What's tactical advantage of putting Pantsir on top of skyscrapers?

What's tactical advantage of putting Pantsir on top of skyscrapers?

  1. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Seems more like a propaganda move honestly

  2. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Countering those new 800km Ukrainian loitering munitions.

  3. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Easier to hit

  4. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    when he posts the white house avenger, remind him that the avenger is way cooler than any gay russian shit

  5. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I wouldn't worry about it.

  6. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Inb4 roof collapses due to Pantsir.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      I tought the same thing.

  7. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone got the gif of the Pantsir firing at the camera man?

  8. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    pantsir-on-head retarded

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      good post

  9. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    More collateral when they fail to intercept anything and blow up

  10. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    How long till they shoot down a domestic airliner?

  11. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Probably heard the news from the UK Foreign minister that they’re considering sending Ukraine ATACMS

  12. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Propaganda to sell the citizens the idea that the ”fight against NATO” is getting dire and mobilizations are needed? I highly doubt that they would expect to actually need AA in Moscow, so it’s likely to be a psyop.

  13. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    To let the population know that they are fighting NATO who is intent on driving all the way to Moscow. It's just there to get the population fired up for the next round of mobilization. Those in power at the Kremlin have no delusions that Russia will be invaded. It's purely a cynical move to get their cowardly population to just go along with whatever they say, but feel somewhat good about it.

  14. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >What's tactical advantage of putting Pantsir on top of skyscrapers?
    ...that are unlikely to ever be attacked because Ukies would never risk hitting so many civilians.

    I'd say it's PSY OPS to make the Russian feel afraid and join the army.

  15. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't it a bad look for propaganda if you're basically saying that the enemy can hit your capital? Doesn't it make you look weak?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Russian propaganda has gone over the ”xaxaxa hohols weak” phase, now it’s boogeymanning about how they are fighting the entire Nato.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      No, they do everything right cumrade

  16. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    There are legitimate concerns within Moscow that internal elements will attempt to stage an attack on the city and decapitate the current regime. It will be presented as something along the lines of "Ukranian infiltrators" and allow the new regime both a clean ascension to power and an easy out for the current situation in Ukraine. It is the same reason a ton of internal security forces are being moved into the area and there is a high amount of scrutiny for anyone living in or traveling around Moscow right now.

    There will be a manhunt sort of like the one for Bin Laden except it will be over in a month and once the perpetrators are brought to justice it will satisfy the general population that Russia has avenged itself. The war itself is extremely unpopular so even a flimsy pretense that it has been won will be good enough at this point.

  17. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    To show you are Pantsir on head retarded

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *