which do you prefer?

which do you prefer?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Personally I default to weaver but recently I've taken to practicing firing one handed on both sides

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver just feels funny to me

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't take any stance that makes me look like I'm shitting my pants while also making me a bigger target.

      Your mom's pussy feels funny to me too

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer Isosceles because it keeps the knees bent and your size is smaller. Good to keep moving and to not get shot by obviously being a tinier target

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver:
    >Comfortable
    >legs positioned naturally to move forward or backward easily
    >Looks tacticool

    Isosceles:
    >uncomfortable
    >awkward if you need to walk forward or backward
    >Looks like you're trying to take a shit

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Please tell me this isn't a typical American physique.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        No it isn't, she's too skinny

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >t. architect

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Uh that’s the best physique for a woman.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Uh that’s the best physique for a woman.

          Please tell me this isn't a typical American physique.

          >American physique.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Dobson please

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        no they're usually fatter
        these are your tacticool freedumb fighters

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >nearly 50% Mexican by 2030
          >most obese country on earth
          Dumbass.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            who are you quoting
            hispanics are only 4 percent (45.6%) more obese than non-hispanic whites (41.4%)
            they also aren't anywhere near 50% of the population
            america isn't the most obese country on earth
            you are silly and also probably obese

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pistols should be used one handed.
    Around cover one handed stance has much less presented area and much less tension to lean out and shoot.
    In the open one hand stance allows to move perpendicularly to the firing line and shoot back.
    Two hand is for shooting at unarmed targets
    One hand is for two way range.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Pistols should be used one handed.
      In that case, what would be the optimal one handed shooting stance/technique? I have tried point shooting and a few other methods of one handed shooting, but I am not as good as two handed.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >what would be the optimal one handed shooting stance/technique?
        whatever the situation requires. learn to shoot with left, right, and both hands, standing, kneeling, moving. It also depends on caliber, recoil of the gun, arm/hand strength, experience and situation (emergency home defense, friendly competition, serious competition, should you really use/need a rifle instead of a pistol?). You are supposed to analyze your situation, chose the proper gun, ammo, and practice so you are ready for your anticipated situation(s).

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Pistols should be used one handed
      >hits nothing beyond ten yards

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >hit
        NTA but unless the sights or crown are fricked it’s a trivial matter to hit at 25m
        Getting a good group one hand is hard but I’m working on it

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver, the isosceles is too awkward and unbalanced for me

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frick that shit, give me the old side-stance (a.k.a. duelist stance).

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    weaver is gay, simple as

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Chadman stance

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      bottom right guy doesn't look too isosceles. rather obtuse if you ask me.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Guy on the top right might have actually killed a man but I can't quite remember

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Center axis relock

      Realistically you probably ought not be engaging targets at 50+ yards with a handgun

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Eastern front memoir where a penal battalion CO’s STV jams so he pulls out a his gun and downs a guy 100m away

        Also Hickok‘s gongs are 100m
        So 100m is what a pro can do with an accurate

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver for handguns.
    Isosceles for long guns.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Iso aggrevates my sciolosis so I shoot wraver, but I don't really think one is better than the other.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer patented secret pretzel one and a half hand stance
    >Left hand goes under left hand and grabs right shoulder
    >Right hand elbow locks the joint while lying on left hands elbow
    It all biomechnically locks your arms into rigid structure, looks weird but allows for acuracy similar to shooting from bench
    Only theoretical downside is that you have to aim using your entire upper body since its very rigid (like these cheat shooting jackets wrn by olympic shooters) , and it does not allow for flashy tacticool moves or even rapid reloading.
    But for precision shooting its great.
    I am dead serious, try it out.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Left hand goes under left hand
      t. octopus

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >pic
      the perfect way to shoot a rifle.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    whatever stance gets the muzzle towards the threat the fastest, idgaf if I look like a clown or not, game of milliseconds

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    One hand power point with max blading and Chapman if two are needed

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver feels natural to me. I tried to do isosceles for years because I drank the Koolaid but I can't tell any appreciable difference in accuracy or speed with it.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    the only reason Weaver didn't do isosceles, according to the guy himself, is that his shoulders were fricked up and thats as far as he could hold the gun out. The semi-bladed stance was because one shoulder was worse than the other and couldn't extend as far.

    It's like moto gp guys doing the leg dangle for no other reason than Rossi did it. You guys are just repeating bullshit without actually doing any thinking.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair, "Rossi does it" is a pretty valid argument.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >which do you prefer?
    I only shoot handguns single handed, even 44Mags. Sorry not sorry. Learn to shoot.

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver feels more natural because of the staggered stance, but the squared stance of iso has obvious benefits if you're using body armor

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    i square up with my enemy like a man. i don't feel the need to angle my body like an absolute pussy.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    lads, where the frick is my god damn pumpkin puree. i want to get this pumpkin bread in the oven before making this pizza and the baking steel needs to warm up for at least an hour. hurry the frick up

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the loafs are in the oven. 40 minutes to go.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver is the only correct answer

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    weaver for me

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have shot weaver for years and immediately improved my ability to fire accurate shots quickly by trying isoceles. I don't care what I look like if I can make fast, accurate hits.

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine training to use some stiff ass, unnatural stance that has zero applications outside of a flat range

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, very nice. Now let's see a target more than 5 yards away

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        its used for tight areas or crowds where you can't stretch out and the distance to targets is close. Unironically, the John Wick club scene shows it well as he pushes out to an isosceles stance where he can.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >If the bad guy isn't going to punch me in the face, then my stance ensures the slide will. Chicks love scars but hate dead guys, so make sure you visibly injure yourself but not enough to die.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    how do they look?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      60% RDX just like the French Resistance, I presume?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >60% RDX just like the French Resistance, I presume?
        and 40% betrayal, just like the French Resistance

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    weaver, but im also kidnda weird I guess since I keep my offhand arm slightly more rigid than my shooting hand arm.
    The curse of the lefty who cant shoot for shit lefty I guess

  27. 11 months ago
    Ulysses

    Try to transition between two targets more than 60° apart and you'll instantly understand why weaver sucks ass.

    Mobility issues are solved by bent knees, and a "larger target" is solved by armor or cover. If you wanna be fast and accurate, shoot ISO

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why the frick are you morons under the impression you can’t bend your knees while shooting weaver? You’re feet are basically in the same position as a boxers and you’d never have a moron saying they’re not mobile enough.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        the part thats stupid about weaver is locking your arm

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pulling your shoulders tight holds your arms steady but it doesn’t lock them.

          See: https://youtu.be/lCRE3QeHZgc

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            ok cool. paul is a decent shot but all of his training is just 80s army training. everything he teaches is just basic rifleman shit.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Not an argument

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's okay, you lost

                Paul is a stupid old fricking homosexual boomer from Washington/Oregon that allowed leftists to pass AWB bills and other stuff because he avoids politics. News flash, they're coming for you, for all of us. Use the same tactics these other people do, get the ADA involved and other orgs. People like to shit on channels like MrGnG but at least he makes it a point to support the 2A.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Autistic post, anon!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                thanks now they think im you

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It's okay, you lost

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver / chapman, no question
    >doesn't leave anus for the taking
    >doesn't give attacker literally the largest surface area to shoot at (granted, by a small margin)
    >potential need to move us taken into acount, resembles someone mid-run and is this more natural to transition in and out of

    • 11 months ago
      Ulysses

      >weaver is better for moving
      >competition shooting champions, the people who are most strongly incentivized to shoot and move as fast as possible, use iso

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Find weaver more natural
    >Shoot better with isoceles
    I'm still trying to figure out why. Maybe I'm letting my form be sloppy in weaver, but because I find isoscles less natural I'm more deliberate about proper stance.

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver, because I don't wear plated as a civvy/hunter.
    >inb4 center of gravity/locking out/some other hocus pocus
    I'm a human and weaver, as with most bladed or semi bladed stances, is much more natural.

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I leave it to Weaver
    >profession: weaver
    >favorite bird: weaver
    >favorite rail: weaver
    >favorite stance: weaver
    >favorite scope: weaver
    >sons name: weaver
    >favorite celeb: sigourney weaver
    >favorite foundation: weaver foundation
    >favorite city: weaver alabama
    >E V E R Y T H I N G I S W E A V E R

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isosceles is so fricking awkward and unathletic feeling.

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Blade. Fight like your forefathers.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      point right foot in direction of gun, and lean head slightly forward, and that's how I shoot.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          ...
          >that pic.
          I guess I'm in the wrong time period. I use a 1911 as well.
          Have an Air Jeep with a recoilless cannon that the us denied ever mounting on it.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            And they say perfection is impossible.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/nxbsNpp.jpg

      >bullseye shooting stance with a semi-auto pistol

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/nxbsNpp.jpg

      >gets shot through the side
      >rips through multiple organs
      >dies
      We have this thing now called body armor gramps.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        And you wear body armor in your everyday life I take it? Most people here are going to benefit from presenting as little target as possible.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not rocking side plates at the mall, fren.

  35. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    its fine but iso is better. if you disagree you're a neo-fudd who doesn't shoot.

  36. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isoscringe is fricking moronic. Where compare the two and ask yourself which one looks like an atheletic stance and which one looks like you’re squatting to take a shit.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
  37. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >without armor and accuracy
    Weaver.
    >armor and speed
    Iso.

  38. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Duelling stance chads rise up

  39. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've shot more rifles than i have shot pistols, but whenever i had a pistol i naturally gravitate to weaver.

  40. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Weaver just feels right.
    I have to consciously force myself to stand any other way. Not worth the effort.

  41. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Left shoulder is fricked and I can't get my left arm up enough for isoceles so Weaver it is.

  42. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >In ten years nobody will remember the details of caliber, stance, or tactics. They will only remember who lived and who didn’t.

    But for me, isosceles just feels too stiff and inorganic. Weaver is just the shape my body flows into when aiming and it feels right.

  43. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine thinking anything other than the squat shot is the correct way to shoot.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I dropshot, it's easier than pressing squat for me.

  44. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Every weapon has a kickback.

    Even a child knows isosceles user would basically be knocked to their asses. Only thing preventing not doing so, is the stupid lean forwards but they still do the rocking motion. Literal woman stance.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *