No point, given the per unit cost it would be a hell of a lot better to build them large enough to carry a crew of 2-4 and have the electronics to handle a whole flight of effectively invisible drones
they take on more aspects of a bomber than a traditional fighter.
I think looking at it in respect to the evolving Air Combat management should provide some insight.
the 4th gen fighters are being repurposed into 4.5 generation fighters, but stopping there on purpose. these 4.5 gens will be used in a defensive role such as air patrols, interceptions, and pursuit actions. as a result they need a high mobility, fast instantaneous movement, and information management systems, but they themselves don't need an extreme amount of stealth. having enough "stealth," to help defeat weapon systems that could be used to identify them from long range or in a defensive dog fight is enough. the idea with these 4.5 gen planes is volume by fire and deterrence by persistence.
the 6th generation planes are oriented more for deep strikes and front-line operations. so they have a bunch of systems that make them better for penetrating enemy air-defenses and surviving. as a result they have a heavy emphasis on stealth and speed. the part that is often left out is that these new planes will have companion Drone fighters and the human pilot is less of a direct risk allowing for human adaptability to superseded the procedural drill of drones. >how much is the mind of a human worth compared to a computer program? >how easy is it to trick. trip up, or out match a computer?
A sixth generation light fighter jet is a stealthy unmanned supersonic AMRAAM bus to fly alongside real manned sixth generation heavyweights
basically the XQ-58
I think they'll eventually scale up a similar design to be supersonic and supercruising to keep up with the NGAD in long range sneaky boy bullshit
>404-6th-copiumerite.jpg
>pictured are the only ones in existence
>Su-75 checkmate
You have made 9 errors in spelling "femboy"
Btw, if F is fighter, B is bimber, what would C stand for?
C is for transport aircraft.
Cargo
We the obsesion with homosexuality?
>we the obsession with homosexuality?
Yes.
I'm glad you're finally engaging in some self-reflection
Femboys are the straightest thing in Universe
cuck
X-32 and YF-23 copies
So this is the new fixation for armatard? There’s been about a dozen threads about this fake pos in the last week
The only reason the SU-57 can stand on anything is becuase it hasn't been shot down. The T14s never showed up so he's got nothing else.
Obsessed
5th gen is the sniper, 4th gen is the grunt. What's 6th gen gonna do?
Overlord
Cargo cult copy of JSF X-32 just like the "su 57" is a cargo cult of the YF-23
No point, given the per unit cost it would be a hell of a lot better to build them large enough to carry a crew of 2-4 and have the electronics to handle a whole flight of effectively invisible drones
they appear to be moving toward:
>high speed evasion
>low radar stealth
>cyber warfare enabled
>IT management enabled
they take on more aspects of a bomber than a traditional fighter.
I think looking at it in respect to the evolving Air Combat management should provide some insight.
the 4th gen fighters are being repurposed into 4.5 generation fighters, but stopping there on purpose. these 4.5 gens will be used in a defensive role such as air patrols, interceptions, and pursuit actions. as a result they need a high mobility, fast instantaneous movement, and information management systems, but they themselves don't need an extreme amount of stealth. having enough "stealth," to help defeat weapon systems that could be used to identify them from long range or in a defensive dog fight is enough. the idea with these 4.5 gen planes is volume by fire and deterrence by persistence.
the 6th generation planes are oriented more for deep strikes and front-line operations. so they have a bunch of systems that make them better for penetrating enemy air-defenses and surviving. as a result they have a heavy emphasis on stealth and speed. the part that is often left out is that these new planes will have companion Drone fighters and the human pilot is less of a direct risk allowing for human adaptability to superseded the procedural drill of drones.
>how much is the mind of a human worth compared to a computer program?
>how easy is it to trick. trip up, or out match a computer?
>SU-75 Femboy
>6th Gen fighter
Anon, the Russians couldn't even make a fifth gen fighter