what's the tactical implication of having more prisoners than you can deal with?

what's the tactical implication of having more prisoners than you can deal with?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That's what death marches are for

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Send them to Poland

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/zObZ4Ps.jpg

      what's the tactical implication of having more prisoners than you can deal with?

      Send them to camps in Poland

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        finally, the real Polish death camps

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Send them to Auschwitz

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Can you just imagine the optics of that, setting up a temp camp for Russians there in the year of our lord 2022.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The Poles would definitely do that if the choice was up to them just to be memers.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What so they can whine about showers that didnt kill anyone for 80 years?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        finally, the real Polish death camps

        But after polish soviet war we got camps for kacaps. Wadowice, in poland known for place of birth le polish pope while for kacaps place of death their relatives.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/GjWmgZt.jpg

        Send them to Auschwitz

        Proposed quarantines sites of Russian POWs in Poland for purposes of protecting the racial hygiene of the public:

        >Chełmno
        >Bełżec
        >Sobibór
        >Treblinka
        >Oświęcim
        >Majdanek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If the Poles agree that's not a bad idea. The US has a lot of personnel there that could help with that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't it be both cheaper and more humane to just shoot them?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Poles would riot if you deny them vatnik blood

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        not if you can exchange them for your own later

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        slander, Poles are nice to POWs
        they would feed the devil

        memoirs from the battle of Vienna aftermath:
        >The Germans, on the other hand, took no captives, but killed them crudelissime [with exceeding cruelty]. Even after death, they dragged their corpses about; flayed them, twisted the flayed strips into straps they might use; the third day after the battle, it was already hard to see a Turk on the battlefield with his body entire; and if any of our men was not cautious in leading a captive, and he rode among Germans, they would seize the prisoner out of his grasp and kill him.

        >My nephew Stanisław Pasek was leading a Turk, some kind of important fellow, for he was handsomely attired and riding a beautiful horse; my nephew, having disarmed the captive, was leading him along on his horse, holding only the reins, when along comes a German, rides alongside the Turk, and stabs him with a dagger. The Turk only groaned; my nephew looked back, and the Turk, mouth agape, is slipping off his horse. Having stabbed him, the German rode off at once to the side. My nephew begins to scold him: "You pig, you knave! Killed my prisoner you have, and is that permitted?" The German but laughs and says: "Ja, Pan, are you Poles feeding the devil?" My nephew rails at him that you're a scoundrel, not a cavalier - to kill a captive already in our hands. But the German only rides on, laughing.

        >What else was there to do? The Germans feel great rancor as the Turks robbed them of so much of their country, their provinces and fortresses; secondly, they are a natura crudeles [innately cruel] and know not how to observe knightly restraint in victoria.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I thought this was about ww2 until it mentioned turks

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      While an actual decent idea to intern them in a third party's nation until prisoner exchanges can be hashed out, the smartass within me compels me to say sending them to Poland is just a more esoteric form of execution for Ivan.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cruel and Unusual punishments are war crimes, Anon.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        but it's a special operation.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes..yes. deport them to ''work camps in the east''

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that would violate human rights conventions

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the polish girls i know have absolutely enormous breasts. orks don't deserve to be surrounded by mega milkers. send them to camp chernobyl.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is it time to heat the ovens?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What exactly are the rules of war on that?
      Obviously Poland can't have prisoners of war if they aren't at war but they can intern foreign troops, right?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Frick that, send them all over europe. Infact make it a bidding war, I'm sure The Netherlands wants to have some over that whole MH17 debacle.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes! Polish camps like the old times

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Arrestovych
    >Too many prisoners

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      k e k

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Zaporizhzhia
      >a power plant

      BRAVO UKRAINE, GREAT WRITING

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Semen Semenchenko

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Are separatists POW?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      no, they've committed treason.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Finally, a use for all those captured mobile crematoriums the vatniks abandoned all over the place. Not a problem.

      No. Fertilizer.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The real tactical implication is an increased logistical burden to store and manage them, using up manpower and resources otherwise able to be more productively allocated in a war.
    But you can't just shoot them in the head because you're not savages. So you take the L and shove them in a stadium or some1thing

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/zObZ4Ps.jpg

      what's the tactical implication of having more prisoners than you can deal with?

      How about

      Send them to Poland

      said. Ask Nato partners (without Turkey or Hungary) to store them to keep them safe from Russian strikes?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nato partners would need to be willing to take them and in extension become even more embroiled in this war. I don't think that's very likely

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          US and UK might, if only to debrief officers for intelligence. The other partners (besides Poland) mostly need not apply anyway.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          What about Japan? Aren't they still technically at war with Russia?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Japan doesn't exactly have a stellar record when it comes to POW camps.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Sounds perfect then.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not seeing the problem here?

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    WE DON'T HAVE THE PROPER FACILITIES TO TAKE YOU ALL PRISONER. SORRY. WE'D LIKE TO BUT WE CAN'T ACCEPT YOUR SURRENDER. WAS THERE ANYTHING ELSE?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based and umbrella-pilled.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Content note.
        The following film presentation was made before the events of the Russian invasion of Ukraine 2022 and reflects the views of its time that paratroopers holding their objectives and armour columns reaching their destination, albeit late, were understood as failures of planning and execution. This content may be upsetting to Vatniks. Viewer discretion is advised.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/iJZdOv5.jpg

      Based and umbrella-pilled.

      Patrician taste

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As fricking trash as they are, a prisoner exchange for the Mariupol fighters and these scum is the right thing to do.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >the Mariupol fighters
      Sorry lad. Apparently you didn't hear the news? Accident at the prison. They all suffered accidental death. Then the prison was set on fire and the corpses burned. Very unfortunate loss of witnesses & evidence. You may have been distracted by the castration video at the time. ook ook banan!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        is that true? fricking barbarians

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Having these prisoners back is a drain on whatever resources Russia has left. And they're probably going to kanga court the Mauripol fighters into the noose anyways so there won't be anything worth swapping for.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Unrionically you either need third party help, you need to release them, or you need to kill them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Da comrade, is of catch and releasings
      >Catch troop by shoot him, release him to front to shooting him again
      >Very earth conscience, may shoot same troop many time before dyings achievement secured
      >Never forgetting: all resource limited, inkludinsk human life
      >Very precious, conserving where possible, da?
      Ukr and rus speech sound similar, right? Or am I invoking ludo narrative disco biscuits here?

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Arrestovich
    XD

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Surrendering requires the consent of two parties

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Put’em on a chain gain in the Arizona desert breaking rocks into smaller rocks for 10 hours a day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Gang***

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Gang***

      if you fed them proper american food then they would be making some real fricking chaingains swinging a pickaxe all day

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If you're going to have them do useless work you mind as well send them to that radioactive area of Nevada and tell them to start digging. That way if the US ever gets back to building nuclear reactors we'll have this nice hole in the ground to toss the waste.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    give them to the Germans for science experiments and furnishing materials.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    POWs?
    They fell of a truck, yes all of them fell of the back of a truck

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Does Dachau have any vacancies?

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Deport them.....to AUSTRALIA!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Seriously, Russian POWs belong in a nation founded by convicts.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      we're full

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You could do what they did in WW2, just fence them off and don't feed them.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    they are POW now, but they are also future slaves for Ukraine.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Same happened during Barbarossa.
    Wtf do you do when you suddenly have a couple million POWs?
    Answer: Get blamed for their deaths later.
    At least this time they're not in the middle of nowhere without supply.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Tell their mothers they can come pick them up, if they come to Kiev personally.
    Can you imagine the optics of Russian soldiers being picked up like naughty schoolboys by their moms?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty sure something similar happened during one of the chechen wars, like a bunch of russian mothers traveled to grozny to talk to the local chechen warlord to get their sons back or something like that.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        it did, in One Soldier's War the author describes an incident where they were on patrol in Grozny and saw ghostly shapes in the streets that were inspecting bodies, and they got so scared that they shot at them and it turned out to just be Russian mothers looking for their dead sons

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is actually a great idea. Those Russian moms will spread the word about what's going on like wildfire. THey won't want their kids to go back to fight either.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Combine it with the Poland idea. Allies foot the bill, Russia looks terrible, Russian soldiers are infantalized for the amusement of all observing.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is actually a great idea. Those Russian moms will spread the word about what's going on like wildfire. THey won't want their kids to go back to fight either.

      Combine it with the Poland idea. Allies foot the bill, Russia looks terrible, Russian soldiers are infantalized for the amusement of all observing.

      They've been offering that since the first days of the war. It's been suppressed hard in Russia. I don't know if anyone actually took them up on it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Some moms have gone to retrieve corpses, I know that.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia accidentally kills civilians
    >/k/: THEY'RE DISGUSTING BARBARIC WAR CRIMINALS KILL THEM ALL
    >Ukraine is moronic and overstretched their logistics
    >/k/: LOL JUST KILL ALL THE RUSSIANS WAR CRIMES ARE BASED WHEN WE DO IT

    really?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >>/k/: LOL JUST KILL ALL THE RUSSIANS WAR CRIMES ARE BASED WHEN WE DO IT
      Meanwhile on actual /k/

      The real tactical implication is an increased logistical burden to store and manage them, using up manpower and resources otherwise able to be more productively allocated in a war.
      But you can't just shoot them in the head because you're not savages. So you take the L and shove them in a stadium or some1thing

      But you can't just shoot them in the head because you're not savages. So you take the L and shove them in a stadium or something

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >WAR CRIMES ARE BASED WHEN WE DO IT
      Yeah no shit moron, how new are you?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      correct

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >gigachad_yes.jpg

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      wtf i love ukraine now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm a moderate

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine is moronic for not realising so many Russians would surrender?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They probably expected stiffer resistance or a more orderly retreat.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No they expected them to die

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think the POWs should die.

      They should be sent to AUSTRALIA.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      unironically yes, really, you stupid russoid homosexual. i support genocide of all russians, no matter the circumstances. total ethnic and cultural cleansing of russians from this earth can't come quick enough.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >russian
      Deserves no mercy.
      >russian invader
      Double no mercy.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >civilians who live there vs invaders taken prisoner

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it's not a war its a

      SPECIAL
      MILLITARY
      OPERATION

      also russians are not human (more akin to chimpanzees) so they don't get human rights

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      "Genocide" is a term applied to human beings getting exterminated. Fortunately, russians don't qualify for that category. Exterminating diseased vermin is a service to humanity.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Me: Geneva Suggestions

      You: Violations of the Geneva Convention and their additonal protocols

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheinwiesenlager

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Send them to Tunisia

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i hear poland has some nicely preserved camps.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder if the showers still work

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        anon, they never worked.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That doesn't mean they can't work

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Depends on how you define cleaning

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Poland re-opens Auschwitz
        Someone tell the Ukies to slow down, there wont be anything left to gas.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Won't work anon, monke has cut the gas supply to Europe

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No reason to panic. Give me cartload of beans and half a dozen partiotic Poles and I'll have those vatniks gassed in no time.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe so anon, but there's nothing he can do to stop me eating several MREs in a row. If the good people of Poland can be persuaded to do the same, well...
        What I'm trying to say is, if there's a will there's a way.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody should be subjected to modern GERMan culture.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The conscripts should be given the option to fight to liberate their homes.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    aha! Russian 4D chess move! I knew it!

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There is no legal means to transfer POWs to a non-belligerent State.
    But these are not POWs as it is not a war per Moscow. They are criminals. Send them to Haiti as long pig meat.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they aren't POWs though, they're Disarmed Enemy Forces.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sick and wounded can be transferred to a neutral country but that might require a treaty between ukes and russkies.

      Having a ton of PoWs is great for Ukraine because those PoWs have families back in the motherland who would very much like to see them back home alive, creating domestic political pressure. Then there's the fact that it creates diplomatic pressures on the donbabwe kangaroo courts not to execute foreign fighters and azovites caught in Mariupol etc.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Fence them in, set up mines and re-run Universe 25.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Building more space for them moron

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gladiatorial arena mosh pit, last one who lives is free.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Unironically Ukraine could probably win by allowing every single soldier to become a POW and then revolting as often as possible
    When soldiers start getting executed by the people holding them captive the west would have to intervene because the optics would be terrible and it would probably get written down in history as a new holocaust

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody gave a wet fricking fart when all the Mariupol prisoners "accidentally" got died. And then "accidentally" incinerated immediately afterward.

      If that were to happen with Russian criminals who invaded a sovereign nation and raped and murdered and looted their way throughout the country for half a year, seems only fair the rest of the world will notice even less.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Damn if only they could set up a series of camps where they could concentrate the prisoners.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Send the useless ones back to the Russians more mouths to feed.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >sending people to russia
      thats inhumane

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    FIRST ONE TO TALK GETS TO STAY IN MY CAMP.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Slave labor. Feed them gruel and force them to repair all roads and bridges.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Would it be possible for Ukraine and Russia to set up a POW exchange program with the UN where their POWs can be held in neutral territories? Probably lessen the strain on both countries, but I'm guessing it's too unrealistic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I think someone claimed a while back that sending POWs to third party countries is a warcrime, though I have no idea how truthful that is.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That sounds moronic, particularly if both sides agree to it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia doesn't want most of their POWs back.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Without a declaration of war, aren't they all unlawful enemy combatants?

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    (OP)
    Into the cum pits they go.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This war would be over in a month if Ukraine and EU made a deal to give vocational training to Russians in POW camps and a work permit in EU when they complete it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Mate, those are russian soldiers.
      They are too dumb for even manual labor

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How can you have POWs if there's no war?

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Proposal (not mine): use euromonies to rent appartments in some sunny cheap place like Egypt or Turkey and send them there. Suddenly, half the Russian army deserts

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    nothing arestovich says is ever true
    they may have some prisoners but the numbers are not significant
    if they have too many Russia will do exchanges because they have many Ukrainians

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Used them for pigfeed

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Fren, whatever did pigs ever do to you to deserve such a fate? Show some humanity.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I do not want my pigs to get hepatitis and AIDS. Just dump the mulch in a pit and compost. We're going to be behind for several harvests.

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I mean they have the entire town of Pripyat where they can put them up.

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Literally this

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Such a good movie

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Put em on trains, ship em off to Poland, let them deal with the problem.
    Worked the last time around, didn't it?

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Tactical implications? Prisoners?
    I don't know anything about any prisoners.
    We found them like that, in that there mass grave. Something wacky must have happened, but it must have happened before we got here.

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Good recruitment pool

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      For the ones who aren't rapists and didn't torture

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Now, hear me out boys. If we were to expand Gitmo ... Those who cooperate in full will eventually get a chance to get out, so long as whatever host country that takes them never allows them to return to Russia.

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The best thing Ukraine can do now is use some EU money to create decent pow camps and let some UN commission to be constantly present
    It would cost a lot of money and the Russians sure as shit don't deserve it but it should show the world who's fighting who

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They just need to capture some of these and play the uno reverse card on the Russians.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Cut of their hands an back to Russia.

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Send them to Nigeria

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    personally I hope Ukrainian despite being dirt poor and not having oil and gas money treat their prisoners as best they can and if have problems transfer to a third country (is that illegal however?) that can keep them in good condition
    just to show world that Ukraine is trying to improve while Russia is not

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Poland has declared that it has places for nearly 22000 officer POWs in a forest in the vicinity of Smolensk.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Poland has declared that it has places for nearly 22000 officer POWs in a forest in the vicinity of Smolensk.
      oh i see what you are saying

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Guy named Arrestovich handles the prisoners
    WHO THE FRICK WRITES THIS SHIT

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      God

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What? The Dnepr isn't deep enough all of a sudden?

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Send ‘em to Brazil

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They can't possibly have more prisoners than bullets.

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Movement speed debuff

  61. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Send them to Hawaii and Texas as a gesture of good will toward surrendering Russians.

  62. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So, let me tell you about this wonderful product.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If we're going to be more technical about it, the most effective German weapon against Soviet POWs was starvation. Two out of three million dead from the start of Operation Barbarossa to New Years Day, 1942.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *