policy and posture must be stated well beforehand. This is the norm. The Chinese have always abided by this.
You're too dumb to broach this topic. Shut your mouth.
Chinks lie. They're basically little yellow Russians when it comes to telling the truth
The fact that they say they want peaceful reunification has no bearing on their actual plans for Taiwan
Since peaceful reunification with mainland china is completely impossible so long as it remains an authoritarian state, a military attack on the island is inevitable and will likely occur in the next 5 years (once old m8 xingers starts feeling his age)
you have to read in between the lines when the chinks say anything
"we will never swear that we will never use force" sounds a lot like "we're not going to grovel to the us in the face of their overwhelming military superiority but we're not suicidal either"
>Bigger than Raptor with less internal weaponry, crappy engines, and they have less of them than we have F-35s for training.
Why do I care? It's nothing.
Not if it didn't have stealth to begin with. They can market it as stealth, but this choice of canards proves it's never really going to be, China most modern full blue prints they have stole is gripen or eurofighter, so it's going with proving it can manufacture those first, and just incorporate a few the simple features of American stealth
Not if it didn't have stealth to begin with. They can market it as stealth, but this choice of canards proves it's never really going to be, China most modern full blue prints they have stole is gripen or eurofighter, so it's going with proving it can manufacture those first, and just incorporate a few the simple features of American stealth
dumbasses.
None of you fricks even have a clue on EM diffraction.
It's a platform for long range AAM's to snipe US bombers, AWACs, tankers, and maybe an F15 if pilot is asleep at the controls. Basically a modern version of the Tomcat + Phoenix missile concept. It's probably as stealthy as it needs to be so it isn't detected and shot down at a distance.
They affirmed their goal of PEACEFUL reunification.
Unless we manufacture a crisis, there won’t be a war. And that’s a good thing.
That’s a bad thing
If you’re actually old enough to post here, do us all a favor and suck start a shotgun.
and of course, the Chinese government would never lie
policy and posture must be stated well beforehand. This is the norm. The Chinese have always abided by this.
You're too dumb to broach this topic. Shut your mouth.
do you actually get reprimanded by the supervisor when outed as a wumao too often? sorry then.
which part of my post is wrong?
Chinks lie. They're basically little yellow Russians when it comes to telling the truth
The fact that they say they want peaceful reunification has no bearing on their actual plans for Taiwan
Since peaceful reunification with mainland china is completely impossible so long as it remains an authoritarian state, a military attack on the island is inevitable and will likely occur in the next 5 years (once old m8 xingers starts feeling his age)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%27s_final_warning
Lol
Lmao even
> They affirmed their goal of PEACEFUL reunification.
Implessive
Didn't they literally say they'd NEVER swear off use of force for reunification? What sort of chink propaganda you listening to?
you have to read in between the lines when the chinks say anything
"we will never swear that we will never use force" sounds a lot like "we're not going to grovel to the us in the face of their overwhelming military superiority but we're not suicidal either"
>Bigger than Raptor with less internal weaponry, crappy engines, and they have less of them than we have F-35s for training.
Why do I care? It's nothing.
I'm no expert, but wouldn't canards comprise stealth?
Yes.
Not if it didn't have stealth to begin with. They can market it as stealth, but this choice of canards proves it's never really going to be, China most modern full blue prints they have stole is gripen or eurofighter, so it's going with proving it can manufacture those first, and just incorporate a few the simple features of American stealth
dumbasses.
None of you fricks even have a clue on EM diffraction.
No u.
Not an argument, better luck next time kiddo.
what do you think effects radar signature? do you think the 1st order variable is orthogonal cross section area?
Not on the J20 design.
Anyone who say canards = non-stealth can be dismissed as ignorant moron or a liar
ding ding ding.
we got a winner.
>They're ignoring me, I gotta bump the thread again.
moron
>not even carrier capable, much less VTOL
have fun sitting in an airbase while we destroy your fleet
Does China actually have anything carrier capable that was designed in the last thirty years?
Their domestic version of the Su-27, the Chinese family of Flankers are probably better than the original line at this point.
Isn't their f35 knockoff supposed to be carrier launched?
Heaven will destroy the Chinese Communist Party
Reminder a 20,000 styrofoam RC plane can do everything the F30-shitter could ever dream of doing
It's a platform for long range AAM's to snipe US bombers, AWACs, tankers, and maybe an F15 if pilot is asleep at the controls. Basically a modern version of the Tomcat + Phoenix missile concept. It's probably as stealthy as it needs to be so it isn't detected and shot down at a distance.