Of course they can't. How are they going to win a war with no ammo, no modern armor, no modern or competent airforce, inaccurate artillery, badly trained soldiers, outdated tactics, low IQ personnel, bad tactics, crippled economy, low morale, no food, drunk soldiers?
How are they still in Ukraine after one year. considering how much a clusterfuck their army is? Considering how well-supported the Ukrainian army is by Western countries, a war against such an incompetent army should not have dragged for an entire year, don't you think?
>It's taking you too long to beat us!
You're an embarrassment on every level.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>It's taking you too long
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. How is it possible for any competent army to be stuck in the trenches, unable to make progress against an army that is extremely incompetent and outdated in every single aspect
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Stop being disingenuous. Ukraine's NATO weapons stock is also very limited and they can't really just curb stomp a numerically superior army that still keeps throwing more bodies into the grinder.
Because not every unit has no ammo? Because small arms aren't the only weapon in use? Because this isn't an RTS where you just have to grind the HP down and capture the objective point to win? If you see a trench of 1,000 soldiers you have no idea if they have ammo or not. So you assume they do and plan to proceed as if they do.
THE MAN WITH THE RIFLE SHOOTS, THE MAN WITH THE AMMO STAYS BEHIND, WHEN THE MAN WITH THE RIFLE IS KILLED THE MAN WITH THE AMMO HAS ALREADY SOLD IT FOR VODKA
>The first man in line gets a rifle! >The second man gets an imagination! >When the first man dies, the second man picks up the rifle and makes "Pew Pew!" noises!
>FORM A LINE >ALL OF YOU SHALL RECEIVE A RIFLE >AMMUNITION WILL BE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN NECESSARY >IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AMMUNITION, IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT IN DANGER >KEEP YOUR RIFLE WITH YOU AT ALL TIMES IN THE EVENT THAT YOU ARE ISSUED AMMUNITION >MOVE TO THE NEXT STATION TO RECEIVE TAMPONS TO PLUG BULLET WOUNDS
>mobilized
>has beards
Either Russian discipline is slacking again, or those are Chechens.
Probably just musslims in general, Russia bends to minority demands when it comes to their practices. So plenty of beards outside of Russian areas.
If they’re not being giving gas masks then shaving is totally pointless
This. That's literally the entire reason men started shaving. A lot of men had beards before WWI and nobody cared
20% of the Russian population is Muslim (40% by 2030, but I think that is probably too soon, 2050 maybe).
At least they got some fresh new AK-12s.
>Fresh AK-12's
>Still no optics
They can't hold zero anyway.
If they dont get spawn camped they need to do a loot run.
I would guess the ones without plate carriers are just sticking a mag or two in their pockets.
I can't believe Ukraine is still unable to defeat an army that doesn't have ammo
I can't believe the 2nd army in the world isn't able to defeat the second most corrupt country in Europe.
Of course they can't. How are they going to win a war with no ammo, no modern armor, no modern or competent airforce, inaccurate artillery, badly trained soldiers, outdated tactics, low IQ personnel, bad tactics, crippled economy, low morale, no food, drunk soldiers?
How are they still in Ukraine after one year. considering how much a clusterfuck their army is? Considering how well-supported the Ukrainian army is by Western countries, a war against such an incompetent army should not have dragged for an entire year, don't you think?
Interesting new cope
>cope
How is that a cope? Everything I said about the Russian army is true
>It's taking you too long to beat us!
You're an embarrassment on every level.
>It's taking you too long
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. How is it possible for any competent army to be stuck in the trenches, unable to make progress against an army that is extremely incompetent and outdated in every single aspect
Stop being disingenuous. Ukraine's NATO weapons stock is also very limited and they can't really just curb stomp a numerically superior army that still keeps throwing more bodies into the grinder.
Because not every unit has no ammo? Because small arms aren't the only weapon in use? Because this isn't an RTS where you just have to grind the HP down and capture the objective point to win? If you see a trench of 1,000 soldiers you have no idea if they have ammo or not. So you assume they do and plan to proceed as if they do.
This applies to every situation.
Truly the greatest mystery of our time.
We are of not started the fire, it was always of burning
>THE MAN WITH A RIFLE SHOOTS
>THE MAN WITH AMMO FOLLOWS HIM
>source
>random on twitter
>"independent journals said so trust me bro"
I'm glad ChrisO_wiki is here to set the record straight.
Yeah but it's about dead kacaps in the kacap killing zone, so it at least makes me happy and you angry. The perfect thread.
>AK-12's
>not a single reddit finger in sight
incredibly based
Problem with those psyops of yours is when you start believing them yourself.
THE MAN WITH THE RIFLE SHOOTS, THE MAN WITH THE AMMO STAYS BEHIND, WHEN THE MAN WITH THE RIFLE IS KILLED THE MAN WITH THE AMMO HAS ALREADY SOLD IT FOR VODKA
Write the dialogue
>The first man in line gets a rifle!
>The second man gets an imagination!
>When the first man dies, the second man picks up the rifle and makes "Pew Pew!" noises!
For the monke Emperor!
>FORM A LINE
>ALL OF YOU SHALL RECEIVE A RIFLE
>AMMUNITION WILL BE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN NECESSARY
>IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AMMUNITION, IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT IN DANGER
>KEEP YOUR RIFLE WITH YOU AT ALL TIMES IN THE EVENT THAT YOU ARE ISSUED AMMUNITION
>MOVE TO THE NEXT STATION TO RECEIVE TAMPONS TO PLUG BULLET WOUNDS