Where do you expect the next counterattack to take place?

Where do you expect the next counterattack to take place?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PROBABLY Kreminna? It really all depends on
    >Where are the russians the most disjointed and ineffective
    >Where are the conditions right for a breakthrough
    >Availability of material and weather conditions
    The boring dumb answer is "The next counterattack will take place where it's best able"

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It'll most likely be this, Ukraine's been slowly moving up in that direction, and once they are out of the woods (literally), they're free to both move up north to Svatove, and south to Rubizhe-Severaldonuts. Especially there, if they start making gains past the Donets river and SD, there's a good chance of destroying any attempts at an Bakhmut offensive without charging Russian trenches.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukros has no strength for offensive and can barely keep the line as it is, russian big offensive will probably come from Belgorod and zaporozhye, maybe to the west from belarus, remains to be seen.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They said that shit before the last offensive as well.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ah yes, all those 109 bradleys, tanks, new himars rockets (for clearing out assets over time before a push) and Humvee's are nothing.
      Totally nothing to worry about.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The thing is that they won't arrive for a while, and Goymany refusing to authorize the Leopard 2 aid might realistically seal Ukraine's fate.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >they won't arrive for a while
          You said that about the previous batch of Bradleys. They were in Ukraine less than a week after announcement.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukies are getting the equivalent of a mechanized infantry division in western IFVs/APCs, tanks and artillery

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >melitopol cant happen.
        >the russians have so much shit there to stop it.
        On the other hand if they do charge in and it breaks you might get a repeat of Izium where Russia loses a huge cache of equipment captured or destroyed. They have bodies but they can't really afford to lose the weapons they can't replace.

        It's wild how the two sides seem to have opposite problems. Russia has unending numbers of mobilized men and obsolete equipment where they have equipment at all, while the Ukrainians are being given every military asset under the sun but won't have the bodies or the training time to effectively crew them with their own mobilized men.

        https://i.imgur.com/CkcHiyH.jpg

        The war must be stoped before Putin dies or gets replaced. We know there are some things he hesitates to do, like full mobilisation, or nuclear/chemical attacks. But the next crazy stupid russian tyrant, who knows?
        It’s safer to quickly end this while Putin is in office.

        The Russians did just talk about how a Russian defeat would mean the end of the world. I'd call it boasting but if they lose and the international community begins the century of humiliation (as they've openly said they will), the thought of biting the bullet may win out.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia has unending numbers
          Rasha is light medium weight class at best. Very, very far from unlimited cumscirptoviches

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          russia has lots of equipment still way more than ukraine who's only recently been given token amounts of western equipment and was given just enough to keep it afloat until then

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >century of humiliation
          should be a season of extermination

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            May very well be the plan. Ask yourself; If you were staring down the death of all national prestige, at least a century of emasculated puppet rule, and probably a Kalergi plan 2.0 to top it all off, wouldn't you just nuke it all too?

            https://i.imgur.com/yVvH6Nr.jpg

            >Russia has unending numbers
            Rasha is light medium weight class at best. Very, very far from unlimited cumscirptoviches

            Huh, that put things into perspective. Still, that's almost 5x the Ukrainian population.

            russia has lots of equipment still way more than ukraine who's only recently been given token amounts of western equipment and was given just enough to keep it afloat until then

            I don't know, there's a lot of videos and pictures of Russians being given ancient gear and vehicles to work with. Vehicles without replacement parts, no fuel, no food, a logistical department that zip-ties tourniquets, etc. VS Ukrainian HIMARS

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      there won't be another rout like the ones you've seen, the russians are well entrenched and ukraine lacks the armament and numbers to win decisively. front is for all intense and purposes frozen until things change and as anon here said, as things stand russia seems posed to launch another zerg attack

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ukrainian commander said month ago that they are conserving a lot of western tech for next offensive and West decided to fulfill his request for APCs/IFVs with marders, strykers and bradleys. Also extra >100 western artillery pieces and UK, USA and Pakistan ammo

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Jesus Christ, Moldova is like the size of a single Ukrainian oblast

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a fake country. It was part of Romania until Stalin stole it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Romania is a fake country made up by western imperialists.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Save it for ranting at the liquor store clerk, you fucking subhuman alcoholic vatnik.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah hurr durr

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russia is a fake country, a Frankenstein of dozens different republics.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I dont get it. First time looking at a map?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        american education

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Putin opens another front from the North
    >Ukr counters into Belarus, then to Monkescow

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically blitz the city of Donetsk. It’s the major city of the separatists and like 10 miles behind the front.
    Take those challys, Bradley’s, MRAPs, HIMARS and whatever else and figure it out. It’s basically taking the enemy capital.
    Taking metropol (too lazy to look up spelling) is the other good option. It splits Russian forces and isolates Crimea.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Mariupol would also be symbolically important as they could hoist the blue and yellow over Azovstral again and make Russian miltubers go into vfib

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Mariupol is the most distant captured city that isn't Crimea. It might be one of the last places liberated.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Donetsk require way too much resources. The separatists have had eight years to build defences around the city.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      not a chance ukraine can take donetsk head on
      people like to talk about crimea but the donbas will be the truly hard part to retake

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At this point I expect them to wait until Russia is starting their new mobik offensive. Let Russia commit forces, tie up their reserves, and be horribly out of position, then rip them to shreds on the opposite side of the country.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Trips and they blitz Belgorod.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Rollan

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Rolling

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >PrepHole - MUHRUSSIAMUHUKRAINE
    care so much about slavs killing each other then go join them fucking fag

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    keyviy

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    melitopol cant happen.
    the russians have so much shit there to stop it.
    mariupol is a better option but still too close to the concentration.
    donestk could work too.
    the best option is luhansk, but it also is the least important objective.
    i dont think a kiev attack is coming, those forces are there just to be a army in being to tie down UKR troops in the north while they train. who knows where they will eventually go.
    i think this war has years to go still, both sides are not going to stop.

    the only way this war is short, IMO is if the UKR decides to clash head on with the RUS somewhere between melitopol and mariupol. It would be a fucking blood bath, but it would shorten the war if the UKR won.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >melitopol cant happen.
      >the russians have so much shit there to stop it.
      On the other hand if they do charge in and it breaks you might get a repeat of Izium where Russia loses a huge cache of equipment captured or destroyed. They have bodies but they can't really afford to lose the weapons they can't replace.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If.
        The rus will be expecting it this time.
        there wont be a panic.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >there wont be a panic.

          Nothing panics easier than untrained conscripts.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The war must be stoped before Putin dies or gets replaced. We know there are some things he hesitates to do, like full mobilisation, or nuclear/chemical attacks. But the next crazy stupid russian tyrant, who knows?
      It’s safer to quickly end this while Putin is in office.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Disagree. Putin will use nukes to stay in power. A successor doesn't need to continue the special operation and can withdraw freely

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't see anybody crazier than Putin who can replace him. Russian oligarchs' first concern is money, so his successor will most likely end the war or at least de-escalate.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would attack Minsk.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bloodthirsty Westerners want to use Ukraine to invade Russia, Putin was right all along.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >picrel
        kek, nothing changed. America stoping imperialist europeans from subjugating a claimed ”vassal”. When was this pic made? Crazy how it’s still relevant.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's right there on the picture, 1904

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            oh. thx, i don’t have my magnifying glass on me.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No? Monroe Doctrine was
          >If a colony becomes independent then we will stop any attempts by other European powers from trying to make it a colony of theirs. However we don't give a shit about your existing colonies.
          Therefore it wasn't about subjugating vassals, it was to stop forever wars in a cyclic nature because that damaged profit. Same reason as nearly every single South American nation got its independence from Spain or Portugal because the British helped them get it. All about profit. Same reason USA dismantled European empires after WW2. All about profit.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yes. And today they do the exact same thing, opposing Russia reclaiming Ukraine as part of their empire.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don’t think this pic means what you think it means.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why do American cartoonists neatly label everything in their political cartoons? Shouldn't most of that shit be self-explanatory?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because their content is aimed at Americans?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You have it backwards. Political cartoons in America are not there to poke fun at things that everyone knows about. They are source of information for an average American. This is how they learn about international politics.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Split between kherson and Zaporozhye. Finns sent them shitloads of old Soviet pontoons.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think towards Mariupol. Russia will gamble on defeating that counter attsck and then responding with their own if possible. This spring will be a decisive campaign season for someone

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Isolating Crimea binds a lot of troops. Still more likely than a Luhansk offensive, because it doesn’t create a big salient if the entire area north of Crimea gets cleared. Will take a lot of troops to accomplish, though. I don’t see it happening in one sweep, which would put Ukraine in a very dangerous position.

    The alternative will produce way more casualties, so it’s probably off the table.stocking troops between the russian border and the rest of Donbas is seems like a unsustainable grind.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HIMARS a particular front.
    Say they will attack that front.
    Russia panics and send everything there.
    Attack elsewhere and blow up whatever was send from a distance.
    THEN attack that front.

    Or russia learns and doesn't send anything.
    But they do attack that front and the line collapses.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Or russia learns and doesn't send anything.
      Not an option, Russia is forced to defend the feinted front regardless of whether they want to - it's the Russian national border

      Your propaganda office can make losing stolen territory come off as a win if it was a "net gain" (thus the excitement about Bakmut, how the Russians are currently internally justifying Ukrainian counter-gains, and how they will ultimately justify any losses from this war as just being reductions on previous 2014 gains), but it's impossible to defend losing mainland national territory permanently.

      They know any mainland losses when you're perceived as the aggressor make you look weak and pitiful, inspire other countries to stop supporting you because you're weak, and makes your enemies more brazen at ripping you apart. Major strategic disadvantages doom the Russian to repeat history.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The Ukrainians could push into Russia, and where would they go? Smolensk? Moscow? And if they do so, from what line are they going to pull the assets and manpower for it, and what assets and logistical support will they need pull to sustain the push? If they bomb Moscow, what has that achieved? Vlad will go to St. Petersburg just like Alexander did, losing Moscow didn't lose them the war with Napoleon and only really served to further infuriate the Russian people. It wouldn't surprise me if Russia is hoping for this exact situation to happen.

        Why do American cartoonists neatly label everything in their political cartoons? Shouldn't most of that shit be self-explanatory?

        The average American is wholly ignorant of nearly everything outside of their immediate interests. It's done to assure any one of them that happens to pick up a paper that Teddy Roosevelt didn't actually shoot an unnamed king in the face.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Holy mother of cope, batman
          >Who wanted national land, anyways?
          >I've lost my capital, making me the victor!
          >Your conquests make me angry! Now I have no choice but to declare extra double super war on you!!!
          >....but-but... not nuclear double super war... can't invite the ire of Nato...
          If losing your land, losing your capital, and losing your war all count as wins to you, you've lost the plot.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Sneed
            >feed
            What I'm saying is that those things wouldn't be wins to either party given the current situation. Ukraine can attack Russia but all it would do in the long run is deplete their defensive lines and waste resources on land they can't hold onto, what is the point of taking Moscow if you're just going to abandon it? An offensive like that would be logistically unsustainable, it would draw forces away from already under-threat lines, and it ultimately wouldn't accomplish anything that would make up for the risk. Everything their invasion would do, could be done by bombing campaigns and missile strikes for less risk and cost.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I know you don't believe any of this because you wouldn't believe any of this if the roles were reversed.

              Say Russia invaded Alaska, America forces mostly folded, and Russia was successfully starting to take territorial gains into Alaska. You wouldn't be saying
              >All it would do in the long run is deplete their defensive lines and waste resources on land they can't hold onto, what is the point of taking Nome if you're just going to abandon it?
              >An offensive like that would be logistically unsustainable
              >Everything their invasion would do, could be done by bombing campaigns and missile strikes for less risk and cost

              You'd be saying shit like
              >Fallen empire! losing land! Resource rich frontiers of gas and oil are being taken from them! A bulkhead's been established in enemy territory! Nome today, Canada next! Mexico will rightfully start getting ideas, time to retake California!
              Because you intuitively know when you lose national land, no matter how marginal, it's a symptom of broader rot that shows you COULDN'T prevent it from happening in the first place.

              Everyone knows if you can cut a God's face, that God probably isn't long for this world.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No. That scenario is entirely different. What you're describing is a straightforward invasion while Ukraine going into Russia would be a counter-invasion while the initial invasion hasn't concluded yet.

                Say Russia invaded the entire west coast, they bungled the invasion but seized the coast, and some interior land, and large cities. American forces retook large swathes of territory but lost a great deal of their forces in the act. Now there is a hotly-contested front line over the remaining Russian held territory and Russia has even started taking some small towns in places with PMC companies as has happened recently. You wouldn't be saying
                >Let's take most of our men from the front line and launch a desperate drive for Moscow in February!
                >Who cares if our lines collapse?
                >If we take Moscow we just win the war because... well... we just will!
                >the enemy army will literally despawn just like in my grand strategy games!

                You'd be saying shit like
                >Let's remove Ivan, then we can worry about Moscow.
                >If there's a fire in your kitchen, your first priority shouldn't be buying groceries.

                A loss of territory does not necessitate the loss of the war, nor does taking territory necessitate victory.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your example proves my point. The absolute first priority in this example is retaking your national land, and it's clear all other objectives are necessarily secondary.

                The differentiating factor where your analogy fails is that the US and NATO are providing a hard backstop for the Ukrainian defense, which Russia fundamentally lacks. The US level of support is actually rather marginal at about 5% of annual military spend - no US boots are on the ground, no US planes are in the air, and no other fronts have been opened against Russia. Were Ukraine to start seriously losing, the US has many levers, economically and militarily, they can use to increase support.

                Russia doesn't have any of those levers, they were supposed to be the superpower and by now it's very clear they're not. They could nuke on the way out, but it wouldn't accomplish any strategic goal besides being a "fuck you" and given the state of their army it's likely their first strike capable attack capacity is seriously diminished, perhaps 5% of their published soviet numbers.

                There isn't anyone capable of turning back a serious invasion if traditional Russian tactics of "die in droves, wait for winter, pray it's harsh" don't work exist. China is basically the only candidate helper - but given Russia's extremely poor showing, it's far more likely China decides to slice off pieces of the far east and Siberia if it's looking like the Russian bear's going down. This means Russia can't let Ukraine start nipping at its territory - the moment it begins, there's no more stopping it thereafter.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus man, that was my point from the beginning.

                All of this started around the stupid idea of Ukraine invading Russia and how Russia would be in any way undone by some retarded crusade to Moscow in the middle of an invasion

                Holy mother of cope, batman
                >Who wanted national land, anyways?
                >I've lost my capital, making me the victor!
                >Your conquests make me angry! Now I have no choice but to declare extra double super war on you!!!
                >....but-but... not nuclear double super war... can't invite the ire of Nato...
                If losing your land, losing your capital, and losing your war all count as wins to you, you've lost the plot.

                . My point through all of this was that that would be a stupid idea that would accomplish nothing and make the situation worse for Ukraine while having a comparatively minimal effect on Russia

                The Ukrainians could push into Russia, and where would they go? Smolensk? Moscow? And if they do so, from what line are they going to pull the assets and manpower for it, and what assets and logistical support will they need pull to sustain the push? If they bomb Moscow, what has that achieved? Vlad will go to St. Petersburg just like Alexander did, losing Moscow didn't lose them the war with Napoleon and only really served to further infuriate the Russian people. It wouldn't surprise me if Russia is hoping for this exact situation to happen.
                [...]
                The average American is wholly ignorant of nearly everything outside of their immediate interests. It's done to assure any one of them that happens to pick up a paper that Teddy Roosevelt didn't actually shoot an unnamed king in the face.

                . We don't know what the west will do if the war goes south, nobody does, I won't pretend I do, but I do know that invading a nation in the middle of a desperate defensive war is a recipe for disaster. That's what I was arguing from the start but I guess I'll say it again.
                >This means Russia can't let Ukraine start nipping at its territory - the moment it begins, there's no more stopping it thereafter.
                Russia doesn't have to worry about this, not until they've been removed from Ukraine and the kitchen fire is out. Ukraine would sabotage their own defense for a doomed logistical nightmare that would achieve nothing lasting if they pursued this before securing the East.
                On the Russian Samson Option though, it would be a very loud "fuck you," since if even one of the alleged thousands of nukes Russia allegedly has manages to connect, the devastation would be on a scale this planet has never seen before. They wouldn't "win" but they could at the VERY least throw the entire earth into a period of ecological crisis that may accelerate the collapse of it's enemies (if they even survive) depending on where that rocket connects. The phantom possibility of that "fuck you" is all the fallback the Russians need, it worked for half a century and it works now.

                Also, if you think the Russian military gleefully looks forward to the onset of winter you've been watching too many romanticized WWII movies and ignoring almost every other major war the Russians have ever fought.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ukraine's offensive capability is basically zero since their most elite brigades got completely fried in back mutt and sole durr
    they might try something in the summer after the latest wunder waffles arrive but that's assuming russia doesn't do anything funny to prevent that from say, belarus.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Delusional. have a nice day gay.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        cry harder chud ukraini lost

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >most elite brigades got completely
      PROOOFS?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope this happens, flattening Belarus will be glorious

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you're a retard

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >counterattack
    hahahahahhaha. Ukraine is LITERALLY just holding on. Despite the hundreds of billions of support it is just about keeping what it took back and has no way of getting anything else despite this support
    >b-b-but..
    If they could they would
    >b-b-but the weather...
    Yet Russia is taking stuff, curious.

    The end result is going to be what Russia wanted in the end. DPR + LPR part of Russia, Crimea officially recognised as Russian and Ukraine fucked for decades if not centuries. Easy peasy. Meanwhile, the USA is fucking over the UK by meddling in their affairs (because Biden is Irish lol), sucking the dick of the EU (mainly Germany) which leads to Germany not sending their tanks and leaning on their 'EU contributions' as proof they're helping. Meanwhile they, Italy and France (plus Netherlands) want Russian gas back on. In short, no nation in Europe wants to help Ukraine win, so it'll give token support to claim they did and when it eventually comes to forcing Ukraine to accept the Russian peace offer, they can go 'Well, we tried!'.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Yet Russia is taking stuff, curious.
      Wagner couldn't even take Bakhmut and had to send human waves to get Soledar. Not exactly impressive. Anyways, Ukraine is close to encircling Kremmina so we'll see where the pendulum swings next week.
      >muh yuros
      Nothing says you're losing faith like sending the largest military aid package you can, including tanks and APCs.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      all this is confirming is that when the next counterattack happens, there will be so much dilation.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tokmak unless they find particulary weak spot in Svatove direction and decide to to exploit it.
    Don't even @ me.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    unrealistic prediction, but taking Dumbass and Luganda would be the greatest way to cripple Russian forces in an instant

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Seversk, Avdeevka, Konstantinovka.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Wherever it takes place, let's hope helicopters won't have to cross bodies of water with Igla and stingers facing them.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    post your guns

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kiev.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's no such place in Ukraine. :^)

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dunno. I'm wondering if the new Russian offensive is coming and when/how.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They will try to cut off the highways from Poland to Kiev and the ultimate goal is to take Lviv.
      >When
      Within a few months, before the spring mud season, so that when they take it Ukrainians will have a hard time re-taking it until May-June.
      By then they will build defenses and will be prepared.

      Assault from another direction will cause ukrainians to move some of their regiments from the east to fortify the north/northwest. This means more russian gains in Donetsk/Luhansk.

      Ukrainians have a very limited manpower they can't defend everything at the same time. For instance there's a shitton of men next to bakhmut/soledar and they are still losing it.
      Now russia started moving towards Zaporozhie direction and they don't have anyone to protect it.

      Tanks, IFV's, aritllery - they won't help because there's simply not enough men.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What this retard doesn't mention is that all roads from Belarus to Lviv are narrow, surrounded by forests, heavily mined and presighted with artillery. Russia will advance 50 km in the east at the cost of literally 70,000 men in the west, more if there's a proper rout followed by encirclement.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The point is to not necessarily take it. The point is to cause ukraine to move some of their troops from donetsk to protect the western ukraine.

          The reason why ukrainians are mobilizing the west (Lviv specifically) right now is exactly because of that. There's not enough men to protect the west.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the western ukraine
            Ignore this gay.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              what, you're out arguments already, porkmeat?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The point of trying to bait people is that you don't give them shit that's too obvious, gay.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Ukrainians have a very limited manpower they can't defend everything at the same time
        they literally have 10 million men available

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you can't mobilize 10 million lol.
          it's not just because the economy will collapse but because when you mobilize too many people, and give them all guns, that's a high risk of the insurrection.
          Nothing's stopping these mobilized troops to turn on their commanding officers.

          And since the ukrainian morale is currently rock bottom, there are videos of people trying to escape the draft and fighting with the recrtuiters.
          That is entirely possible.

          They just grab randoms on the street at this point and drag them to the frontlines against their will.
          This won't end well.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you're retarded

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No you're retarded.
              Ideology is not a good enough motivator.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > hurrr durr durrr you can't mobilize 10 million
            it's 20 if you're trow women too btw, you mobilized them by invading their country you drunk piece of shit

            >And since the Ukrainian morale is currently rock bottom,
            nice projection gay you lost massive chunk of land in the past month and had to throw literal human wave to take a fucking town

            it's going to be hilarious when nato finally nuke russia without any repercussion because your miserable army is obviously incapable of anything

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >it's 20 if you're trow women too btw, you mobilized them by invading their country you drunk piece of shit
              It doesn't work like that. You can't mobilize everyone.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >ukrainian morale is currently rock bottom
            You legitimately have to be brainwashed to believe this. It's like all the Ukrainian shills screeching about entire Russian corps mutinying.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Actually Russian forces are active on the Zaporozixyz front

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      From pro Russian telegram

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        NOOOOOOO ONLY THE UKRAINIANS ARE ADVANCING EVER!!! RUSSIANS DON'T EVEN HAVE RIFLES I READ THAT ON /UHG/

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've said this for the past months and I'll say it again. Watch where HIMARS are operating. They will hammer the backlines and logistics of a particular place for a couple months before the counterattack starts. Happened in Kharkiv and Kherson so far. It will happen again. Russians have 0 counter to HIMARS so far, so they are more or less destined to lose on any front with significant HIMARS usage

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    establishment of Bilhorod People's Republic

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dunno how accurate the marking of Russian units is on Deep State's map, but going for Melitopol or Kremina looks like major arseache if it's anything to go by.

    https://deepstatemap.live

    Perhaps Mariupol?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Perhaps Mariupol?

      And Svatove

      But anything after that is going to be very messy.

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Expect? No idea.
    But I just want to see Crimea and surrounding areas cut off from the land bridge.
    The sheer amount of butthurt this would cause will make me coom handsfree

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OPERATION CORRIDOR '23

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *