Whew, that congress meeting sure was something.

Whew, that congress meeting sure was something. Can’t wait to see these bad boys do some damage within the next two years.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They affirmed their goal of PEACEFUL reunification.
    Unless we manufacture a crisis, there won’t be a war. And that’s a good thing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That’s a bad thing

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If you’re actually old enough to post here, do us all a favor and suck start a shotgun.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      and of course, the Chinese government would never lie

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        policy and posture must be stated well beforehand. This is the norm. The Chinese have always abided by this.
        You're too dumb to broach this topic. Shut your mouth.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          do you actually get reprimanded by the supervisor when outed as a wumao too often? sorry then.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            which part of my post is wrong?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Chinks lie. They're basically little yellow Russians when it comes to telling the truth
          The fact that they say they want peaceful reunification has no bearing on their actual plans for Taiwan
          Since peaceful reunification with mainland china is completely impossible so long as it remains an authoritarian state, a military attack on the island is inevitable and will likely occur in the next 5 years (once old m8 xingers starts feeling his age)

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%27s_final_warning

          Lol
          Lmao even

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > They affirmed their goal of PEACEFUL reunification.

      Implessive

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Didn't they literally say they'd NEVER swear off use of force for reunification? What sort of chink propaganda you listening to?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you have to read in between the lines when the chinks say anything
        "we will never swear that we will never use force" sounds a lot like "we're not going to grovel to the us in the face of their overwhelming military superiority but we're not suicidal either"

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Bigger than Raptor with less internal weaponry, crappy engines, and they have less of them than we have F-35s for training.
    Why do I care? It's nothing.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm no expert, but wouldn't canards comprise stealth?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not if it didn't have stealth to begin with. They can market it as stealth, but this choice of canards proves it's never really going to be, China most modern full blue prints they have stole is gripen or eurofighter, so it's going with proving it can manufacture those first, and just incorporate a few the simple features of American stealth

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

      Not if it didn't have stealth to begin with. They can market it as stealth, but this choice of canards proves it's never really going to be, China most modern full blue prints they have stole is gripen or eurofighter, so it's going with proving it can manufacture those first, and just incorporate a few the simple features of American stealth

      dumbasses.
      None of you fricks even have a clue on EM diffraction.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No u.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not an argument, better luck next time kiddo.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what do you think effects radar signature? do you think the 1st order variable is orthogonal cross section area?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not on the J20 design.
      Anyone who say canards = non-stealth can be dismissed as ignorant moron or a liar

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ding ding ding.
        we got a winner.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        ding ding ding.
        we got a winner.

        >They're ignoring me, I gotta bump the thread again.
        moron

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >not even carrier capable, much less VTOL
    have fun sitting in an airbase while we destroy your fleet

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Does China actually have anything carrier capable that was designed in the last thirty years?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Their domestic version of the Su-27, the Chinese family of Flankers are probably better than the original line at this point.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't their f35 knockoff supposed to be carrier launched?

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Heaven will destroy the Chinese Communist Party

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder a 20,000 styrofoam RC plane can do everything the F30-shitter could ever dream of doing

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's a platform for long range AAM's to snipe US bombers, AWACs, tankers, and maybe an F15 if pilot is asleep at the controls. Basically a modern version of the Tomcat + Phoenix missile concept. It's probably as stealthy as it needs to be so it isn't detected and shot down at a distance.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *