that defection and that if any enemy picks up that rifle, they wouldn’t be able to use it well. Then he goes on to prove to that general he knows how to shoot his specially gimped gun.
      Really retarded.

      >the Left can't mem
      There was some Commie narrative in there about how their weapons don't work right, if my survey of the USSR's history is any indication which it is.

      Of course the 'Peasant Hero makes Good' is there with bright young girl ready to spready her supple thighs for the King of Sniper.

      But literally Commies can't meme because they have to explain the contents of their 'Zines to you in excruciating detail while they flog themselves for racial injustice.

      Commies are all the same and require extermination, preferably with the neutrons.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        what the FUCK are you talking about

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus Chris i fucking laughed. Especially because of that video recently showing the PLA weapon keyholing at room clear ranges.

      >yes I know it was the projectile bouncing

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      To make matters worse it's all this for a fucking 400m target, sheesh

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >which nation has the best regular infantry?
    pound for pound? like highest quality independent of finances? pains me to say but probably Israel.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      retard

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Cope

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Conscripts
      No. Murdering Palestinians isn't a sign of skill.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        True
        They make it too easy

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Murdering Palestinians
        its more like pest removal

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      kek you got them wound up with that one Solomon.

      I agree, # for #, it's the IDF, they get the most done and demonstrably done so several times in a row. IDF's problem is they're so successful, they have to stop gnomish religious fanatics as taking as a sign to move to the West Bank.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      israel's ground forces are garbage: https://web.archive.org/web/20090326212531/http://www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/download/csipubs/matthewsOP26.pdf

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    probably some country with a lot of mountains or other terrain that means infantry has to do the heavy lifting

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    OP this is going to sound insane but just read. It's me.
    Not a professional army, me.

    I'm so fucking powerful. Just pray my handlers don't send me your way...

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    probably a small country with a selective military and small army, maybe like Australia or Japan?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Australia head and shoulders above the UK who do the coalition minimum. They are like the Czechs, they were there but weren't involved anywhere near as much as the Australians. Just from the sheer amount of conflicts they have co operated in.
      Somalia. Elands River. Bersheeba. Out of the 60k troops they sent to Vietnam, they lost 500 total.Massive KDR and an excellent special forces mode. After Long Tan the viets never ever attacked them in op areas ever again. They were in Korea like the Canadians. Were in Greece. Egypt. Indonesia, Papua in the 40s 60s and 80s and 90s depending. They have sub 50 deaths for the whole war on terror. That's some serious numbers fixing. They also have one of the few reserve corps that also has a Commando regiment. They have hyper hostile neighbours. They were also the outright first upfront to jump into the forever war. They did well in Malaya. They had troops training the Chinesecommunist guerillas in ww2. They've fought everywhere that the US has and more and you can look at the sheer number of warcrimes they get away with as a metric of how often that shit has to happen.
      The dutch are the worst. Because they can fight but will bail on your and run. They're known for it here.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    With absolutely no knowledge at all I'm gonna say Finland.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >nordic militaries

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        More competent than drunk Russians

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Infantry means humans, so Norway is disqualified for not having humans in it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        what a waste each woman there is one less baby making device. Who thought of sending women in it's such a waste of resources

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >ywnb a Russian rapefugee getting these cuties applying electrodes to your balls

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Rape bait for Russians

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >which nation has the best regular infantry?
    Brits
    >what makes a good infrantist these days?
    Being a good infanteer in the modern battlespace involves being able to seize and hold ground quickly, and being able to back up your seizure with a variety of support elements like engineers/arty/air support/armour. And doing so quickly.

  10. 1 month ago
    Sage

    oh look another attempt at chink propaganda. Go die in a workplace accident chang

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    General infantry? The UK. Infantry have comparable resources (on a global scale) to US, with higher entry requirements, better training ,and significantly better discipline. All the good traits of general line infantry.

    Australian infantry train from the same manuals and have slightly worse gear, but do have the advantages of higher entry requirements. They're not very disciplined but have much better sense of initiative. On the squad level that makes them better, at the division or battalion level UK troops are better because at that point doing what you're told specifically is more useful.

    The US could have the best infantry if they put their mind to it, but they use the army as part a social welfare program so entry standards need to be low compared to other Western countries. Better basic and better fancy toys than others. If they upped the standards and the wages to suit, and accepted a drastically smaller army, they could walk home with it.

    Some of the Nordic countries I suspect are good, but it's hard to know given their lack of many deployments. France is okay but the quality of units varies widely - the ones who've been on prolonged African deployments have gotten quite good, but the ones at home aren't much to speak of.

    If I was being a smartarse I'd say the Vatican because the Swiss Guard, when not on parade and ceremonial duties, can still technically be deployed as a small infantry formation, and are very fucking good. But they do cheat because they don't have to create the baseline infantry to pull their forces from, unlike every other country.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      any country that has women in infantry is disqualified

      >If I was being a smartarse I'd say the Vatican because the Swiss Guard, when not on parade and ceremonial duties, can still technically be deployed as a small infantry formation
      true
      >are very fucking good
      citation needed, they look like a bunch of scrawny soibois, idk how elite they actually are.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The Pope is the second-most desirable target for assassination in the world behind any given US president, maybe first. With a fraction of the intelligence resources of the US and a fraction of the numbers of the Secret Service they are protecting someone who makes regular public appearances in full sight, while being significantly less visible. And it has been a long time since the last visible attempt to assassinate the Pope. They're very good at what they do.

        Also it'll never come up in practise, but they do know how to use those halberds. I was very much for someone to try and make a play in the Vatican in sight of the ceremonial guard and get absolutely fucking Swissed by a halberd.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Literally nobody cares about the pope in the same way nobody has done a shooting/stabbing in the al aqsa mosque, the only people doing asssasinations these days are schizos

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            media labels them as schizose sama because they doesnt want create sympathy

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            But Al Aqsa was the site of a bombing and other violence which kicked off an intifada in the 90s if I recall. The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade was the raghead response to violence at that famous mosque. I don’t know about assassinations but all I’m saying is Al Aqsa has seen violence much more recently than VC

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, the Swiss are professionals and they mean business, I don't even like the Pope but you wouldn't catch me trying to assassinate him.

          AFAIK Vatican City isn't an obliged signatory to any Human Rights conventions. They were there but I don't think they're legally bound by Geneva.

          So I think the Swiss will use those halberds and whatnot to do mean things to you, and nobody can do anything about it except by delcaring war on the Catholic Church and occupying Vatican City.

          Come to think of it, I want to see all of this happen, we need another Condotierri era.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The Pope is the second-most desirable target for assassination in the world behind any given US president, maybe first. With a fraction of the intelligence resources of the US and a fraction of the numbers of the Secret Service they are protecting someone who makes regular public appearances in full sight, while being significantly less visible. And it has been a long time since the last visible attempt to assassinate the Pope. They're very good at what they do.

        Also it'll never come up in practise, but they do know how to use those halberds. I was very much for someone to try and make a play in the Vatican in sight of the ceremonial guard and get absolutely fucking Swissed by a halberd.

        Meh, the Swiss haven't fought a war in living memory, and all the gayer parts of the Geneva Conventions reflect that. I'm not convinced they wouldn't crack under the pressure of a sustained bombardment like a bunch of ironclad eggs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >better basic
      >up the standards
      what are you talking about, lol? all infantry go through infantry schooling on top of basic and the standards have gone up not down. they extended both army and marines training by a couple weeks more.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      in France, the unit that don't go in deployment are usually trash tier : filled with thuggish immigrants, with the MP having to go maintain order everyday. those regiment solely exist so that the army can say : "yeah, we have X number of regiment". in reality, those guys have no chance to go in operation because everyone knows the fucking embarrassment it would be (both in terms of performance and images)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There are... Almost no things that are true in this post...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I've heard of American infantry getting jealous of Australian standard issue and comparing them to special forces kit. You sure on the worse gear thing?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The UK. Infantry have comparable resources (on a global scale) to US,
      Untrue. The US has so much more to play with at every scale.
      >with higher entry requirements,
      Untrue. Aptitude and physical requirements are almost identical.
      >better training ,
      Mostly true. US basic and AIT are inferior to Commonwealth equivalents in all reapects.
      >and significantly better discipline.
      Untestable. Probably untrue.
      >All the good traits of general line infantry.
      You don't know what the traits of good line infantry are. Haven't even addressed physical fitness, esprit de corps, unit cohesion or morale. Pathetic.
      >Australian infantry train from the same manuals
      Completely untrue .
      >and have slightly worse gear,
      Completely untrue.
      >but do have the advantages of higher entry requirements.
      Only physical/medical requirements, but most infantrymen will acquire niggling injuries before their first deployment anyway.
      >They're not very disciplined
      Untrue. Are you just basing this off 1940s stereotypes?
      >but have much better sense of initiative.
      As above.
      >On the squad level that makes them better, at the division or battalion level UK troops are better because at that point doing what you're told specifically is more useful.
      None of those things are true, and you also missed three levels of command, including the ones that both armies primarily train to deploy. Your opinions are ignorant, retarded and irrelevant.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Poland
    >inb4 a*glo seethe

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    About 20 years ago, I'd say any US light infantry unit, for both technology and capability. Now, I think the US only has the best technology.
    Just compare the USMC during the Invasion of Iraq to the modern USMC.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      how has the usmc changed since the invasion of iraq to now?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        A lot of combat veterans were denied reenlistment due to previous NJPs/tattoos that once weren't a problem. Culturally, the Marine Corps changed a lot as well. Greater emphasis on promoting Marines that are perfect on paper over combat efficiency, higher command panic over hazing made keeping sloppy new guys in line a gamble, integration of women into combat roles/the Corps/frankly the military has been more of a detriment than an improvement.
        The Marine Corps will promote and retain people who treat it as more of a gym membership and portfolio building center than a lethal expeditionary force.
        Also, combined arms and the MAGTF made 03s deadly, that being 03s with 08s, 18s, etc. With drawbacks in numbers and entire units in those fields, the USMC is seeking to be more closely integrated with Navy ships. This can severely limit how self sustaining the MAGTF can be.
        I'm rambling and I generally type like a retard as is.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >which nation has the best....
    United States. Infantry? US. Aircraft? US. Logistics? US. Navy? US. Literally everything militarily goes to the US. Fuck off changs, slavmorons and eurofags, no ones interested in your busch light tier equipment

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I’m sure someone will be skeptical but I promise I know what I’m talking about.

    The United States. And anyone saying otherwise is either an edgy cunt or a teenager. Neither of which know what the fuck they’re talking about.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Whatever.
      All as good as the other,including those of exceptional infanteering skills.
      Jog on.
      Applaud yourself,with typical inbred arrogance.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If the bullets fall, do they get caned?

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    any answer other than the US is wrong
    not that the US is perfect, in the sense that perfection is never attainable

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    She doesn't even have a sight picture.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The first time I got issued the Austeyr, the front grip fell off instantly and I had to fix it. The second time, someone had got into the armoury and stolen all of the bolts off the scopes and it took three days to get in replacements.

    The theoretical issue gear for the Australian army is decent stuff, and I might have been impressed if I ever saw someone who had all of it at once.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Mate we get issued dual tube PVS31As, Team Wendy ballistics, Elcan Specter optics, and a more scalable plate carrier than Americans get, we literally have hands down the best gear in the whole world at the individual soldier level and no other Army even comes close. A cook in the ADF is indistinguishable from a SASR trooper

    Well this is an image board i came for pics

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >admitting to being a 4chanfag
      God that man should be shot.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Elcan Specter is a pig. Would rather use a red dot.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    German has solid police force style tactics. Anti-terror units.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >which nation has the best regular infantry?
    UK or Australia

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ya probably this. They have had many generations to refine their training and doctoring, and it really shows in their performance

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is Jackie Trans over here stacking bullets on his keyhole cannon?

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >what makes a good infrantist these days?
    whoever has the best airforce

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i want a QBU-88 so fuckin bad bros i dont care if its actually dogshit

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    People keep saying UK or Australia etc. but really isn't it just the US? US infantry are better supplied, better paid, better supported in the field etc. A US infantry section in the field generally has more assets and resources at their disposal than any other equivalent group.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That basically,comes down to finance.
      Not infanteering skill.
      There’s a huge difference between the two.
      Yep,over the years,worked with US Forces,across the board.
      Still have the same opinion.
      As they (US Forces) had themselves.
      Whatever.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >cooks get personal modded m4s with all the attachments and not a random beat up steyr they only touch every few months

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Definitively not any from the anglosphere.
    Was on exercise with some of them in northern scandi a couple of years ago and they were nearly useless. Don't know if it was because of unfamiliar terrain, climate or whatever but they didn't impress me much.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If we're talking one to one infantry with no additional support, I'd say Croatia.
    First off, while lacking in heavy weapons and strategic assets, Croatian infantry equipment is actually high quality. In case of war it'd be interesting to see what will be pulled out of stock though, but there are plans to dump all stockpiles of old yugo equipment to Ukraine and replace it with modern equipment. There is also the issue of optics, as there aren't many images of troops issued with one, but it could be that they just aren't issued in trainings and photo ops, or it could point to a lack of optics.
    Second, defense doctrine is rather interesting. In case of war, doctrine dictates that professional military would take on the role of squad leaders and have conscripts attached to them. It also gives high autonomy to squad leaders. Because of this, most of the professional army has extensive leadership training. This doctrine has already paid dividends, as it was used in latter part of the Croatian war with massive success.
    Third is that it still has war experience. Parts of command and training staff has seen conflict and combined with previous training in leadership, means that it has taken root in current generations of troops. Would it persist after the old timers kick the bucket is hard to tell, but currently it's still there.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If we're talking one to one infantry with no additional support, I'd say, I'd say Congolese.
    First off the Congo is poor as fuck so individual soldiers have shit gear, but they make up for it in initiative and cunning.
    Second, defense doctrine is rather interesting. Congolese squad leaders can do whatever they want, whenever they want, up to and including burning villages, raping, and chopping off limbs of villagers.
    Third is that it still has war experience. Many old timers have still have multiple war brides from old conflicts and this desire for jungle pussy has taken root in current generations of troops. Would it persist after the old timers kick the bucket is hard to tell, but currently it's still there.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >They don't have equipment, but somehow the best

      If we're talking one to one infantry with no additional support, I'd say Croatia.
      First off, while lacking in heavy weapons and strategic assets, Croatian infantry equipment is actually high quality. In case of war it'd be interesting to see what will be pulled out of stock though, but there are plans to dump all stockpiles of old yugo equipment to Ukraine and replace it with modern equipment. There is also the issue of optics, as there aren't many images of troops issued with one, but it could be that they just aren't issued in trainings and photo ops, or it could point to a lack of optics.
      Second, defense doctrine is rather interesting. In case of war, doctrine dictates that professional military would take on the role of squad leaders and have conscripts attached to them. It also gives high autonomy to squad leaders. Because of this, most of the professional army has extensive leadership training. This doctrine has already paid dividends, as it was used in latter part of the Croatian war with massive success.
      Third is that it still has war experience. Parts of command and training staff has seen conflict and combined with previous training in leadership, means that it has taken root in current generations of troops. Would it persist after the old timers kick the bucket is hard to tell, but currently it's still there.

      >They don't have ammo, NVGs or heavy weapons but somehow the best

      How can you make the CSGO argument for Infantry effectiveness when we can't even be sure they have a supply of grenades? Much less a squad, platoon or company engagement where organic mortars and heavy weapons are necessary force multipliers? There is no such thing as infantry without support, unless you're Russian and then that's the only kind you have.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        And this goes before we consider a mechanized infantry company with IFVs. And companies execute tasks, a battalion or brigade execute missions with 600 or 3000 men all with equipment and vehicles and needs of ammo, fuel, food and other supplies.

        CSGO, Valorant or squads Fortnite is not what regular infantry do.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    93 posts and people can't accept that the US Infantry, the best trained and best equipped and best supported infantry is the best infantry.

    A lot of help all that manly advertising did for Russia. BTW unsupported and unsupplied infantry die no matter how good an individual or squad is. Even NATO allies are poor at logistics. See paradise, put up a FOB.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Unfortunately, we have a teaboo infestation

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >which nation has the best regular infantry?
    Whatever nation I like the most

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    FFL
    Legion

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What about that one country that sent soldiers to be UN peacekeepers who were meant to be absolute cucks and do nothing but instead shot everything they deemed a threat to peace? Shootbat I think it was called, it came from a cold war era survive and resist at all costs doctrine vs Soviet invasion. Basically soldiers would prioritize the mission and only the mission from officers down to grunts, they could act independently even if the chain of command was destroyed, and they ghosted the seething politicians and UN generals telling them to surrender or not engage in combat. This unit ended up with an incredible combat record but also did really well.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nvm found it
      https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2017/9/20/trigger-happy-autonomous-and-disobedient-nordbat-2-and-mission-command-in-bosnia

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        based eternally uncucked swedes

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          heh

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *