When will Ukraine drive a wedge in the Russian front?

When will Ukraine drive a wedge in the Russian front? Surely this is the most effective way to reduce supplies for the Southern front.

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it would also increase the length of the front so also a plus for ukies

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's what Gay Zone and Incel Slave ZOD have been saying.
    Since vatniks are expecting it, it might be a ruse from ukies

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most Russian supples go through Crimea don't they?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If Mariupol was retaken a certain bridge would be in range...

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Blow the bridge and it's over in days.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is a real possibility that has vatnik milbloggers really worried.
    My guess is either Ukraine is waiting in case Russia moves units from Melitopol to shore other fronts up, or they have decided that 3 offensives at once would be to risky and want to make the most of their 2 current ones. It would make sense since things are going well in Kharkiv and Kherson is finally starting to crack.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not that simple. There are hills on the way so they'd have to either run around them or decide on a risky uphill battle.
    Unless Ukrainian VDV.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Great relief map, very interesting.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      super exaggerated map tbh, ukraine is as flat as the american midwest in terms of topography, the carpathian range in the southwest has substantial elevations which doesnt really matter that much in this war

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Mmm yes the famously mountainous country of Ukraine

        https://i.imgur.com/cTxpEqf.jpg

        [...]
        The hills are barely a hundred meters at most, Ukraine is flat as fuck. I would only use it as a reference for advancing cover.

        100m is enough elevation to cause problems

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ukraine is as flat
        ???
        Only south is flat, east as an extend. Center, including Kyiv, is pretty hilly and west is just straight up fucking mountains.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Hello, fellow Eastern Euro

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Everybody knows that Ukraine is anything but flat!

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          UMPH

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Azov-chan has a pretty wife.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          God I love Hetalia.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This

        Yoy can see with this just how ridiculously flat all but the very west of the country is. The east is merely elevated relative to what's in the middle, but still pretty low.

        https://en-gb.topographic-map.com/maps/rgly/Ukraine/

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mmm yes the famously mountainous country of Ukraine

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They filmed Sharpe in Ukraine.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Great relief map, very interesting.

      The hills are barely a hundred meters at most, Ukraine is flat as fuck. I would only use it as a reference for advancing cover.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ukraine is as flat
      ???
      Only south is flat, east as an extend. Center, including Kyiv, is pretty hilly and west is just straight up fucking mountains.

      california oblast topo comparison

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does this also have the potential for Ukraine to put their own troops in a pincer?

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Soon after Kherson probably.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Cause a rout and then cut off escape and evacuation routes. Meaning they can only flee towards Crimea... so you follow them before they can build up a new line of defense and you can maybe threat the needle and enter the peninsula without a big fight by just herding fleeing Russians in front of you.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If Ukraine takes Melitopol the war is unironically over. The entire southern front would collapse and Crimea would be invaded in short order. Surely Russia knows this and has heavily reinforced the location.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What does the Ukraine have to take for the war to be ironically over?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It is already.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Crimea would be invaded in short order.
      It's the only thing i'm still uncertain, russian incompetence has found amazing ways of surprise everybody, but losing Crimea would top everything in this war, and i'm counting the blowjob in this, it's too easily defendable

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The problem is that its defensibility causes issues for the Russians. If they were peer to the Ukies, either way, it wouldn't br a problem. As is the Ukies have superior satellite and aerial recon, long range precision artillery, and a capability of hitting targets deep in Crimea proper. Without parity the land bridge just concentrates Russian forces in a small area, and Ukraine just got rocket launched shotguns.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hohol cope arrow
    You officially lost territory and lost the war - get over it!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What you do if Hohols declare that annexation is gay?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hohols have no say
        Russia is a superpower and what a superpower says - goes
        You Europeans should know this after being under American occupation for 80 years

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia is a superpower
          Not sure if irony or cope.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            But russia is getting its ass kicked in Ukraine, so that means russia is not in fact a superpower, but Ukraine is

            Russia has been fighting with peacetime measures
            How much stronget can they be once mobilised hmmm?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              meat thrown at dug in and armored lines didn't work in world war 2 you literal spastic, just ask the vatmorons that before they got their shit together with Uncle Sam's gibs.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >How much stronget can they be once mobilised hmmm?
              Not much

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Mobilized with what? A bunch of unwilling conscripts even more poorly trained and equipped than those already there?
              The mass defections and surrenders will be quite amusing.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Even worse if you have jungendputler ( who don't surrender and become fertiliser without even seeing a Ukrainian solider. I think putin will keep going and sticking people in lorries as long as the russian public let him

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                .

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous
        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          But russia is getting its ass kicked in Ukraine, so that means russia is not in fact a superpower, but Ukraine is

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Russian worldview really is something else

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Just imagine the sort of retarded things the average Russian soldier in the field believes.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is a long post, so bear with me.
          A superpower is defined as a cou ntry capable of fighting two wars at once.
          The U.S is a superpower, and what the U.S says will go.
          On this, you and I are in agreement.
          Where we diverge is this: Russia is not a superpower and has not been one since the 1990's at best.
          If a second war opened up Russia would suffer a massive failure, primarily in its logistics capability, and that would be the end of the matter.
          With little ability to meet logistics needs, the strategic and tactical objectives become impossible.
          Russia is already forcing conscripts to purchase their own gear and has been, no bullshit, issuing Mosin-Nagant 91/30s.
          If America starting conscripting troops and giving them Springfield 03's and sending them to buy surplus Woodland camo, PrepHole would no doubt discuss the amount of SOVL that has, but we'd all agree that it doesn't bode well.
          Russia is not a superpower and even if they somehow win in Unraine militarily, they are still going to lose.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >If America starting conscripting troops and giving them Springfield 03's and sending them to buy surplus Woodland camo, PrepHole would no doubt discuss the amount of SOVL that has
            I hate how true this is.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >If America starting conscripting troops and giving them Springfield 03's and sending them to buy surplus Woodland
            A Springfield 03 would still be a better rifle than any model of Mosin-Nagant.
            I know a lot of guys skilled them back in the day, but they made a lot of sense when you could get a .30 caliber rifle for 80 dollars and use it for things like hunting or as a range toy.
            They make no sense at all as a military weapon on a modern field, whereas with a decent scope a Springfield makes a solid choice for sharpshooters to put a 30-06 in someone who looks important before scooting out of the area.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Russia is not a super powe and is borderline third world, Brazil has more.lf.a future and economic potential than Russia

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Supah powah
          You talk like you're cope

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >and what a superpower says - goes
          American here, and I am a member of a superpower. So...by your own childish logic....what I say goes.
          Here is my ultimatum. Evacuate your troops off of Ukrainian soil, or Moscow and St. Petersburg get glassed.

          Get on it, vatnik peasant....chop chop.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >oh look it's that vatmoron again
          I hope they pay you well for shitting up this board.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      But you see, Ukraine just signed a paret that made Ukraine the true heir of both USSR and Kievan Rus empire, which means that Putin and friends are just illegimate terrorist rebels with zero claims on anything.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They can keep wrapping up the flanks in Kherson and Kharkiv. No need to attack centrally until the Russians pull reserves out of Zaporizhzhia

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if anything they should push west from your blue line. melitopol in red circle is obvious target, big transport hub on the occupied land bridge to crimea. also from that area key bridges/roads out of crimea will be in range of something like atacms. also ZNPP will be up for easier liberation

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    stop feeding obvious derail fag with (you)s

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >russians see a threat on Zaporozhzhia front
    >put defence there
    >shitshow starts elsewhere
    >they still keep forces on still front
    >other fronts start to crumble
    >nothing is moving on Zaporozhzhia front
    >russians decide Zaporozhzhia threat was just a feint
    >(No) panic
    >send people from Zaporozhzhia to save other frontlines
    >ukies kek and move in
    That's how this gonna go.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Basically this. Both factions keep forces in this region

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Supplies?

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tiny strip of land you have to defend from two sides? Am a expat, not a PrepHole arm chair general. Love the board BTW, no homo.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Probably once they've retaken Kherson, the bridges there are too damaged to let ukrainian forces go through them and crossing the river there would be too dangerous, so once they retook Kherson the forces aorund there will probably be deployed to Zaporizhia to start driving the wedge there

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    After retaking Kherson, all Crimea including Kerch bridge should be within HIMARS range. Close the canal, block the isthmus and keep blowing military bases from afar while Russians die from thirst and starvation

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Feel free to pause the video and spot the best move. I just want to enjoy the show, Valery’s ELO is pumping. Aggressors on suicide watch.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Aggressors on suicide watch.
      So HATO is on suicide watch?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        poor b8 m8

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Personally I think they should increase pressure on that front but they shouldn't try to cut the forces in half. Leaving a landbridge open to russian forces that seems threatened by ukie forces can sway a commander to retreat the southern forces through the landbridge while they can. Cut them off and you take that away. They think they must fight to the death and could even increase pressure to force a breakout. I would love to see tens of thousands of russians die in southern ukraine, however strategically it's best for Ukraine to force Russia to retreat rather than try to destroy them all.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >When will Ukraine drive a wedge in the Russian front? Surely this is the most effective way to reduce supplies for the Southern front.
    I don;t see that. The UKranains should identify where the Russians are weak dynamically and exploit the opportunities that allow them to kill as many Russians as possible until they are in a strip of land that their long range artillery can target any location in. Once you have them in that 200KM strip and spotters you can kill them at will from heavy weapons to supplies, command posts and convoys. After a few weeks of that they are just a worthless mob. When the Ukrainians can make weak troops in front of them fold cheaply and roll up lines, take the opportunities as they come, don't get stuck in in russian/soviet shit of the arrow on the map said go here.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Aren't both ends of the front in practically a full rout? Is there even any need to do that? They seem to not be willing to fight anyways.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If they're going to do it this year it'll have to be within the next month before everything starts to freeze come November. Maybe if they can encircle Kherson in good time they can redeploy a lot of those troops to the Zaporizhia front for one last jolly before winter sets in.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    blah blah blah. is simple. When at the end of this special military operation Russia will still control the eyebrows of Crimea and will learn from its raise to create a unibrow of strength (based on new physical principles)

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Same strategy Zelenskyy and the UAF had before they started their counteroffensive; basically a straight push to Mariupol to cut the Russian territory in half, but the Americans advised them against it due to potential losses and risk of failure.

    What you're seeing now is the result of the UAF and their US advisors' wargaming and planning for months.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *