its fun
shoot some of the damn things before you come here and start talking about muh performance furthermore ammos getting cheaper i can get .70 cpr locally now
Better than 9mm suppressed, recoil is almost 22lr tier, Gucci ammo zips soft armor, drop allows 100yd shots on dot equipped pistols, high mag capacity.
The number one reason for me was weight. I got a gun that weighed less than the 7 shot single stack 9mm it replaced. Amazing gun.
the trigger feels more like a rifle trigger. the rock is fucking amazing for the price
you can get one with 10 mags and 1000 rounds for less than an FN , also you can fit 25 in the magazine
Gross. The Five-seveN MRD with an RMR is the meta.
>It's expensive
Not really. You'll probably save money after you sell all of your 9mm pistols once you realize they're all outdated and do the same thing whereas the Five-seveN is a generational leap forward in tech.
pure cope as expected
5.7 cant even stop modern soft armor (hint: not chinesium) and does worse on flesh than your average 9mm
outdated gimmick only resurrected by cartels and drill rappers
1 month ago
Anonymous
>5.7 cant even stop modern soft armor
Neither can 9mm >does worse on flesh than your average 9mm
Outright incorrect. Fast bullet hit harder.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Neither can 9mm
no one suggested it did >Outright incorrect. Fast bullet hit harder.
its fast because its microscopic in size compared to a 9mm
1 month ago
Anonymous
So is .223 but .223 still does way way more damage than 9mm
1 month ago
Anonymous
no shit, its not limited by a tiny pistol grip
1 month ago
Anonymous
5.7 preforms better than 9mm on soft targets
Watch any ballistics gel video on it
Its also more likely to pen armor
And it recoils less and you nearly double your mag capacity to 9mm
Its better in every way other than price
So just don't be poor
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Watch any ballistics gel video on it
no ballistics gel makes a good case for 5.7 >Its also more likely to pen armor
my thumb can pen the chinese armor that round is being tested on >And it recoils less and you nearly double your mag capacity to 9mm
manlet issue plus i have a 19 round mag for my glock 19 >So just don't be poor
poverty brands are releasing their own 5.7s
1 month ago
Anonymous
Funny cause in every video where they gel test it, its better performance than 9mm if not ideal performance and with FMJ rounds too LMAO
Get fucked
1 month ago
Anonymous
is that pathetic penetration supposed to impress me?
1 month ago
Anonymous
LMAO
It preformed better than the 9mm
It dropped more energy and didn't over-penetrate
Ideally, a round would stop in 12 inches of gel
So you don't know what you are talking about and you're clowning yourself.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>It preformed better than the 9mm
by what metric? the pitiful expansion? >Ideally, a round would stop in 12 inches of gel
is this the new cope for Fnaggers?
1 month ago
Anonymous
No thats literally common knowledge that ballistics gel is simply a simulation media and that 12 inches of penetration is ideal lol
Everyone fucking knows this other than you apparently
1 month ago
Anonymous
>The FBI considers a penetration depth under 12 inches a failure and any penetration over 18 inches to demonstrate an over-penetration risk
1 month ago
Anonymous
The caliber debate has been won dude
Caliber doesn't matter
Capacity does
I would rather have 30 rounds of .22lr than 5 rounds of 9mm
1 month ago
Anonymous
I would rather have 30 rounds of 5.7 than 30 rounds of .22LR, rimfire isn't reliable
1 month ago
Anonymous
Oh yea for sure
But the point is that capacity in the end matters more and shot placment matters more than how a bullet preforms
People who bicker about 40 9mm 45 10mm its all bullshit and all that really mattered in the end was capacity and follow up shots which is why 9mm won the debate
But now 5.7 does all of that better
9mm has nearly the same magazine capacity
[...]
impressive how shit of a shot you are
No it doesn't its not even close
The M&P 5.7 has 22 round mags with no extenders a glock 34 that is the same size holds 17
1 month ago
Anonymous
my 19 rounders disagree
not like it matters past 5 rounds, but Fnaggers need to be ready to take on a platoon with one mag
1 month ago
Anonymous
Bro I have carried 9mm for ages
I'm getting 5.7 cause its better in every way
Cry about it
1 month ago
Anonymous
glad to hear that, marketer
1 month ago
Anonymous
9mm is simply too heavy. Feels like bricks in comparison and I'm never hanging a duty sized Glock off my waist ever again no seething will change that. This offends people who have their identity wrapped up in a 100+ year old object but it's the truth. 9mm is outdated.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>its outdated because... well its too heavy for me!
1 month ago
Anonymous
We've already pointed out numerous reasons you've handwaved I'm simply telling you I'm not going to hang a 3lb SAA off my belt because you're emotionally invested in black powder. Technology advances.
If it was nothing but 9mm but lighter id still want it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
technology has diminishing returns and weve clearly reached them with pistols
but if you feel more comfortable with your five seven because its lighter, so be it
1 month ago
Anonymous
>rimfire isn't reliable
Stop buying bucket ammo
1 month ago
Anonymous
9mm has nearly the same magazine capacity
https://i.imgur.com/SWUmpX1.jpg
that's right niggaz.
impressive how shit of a shot you are
1 month ago
Anonymous
I haven't posted an paper targets, you conclusion jumping homosexual.
You try shooting raccoon at dusk and get back to us, you motherfucking fucking nagger.
1 month ago
Anonymous
cry about it
1 month ago
Anonymous
you're the one whining like a retarded woman.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Capacity rarely changes the outcome in non-police shootings. Early effective hits are the most important factor. That still makes 5.7x28 better than 9mm, but my money is on 7.5FK as the superior concept for a CC round.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I guess the only other real problem with 5.7 is its lack of adoption so there are few guns made for it and the ones that are in 5.7 are all full size handguns
But if your EDC gun is a glock 17 it just doesn't make sense to not swtich over to a 5.7 its basically the same size, thinner actually but you increase capacity by 10 to a 17
1 month ago
Anonymous
>5.7 cant even stop modern soft armor (hint: not chinesium) and does worse on flesh than your average 9mm
how many living creatures have you shot with 9mm and 5.7? I shot dozens of raccoons and the 5.7's wounds were far nastier and they stopped instantly. the fuckers just kept on running with 9mm even after I pumped 3 or 4 HP into them.
1 month ago
Anonymous
3 >I shot dozens of raccoons and the 5.7's wounds were far nastier
damn thats impressive
1 month ago
Anonymous
that's right niggaz.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Even with hollow points?
I would like to know more
1 month ago
Anonymous
Wait didn’t the Pulse shooter use 5.7? Someone broke down the effectiveness a long time ago and seemed like it didn’t pretty fucking well.
1 month ago
Anonymous
no he used an AR , but half the victims died to crossfire from the cops lmao
also one of the gays left through an emergency exit and held it shut behind him , so all the gays were stacked up and killed lmao
1 month ago
Anonymous
Just looked it up. Sig MCX and Glock 17. Which mass shooter am I thinking of then?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Fort Hood “workplace violence” shooting in 2009
1 month ago
Anonymous
Ah yes the totally unpredictable definitely not Islamic terrorist shooting that totally had no links to Anwar Al-Awlaki that totally wouldn’t have been mitigated by trained soldiers being allowed to carry. Thank God nobody decided to be a hero and keep a firearm in their vehicle like that idiot in Chattanooga.
>Gross. The Five-seveN MRD with an RMR is the meta.
I just bought one for the rebate, but FN fucked up by not including a threaded barrel. Watch them come out with a "tactical" model next year that comes with a 5.5" threaded barrel.
22 round mag capacity
Insanely low recoil
Its basically cheating for defensive carry
And carry ammo was always expensive anyway
Oh and here's where 5.7cucks get even more retarded, they're not even talking about using 5.7 out of a 10" barrel and getting cucked performance conpared to a similarly sized rifle. They want to shoot it out of a fucking 5" barrel handgun and cuck it even worse!
>hurr it has no recoil! >*75% of the powder is burned outside the barrel*
You will never be a duty round because you lack the MASS, boy.
Hate recoil? Get a compensated gun. I don't get why people don't realize recoil isn't an issue anymore. It's nearly zero with them like shooting a .22lr pistol.
>just making shit up
The mp7 is very popular with NATO SOF units (would absolutely LOVE to hear your expert take on 4.6x30 btw lmao)
The P90 doesn't seem to really see widespread mil use although NATO did officially adopt it, but it's absolutely very popular with law enforcement lmao.
This thread reeks of sour grapes, which is especially funny because 5.7x28 isn't some gucci unobtanium round. You can get a solid 5.7 pistol for like $400 and a solid 5.7 carbine for like $600, and decent training ammo for less than 5.56 currently.
Ah yes, the highly popular P90 that I see everywhere. Such a highly adopted rifle.
https://i.imgur.com/1vhKiPD.gif
It's used by the Secret Service to protect the POTUS. If any organization is going to determine what's the best CCW for personal defense, it's going to be them. I don't get why fags circle jerk over what the FBI and LEOs use when it's very obvious that those organizations have things like budget constraints and a vested interest in making sure as many recruits pass pistol markswomanship requirements as possible.
It's used because it fits under their jackets. They've wilfully accepted a cucked caliber because it fits in a small package, they would opt for a real rifle caliber if they didn't need to conceal it, and many of them do opt for actual rifles and just wear bigger jackets.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>They've wilfully accepted a cucked caliber because it fits in a small package,
So why did they bother to switch from 9mm to 5.7? >they would opt for a real rifle caliber if they didn't need to conceal it
I mean do they really need to conceal it anyway? Everyone knows the POTUS is protected by guys with guns. I guess concealing them could be more of a public relations thing, but it seems more likely that the Secret Service has determined that 5.7 offers the most benefit for the size/weight. If they thought there was something better for protecting the life of the most important man in the world, then they would use it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
[...]
The P90 is FNH's best selling product per head of FNH global sales interview with Larry Vickers. He'd be the guy to know and not a single person would say the MAG/240/249 are unsuccessful yet the P90 "isn't widespread" despite selling like hotcakes.
The P90 sells because it's cool, the SS used it because it's cool. Simple as. You've really never been involved in any agency in your life have you? Sometimes it's really not about what's best but what you just wanna carry for the fuck of it. Dudes thought it fit well under their coats and had good handling indoors so they wrote up a memo and wallah, the P90 is apparently now the best gun to protect the most corrupt man in the world. I'd take a P90 over a handgun because it has 50 rounds on tap and can clear indoors easily, especially if it's full auto in case suppressive fire is needed. I wouldn't take one over an SBR in pretty much any of the popular rifle calibers, because it underperforms them. This is objective fact. It underperforms handgun rounds too in most applications. It will never be adopted as a duty caliber because it can't penetrate something like a windshield or piece of furniture without serious deflection due to lack of mass. It's somewhere between a rifle and handgun caliber and manages to suck at both, but 50 fucking rounds and such a short presented length is indeed neat. For most applications I'd take a 9mm handgun with 2 spare mags over it though, it just does more but yeah the cool factor isn't there.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>It's somewhere between a rifle and handgun caliber and manages to suck at both
Because dumb westerners went through a period of thinking .20 cal rounds were viable (5.56, 5.7) so they made a miniature .20 can round which just makes a miniature round even more miniature. They should've miniaturized a .30 cal round, which has already been done to great effect. This does what the 5.7 does without even trying. Give this sucker a modern twist and you have a round that has the mass for duty and heat for special AP applications. It's already there as it is.
1 month ago
Anonymous
henlo nogunz
u stinky eurostani nogunz
1 month ago
Anonymous
What is recoil
1 month ago
Anonymous
A part of shooting firearms.
>FN's best selling product globally only sells well because it looks cool
9mm cope is reaching new heights. Pretty soon I'm going to need a balloon to tell them they're stupid to their face.
Lol nocontracts.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>FN's best selling product globally only sells well because it looks cool
9mm cope is reaching new heights. Pretty soon I'm going to need a balloon to tell them they're stupid to their face.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Again I think this whole post is one poorfag seething about a round that they think they can't afford so hard that they don't even realize that's not the case anymore lol. Back when only FN made the guns and only FN made the ammo and set the price accordingly, a LOT of people made up their mind that it was just .22mag for 5x times cost (wasn't true then, isn't true now) and are refusing to adjust their opinion to new information, like the fact that the main downside to 5.7 has always been cost.
Personally, I think I'll probably keep carrying a 9mm handgun but man I sure do think my 5.7 carbine is better than my 9mm carbine in every single area except cost per round.
It's fundamentally a poorfag argument. And like, thinking the shit's too expensive for its improvements over rounds that have been the standard for a very long time is not an invalid position to take, but the amount of seething ITT about 5.7 to me says that this person is personally invested in proving that they already have the best kit and nothing will ever be better than the platforms they've built their identity around.
1 month ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/KHorMWE.jpg
>It's somewhere between a rifle and handgun caliber and manages to suck at both
Because dumb westerners went through a period of thinking .20 cal rounds were viable (5.56, 5.7) so they made a miniature .20 can round which just makes a miniature round even more miniature. They should've miniaturized a .30 cal round, which has already been done to great effect. This does what the 5.7 does without even trying. Give this sucker a modern twist and you have a round that has the mass for duty and heat for special AP applications. It's already there as it is.
>FBI determined in the 80's that 10mm is superior for engaging large-statured combatants armed with assault rifles who are using automobiles as cover >NATO determined in the 90's that 5.7x28 is superior in high-capacity PDWs so vehicle crews can protect themselves from enemies wearing body armor >poorfags still think cartridges designed for shooting 5' malnourished peasants in the back of the head 100 years ago are the end-all, be-all of CCW
1 month ago
Anonymous
>P90 >rifle
1 month ago
Anonymous
>it's used because of one of its advantages, if they didn't need to utilize that advantage they would have went with something else
No shit. This is the most profoundly mentally retarded argument I've seen someone try to make here all month.
Ah yes, the highly popular P90 that I see everywhere. Such a highly adopted rifle.
[...]
It's used because it fits under their jackets. They've wilfully accepted a cucked caliber because it fits in a small package, they would opt for a real rifle caliber if they didn't need to conceal it, and many of them do opt for actual rifles and just wear bigger jackets.
The P90 is FNH's best selling product per head of FNH global sales interview with Larry Vickers. He'd be the guy to know and not a single person would say the MAG/240/249 are unsuccessful yet the P90 "isn't widespread" despite selling like hotcakes.
i heard it takes half an mp7 mag to kill a dude, was that not true?
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're talking to a zoomer who never read that post. Zoomerlore about the GWOT is a thing.
1 month ago
Anonymous
aw man i hoped it wasnt true
what about the gwot specifically is zoomerlore?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Multiple seals have basically said that in interviews, yeah. And yet, they still love it, which means that even though they're hosing down every kill with 15-20rds, they're still picking it for certain situations.
Interestingly, LEO testimony about 5.7 says the opposite, that it's extremely effective at killing unarmored targets out of a 10.5" barrel and from what I've read tends to leave devastating wounds with projectiles that don't exit the body.
1 month ago
Anonymous
strange theyd still take the mp7 even knowing that
low recoil and portability maybe?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Again nobody in this thread has ever fired an MP7 and never will unless HK gets real cool real quick (they wont), but supposedly they love the form factor, capacity, extremely lightweight rounds mean you can carry a fuckload of it no sweat, and it shoots extremely smooth, and recoils like a damn airsoft gun.
And probably most importantly, it looks cool as fuck and most of those dudes care about that a LOT more than people realize.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>most importantly, it looks cool as fuck and most of those dudes care about that a LOT more than people realize.
youre probably right i wanted 4.6 to be good just because i thought the mp7 was cool lol
1 month ago
Anonymous
If HK weren't such massive homosexuals they'd just chamber the fucking gun in 5.7 but they are so they don't. 5.7 was found in the NATO PDW trials to be across-the-board obviously superior to 4.6 but the fucking Krauts sperged out and flipped the table and delayed NATO PDW standardization for literally 20 years.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Again nobody in this thread has ever fired an MP7
Lol they're popular rental mgs. I've fired one. It's mk18 sized which means I'd never buy one but the recoil was nil. Also the ch kept coming out the back for some reason. Doesn't auto latch with a forward bolt like a ar does.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I guess I more meant it in the sense that none of us have any comprehensive experience and I don't count spending a few hundred bucks to put 2 mags through the gun on a static range while an RSO holds your shoulders like he's teaching his date how to golf, which I think we'll agree are pretty different experiences. That's still cool and I fully plan on doing the same at some point. >It's mk18 sized
The Mk18 is 26" fully collapsed, 30" extended, the MP7 is 16" collapsed and 25" fully extended. It's certainly bigger than most people realize but even with the stock fully extended it's still smaller than a mk18 in its smallest possible configuration and significantly smaller in its stowed configuration >Also the ch kept coming out the back for some reason. Doesn't auto latch with a forward bolt like a ar does.
Anon, the odds that that was because you were shooting a clapped out rental gun that has had tens of thousands of rounds magdumped through it full auto by retards is about 1000%
It's used by the Secret Service to protect the POTUS. If any organization is going to determine what's the best CCW for personal defense, it's going to be them. I don't get why fags circle jerk over what the FBI and LEOs use when it's very obvious that those organizations have things like budget constraints and a vested interest in making sure as many recruits pass pistol markswomanship requirements as possible.
centerfire .22mag but with triple the muzzle energy. So it's more accurate and hits harder while also being FAR more reliable as well as suppressing a lot better.
The literal only downside is cost. You're not poor, are you?
>thats a high bar to set
It is since a 24" 22 mag is absolutely lethal and that's with baby dick varmint loads designed to frag. 5.7 is actually designed to be effective on things other than coyotes.
>am replacing my 9mm full size winter carry glock 34 for a s&W 5.7 cause of capacity and because it shoots flatter
Based. I only keep my micro 9 as a deep carry option now. Five-seveN replaced every other 9mm I had after its first range session. Dramatic difference in capability.
I'll just keep the glock 34 as my duty pistol cause getting a safariland holster for the M&P is unlikely
But we will see how the M&P 5.7 feels to carry if its easy to conceal I will carry it even in summer cause my glock 48 mos with shield mags I just don't love. Its small and the mags get rusty from sweat.
I trust M&P reliability more than glock reliability NGL but reliability is like a ghost or a fog in the air
People have tons of opinions on reliability of weapons that are rarely based out of reality but instead off advertising or unscientific testing done by social media people
it's ghosts making every cop shooting feature a jamming glock?
1 month ago
Anonymous
What I mean is reliability and people's opinions on it really don't mean much
And you shouldn't trust your own opinions because the data set in your mind causing you to prefer brand over other brand and the data set is tiny.
Its why a single mud test or freeze test video from a big youtuber can completely change how people view a gun.
But it most modern semi auto glock copies are reliable if not more reliable than glocks.
1 month ago
Anonymous
you're stating an opinion formed from a very small data set. I will have to, unfortunately disregard everything you're saying and continue to only form my opinions based on that one guys torture test video like everyone ever.
it's the logical conclusion of "shot placement is everything". it trades all of its recoil for flash and noise. it can get through any sort of concealable IIIA body armor while meeting all the FBI penetration requirements and dumping all of its energy into the target. unlike rimfire it's actually reliable and unlike .32 ACP or .25 ACP or whatever contrarian mousegun round someone's going to bring up it actually has respectable external ballistics and is flatter shooter and more capable than any round that uses a traditional short and stubby pistol bullet
unlike 9mm dillon or .22 TCM it has a spitzer bullet. try and fit said spitzer bullet on a shorter but fatter cartridge with a more aggressive neck and your chamber pressure and throat erosion become serious problems (.224 boz based on 10mm auto). try and make the case longer and the grip becomes far too wide to be comfortable (those crazy automag meme cartridges).
Yeah, I have. It's a pretty fuckin' average handgun trigger.
Complaining about triggers is 100% bitchmode. It's not the gun's fault you can't hit shit, just practice more.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I have an LC Charger and it's got the same FCG as the 57. The trigger is fine in a carbine format but the reset is definitely a little goofy and takes some getting used to, and I could for sure see it being extremely annoying in a handgun.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I hate it so much when the competition blows it out of the water
Wasn't there a mass shooting on a military base with 5.7 and it was discovered when examining victims that it was causing bones to explode on impact or some shit? I think that's a pretty good reason. Really good penetration and energy transfer even to the skeletal system.
Wasn't there a mass shooting on a military base with 5.7 and it was discovered when examining victims that it was causing bones to explode on impact or some shit? I think that's a pretty good reason. Really good penetration and energy transfer even to the skeletal system.
let me contextualize this:
what was discovered was that 5.7 had enough energy to break bones, even big ones like the leg, which is one of the critical breakpoints for wounding
this isn't really special but when you're fighting the argument that it has no stopping power at all it's important
For military truck drivers who generally aren't expected to be fighting and who don't have the highest degree of training or experience, they can have the small p90 in the truck with enough capacity to brrt out a few cones of bullets. It's literally for military personel who's primary role is not fighting but it was in Stargate SG-1 and the p90 looks cool and soft body armor and stuff. So, whatever.
Makes 9mmfags seethe just like 10mm and anything else designed less than 40 years ago. Everyone wants to feel like he carries the most cutting-edge firearm, and people who invested a lot into 9mm can't accept that it's not the best at everything when it comes to CCW. Perfect example was when pic related shot up that school in Nashville, and all the cops armed with 9mm Glocks sat around with their thumbs up their asses waiting for the one guy with an AR to actually engage the looney-troon.
In a do-or-die situation like that, a 5.7 handgun with a red dot could have eliminated the threat sooner. All those cops were probably using Glock 19s complete with the included Fisher Price sights.
Looks like plastic
upvoted
lol
op demolished
heh
good post
It's not a point it's a meplat
Fucking noguns newfags
Does meplat still post here? Summoning him if he is lurking in this thread as we speak.
Me plat plat plat plat plat plat plat get penetrated get penetrated get penetrated get penetrated get penetrated get penetrated get pregnatrated
you're missing the point
OP buttblasted, humiliated, and annihilated
Based
truly one of the finer comments of our time
its fun
shoot some of the damn things before you come here and start talking about muh performance furthermore ammos getting cheaper i can get .70 cpr locally now
Better than 9mm suppressed, recoil is almost 22lr tier, Gucci ammo zips soft armor, drop allows 100yd shots on dot equipped pistols, high mag capacity.
The number one reason for me was weight. I got a gun that weighed less than the 7 shot single stack 9mm it replaced. Amazing gun.
this is where I think the meta is
>striker fired
ngmi
I will fuck your mouth
the trigger feels more like a rifle trigger. the rock is fucking amazing for the price
you can get one with 10 mags and 1000 rounds for less than an FN , also you can fit 25 in the magazine
note: you cannot fit 25 in the magazine
maybe you can't but its definitely possible
Gross. The Five-seveN MRD with an RMR is the meta.
>It's expensive
Not really. You'll probably save money after you sell all of your 9mm pistols once you realize they're all outdated and do the same thing whereas the Five-seveN is a generational leap forward in tech.
>9mm outdated
how
>5.7 leap forward
how
>how
By being a worse 5.7
>how
By being a better 9mm
Every pro 9mm argument appearing in 9mm vs .45 applies here except the round costs more.
pure cope as expected
5.7 cant even stop modern soft armor (hint: not chinesium) and does worse on flesh than your average 9mm
outdated gimmick only resurrected by cartels and drill rappers
>5.7 cant even stop modern soft armor
Neither can 9mm
>does worse on flesh than your average 9mm
Outright incorrect. Fast bullet hit harder.
>Neither can 9mm
no one suggested it did
>Outright incorrect. Fast bullet hit harder.
its fast because its microscopic in size compared to a 9mm
So is .223 but .223 still does way way more damage than 9mm
no shit, its not limited by a tiny pistol grip
5.7 preforms better than 9mm on soft targets
Watch any ballistics gel video on it
Its also more likely to pen armor
And it recoils less and you nearly double your mag capacity to 9mm
Its better in every way other than price
So just don't be poor
>Watch any ballistics gel video on it
no ballistics gel makes a good case for 5.7
>Its also more likely to pen armor
my thumb can pen the chinese armor that round is being tested on
>And it recoils less and you nearly double your mag capacity to 9mm
manlet issue plus i have a 19 round mag for my glock 19
>So just don't be poor
poverty brands are releasing their own 5.7s
Funny cause in every video where they gel test it, its better performance than 9mm if not ideal performance and with FMJ rounds too LMAO
Get fucked
is that pathetic penetration supposed to impress me?
LMAO
It preformed better than the 9mm
It dropped more energy and didn't over-penetrate
Ideally, a round would stop in 12 inches of gel
So you don't know what you are talking about and you're clowning yourself.
>It preformed better than the 9mm
by what metric? the pitiful expansion?
>Ideally, a round would stop in 12 inches of gel
is this the new cope for Fnaggers?
No thats literally common knowledge that ballistics gel is simply a simulation media and that 12 inches of penetration is ideal lol
Everyone fucking knows this other than you apparently
>The FBI considers a penetration depth under 12 inches a failure and any penetration over 18 inches to demonstrate an over-penetration risk
The caliber debate has been won dude
Caliber doesn't matter
Capacity does
I would rather have 30 rounds of .22lr than 5 rounds of 9mm
I would rather have 30 rounds of 5.7 than 30 rounds of .22LR, rimfire isn't reliable
Oh yea for sure
But the point is that capacity in the end matters more and shot placment matters more than how a bullet preforms
People who bicker about 40 9mm 45 10mm its all bullshit and all that really mattered in the end was capacity and follow up shots which is why 9mm won the debate
But now 5.7 does all of that better
No it doesn't its not even close
The M&P 5.7 has 22 round mags with no extenders a glock 34 that is the same size holds 17
my 19 rounders disagree
not like it matters past 5 rounds, but Fnaggers need to be ready to take on a platoon with one mag
Bro I have carried 9mm for ages
I'm getting 5.7 cause its better in every way
Cry about it
glad to hear that, marketer
9mm is simply too heavy. Feels like bricks in comparison and I'm never hanging a duty sized Glock off my waist ever again no seething will change that. This offends people who have their identity wrapped up in a 100+ year old object but it's the truth. 9mm is outdated.
>its outdated because... well its too heavy for me!
We've already pointed out numerous reasons you've handwaved I'm simply telling you I'm not going to hang a 3lb SAA off my belt because you're emotionally invested in black powder. Technology advances.
If it was nothing but 9mm but lighter id still want it.
technology has diminishing returns and weve clearly reached them with pistols
but if you feel more comfortable with your five seven because its lighter, so be it
>rimfire isn't reliable
Stop buying bucket ammo
9mm has nearly the same magazine capacity
impressive how shit of a shot you are
I haven't posted an paper targets, you conclusion jumping homosexual.
You try shooting raccoon at dusk and get back to us, you motherfucking fucking nagger.
cry about it
you're the one whining like a retarded woman.
Capacity rarely changes the outcome in non-police shootings. Early effective hits are the most important factor. That still makes 5.7x28 better than 9mm, but my money is on 7.5FK as the superior concept for a CC round.
I guess the only other real problem with 5.7 is its lack of adoption so there are few guns made for it and the ones that are in 5.7 are all full size handguns
But if your EDC gun is a glock 17 it just doesn't make sense to not swtich over to a 5.7 its basically the same size, thinner actually but you increase capacity by 10 to a 17
>5.7 cant even stop modern soft armor (hint: not chinesium) and does worse on flesh than your average 9mm
how many living creatures have you shot with 9mm and 5.7? I shot dozens of raccoons and the 5.7's wounds were far nastier and they stopped instantly. the fuckers just kept on running with 9mm even after I pumped 3 or 4 HP into them.
3
>I shot dozens of raccoons and the 5.7's wounds were far nastier
damn thats impressive
that's right niggaz.
Even with hollow points?
I would like to know more
Wait didn’t the Pulse shooter use 5.7? Someone broke down the effectiveness a long time ago and seemed like it didn’t pretty fucking well.
no he used an AR , but half the victims died to crossfire from the cops lmao
also one of the gays left through an emergency exit and held it shut behind him , so all the gays were stacked up and killed lmao
Just looked it up. Sig MCX and Glock 17. Which mass shooter am I thinking of then?
Fort Hood “workplace violence” shooting in 2009
Ah yes the totally unpredictable definitely not Islamic terrorist shooting that totally had no links to Anwar Al-Awlaki that totally wouldn’t have been mitigated by trained soldiers being allowed to carry. Thank God nobody decided to be a hero and keep a firearm in their vehicle like that idiot in Chattanooga.
9mm BTFOs 5.7mm out of a pistol. You are comparing p90 ballistics with handgun.
>>
>9mm BTFOs 5.7mm out of a pistol.
Nope. Per NATO and now Speer 5.7mm mogs it.
>You are comparing p90 ballistics with handgun.
Nope
Damn 9mm fags really do jump through a lot of hoops to claim their competitions "outdated"
>t. Look at 70% of retards who fight over 9mm vs .45
>Gross. The Five-seveN MRD with an RMR is the meta.
I just bought one for the rebate, but FN fucked up by not including a threaded barrel. Watch them come out with a "tactical" model next year that comes with a 5.5" threaded barrel.
Oh and here's where 5.7cucks get even more retarded, they're not even talking about using 5.7 out of a 10" barrel and getting cucked performance conpared to a similarly sized rifle. They want to shoot it out of a fucking 5" barrel handgun and cuck it even worse!
>hurr it has no recoil!
>*75% of the powder is burned outside the barrel*
based as fuck.
You will never be a duty round because you lack the MASS, boy.
Hate recoil? Get a compensated gun. I don't get why people don't realize recoil isn't an issue anymore. It's nearly zero with them like shooting a .22lr pistol.
5.7 is literally a duty round adopted officially by the most powerful military alliance to ever exist. Cope.
And not actually used by any national military or law enforcement agency globally lmao.
>just making shit up
The mp7 is very popular with NATO SOF units (would absolutely LOVE to hear your expert take on 4.6x30 btw lmao)
The P90 doesn't seem to really see widespread mil use although NATO did officially adopt it, but it's absolutely very popular with law enforcement lmao.
This thread reeks of sour grapes, which is especially funny because 5.7x28 isn't some gucci unobtanium round. You can get a solid 5.7 pistol for like $400 and a solid 5.7 carbine for like $600, and decent training ammo for less than 5.56 currently.
Ah yes, the highly popular P90 that I see everywhere. Such a highly adopted rifle.
It's used because it fits under their jackets. They've wilfully accepted a cucked caliber because it fits in a small package, they would opt for a real rifle caliber if they didn't need to conceal it, and many of them do opt for actual rifles and just wear bigger jackets.
>They've wilfully accepted a cucked caliber because it fits in a small package,
So why did they bother to switch from 9mm to 5.7?
>they would opt for a real rifle caliber if they didn't need to conceal it
I mean do they really need to conceal it anyway? Everyone knows the POTUS is protected by guys with guns. I guess concealing them could be more of a public relations thing, but it seems more likely that the Secret Service has determined that 5.7 offers the most benefit for the size/weight. If they thought there was something better for protecting the life of the most important man in the world, then they would use it.
The P90 sells because it's cool, the SS used it because it's cool. Simple as. You've really never been involved in any agency in your life have you? Sometimes it's really not about what's best but what you just wanna carry for the fuck of it. Dudes thought it fit well under their coats and had good handling indoors so they wrote up a memo and wallah, the P90 is apparently now the best gun to protect the most corrupt man in the world. I'd take a P90 over a handgun because it has 50 rounds on tap and can clear indoors easily, especially if it's full auto in case suppressive fire is needed. I wouldn't take one over an SBR in pretty much any of the popular rifle calibers, because it underperforms them. This is objective fact. It underperforms handgun rounds too in most applications. It will never be adopted as a duty caliber because it can't penetrate something like a windshield or piece of furniture without serious deflection due to lack of mass. It's somewhere between a rifle and handgun caliber and manages to suck at both, but 50 fucking rounds and such a short presented length is indeed neat. For most applications I'd take a 9mm handgun with 2 spare mags over it though, it just does more but yeah the cool factor isn't there.
>It's somewhere between a rifle and handgun caliber and manages to suck at both
Because dumb westerners went through a period of thinking .20 cal rounds were viable (5.56, 5.7) so they made a miniature .20 can round which just makes a miniature round even more miniature. They should've miniaturized a .30 cal round, which has already been done to great effect. This does what the 5.7 does without even trying. Give this sucker a modern twist and you have a round that has the mass for duty and heat for special AP applications. It's already there as it is.
henlo nogunz
u stinky eurostani nogunz
What is recoil
A part of shooting firearms.
Lol nocontracts.
>FN's best selling product globally only sells well because it looks cool
9mm cope is reaching new heights. Pretty soon I'm going to need a balloon to tell them they're stupid to their face.
Again I think this whole post is one poorfag seething about a round that they think they can't afford so hard that they don't even realize that's not the case anymore lol. Back when only FN made the guns and only FN made the ammo and set the price accordingly, a LOT of people made up their mind that it was just .22mag for 5x times cost (wasn't true then, isn't true now) and are refusing to adjust their opinion to new information, like the fact that the main downside to 5.7 has always been cost.
Personally, I think I'll probably keep carrying a 9mm handgun but man I sure do think my 5.7 carbine is better than my 9mm carbine in every single area except cost per round.
It's fundamentally a poorfag argument. And like, thinking the shit's too expensive for its improvements over rounds that have been the standard for a very long time is not an invalid position to take, but the amount of seething ITT about 5.7 to me says that this person is personally invested in proving that they already have the best kit and nothing will ever be better than the platforms they've built their identity around.
>FBI determined in the 80's that 10mm is superior for engaging large-statured combatants armed with assault rifles who are using automobiles as cover
>NATO determined in the 90's that 5.7x28 is superior in high-capacity PDWs so vehicle crews can protect themselves from enemies wearing body armor
>poorfags still think cartridges designed for shooting 5' malnourished peasants in the back of the head 100 years ago are the end-all, be-all of CCW
>P90
>rifle
>it's used because of one of its advantages, if they didn't need to utilize that advantage they would have went with something else
No shit. This is the most profoundly mentally retarded argument I've seen someone try to make here all month.
The P90 is FNH's best selling product per head of FNH global sales interview with Larry Vickers. He'd be the guy to know and not a single person would say the MAG/240/249 are unsuccessful yet the P90 "isn't widespread" despite selling like hotcakes.
i heard it takes half an mp7 mag to kill a dude, was that not true?
You're talking to a zoomer who never read that post. Zoomerlore about the GWOT is a thing.
aw man i hoped it wasnt true
what about the gwot specifically is zoomerlore?
Multiple seals have basically said that in interviews, yeah. And yet, they still love it, which means that even though they're hosing down every kill with 15-20rds, they're still picking it for certain situations.
Interestingly, LEO testimony about 5.7 says the opposite, that it's extremely effective at killing unarmored targets out of a 10.5" barrel and from what I've read tends to leave devastating wounds with projectiles that don't exit the body.
strange theyd still take the mp7 even knowing that
low recoil and portability maybe?
Again nobody in this thread has ever fired an MP7 and never will unless HK gets real cool real quick (they wont), but supposedly they love the form factor, capacity, extremely lightweight rounds mean you can carry a fuckload of it no sweat, and it shoots extremely smooth, and recoils like a damn airsoft gun.
And probably most importantly, it looks cool as fuck and most of those dudes care about that a LOT more than people realize.
>most importantly, it looks cool as fuck and most of those dudes care about that a LOT more than people realize.
youre probably right i wanted 4.6 to be good just because i thought the mp7 was cool lol
If HK weren't such massive homosexuals they'd just chamber the fucking gun in 5.7 but they are so they don't. 5.7 was found in the NATO PDW trials to be across-the-board obviously superior to 4.6 but the fucking Krauts sperged out and flipped the table and delayed NATO PDW standardization for literally 20 years.
>Again nobody in this thread has ever fired an MP7
Lol they're popular rental mgs. I've fired one. It's mk18 sized which means I'd never buy one but the recoil was nil. Also the ch kept coming out the back for some reason. Doesn't auto latch with a forward bolt like a ar does.
I guess I more meant it in the sense that none of us have any comprehensive experience and I don't count spending a few hundred bucks to put 2 mags through the gun on a static range while an RSO holds your shoulders like he's teaching his date how to golf, which I think we'll agree are pretty different experiences. That's still cool and I fully plan on doing the same at some point.
>It's mk18 sized
The Mk18 is 26" fully collapsed, 30" extended, the MP7 is 16" collapsed and 25" fully extended. It's certainly bigger than most people realize but even with the stock fully extended it's still smaller than a mk18 in its smallest possible configuration and significantly smaller in its stowed configuration
>Also the ch kept coming out the back for some reason. Doesn't auto latch with a forward bolt like a ar does.
Anon, the odds that that was because you were shooting a clapped out rental gun that has had tens of thousands of rounds magdumped through it full auto by retards is about 1000%
It's used by the Secret Service to protect the POTUS. If any organization is going to determine what's the best CCW for personal defense, it's going to be them. I don't get why fags circle jerk over what the FBI and LEOs use when it's very obvious that those organizations have things like budget constraints and a vested interest in making sure as many recruits pass pistol markswomanship requirements as possible.
>whats the point of this caliber in 2023
Distracting plebs from the superior .22TCM9R
it's the bit at the top
Sunk cost fallacy copium.
>this caliber
.22? it's the most popular caliber of all time.
5.7 is literally the cheapest and most accessible it's ever been lol
centerfire .22mag but with triple the muzzle energy. So it's more accurate and hits harder while also being FAR more reliable as well as suppressing a lot better.
The literal only downside is cost. You're not poor, are you?
hits harder than a 22 magnum? thats a high bar to set
>thats a high bar to set
It is since a 24" 22 mag is absolutely lethal and that's with baby dick varmint loads designed to frag. 5.7 is actually designed to be effective on things other than coyotes.
a 22lr is lethal out of a 5 inch barrel
Was this a "gotcha!" in your head?
i thought we were just stating obvious facts
Theres enough of a point to it that ruger undercut the market then made it into a carbine so surely theres *some* market
5.7 is based and I am replacing my 9mm full size winter carry glock 34 for a s&W 5.7 cause of capacity and because it shoots flatter
>am replacing my 9mm full size winter carry glock 34 for a s&W 5.7 cause of capacity and because it shoots flatter
Based. I only keep my micro 9 as a deep carry option now. Five-seveN replaced every other 9mm I had after its first range session. Dramatic difference in capability.
I'll just keep the glock 34 as my duty pistol cause getting a safariland holster for the M&P is unlikely
But we will see how the M&P 5.7 feels to carry if its easy to conceal I will carry it even in summer cause my glock 48 mos with shield mags I just don't love. Its small and the mags get rusty from sweat.
you should put a thousand rounds through it first to make sure it actually works reliably
I trust M&P reliability more than glock reliability NGL but reliability is like a ghost or a fog in the air
People have tons of opinions on reliability of weapons that are rarely based out of reality but instead off advertising or unscientific testing done by social media people
it's ghosts making every cop shooting feature a jamming glock?
What I mean is reliability and people's opinions on it really don't mean much
And you shouldn't trust your own opinions because the data set in your mind causing you to prefer brand over other brand and the data set is tiny.
Its why a single mud test or freeze test video from a big youtuber can completely change how people view a gun.
But it most modern semi auto glock copies are reliable if not more reliable than glocks.
you're stating an opinion formed from a very small data set. I will have to, unfortunately disregard everything you're saying and continue to only form my opinions based on that one guys torture test video like everyone ever.
22 round mag capacity
Insanely low recoil
Its basically cheating for defensive carry
And carry ammo was always expensive anyway
the PSA is better
1. it works
2. feels better in my hand
3. cheaper
can you put the S&W M&P style Leupold Deltapoint Micro on one?
100% would but they gave it a tiny gay safety instead of the excellent m&p shelf safety
it's the logical conclusion of "shot placement is everything". it trades all of its recoil for flash and noise. it can get through any sort of concealable IIIA body armor while meeting all the FBI penetration requirements and dumping all of its energy into the target. unlike rimfire it's actually reliable and unlike .32 ACP or .25 ACP or whatever contrarian mousegun round someone's going to bring up it actually has respectable external ballistics and is flatter shooter and more capable than any round that uses a traditional short and stubby pistol bullet
unlike 9mm dillon or .22 TCM it has a spitzer bullet. try and fit said spitzer bullet on a shorter but fatter cartridge with a more aggressive neck and your chamber pressure and throat erosion become serious problems (.224 boz based on 10mm auto). try and make the case longer and the grip becomes far too wide to be comfortable (those crazy automag meme cartridges).
20 to 23 rounds in a handgun of ammo that's superior to 9mm. This is a no brainer. You'd be a retard for not having a five seven of some sort.
t. has 2 FN FiveseveNs and a ps90.
have a nice day raccoons are good little guys
>that spread rabies like homosexuals spread hiv
Not the heccin trash pandarino!
Working man’s choice
it's shit, bad trigger
You naggers say that about literally every gun ever. You don't even know what a bad trigger is.
have you used one
it's no staple gun but I hate fighting double action springs
Yeah, I have. It's a pretty fuckin' average handgun trigger.
Complaining about triggers is 100% bitchmode. It's not the gun's fault you can't hit shit, just practice more.
I have an LC Charger and it's got the same FCG as the 57. The trigger is fine in a carbine format but the reset is definitely a little goofy and takes some getting used to, and I could for sure see it being extremely annoying in a handgun.
I hate it so much when the competition blows it out of the water
PSA Rock > Ruger 57
Rn the correct choice for 5.7 is PSA Rock + SBR'd LC Charger because the mags are compatible
can somebody make a hammer/trigger replacement for the Rugers already
separating idiots from their money.
Because fuck you, you nogunz autismo. that's why.
very emotional
Wasn't there a mass shooting on a military base with 5.7 and it was discovered when examining victims that it was causing bones to explode on impact or some shit? I think that's a pretty good reason. Really good penetration and energy transfer even to the skeletal system.
That was the Fort Hood "workplace violence" shooting in 2009.
>and it was discovered when examining victims that it was causing bones to explode on impact
let me contextualize this:
what was discovered was that 5.7 had enough energy to break bones, even big ones like the leg, which is one of the critical breakpoints for wounding
this isn't really special but when you're fighting the argument that it has no stopping power at all it's important
.22 can break bones bud, these are bullets we're talking about not bbs.
>.22 can break bones bud
In a calcium deficient child I suppose, unless you're referring to 22 wmr
For military truck drivers who generally aren't expected to be fighting and who don't have the highest degree of training or experience, they can have the small p90 in the truck with enough capacity to brrt out a few cones of bullets. It's literally for military personel who's primary role is not fighting but it was in Stargate SG-1 and the p90 looks cool and soft body armor and stuff. So, whatever.
What are the decent 5.7 carbine options?
Makes 9mmfags seethe just like 10mm and anything else designed less than 40 years ago. Everyone wants to feel like he carries the most cutting-edge firearm, and people who invested a lot into 9mm can't accept that it's not the best at everything when it comes to CCW. Perfect example was when pic related shot up that school in Nashville, and all the cops armed with 9mm Glocks sat around with their thumbs up their asses waiting for the one guy with an AR to actually engage the looney-troon.
The cops having 9mm had nothing to do with them pussying out and waiting for someone else to come to the rescue
In a do-or-die situation like that, a 5.7 handgun with a red dot could have eliminated the threat sooner. All those cops were probably using Glock 19s complete with the included Fisher Price sights.