What's the tactical advantage of sending soldiers into battle with no ammo?

What's the tactical advantage of sending soldiers into battle with no ammo?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >mobilized
    >has beards
    Either Russian discipline is slacking again, or those are Chechens.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Probably just musslims in general, Russia bends to minority demands when it comes to their practices. So plenty of beards outside of Russian areas.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If they’re not being giving gas masks then shaving is totally pointless

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This. That's literally the entire reason men started shaving. A lot of men had beards before WWI and nobody cared

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      20% of the Russian population is Muslim (40% by 2030, but I think that is probably too soon, 2050 maybe).

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    At least they got some fresh new AK-12s.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Fresh AK-12's
      >Still no optics

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They can't hold zero anyway.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If they dont get spawn camped they need to do a loot run.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I would guess the ones without plate carriers are just sticking a mag or two in their pockets.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I can't believe Ukraine is still unable to defeat an army that doesn't have ammo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I can't believe the 2nd army in the world isn't able to defeat the second most corrupt country in Europe.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Of course they can't. How are they going to win a war with no ammo, no modern armor, no modern or competent airforce, inaccurate artillery, badly trained soldiers, outdated tactics, low IQ personnel, bad tactics, crippled economy, low morale, no food, drunk soldiers?

        How are they still in Ukraine after one year. considering how much a clusterfrick their army is? Considering how well-supported the Ukrainian army is by Western countries, a war against such an incompetent army should not have dragged for an entire year, don't you think?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Interesting new cope

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >cope
            How is that a cope? Everything I said about the Russian army is true

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >It's taking you too long to beat us!
              You're an embarrassment on every level.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It's taking you too long
                Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. How is it possible for any competent army to be stuck in the trenches, unable to make progress against an army that is extremely incompetent and outdated in every single aspect

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stop being disingenuous. Ukraine's NATO weapons stock is also very limited and they can't really just curb stomp a numerically superior army that still keeps throwing more bodies into the grinder.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because not every unit has no ammo? Because small arms aren't the only weapon in use? Because this isn't an RTS where you just have to grind the HP down and capture the objective point to win? If you see a trench of 1,000 soldiers you have no idea if they have ammo or not. So you assume they do and plan to proceed as if they do.

      This applies to every situation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Truly the greatest mystery of our time.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    We are of not started the fire, it was always of burning

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >THE MAN WITH A RIFLE SHOOTS
    >THE MAN WITH AMMO FOLLOWS HIM

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >source
    >random on twitter
    >"independent journals said so trust me bro"
    I'm glad ChrisO_wiki is here to set the record straight.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but it's about dead kacaps in the kacap killing zone, so it at least makes me happy and you angry. The perfect thread.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AK-12's
    >not a single reddit finger in sight
    incredibly based

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Problem with those psyops of yours is when you start believing them yourself.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    THE MAN WITH THE RIFLE SHOOTS, THE MAN WITH THE AMMO STAYS BEHIND, WHEN THE MAN WITH THE RIFLE IS KILLED THE MAN WITH THE AMMO HAS ALREADY SOLD IT FOR VODKA

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Write the dialogue

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The first man in line gets a rifle!
      >The second man gets an imagination!
      >When the first man dies, the second man picks up the rifle and makes "Pew Pew!" noises!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      For the monke Emperor!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >FORM A LINE
      >ALL OF YOU SHALL RECEIVE A RIFLE
      >AMMUNITION WILL BE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN NECESSARY
      >IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AMMUNITION, IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT IN DANGER
      >KEEP YOUR RIFLE WITH YOU AT ALL TIMES IN THE EVENT THAT YOU ARE ISSUED AMMUNITION
      >MOVE TO THE NEXT STATION TO RECEIVE TAMPONS TO PLUG BULLET WOUNDS

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *