Whats the verdict on the Tor-M1

Whats the verdict on the Tor-M1

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's a missile system.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pain in the ass in DCS

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I love hunting them with the A-10C II and a few AGM-65s, you need hills but doing DEAD in something so bad at it is satisfying.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I had the old Sierra “A-10 Thunderbolt II” game and the best missions in the game were ones where you had to terrain mask to get gun kills on SAMs because you couldn’t carry enough ordinance to use a maverick on them and also complete the mission, and if you got above the ridge line, not only would the SAMs waste you, but so would the MIG-29s.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I like the concept but there won't be any verdict for a long time, some will say it's terrible and others will say it's great and neither will produce combat stats.
    >but some got killed
    The best system on earth can be killed if the crew is shit or they run out of fuel
    >but they shot down x
    Take enough shots and some will land

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The best system on earth can be killed if the crew is shit or they run out of fuel
      kek, slavshit equipment fans have been reduced to coping about MUH MONKEY CREWS

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >point out no one has combat preformance info
        >I must be a vatnik shill
        Russian crews are terrible and we saw them get in a 10km long traffic jam that lasted 2 weeks becasue logi was so fucked.
        The idea that incompetent crews or no fuel is getting vehicles killed shouldn't be news to anyone at this point.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wheres the lie? Russian AA crews almost certainly are dog shit. It's a conscript military backed by a Spanish sized economy, so retaining skilled AA crew must be hard. They must lack interoperability training with the dribbling thalidomide children of the Russian Air Farce based on the fact their large exercises are just dog and pony shows.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's performance has been much better than the Pantsir. But the interface and software are still 1980s era antiques staffed by poorly trained Russians.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Everything western is better by an order of magnitude. But Ukraine can still use it to fuck up russia (not vice versa, though).

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    here's your verdict

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      top kek

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/6KkaDa1.jpg

      top kek

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Free my nigga

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >chinks get the tor
    >russian don't
    >chink zsu 57 is the only one with fused shells
    Chink bias is the true wathunder bias

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >command giuided
    into the trash it goes

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Computer commands. Not MCLOS or any such bullshit.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I never understood why the missiles are in the turret

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I think it simplifies the initial turn
      >come out vertical
      >fire thruster to pitch forward
      >turret is already rotated to the target so forward is always towards the target

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Whats the verdict on the Tor-M1
    VLS is cool

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine vids show the radar to be inadequate for both cruise missiles and GMLRS missiles

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    absolutely clapped piece of shit

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *